Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

We're melting, we're meltingFollow

#227 Feb 06 2007 at 8:51 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
C'mon, c'mon, c'mon...

You keep harping on why this is so important and, although it isn't, I'm sure you have the hard data to keep going on about it. Show us your links to the percentages, please.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#228REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 8:52 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The last 3 pages of you being unable to answer the simplest question shows you know nothing about climatology or global warming or cause and effect. Link + cite = <this thread>
#229 Feb 06 2007 at 8:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
No, let's see it. Prove us all wrong. Cite please.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#230REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 8:54 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You've dodged an answer for 3 pages. QED.
#231 Feb 06 2007 at 8:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Where's your cite? Are you saying you have nothing? C'mon, now.. cough up.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#232 Feb 06 2007 at 9:27 AM Rating: Good
MonxDoT wrote:
[QUOTE=Barkingturtle]MonxTwat or Monx@#%^, which one do you prefer?

Both, BarkingturtleWHO? Your bravery of piling on to get some forum=4 luv is overwhelming. You want a Post + 1 Purple Heart for your eff3rtZ?



I would like to point out that I did not pile on this one. In fact, I was on the cutting edge of the "MonxDot is a ******" movement, as illustrated here

And while it may seem insignificant in the growing list of skills you lack, learn to quote.

#233 Feb 06 2007 at 9:31 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
I think it is time to ignore the tertiary arguments and join Jophiel in asking for a cite. Because the simple fact is that if Monx cant provide one his argument (including the tertiary ones he continously drags others into to avoid having to give a cite) falls apart.

So yeah, cite pls kk?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#234 Feb 06 2007 at 9:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Barkingturtle wrote:
I was on the cutting edge of the "MonxDot is a ******" movement, as illustrated here
Hooray for a cite! Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#235 Feb 06 2007 at 9:38 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Sadly, not the cite you were looking for. I do enjoy a nice pile-on.

Cite, Monx? Chop, chop.
#236 Feb 06 2007 at 9:54 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
I do enjoy a nice pile-on.



now THAT's a thread derailer if I ever saw ome.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#237 Feb 06 2007 at 10:01 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
I do enjoy a nice pile-on.



now THAT's a thread derailer if I ever saw ome.


Can I watch?
#239 Feb 06 2007 at 10:33 AM Rating: Good
MetalJeff wrote:
I believe This Will answer all your questions about Global Warming.


FUck off.
#240 Feb 06 2007 at 10:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It may but since I'm not about to click on a video at work, will forget about it before I get home and sure it's some retarded thing attempting to be cute -- I guess I'll never know.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#241 Feb 06 2007 at 10:38 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
You linked a video off of myspace?

Are you serious?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#243 Feb 06 2007 at 10:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MetalJeff wrote:
It was meant to be a joke.
"Meant to be".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#244 Feb 06 2007 at 10:50 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
MetalJeff wrote:
I guess it fell on blind eyes.


No, you just failed.
#245REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 11:02 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) /point <Post +1>
#246 Feb 06 2007 at 11:05 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
MonxDoT. i sincerely want to know. What the fUck is your point?

ALL SCIENCE IS INCOMPLETE
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#247 Feb 06 2007 at 11:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
No cites from Monx. He doesn't know the percentages of how much of the Earth's heat is generated by the sun Smiley: frown Obviously, he doesn't know the first thing about climatology.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#248 Feb 06 2007 at 11:09 AM Rating: Decent
MonxDoT wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
In fact, I was on the cutting edge of the "MonxDot is a ******" movement, as illustrated here

And while it may seem insignificant in the growing list of skills you lack, learn to quote.


Fixed that /quote for ya. Ahhhh, memories. So whatever happened to "Grandfather" Barkingturtle? It die of old age after you whined to some Admins to change it to just plain old Barkingturtle for bare shell lameness?

Well I guess that's that then. Keep on believing your liberal fairies power the temperature of the earth like hamsters on treadmills underneath the crust. You demonstrated finely that you know jack **** about global warming, or any studies purporting such, and are petty hype rats parroting crapola. Yippee for j00. Keep quoting your new delusional studies in new news articles that come out about them.

Atomicflea wrote:
Cite, Monx? Chop, chop.


/point <Post +1>


What I want to know is how MonxDoT types with the straightjacket on.
#249 Feb 06 2007 at 11:09 AM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
MonxDoT wrote:
bodhisattva wrote:
I think he is just spamming trying to get to 2k posts.

Which is fine because it gives me more fodder to get him to sub-default as a base rating.


Knock yourself silly bodhi. I don't have enough time to care about rates or post counts, unless it somehow bothers you. You are, after all, the biggest whiner cnut on the board when it comes to rates. Afraid GitSlayer has you beat on whining about post counts though. But I'm sure if you tried a little harder ...

Barkingturtle wrote:
MonxTwat or Monx@#%^, which one do you prefer?


Both, BarkingturtleWHO? Your bravery of piling on to get some forum=4 luv is overwhelming. You want a Post + 1 Purple Heart for your eff3rtZ?

Edited, Feb 6th 2007 1:33pm by MonxDoT


Nah, post all you want now, at least you aren't spamming anymore. Besides I need more of your posts to rate down. Have that fallin' feelin'? Thats you takin' the express elevator to sub-default you cracked in the head cracka.
#250REDACTED, Posted: Feb 06 2007 at 11:11 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The point is they are scam artists perpetrating a global warming hoax, who can't even demonstrate the most basic knowledge of a simple question, such as the relative warming energy generated by the Sun versus the relative warming energy generated by humans. They're wackos, unaware that the Earth exists in space in the solar system. It's clear all they do is blindly parrot the environmentalist socialist agenda. Whatever, was a fun thread, I guess.
#251 Feb 06 2007 at 11:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
such as the relative warming energy generated by the Sun versus the relative warming energy generated by humans.
Answer with link, plz.

Which part of this is too hard for you? The "Li" or the "nk"?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 267 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (267)