Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Damn you, Starbucks!Follow

#1 Jan 29 2007 at 8:46 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Okay, I'll say it.

I hate Starbucks.

No, it's not because they're an evil mega-corp trying to worm their way in everywhere and take advantage of third-world coffee farmers by paying them a pittance. I'm not that deep.

I just don't like their coffee. In my opinion, it's very bitter, as though they have burned, or at least over-roasted, their beans. If I want to spend $3 on an absurdly over-priced cuppa joe, I'll spend it someplace where I enjoy the aforementioned cuppa much more.

That place, for the last 8 years or so, has been Coffee People. Even when they changed hands a few years back and started using Deidrich beans, it was still damned good coffee, and they had snazzy slogans like "Good coffee, no backtalk." They also have nifty drive-thru locations called Motor-Moka and even kiosks at the Portland airport called Aero-Moka. And who doesn't love a company that sells a kind of coffee called Black Tiger, whose only difference from regular coffee is that it contains 25% more caffeine?

Alas, it's the end of an era. Last fall, Deidrich decided they wanted to focus on their beans business and get out of running actual shops, so they sold Coffee People. To Starbucks. Unfortunately, Starbucks in their infinite wisdom decided they could not do as they did when they bought Seattle's Best and keep the operation running as a separate entity from Starbucks. No, instead, they decided to shut down the Coffee People stores. Many of the "dine-in" coffee bar locations are already closed, and our nearest Motor-Moka closes tomorrow.

Dear Starbucks: Closing Coffee People will not make me any more inclined to drink Starbucks coffee. I would rather go without than drink something I don't like the taste of. By closing Coffee People, rather than allowing them to continue operating under your management, you have deprived yourself of the revenue you would have made from my corner of the economic globe. In closing, go f'uck yourself.

Luckily, the manager of one of the non-drive-thru coffee bar locations here in Beaverton bought his lease and will changing the store's name, but continuing to sell products made with the same Diedrich beans, so we have options when we really get our jones on. But this location is farther away than our usual stops, and isn't a Motor-Moka, which means we will be patronizing it much less. But at least we have options. Most of the other independently run drive-thru coffee places around here aren't all that tasty either (I think they use Panache coffee), so we really don't have many.
#2 Jan 29 2007 at 9:07 PM Rating: Decent
I thought this thread was about coffee.. such a let down!
#3 Jan 30 2007 at 12:29 AM Rating: Default
We need to ban coffee like we ban cigarettes just because it will pidd off tons of people that need to be pissed off, in exactly this sort of way. Provoke some hissy fits. Provide coffee links to terrorism and drugs. Associate coffee drinkers to pollution. Breed some eco warriors who tip peoples coffee over and spill it on their owners. I know it can be done.

I hate coffee. I'm a cold drink person. Ice water or iced tea for me. Bring on the war to end coffee!

Edit: I call for a $15 per cup tax on coffee to provide income and property tax relief across the board! Feel free to add more taxes at the State and local level.

Edited, Jan 30th 2007 3:54am by MonxDoT
#4 Jan 30 2007 at 12:34 AM Rating: Good
***
1,077 posts
I imagine DSD, the Caffeine Queen will post here. Definitely along her lines. :D

I agree, as much as we may dislike them, the big corporations do come in and buy up all the mom and pop businesses. WalMart's been doing it for years. Protest's have been done. I don't think anything is going to change. The taxes these companies pay is just as good as anyone else's...and that's all that matters in the end. The money.

*sigh*

It's not right. But I can see how it happens from a personal standpoint. Starbucks pays decently and offers benefits and other nice options, like 401K. The very things we as employees want. So there...you have a staff. And all you need is to place a store on a major route so it gets a lot of traffic. Then your direct revenue is good. It happens so easily.

I still protest, but I don't know what good it does anymore. I don't have a single rep in my state that gives a **** anymore.

____________________________
Nekovivie - Titan Server/retired
WereStillWithYellow


We are the Canadian Borg.
Resistance would be impolite.
Please wait to be assimilated.
Pour l'assimilation en francais, veuillez appuyer le
[ffxivsig]463107[/ffxivsig]
#5 Jan 30 2007 at 3:17 AM Rating: Decent
I used to boycott starbucks, but unfortunately, I love their iced moccas, so i go there during the summer. I don't feel great about it, but "cafs" in England have ****-poor coffee, and no iced moccas.

It is sad that they are killing, deliberatly most of the time, small independent coffee shops. But, you can't blame them, they are only operating within the market laws, and doing a great job at it. If anything is wrong, it's not starbucks, but the laws that allow them to do that.

