Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Liberals run and hide, Michael Savage may run for president.Follow

#77 Feb 10 2007 at 1:39 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not even going to waste my time arguing with you retards.



Yes you are, see:


That proceding wasn't an agrument. it was a statement.

Quote:
Make the country great by restoring the rights and freedoms that we've lost because of entitlement programs, citizen pocket raping, fixing out image of pushy war mongers, you know, that kinda great.


Go to Colonial Williamsburg.



My statements are not directed directly at you personally but what you and people like Michael Savage represent;
and if you stand under that flag; than you deserve no better words from me than I would give to Michael Savage.

You want to sponsor a man to be the leader of our country you better be prepared to answer for that man's views.

and I say again,

Michael Savage is a racist, biggoted, xenophobic, hate-monger.

Edited, Feb 10th 2007 4:41pm by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#78 Feb 10 2007 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
<insert metaljeff sucking Metastophicleas **** statement here>


I don't have to. Your post speaks for itself.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#79 Feb 10 2007 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
There's an interseting duality in Metastiphucles, where he on one hand spews the typical homophobe justifications and other the other hand he claims to be totally accepting. It's rather phoney, and indicative of someone who's more than a bit naive, but would really like to fit in, himself. That said, I enjoy how his threads always seem to end with him learning some valuable life lesson, like a saturday afternoon matinee.


Yeah, I learn something everyday, usually from conversations with people of different views. That's a bad thing, now? At least you enjoy my threads.

So, because I think that homosexuality is a choice, I'm a homophobe. Because I'm ok with people that make that choice, and don't really care, because it's their business, I'm a homosexual. So, because I'm afraid of homosexuals, and I am one, I'm afraid of myself, and thus hate myself, making me a hate monger? Oh wait, I'm a racist too, but I can't figure out where that one came from.

I'm not trying to fit in. I really don't give a **** if you like me or not. My life doesn't revolve around these forums. I've got two kids, and a wife to be, I enjoy these forums for keeping from being bored at work, and for the intelligent conversation. I've never had any problems fitting in, because I'm honest about who I am, and what I think. I either fit, or I don't. I don't give a damn either way.
#80 Feb 10 2007 at 1:48 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
making me a hate monger? Oh wait, I'm a racist too, but I can't figure out where that one came from.


in case you missed it
Quote:
and if you stand under that flag; than you deserve no better words from me than I would give to Michael Savage.

You want to sponsor a man to be the leader of our country you better be prepared to answer for that man's views.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#81 Feb 10 2007 at 1:54 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
That proceding wasn't an agrument. it was a statement.


What followed the ":" was an argument.

Quote:
Quote:
Make the country great by restoring the rights and freedoms that we've lost because of entitlement programs, citizen pocket raping, fixing out image of pushy war mongers, you know, that kinda great.


Go to Colonial Williamsburg.


I do every year, since I live right down the road from it. It's a great educational tool for my daughter.



Quote:
    My statements are not directed directly at you personally
but what you and people like Michael Savage represent;
and if you stand under that flag; than you deserve no better words from me than I would give to Michael Savage.

You want to sponsor a man to be the leader of our country you better be prepared to answer for that man's views.

and I say again,

Michael Savage is a racist, biggoted, xenophobic, hate-monger.


So...they're not aimed at me, but what I represent...you're a closed politician, aren't you.

He may be a racist (show proof please), biggot (again, show proof), xenophobe (where do you come up with this stuff?), and a hate monger (maybe, maybe not), but you know, everyone has their flaws. People said the same things about Ronald Regan, and he didn't kill of the homosexuals. I think you're making mountains out of mole hills, much like everyone who ran scared over homosexuals getting married. OMG, the world will end if someone you don't like wins the election. I don't like most of the Dem's, but you didn't hear me saying that I'd flee the nation if they won.

I never said that I want Savage to win. I want him to run. I think that'd be enough, as I've said time, and time, again. If he did win, I don't think the country would suffer a horrible fate, remember, the president is only as powerful as we allow him to be. He may actually do some good, who knows?
#82 Feb 10 2007 at 1:55 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
Quote:
making me a hate monger? Oh wait, I'm a racist too, but I can't figure out where that one came from.


in case you missed it
Quote:
and if you stand under that flag; than you deserve no better words from me than I would give to Michael Savage.

You want to sponsor a man to be the leader of our country you better be prepared to answer for that man's views.


That being the case then, be prepared to be hung on a cross for anything Bill Clinton has done. So, when shall I nail your *** for his selling of our nuclear secrets to China?
#83 Feb 10 2007 at 1:59 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
He may be a racist (show proof please), biggot (again, show proof), xenophobe (where do you come up with this stuff?), and a hate monger (maybe, maybe not), but you know, everyone has their flaws. People said the same things about Ronald Regan, and he didn't kill of the homosexuals. I think you're making mountains out of mole hills


You have actually listened.. to.. y'know.. Micheal Savage, right? We ARE talking about Michael Savage the right-wing, drum-beating,zealot, Michael Savage here? If we're not than I apolojize and offer a full retractions of all of my previous statements.


Quote:
He may actually do some good, who knows?


yeah, to make people realize how carefull we REALLY need to be.

Edited, Feb 10th 2007 5:00pm by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#84 Feb 10 2007 at 2:07 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
No, we're talking about the same person. The difference is this: I'm spoken to the man in person. Most of what you hear on the radio is hyped up for entertainment, nothing more.

I also never stated that I agree with everything he says either. I agree that we need to protect out borders, strengthen our culture, and protect our language. It's in the details that he and I start to disagree, much like with other people as well. I'm sure that you'd agree that we need to deal with the three items that I've highlighted.
#85 Feb 10 2007 at 2:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
We've had six years to learn that one.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#86 Feb 10 2007 at 2:20 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Metastophicleas wrote:
strengthen our culture

What an odd statement.

#87 Feb 10 2007 at 3:03 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Quote:
Metastophicleas wrote:
strengthen our culture


What an odd statement.


No, seriously, he's not xenophobic. Smiley: lol
#88 Feb 10 2007 at 3:15 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
If I am, define our culture. Are we the Godless heathens that the radical Muslims think we are? Maybe we're the war mongering savages that Europe thinks we are. How about the oil starved bastards the left of this country thinks we are. Maybe it's that we're a culture of hate, as others have accused us of being. I know, we're a nation of imperialists, bent on world domination.

Personally, I'd love to have a definition similar to what my grandparents have, "the greatest generation". We know that our grandparents (parents in some cases), did what they had to do to put down evil, and defend the weak. Our nation has become a simple exercise in nothing since then. What does the U.S. stand for today?
#90 Feb 10 2007 at 4:23 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
Our nation has become a simple exercise in nothing since then. What does the U.S. stand for today?


Sounds like you're itching for another World War simply for the sake of pride.
Why are you complaining? the next generation had VietNam, and then Korea, then Iraq.

You think we went to WW2 to save the Jews and the poor refugees from Europe? I'd say we went their mainly to protect our own interest.

I do not slight the bravery and integrity of those who go to war, however I recognize the motives of a young man to join the military as totally seperate from the reasons a government decides to harness the bravery of it's citizens.

Edited, Feb 10th 2007 7:24pm by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#92 Feb 10 2007 at 4:31 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
MetalJeff, Eater of Souls wrote:
I'm a typical WoW player


yeah, we see
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#94 Feb 10 2007 at 4:36 PM Rating: Decent
Wants you as a new recruit!
*****
17,417 posts
MetalJeff, Eater of Souls wrote:
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
MetalJeff, Eater of Souls wrote:
I'm a typical WoW player


yeah, we see


Haha, what a nerd statement. Is that all you got left? I bled you dry.

Edited, Feb 10th 2007 7:34pm by MetalJeff


Your such an r-tard

AM I DOIN IT RITE KELVY?!
____________________________
Bringing derailâ„¢ back.
Smiley: canada
Qui s'estime petit deviendra grand.
#96 Feb 10 2007 at 5:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Metastophicleas wrote:
No, we're talking about the same person. The difference is this: I'm spoken to the man in person. Most of what you hear on the radio is hyped up for entertainment, nothing more.
Assuming this is true, I'm supposed to take seriously a man who riles up a crowd into a hateful frenzy "for entertainment" but he doesn't really believe that stuff himself? He just likes cashing a paycheck for making others believe it?

Oh, well that's so much better. Savage for president! Smiley: dubious
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 270 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (270)