But I was wondering if anyone has played with the full version enough to tell if it is woth the upgraderight now, or is it still buggy enough to warrent waiting a few weeks?
Well, at present, it's slower, less stable, uses more resources, and is less secure than XP SP2.
On the other hand it does come with a preposterous DRM system that adds huge amounts of overhead and pro-actively cripples hardware drivers from processing copyrighted content if they don't meet exact specifications.
Network Stack's better though. Close to 1/18th as efficient as Liunx, up from 1/29th with xp.
Vista itself is literally a downgrade for most people, but the problem, of course, is DX10. If Microsoft would port DX10 to XP, there would be absolutely zero reason for anyone to upgrade to Vista, ever.
Maybe it'll get better, anything's possible. I'd say people not being able to do things like view HD content on their HD monitors because their OS intentionally downgrades their output quality might get people to move away from MS operating systems, but I'm a realist. If you're thinking of upgrading and aren't dual booting Linux now, it's time to start.
____________________________
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.