Starbucks is intresting though, because it was one of the first companies to really push the "targeted price" system, which basically makes people pay as much as they can for a coffee.

Coffee is one of the cheapest raw product in teh world, and will almost always be so since it is so easy to produce. It is the telemarketing of raw products, in a way. Prices will never go up, because someone will always be able to produce it for cheap.

So how come it ends up 7000 times more expensive just by crossing an ocean? And how come people buy it?

First because it's addictive.

Second, because of the way it is consumed. Most people will not want to add 5 minutes to their morning journey in order to save $1. Which means that location puts a huge premium on the price of coffee. A well places coffee shop (for exemple in the middle of a busy train station) can charge almost as much as it wants for a coffe, and always get clients. The further away the next coffee shop is, the more it *can*, and will, charge. This also means that rent rates for such places are extremely high, since the landlord knows that he can find another coffee branch that will be willing to pay loads of money for this location. High rents, because of high demand, means high coffee prices.

Price targetting, however, is even funnier.

It basically means trying to charge as much as the consumer is willing to pay. You can't charge rich people $4 for a coffee, and poor people $2. Not very practical.

What you can do, however, is add "supplements", that cost the company virtually nothing, and charge a relatively hefty sum for them. A "large" coffee, as opposed to a "small" one, costs the company *nothing*. It costs around 0.001 cents, for the extra water. And yet, they charge 50 cents for a bigger coffee. That's 50 cents of "pure" profits, since it costs them nothing more. It's exactly the same for these other ingredients, like syrup, or chocolate sprinkle, or even making it a "double".

That's where companies like Starbucks have been so clever, they understood these concepts very quickly. And they have a million supplements, so that your coffee will be as expensive as it can possibly be. A grande double moccha with cream and syrup will cost $2 more than a small black cofee with nothing, and yet for the company the costs are exactly the same.

It's very clever, and it's moving from coffee to many other things.

Edited, Jan 30th 2007 11:20am by RedPhoenixxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#6 Jan 30 2007 at 4:11 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Ambrya wrote:
I just don't like their coffee.


QFT
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#7 Jan 30 2007 at 4:51 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
I'm not a huge fan of Starbucks either. I will seek one out if I'm looking for a Chocamochacarmelmacciatolatte type of deal but an average cup o' coffee can be purchased from any number of "little guy" shops and probably be a lot better.

It bugs me to see a Starbucks everywhere I go. I'm not sure why.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#8 Jan 30 2007 at 5:23 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Quote:
We need to ban coffee


BLASPHEMY!!!!!!!!!

Sorry to hear your fav bean stop has been taken over Am. I feel your pain. Each person has their preference for coffee and I have to agree, Star Bucks is too bitter. I had a friend who worked there years ago and he told me the way they get such a strong (burnt) taste was that they actually over roasted and burnt their beans. So basically Star Bucks coffee is burnt coffee.

The only thing from there I really enjoy is their Cafe Mocha. I really like it, but not as something I need every day.

My advice? Buy a Keurig and check out all the different options out there for it. I have found some amazing coffee that I never would have been able to check out before I bought that coffee maker. Its easy to make a travel size mug of coffee, a lot cheaper in the long run, and better tasting coffee than those giant corporations.
#9 Jan 30 2007 at 5:32 AM Rating: Good
Tim Hortons will always pwn Starbucks for coffee.
#10 Jan 30 2007 at 5:40 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Tim Hortons coffee is grand, but in some ways the company is even more f'ucking insidious than Starbucks
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#11 Jan 30 2007 at 5:48 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
I do miss Tim Hortons.

Smiley: frown
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#12 Jan 30 2007 at 6:33 AM Rating: Default
Monsieur RedPhoenixxx wrote:
It is sad that they are killing, deliberatly most of the time, small independent coffee shops. But, you can't blame them, they are only operating within the market laws, and doing a great job at it. If anything is wrong, it's not starbucks, but the laws that allow them to do that.


Those laws are simple supply and demand and freedom of choice. What laws are next Mr. Champion of the Peoples' Freedom, if anything is wrong, it's not beautiful people, but the laws that allow them to have consensual sex.

Monsieur RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Most people will not want to add 5 minutes to their morning journey in order to save $1. Which means that location puts a huge premium on the price of coffee. A well places coffee shop (for exemple in the middle of a busy train station) can charge almost as much as it wants for a coffe, and always get clients. The further away the next coffee shop is, the more it *can*, and will, charge. This also means that rent rates for such places are extremely high, since the landlord knows that he can find another coffee branch that will be willing to pay loads of money for this location. High rents, because of high demand, means high coffee prices.


