Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

gbaji, Is this you?Follow

#1 Jan 20 2007 at 4:30 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,053 posts
This person http://forums.kearnyontheweb.com/index.php?showuser=434, on the Kearny on the Web boards, has used every one of gbaji's targets to argue in the favor for the teacher, Mr Paszhiewicz's right to talk about his beliefs in the classroom and Intelligent Design/Creationist theory.

Checking his profile I find he join the site one day before I did, last month, when the thread was still on page one.

I just can't think 2 people could have the same writing style and fall back on the same arguments time after time, no matte how others discredit them.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#2 Jan 20 2007 at 6:52 PM Rating: Decent
So you found another pompus windbag on a different forum and want to know if its Gbaji?


I thought all pompus windbags, on all forums, were named Gbaji. Smiley: lol
#3 Jan 20 2007 at 7:51 PM Rating: Default
If it's not a Scottish pompous windbag, it's craaaappppppppp!!!!!!!
#4 Jan 22 2007 at 7:25 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Not me. First off, while he's got some valid points, he's clearly a "believer" in Christianity, whereas I'm agnostic. When I make posts defending christian positions, it's usually either because I'm playing devil's advocate (and I say so), or to point out the few areas in which they may be "correct", but often for the wrong reasons.

On some areas, he does seem similar though. Like the whole "mountains can change height" argument. He's not saying that he's proven that a global flood occured. He's simply arguing that it's not "impossible" for such a flood to occur (or even to have occured). That is the sort of argument I do tend to get into, since it's not uncommon for those I'm arguing against to assume that if I am arguing that something isn't "impossible", that I must be arguing that it happened (and add in a bunch of other assumptive stuff somewhat tied to it).


Kinda like when I argue against global warming, I'm not arguing against US industry making an active effort to reduce their pollution, but am questioning the validity of the arguement that "since global warming exists, we *must* do <list of things>". My arguments are rarely black and white, but many of those I argue against tend to view the issue we argue about in black and white terms and can't seem to grasp that not all of us do.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 244 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (244)