Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

We're melting, we're meltingFollow

#202REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 6:42 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ahhh, still can't answer even the most basic simple queries which only goes to show you know nothing about whether global warming exists or not, and you know nothing about understanding studies which claim global warming exists or not.
#203 Feb 06 2007 at 6:57 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
Mission Accomplished! beeyatches


what mission is that, excatly?

Using your same logic, you cannot prove to me that you even exist.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#204 Feb 06 2007 at 6:59 AM Rating: Decent
MonxDOT wrote:
Any independent thinking objective minded people who come by


will already know about man-made global warming, like 99% of the people on the face of this planet.

You've accomplished nothing, except mortage some embarassment that will come your way sooner or later.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#205REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 7:11 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Hell, for ***** and giggles let's throw in your disaster global warming predictions to today's temperatures.
#206 Feb 06 2007 at 7:19 AM Rating: Decent
MonxDoT wrote:
You're still not explaining basic temperature differences from city to city, let alone globally, let alone on one single day, let alone hundreds of years into the future.



And you're still not understanding the Gaia phenomenon.

Nor how the planet works as an ecosystem.

Nor the butterfly effect.

Nor the basics of Colouring.

But nevermind, I get enough kicks arguing with robots like gbaji, I'll leave you in the good hands of Joph.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#207 Feb 06 2007 at 7:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
Here's some forecast high temperatures for today:
It's funny how often "OMG You can't prove anything within our 500,000,000 years of weather!" becomes "OMG It's cold out today so global warming has to be fake!"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#208REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 7:35 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Whatever, like I care about a sh11ty ubb site with sh11ty non-existent ubb faqs. [:roll eyes:]
#209 Feb 06 2007 at 7:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You got my links yet, Monx? C'mon... it's not so hard.

Or will you keep crying? I bet the latter. Prove me right.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#210REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 7:38 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Who says "it's cold"? I just listed mere massive temperature variance from space to space on the planet which far dwarfs your dnager=global warming claims. You can't even explain that. So what makes you think you understand anything in regards to the claims of climatologists?
#211 Feb 06 2007 at 7:42 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
I just listed mere massive temperature variance from space to space on the planet which far dwarfs your dnager=global warming claims. You can't even explain that.


um. do you understand how global weather patterns work AT ALL?
don't bother answering. You already have.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#212 Feb 06 2007 at 7:45 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
Quote:
Is this the official report that began the thread? And let the reader note the typical evasion of the question and concealing of the socialist agenda continues. So without humans the Earth would be 92.5% colder? You get an 'F' trickbeck. I think it's quite obvious you people are not only full of ****, but you could care less about the planet either.


Idiot...go back to school.

Without humans the global temperature would only be increasing at 7.5% (100%-92.5%) of the rate it is now and you're an idiot. We're talking about temperature change, not total temperature and you're an idiot. Nowhere does anyone say that humans generate 92.5% of the Earths heat, that's absurd and you're an idiot. You can't seem to get your mind around that, among other things and you're an idiot. My 5 year old has better comprehension skills than you and you're an idiot.

Without humans instead of increasing an average of 4C (entirely made up number but within the range of the report) over the next 100 years, there would be an increase of 0.3C.

There must be something shiny on Monx's monitor to hold his attention for so long.
#213 Feb 06 2007 at 7:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
Who says "it's cold"?
So, you opted to keep crying. Thought so.

Got my links yet?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#214 Feb 06 2007 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I wonder if he argues about where the doctor sticks the thermometer when taking his temperature.

"ZOMG!!you are taking my mouths temperature, how is that going to tell you about my bodies temperature!!? NOOOB"


After my car warmed up this morning I was sweating... OMG!! GLOBALWARMING
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#215REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 7:52 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) That's the point dumbfuck. You don't understand global weather patterns at all, and have demonstrated zero understanding of such, yet make claims of "global warming" hundreds of years into the future. You wish you could explain it just today.
#216 Feb 06 2007 at 7:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The fact that you keep asking it speaks volumes. Much like your nonexistant links.

