MonxDoT wrote:
Did you get it now?
I expect an apology typed out by morning. No less than 500 words, double-spaced.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- We're melting, we're melting
We're melting, we're meltingFollow
#127REDACTED,
Posted: Feb 02 2007 at 11:02 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Wahtever. Just start out giving me the simple ****. The Earth = Temperature X. The Sun contriubtes .99Y to X and the the other cnut internal factors contribute 0.000001Z to X. Now, go ahead, ASTOUND me.
Have you thought about why it's irrelevant yet? If not, get to work. If you haven't been able to figure it out, try to become smarter somehow.
I expect an apology typed out by morning. No less than 500 words, double-spaced.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#129REDACTED,
Posted: Feb 02 2007 at 11:17 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Don't worry. I've already got an PWNology linked to this thread typed out in the OOT. Go take a look.
bodhisattva wrote:
One science reporter said something really that rang true. If you get three scientists in a room observing 1 thing they will give you three different observations. For 600+ of the leading scientists in their field from over 113 countries to reach such certain agreement on the issue is huge.
Not really. Not taking any position right now on the issue itself, but that logic is ridiculous. If you simply invite 5.3 scientists from each country who already believe in the statement at hand and have them draft the report, you'll get those numbers. It's meaningless in that context.
I'm sure that if someone stated that 600 of the leading multinational CEO's all agreed that lower pay for workers was better for everyone, somehow meant that this must be a huge deal and we should all take what they say seriously, you'd be jumping all over the huge gaping flaw...
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#131REDACTED,
Posted: Feb 02 2007 at 11:22 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Hell yeah. Unique pwn gbaji! /bow
MonxDoT wrote:
Don't worry. I've already got an PWNology linked to this thread typed out in the OOT. Go take a look.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
gbaji wrote:
I'm sure that if someone stated that 600 of the leading multinational CEO's all agreed that lower pay for workers was better for everyone, somehow meant that this must be a huge deal and we should all take what they say seriously, you'd be jumping all over the huge gaping flaw...
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Still failing 
I'm off for bed, but have it done for me by morning, okay?
kkthx~la
I'm off for bed, but have it done for me by morning, okay?
kkthx~la
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Hey MonX
Stand outside on a warm sunny day that's tolerable in T-shirt and Shorts.
Now stand outside on the same day wearing a thick overcoat.
ZOMG my coat is more pwnerful than teh Sunz0rzzz!!!
****
Stand outside on a warm sunny day that's tolerable in T-shirt and Shorts.
Now stand outside on the same day wearing a thick overcoat.
ZOMG my coat is more pwnerful than teh Sunz0rzzz!!!
****
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#138REDACTED,
Posted: Feb 03 2007 at 12:55 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Now lower your Shields all the way down while I creep up behind you like Khan.
gbaji wrote:
bodhisattva wrote:
One science reporter said something really that rang true. If you get three scientists in a room observing 1 thing they will give you three different observations. For 600+ of the leading scientists in their field from over 113 countries to reach such certain agreement on the issue is huge.
Not really. Not taking any position right now on the issue itself, but that logic is ridiculous. If you simply invite 5.3 scientists from each country who already believe in the statement at hand and have them draft the report, you'll get those numbers. It's meaningless in that context.
I'm sure that if someone stated that 600 of the leading multinational CEO's all agreed that lower pay for workers was better for everyone, somehow meant that this must be a huge deal and we should all take what they say seriously, you'd be jumping all over the huge gaping flaw...
You assume just because a country signed the accord that every scientist in that country believes. How about 600+, regardless of country, agree that humans effect the climate. Thats a fUcking lot, either way. aSshole.
#140REDACTED,
Posted: Feb 03 2007 at 1:01 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Sing it. 600 men in the The Glorious GitSlayer hole. But yeah, it was lot of /yum appetizer.
MonxDoT wrote:
Sing it. 600 men in the The Glorious GitSlayer hole. But yeah, it was lot of /yum appetizer.
'Cause now it's back down to str8 up vote = fact scientific politicization.
'Cause now it's back down to str8 up vote = fact scientific politicization.
Uhhhhh, what?
Falling back on not making sense isn't going to change the facts ******** What is, is....(and I know what not makin' sense means, as I'm fuuuucked up and 5 minutes from gettin' some. OMG a womanz on teh drink!)
For Demea:
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
#143REDACTED,
Posted: Feb 03 2007 at 1:10 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Sure. If you say so, oh representative of the Bastion of Credibility!
but we're getting an early spring
PUNXSUTAWNEY, Pa. - A new pair of hands pulled him from his stump this year, so it was only fitting that Punxsutawney Phil offered a new prediction.
ADVERTISEMENT
The groundhog did not see his shadow Friday which, according to German folklore, means folks can expect an early spring instead of six more weeks of winter.
Since 1886, Phil has seen his shadow 96 times, hasn't seen it 14 times, and there are no records for nine years, according to the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club. The last time Phil failed to see his shadow was in 1999.
