Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Anna RecksiaFollow

#1 Feb 06 2007 at 3:34 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
. . . or whatever her name is.

I see some cities are banning "Size 0" models from their catwalks to counter the rise in Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimima and other eating disorders that (primarily) affect teenage girls.

Linky

Now I personally find those skinny girls unappetising (As Anthony Burgess said of sleeping with Yves Saint Lauren's Models in the 60s "It's like going to bed with a bicycle frame") and I lika da curves (especially some that adorn this hallowed forum).

But is banninating teh sk1nn1es the right approach?

Personally I can see some mileage. Yes we can only go far 'protecting us from ourselves' but bombarding hormone phased adolescent girlies with images that make 'em think you have to look like a fluourescent strip light to attract boys can't be that smart can it?


On an unrelated note, did you know that Kylie Minogue and Geri Halliwell (Ginger Spice) may be banjo players? Linked for random hawtness

Edited, Feb 6th 2007 6:35pm by Nobby
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#2 Feb 06 2007 at 3:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
When I worked at this fancy retail store I used to browse through their catalogs while on break and they had some seriously disgusting models in them. I really don't know why they would want models where you can actually SEE their joints. I mean people are skinny yes, but they're not on-the-brink-of-death skinny. *shudder*
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#3 Feb 06 2007 at 3:39 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Ban them? Perhaps not the best plan.

Publicly ridicule them for looking like a sack of deer antler, yes. If anything open ridicule will have a more of an effect on how teenage girls perceive them than outright banning (which probably would make them more desirable).

Plus it gives us someone else to make fun of, and who doesnt enjoy that?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#4 Feb 06 2007 at 4:05 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,730 posts
Nanny state mentality. Protect everyone from themselves. It's a pity there is no "new frontier" to emigrate to before all the first world goverments turn facist.
#5 Feb 06 2007 at 4:39 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
King Nobby wrote:
On an unrelated note, did you know that Kylie Minogue and Geri Halliwell (Ginger Spice) may be banjo players? Linked for random hawtness



They called that "making out"...sheesh...I was hoping for some feeling up or something, not just spit swaping. I want my 1:35 seconds back (well the kiss was hawt, I don't need those two seconds).
#6 Feb 06 2007 at 5:02 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
Ban them? Perhaps not the best plan.

Publicly ridicule them for looking like a sack of deer antler, yes. If anything open ridicule will have a more of an effect on how teenage girls perceive them than outright banning (which probably would make them more desirable).

Plus it gives us someone else to make fun of, and who doesnt enjoy that?


I like this idea. Seeing as many of the teenage girls try to look like the models in order to achieve that pie in the sky dream of being perfect, a good dousing of ridicule to those they try to emulate may open their minds to how stupid nanosized models are as a role-models. And ridiculing is something teenagers get.
#7 Feb 06 2007 at 5:50 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Interesting how one of the most morbidly obese countries in the world also has to enact laws combatting skinniness.

Can't we make up our minds??
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#8 Feb 06 2007 at 5:52 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Debalic wrote:
Interesting how one of the most morbidly obese countries in the world also has to enact laws combatting skinniness.

Can't we make up our minds??


We did, we want to be fat, apparently.
#9 Feb 06 2007 at 6:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Hot outfit of 2007: A 2 piece suit made of a bag and antlers! With matching faux handbag?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#10 Feb 06 2007 at 9:38 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Does anyone actually pay attention to runway shows except for people in the fashion industry?

Seems like movies and TV would have a much bigger influence on teenage girls.

Not that I advocate banning skinnies there either. The whole thing seems well intentioned but ineffective.

#11 Feb 07 2007 at 1:27 AM Rating: Decent
I think it's a step, in which direction I couldn't guess. It would be interesting to see more modeling agencies refuse to hire excessively skinny models (bone thin) and get some women in there with curves.

As my hubby says: Nothing like a good rack on top and an *** to match.
#12 Feb 07 2007 at 2:34 AM Rating: Decent
I think it should be banned. I like Bodhi's idea, don't get me wrong, but the perssure that fashoin houses are putting on those girls, and on modelling agencies, is too strong to be changed simply by ridicule.

There is something very wrong with those models, both in terms of looks and health. It's a completely fUcked-up situation that those girls should be pressured into looking like stick insects, and that teenage girls look-up to them.

It's even more mind-boggling since no one looks like that in real life, give or take a few Ethiopians.

I know it's hard to "ban", since there are problems with the whole BMI and it varies from person to person, but still. It's unhealthy, sick, and stupid.

I don't think anyone on this forum finds these girls attractive, excpet maybe Barkingturtle since most look 12 years old. Smiley: grin

Lily Cole, for exemple, would look as the evil doll good in Child's Play VI.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#13 Feb 07 2007 at 7:56 AM Rating: Good
**
296 posts
Few people think that stick-figures look good, (except maybe Popeye and Bluto) those models are generally hired because, supposedly, they make the CLOTHES look good.

Now take a glimpse at a Victoria's Secret catalog, and you see a bit more in the way of curviness. And let's be clear, when a guy is sneaking into the bathroom to manhandle himself, well Victoria's Secret catalogs are fairly well known for that.

Of course, above that you have Playboy, which has become a sort of societal benchmark for hawtness. Take a look through Playboy and you really won't see the stick-figures, you see women with curves, maybe not large women, but clearly women who are fit, healthy, and have body fat which is distributed in an aethetically pleasing way.

It isn't society that puts the super-skinny ideal in women's heads, it is advertisers and women themselves. I dare you to compare the models shown in a "women's magazine" with the Playboy bunnies. There is a clear disparity in what men and women think is an attractive form for women. When you get down to it the answer is obvious. Advertisers do not like people who have good self-esteem. Self-esteem means that a person does not feel that they need to buy something to "fix" themselves. Someone with low self-esteem, someone that thinks they need to be fixed will buy makeup, clothes, diet pills, whatever they are told will fix them. Of course, ads do not only apply to women, how many ads aimed at men have said 1)your ***** is too small, make it bigger and women will like you, 2) buy our beer and women will like you, 3) you smell bad, buy our deodorant/body spray and women will like you, etc etc etc.

Ads are ads, their job is to make you want to buy a product. People need to wake up and realize that ads are not a guide to expected societal norms.
#14 Feb 07 2007 at 8:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Ridana wrote:
And let's be clear, when a guy is sneaking into the bathroom to manhandle himself, well Victoria's Secret catalogs are fairly well known for that.
Pfftt... used to be. These days, the Victoria's Secret catalog is about as risqué as a J.C. Penny's flier.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Feb 07 2007 at 8:27 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
trickybeck wrote:

Does anyone actually pay attention to runway shows except for people in the fashion industry?

Seems like movies and TV would have a much bigger influence on teenage girls.

It's a ripple effect. Actresses and singers get sample-sized clothing to wear for events and such, and this is part of their job. Well, these clothes are sized to fit superskinnymodels, so it's in the best interest of rising starlets to drop weight to look better on camera, fit into an Armani dress, and increase their public name recognition. They can do it, because they have the time and the means, and the incentive to spend a large portion of their day and income on keeping their appearance up.

When I lived in Peru, they still loved a curvier figure. Now when I go back, the models are as thin as they are here. I'm not hating on the body type, it occurs on some folk naturally, but I think it's as uncommon as a morbidly obese person. It shouldn't be held up as the expectation, because you're setting thousands of women up for failure.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 213 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (213)