What would happen if landlord's didn't charge the highest rents they could for well placed locations? What if the rents were artificially restricted? All that would mean is that you are using violence to change the highest number of consumers getting the greatest amount of satisfaction that can be gotten to a lesser number of consumers getting a lesser amount of satisfaction. Then, instead of Starbucks you can have Edwardo's Tobacco Shop, or Billy Bob's ShavingCreamMochaFaceHairs coffee shop.

Starbucks makes a profit from those locations because people voluntarily choose to purchase coffee at those locations. Everytime someone buys a cup of coffee, they are by definition better off, wealthier having bought a cup of coffee. And simultaneously, Starbuck is by defintion better off, wealthier having sold a cup of coffee. Otherwise, they wouldn't have bought and sold that cup of coffee in the first place. But leave it to dumb$hit liberals to interfere with that, to make more people less wealth, to create poverty. This is a perfectly clear example of what liberalism does en masse, create poverty, make people worse off, less happy.
#13 Jan 30 2007 at 6:39 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,735 posts
I like my White Chocolate Mochas. Only other coffee place I know of in Miami is Dunken Donuts, which I'm not a fan off, really (unless I want a bagel!)

Besides, it's funny picking on the Starbucks people.

"What size?"
"Large."
"You mean Venti."
"That's what I said; large."
#14 Jan 30 2007 at 6:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Put me down as another who doesn't really like their coffee. Aside from the hyper-sweetened novelty drinks made of chocolate and caramel and whipped creams, I'd rather drink the corrosive swill that comes out of the office coffee machine.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Jan 30 2007 at 7:14 AM Rating: Decent
MonxDoT wrote:
Starbucks makes a profit from those locations because people voluntarily choose to purchase coffee at those locations. Everytime someone buys a cup of coffee, they are by definition better off, wealthier having bought a cup of coffee. And simultaneously, Starbuck is by defintion better off, wealthier having sold a cup of coffee. Otherwise, they wouldn't have bought and sold that cup of coffee in the first place. But leave it to dumb$hit liberals to interfere with that, to make more people less wealth, to create poverty. This is a perfectly clear example of what liberalism does en masse, create poverty, make people worse off, less happy.


It's coffee. Let's not read to much into it.
#16 Jan 30 2007 at 7:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Señor Exodus, Rey del Queso wrote:
I like my White Chocolate Mochas. Only other coffee place I know of in Miami is Dunken Donuts, which I'm not a fan off, really (unless I want a bagel!)

Besides, it's funny picking on the Starbucks people.

"What size?"
"Large."
"You mean Venti."
"That's what I said; large."


Venti means twenty (as in ounces), so use that. Hilarity ensues.

I like their chai. /shrug

I'm not one of those who rails against Starbucks, or any other chain. I tend to patronize them selectively, and to spend my money locally when I can; but the fact is, they have a great business model.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#17 Jan 30 2007 at 7:30 AM Rating: Good
Burnt coffee beens means burnt tasting coffee. Super if you are a bitter freak, bad if you are someone who just lost 50 lbs and doesn't want 5 packets of sugar in you coffee to make it potable.
#18 Jan 30 2007 at 7:33 AM Rating: Good
You should get your coffee at Cowgirls Espresso.


http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2007-01-29-coffee_x.htm

Quote:
TUKWILA, Wash. — Coffee-stand owner John Cambroto couldn't compete against the bikini-clad women selling espresso up the road.
"We had a much better atmosphere, good coffee. Unfortunately, they ran around half-naked and we didn't," said Cambroto, who finally threw in the towel last spring and sold his business to his rival, the operator of six Cowgirls Espresso stands in the Seattle suburbs.

The naughty baristas of Cowgirls Espresso represent a new trend in and around Seattle — perhaps the most caffeinated city in America — and illustrate how cutthroat the competition can be in the hometown of Starbucks, which has multiple coffee shops competing on the same block.

Among the other coffee stands that are showing some skin: Moka Girls in Auburn, The Sweet Spot Cafe in Shoreline, Bikini Espresso in Renton and Natte Latte in Port Orchard.

One recent afternoon, there was a long line of cars at the tiny, black-and-white, cow-painted Cowgirls stand in front of a Tukwila casino.

Candice Law, leaning provocatively out the drive-through window in a black bra that didn't quite cover her shiny purple pasties, and Toni Morgan, wearing a skimpy halter top, see-through red lace panties and chaps, seemed to know every customer.

Most of the customers declined to give their names or be interviewed — "Nobody wants to admit to their wives that they're here," Law said. One who did, a 25-year-old diesel mechanic named Mike West, said he comes every day for the coffee.