Link please.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#217 Feb 06 2007 at 7:55 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
You don't understand global weather patterns at all, and have demonstrated zero understanding of such, yet make claims of "global warming" hundreds of years into the future. You wish you could explain it just today.



I said that?
ok


Smiley: looney
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#218 Feb 06 2007 at 7:56 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
MonxDoT wrote:
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
um. do you understand how global weather patterns work AT ALL? don't bother answering. You already have.


That's the point dumbfuck. You don't understand global weather patterns at all, and have demonstrated zero understanding of such, yet make claims of "global warming" hundreds of years into the future. You wish you could explain it just today.

Learn to answer simple questions Yodabunny. You dumbfuck fools haven't been able to answer the simplest question for over 2 pages now. Keep playing dumb moran.


It's not that they're not able, it's that the question has no bearing on the topic. You continue to grasp at straws that don't exist. It's pitiful.

The concern isn't the temperature in your city, the concern is the average GLOBAL temperature. You can't seem to contemplate anything larger than the weather channel.
#219 Feb 06 2007 at 8:11 AM Rating: Decent
No, you shut up!

MonxDOT, do us all a favour and go back to posting those deliberately stupid and incomprehensible posts.

As opposed to this crap, which is just as stupid, granted, but doesn't give you the excuse that you were just messing around.

I swear, I thought you were more clever when you were posting your old crap.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#220REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 8:21 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) What percentage of "the average GLOBAL temperature" is generated by the Sun el dumbfuck? What percentage of "the average GLOBAL temperature" is gnerated by the fossil fuel burning activities of humans dumbfuck? It's a very basic, very simple question, Climatology 101, that has been dodged for going on 3 pages now. Why do you think that is? If you can't answer and prove simple stuff like this, you can't answer and prove the more advanced bs claims of globabl warming climatologists. But keep pretending like you can, like you're a planet hero environmentalist actor like Jeff Goldblum lol.
#221 Feb 06 2007 at 8:34 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Yodabunny wrote:
It's not that they're not able, it's that the question has no bearing on the topic. You continue to grasp at straws that don't exist. It's pitiful.


I think he is just spamming trying to get to 2k posts.

Which is fine because it gives me more fodder to get him to sub-default as a base rating.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#222 Feb 06 2007 at 8:34 AM Rating: Good
MonxTwat or MonxCUnt, which one do you prefer?
#223 Feb 06 2007 at 8:40 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
As the saying goes "A piece is a piece"
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#224 Feb 06 2007 at 8:43 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
After my car warmed up this morning I was sweating... OMG!! GLOBALWARMING


Yup, that's the typical understanding level of the global warming hypers. What's even funnier is Nobby used a similar analogy on page 3 with a winter coat versus summer shorts.


ok, how about.

SUMMERTIME:
After the AC in my car kicked in this morning I was freezing my *** off... OMG!! Global Freezing!!

there is no difference. You seem like you are trying to prove a negative. These last few years have been the hottest on record. Glaciers are melting and flooding is happening all over the place.

What excatly are you trying to get at? That temperatures are NOT rising? Or that are you arguing that the glaciers are likely to return and that this is all just a random occurance in nature?

sorryr, I havn;t been following your "wise words" in this thread.. but let's see off the top my head.. please feel free to argue them case by case.

I. Glaciers melting all over the world
II. Warmest summers in known recorded history
III. Birds not conforming to usual migratory patterns
IV. Plants blooming way too early


let's just start with those. feel free to offer an explanation with valid links as proof to your arguments against these things happpening being just a normal thing.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#225 Feb 06 2007 at 8:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
What percentage of "the average GLOBAL temperature" is gnerated by the fossil fuel burning activities of humans
I give up. Which? Please provide links and cites so that I may check your work.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#226REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 8:46 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Both, BarkingturtleWHO? Your bravery of piling on to get some forum=4 luv is overwhelming. You want a Post + 1 Purple Heart for your eff3rtZ?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 268 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (268)