More than 15,000 revelers danced or milled about in a misty snow waiting for the prediction, as fireworks exploded overhead and the "Pennsylvania Polka" and other music blared in the background.
Longtime handler Bill Deeley retired after more than a dozen years and was replaced Friday by Punxsutawney Groundhog Club Inner Circle members John Griffiths and Ben Hughes.
Each Feb. 2, thousands of people descend on Punxsutawney, a town of approximately 6,100 people about 65 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, to celebrate what had essentially been a German superstition.
The Germans believed that if a hibernating animal cast a shadow on Feb. 2 — the Christian holiday of Candlemas — winter would last another six weeks. If no shadow was seen, legend said spring would come early.
I know they say it's been since '99 that he last didnt see his shadow but it sure as hell seems a lot longer than that. Every Groundhogs day I would wish for a shotgun when I heard his predictions. Not that it's scientifically accurate. It's just more of having your superstitious hopes dashed and stomped on while you deal with freezing cold weather.
Quote:
PUNXSUTAWNEY, Pa. - A new pair of hands pulled him from his stump this year, so it was only fitting that Punxsutawney Phil offered a new prediction.
ADVERTISEMENT
The groundhog did not see his shadow Friday which, according to German folklore, means folks can expect an early spring instead of six more weeks of winter.
Since 1886, Phil has seen his shadow 96 times, hasn't seen it 14 times, and there are no records for nine years, according to the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club. The last time Phil failed to see his shadow was in 1999.
More than 15,000 revelers danced or milled about in a misty snow waiting for the prediction, as fireworks exploded overhead and the "Pennsylvania Polka" and other music blared in the background.
Longtime handler Bill Deeley retired after more than a dozen years and was replaced Friday by Punxsutawney Groundhog Club Inner Circle members John Griffiths and Ben Hughes.
Each Feb. 2, thousands of people descend on Punxsutawney, a town of approximately 6,100 people about 65 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, to celebrate what had essentially been a German superstition.
The Germans believed that if a hibernating animal cast a shadow on Feb. 2 — the Christian holiday of Candlemas — winter would last another six weeks. If no shadow was seen, legend said spring would come early.
I know they say it's been since '99 that he last didnt see his shadow but it sure as hell seems a lot longer than that. Every Groundhogs day I would wish for a shotgun when I heard his predictions. Not that it's scientifically accurate. It's just more of having your superstitious hopes dashed and stomped on while you deal with freezing cold weather.
He's not ours, he just won't leave.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
King Rimesume wrote:
Not ours. Just another mooglefUcker.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
MonxDoT wrote:
Sure. If you say so, oh representative of the Bastion of Credibility!
Good. 'Cause I don't. Now explain it to me like I'm Joophiel.
The Glorious GitSlayer wrote:
and I know what not makin' sense means
Good. 'Cause I don't. Now explain it to me like I'm Joophiel.
Meh, I was drunk. I'm lucky I was able to type at all last night.
Scholar
19 posts
I dont know about everyone else, but i'm interested in seeing what credentials Monx has that he thinks he is able to argue against the studies of the top scientific minds in the world.
PS: reading a small selection of articles does not count as it shows nothing for your understanding of the topic as a whole.
PS: reading a small selection of articles does not count as it shows nothing for your understanding of the topic as a whole.
Monx has no credibility.
He makes a random claim that he is unable to back up or prove. However he childishly places the onus onto the person he is arguing against to somehow prove him wrong. If they don't do all the foot work to prove him wrong then he must somehow be right! This logical stance is worse than ludicrous. What is worse is that even when someone does prove him wrong he simply jumps onto another random claim using the same illogic demanding that he be proved wrong again in order to back himself up.
When pushed he resorts with personal attacks and flat out dismissal of well sourced material. Not by faulting its science, because he can't do that, but by merely once again attacking the source of the data itself.
The kid is a joke.
He makes a random claim that he is unable to back up or prove. However he childishly places the onus onto the person he is arguing against to somehow prove him wrong. If they don't do all the foot work to prove him wrong then he must somehow be right! This logical stance is worse than ludicrous. What is worse is that even when someone does prove him wrong he simply jumps onto another random claim using the same illogic demanding that he be proved wrong again in order to back himself up.
When pushed he resorts with personal attacks and flat out dismissal of well sourced material. Not by faulting its science, because he can't do that, but by merely once again attacking the source of the data itself.
The kid is a joke.
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
I'm sure that if someone stated that 600 of the leading multinational CEO's all agreed that lower pay for workers was better for everyone, somehow meant that this must be a huge deal and we should all take what they say seriously, you'd be jumping all over the huge gaping flaw...
Worst analogy in a lifetime of shockingly bad ones. It would have been more effective if you'd literally replaced your choice with "600 of the leading elephant handlers all agreed that cheese wizz builds skyscrapers".
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Recent Visitors: 171
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (171)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- We're melting, we're melting
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC