Quote:
don't know about being married, but having family in Iraq, does give you a unique view of the situation. Anyone that doesn't think that we have a vested interest in America's policy in Iraq, can _______. Whether you support the President's policy or not, I think we can all agree that the troops deserve our full support.
Leave it to some f'uck nut to chime in where, yet again, they have no business offering an opinion.
How does having a unique view of a situation make you qualified to asses the validity of a battle plan or the efficacy of a war effort or even the nature, good or bad, of a response to regional conflict? Someone woke up one morning and bestowed on you the width and breadth of military tactical knowledge? You suddenly become imbued with wisdom beyond years regarding the ways of battle simply because someone in your family happens to be in a combat zone?
F'uck you.
Nothing in my statement had anything to do with supporting the troops (which I happen to) or supporting the mission (which I happen to) or agreeing with the mission (which I happen to). It was solely focused on the complete f'ucking buffoonery demonstrated by a pharmacy technician (which, let's be honest, is a glorified stock girl/data entry clerk) offering her assessment on the success or failure of a military operation.
I, too, have family in the middle east. Family who volunteered to go back to Afghanistan after being deployed there twice and family who volunteered after the initiation of hostilities in Iraq. It in no way makes me qualified to assess the success or failure of campaigns and I know it. If you're too much of a f'ucking ****** to understand the meaning behind my posts, perhaps you should simply ignore them and move through to someone like Katie, on who's intellectual level you're quite obviously much more comfortable conversing.