"I could care less what they wear," he said.

Lori Bowden, the owner of Cowgirls Espresso, opened her first stand, by the entrance to the Silver Dollar Casino, four years ago. Law and other employees suggested doing "Bikini Wednesdays." Bowden approved, and her stand immediately doubled the amount of money it was taking in — from $200 to $400 — on Wednesdays.

"Fantasy Fridays," "School Girl Thursdays," "Cowgirl Tuesdays" and "Military Mondays" soon followed. The stand now rakes in about $800 a day, Bowden said. The girls make minimum wage, plus $80 to $150 a day in tips.

Steve McDaniel, chief operating officer at the casino, saw the line of vehicles and knew there was money to be made. He opened Moka Girls last summer. Like Cowgirls, it features theme days and racy lingerie.

"Most guys like to see pretty girls when they get their mochas," said Sarah Araujo, who opened The Sweet Spot two years ago. "We just figured we'd be honest about it."

As long as the employees' breasts and buttocks are covered, they aren't breaking the law. And the owners of the stands say they get few complaints.

Bowden said the baristas at one Cowgirls stand stopped signing the paper coffee cups "XOXO" after the wife of one customer complained, but that's been about it.





Gotta <3 the dual tramp stamp in the photo.
#19 Jan 30 2007 at 7:41 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
Samira wrote:

Venti means twenty (as in ounces), so use that. Hilarity ensues.

I like their chai. /shrug

I'm not one of those who rails against Starbucks, or any other chain. I tend to patronize them selectively, and to spend my money locally when I can; but the fact is, they have a great business model.


This is the only reason I won't go to a starbucks. If you're going to sell coffee in a bilingual country, list the damn sizes in English or French. I don't care what the heck Venti is and I don't want to try to say it. It makes me feel stupid asking for something with a word that A. I don't understand B. Doesn't fit into my English sentence C. Just sounds wrong. I will go to second cup however, when I ask them for a large coffee I get a large coffee and their coffee is quite good. Usually it's country style, I'm not a big fan of Tim Hortons their double double is too creamy and I'm too lazy to say "2 sugar one cream".
#20 Jan 30 2007 at 7:47 AM Rating: Decent
MonxDOT wrote:
blablaba


I wasn't making a political point, just explaining something that I found intresting when I read it.

Not saying it's good or bad, it's just the way it is.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#21 Jan 30 2007 at 7:53 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
Yodabunny wrote:
If you're going to sell coffee in a bilingual country, list the damn sizes in English or French.


Same thing with those goddamned Greek, Thai, etc restaurants.

It's not Saganaki, it's Flaming Cheese.
It's not Pad Se Ewe, it's Greasy Beef Noodles.

Jesus, when will these fuckers learn to word things the way *I* want them to?

(Oh and I <3 Tim Hortons)
#22 Jan 30 2007 at 8:23 AM Rating: Default
Celcio wrote:
It's not Saganaki, it's Flaming Cheese.


You just made Exodus drool.
#23 Jan 30 2007 at 8:40 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
Celcio wrote:
Yodabunny wrote:
If you're going to sell coffee in a bilingual country, list the damn sizes in English or French.


Same thing with those goddamned Greek, Thai, etc restaurants.

It's not Saganaki, it's Flaming Cheese.
It's not Pad Se Ewe, it's Greasy Beef Noodles.

Jesus, when will these fuckers learn to word things the way *I* want them to?

(Oh and I <3 Tim Hortons)


Uhm yeah. Calling something by it's native name and listing a quantitative measurement in a different language are 2 completely different things. If it's a Greek dish by all means call it a greek name but tell me it's a large, not a greekwordforbiggerthandonkey.
#24 Jan 30 2007 at 9:30 AM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
F'uck all you guys. I like Starbucks, and not in the pretentious way that most of the yuppies that hang out there do. I do prefer, however, to spend my green at local businesses because I like to support those types of establishments. This is my local coffee-hole in town; they make good Cappuccinos and the some of the waitresses are cute. I also patently refuse to drink Dunkin Dognuts coffee. It tastes like swamp-***.

DSD wrote:
Some more bragging about her awesome black-liquid-heaven-in-a-cup machine


*****. Smiley: glare
#25 Jan 30 2007 at 10:01 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
/sips her awesome, freshly brewed coffee and smirks at JD
#26 Jan 30 2007 at 10:11 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Starbucks sucks. I like their mocha frappucinos and most of their pre-packaged yums, but their actual coffee, what their business is based upon, is about as tasty as burnt leather soaked in pure ***.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 328 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (328)