Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Feeling belligerent today!Follow

#27 Jan 18 2007 at 11:46 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
paulsol is a f'ucking idiot who prattles on about meaningless things.

gbaji is a f'ucking idiot who prattle on endlessly about meaningless things.

paulsol loses for giving gbaji an excuse to unleash his textual diarrhea on the rest of us.

That is all.
QFT.

Missed ya, Moe.
#28 Jan 18 2007 at 11:48 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Iraq was not an imminent threat and had nothing to do with 9/11.

BOOYAHHHH
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#29 Jan 18 2007 at 11:50 AM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Elderon wrote:
Quote:
Feeling belligerent incontinent today!
Welcome to my world.


It was the hitting 10k thing, wasn't it?
#30 Jan 18 2007 at 12:43 PM Rating: Default
Incoming Draft in 3... 2... 1..


Operation Blue to Green was a HUGE failure. Only by "leaning" the annual enlistment numbers are the recruiters able to make their quota. We no longer have the experienced military numbers and we are sending troops who have little training into Iraq. Everday we are coming closer to the Draft being reinstated. I'm for some kind of civil service draft be it military or otherwise. I just think it was idiotic to implement "force reshaping" during a war.
#31 Jan 18 2007 at 1:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
I just think it was idiotic to implement "force reshaping" during a war.

I love how being married to a soldier makes some people feel qualified to offer assessments of military policy. Its almost as funny as people who partied at Yale and owned part of a baseball team feeling qualified to run a country.

Any similarities here that we can draw? Maybe only that we should fence Texas off and remove their access to the interwebs.
#32 Jan 18 2007 at 2:45 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
If a draft ever happens within the next 5 years I will fUck my 21" CRT monitor and post pics of it.

Edited, Jan 18th 2007 5:39pm by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#33 Jan 18 2007 at 4:15 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Breaking News!

The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) has today announced a radical change to its publication policy!


OED wrote:
We will, of course produce the concise (853 pages) edition of the OED, and the 17 volume (average 654 pages per volume) version.

For 2007 we are releasing a series of additional annexes, appendices and errata exclusively for the use of gbaji. These will contain an average of 4,654 pages per volume, and current projections indicate at least 268 volumes.

They will only contain a total of 27 distinct words, but these will be repeated extensively, and we believe that in creating editions weighing in at 43.6 metric tonnes per collection, we can capture the essence of gbaji's message.

We had intended to produce a shorter 'Concise gbaji edition' by removing the wrods, 'reason' and 'logic'. Sadly, this only ran to 2 pages and was rejected.

The varrus edition will continue to be availble in the 2 page wipe-clean scratch-n-sniff format.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#34 Jan 18 2007 at 7:11 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I love how being married to a soldier makes some people feel qualified to offer assessments of military policy.


I don't know about being married, but having family in Iraq, does give you a unique view of the situation. Anyone that doesn't think that we have a vested interest in America's policy in Iraq, can _______. Whether you support the President's policy or not, I think we can all agree that the troops deserve our full support.
#35 Jan 18 2007 at 7:32 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
Suppository much gbaji?

That's more like it.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#36 Jan 18 2007 at 9:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
don't know about being married, but having family in Iraq, does give you a unique view of the situation. Anyone that doesn't think that we have a vested interest in America's policy in Iraq, can _______. Whether you support the President's policy or not, I think we can all agree that the troops deserve our full support.

Leave it to some f'uck nut to chime in where, yet again, they have no business offering an opinion.

How does having a unique view of a situation make you qualified to asses the validity of a battle plan or the efficacy of a war effort or even the nature, good or bad, of a response to regional conflict? Someone woke up one morning and bestowed on you the width and breadth of military tactical knowledge? You suddenly become imbued with wisdom beyond years regarding the ways of battle simply because someone in your family happens to be in a combat zone?

F'uck you.

Nothing in my statement had anything to do with supporting the troops (which I happen to) or supporting the mission (which I happen to) or agreeing with the mission (which I happen to). It was solely focused on the complete f'ucking buffoonery demonstrated by a pharmacy technician (which, let's be honest, is a glorified stock girl/data entry clerk) offering her assessment on the success or failure of a military operation.

I, too, have family in the middle east. Family who volunteered to go back to Afghanistan after being deployed there twice and family who volunteered after the initiation of hostilities in Iraq. It in no way makes me qualified to assess the success or failure of campaigns and I know it. If you're too much of a f'ucking ****** to understand the meaning behind my posts, perhaps you should simply ignore them and move through to someone like Katie, on who's intellectual level you're quite obviously much more comfortable conversing.
#37 Jan 19 2007 at 4:45 AM Rating: Default
Hey *** hat. Do you even realize what Operation Blue to Green is?
#38 Jan 19 2007 at 4:54 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
The One and Only Katie wrote:
Hey *** hat. Do you even realize what Operation Blue to Green is?


Is that when you pee in the pool?
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#39 Jan 19 2007 at 5:34 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Hey *** hat. Do you even realize what Operation Blue to Green is?

I do. How does the nature of the operation in question make you any more qualified?
#40 Jan 19 2007 at 6:03 AM Rating: Decent
MoebiusLord wrote:
Quote:
Hey *** hat. Do you even realize what Operation Blue to Green is?

I do. How does the nature of the operation in question make you any more qualified?


If people only spoke about what they were qualified to talk about, most conversations would revolve around ************ and going to the toilet.

I guess you'd find the OOT pretty good in that respect.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#41 Jan 19 2007 at 6:23 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
If people only spoke about what they were qualified to talk about, most conversations would revolve around ************ and going to the toilet.

Then I guess you should take this opportunity to shut the f'uck up, as this conversation really doesn't revolve around either, now shouldn't you?
#42 Jan 19 2007 at 6:28 AM Rating: Decent
MoebiusLord wrote:
Then I guess you should take this opportunity to shut the f'uck up, as this conversation really doesn't revolve around either, now shouldn't you?


This conversation was both shIt and a pile of ****, so I don't think I'm too wide off the mark.

Anyway, expecting people not to talk crap on internet forums is widly optimistic, especially for someone as cynical as you, no?



Edited, Jan 19th 2007 9:18am by RedPhoenixxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#43 Jan 19 2007 at 6:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Anyway, expecting people not to talk crap on internet forums is widly optimistic, especially for someone as cynical as you, no?

Pardon me while I channel Don Quixote for a moment, will you?
#44 Jan 19 2007 at 6:38 AM Rating: Decent
MoebiusLord wrote:
Quote:
Anyway, expecting people not to talk crap on internet forums is widly optimistic, especially for someone as cynical as you, no?

Pardon me while I channel Don Quixote for a moment, will you?


Go right ahead while I pretend to know what you're on about.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#45 Jan 19 2007 at 6:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Go right ahead while I pretend to know what you're on about.

Pearls before swine, I tell ya. Pearls before swine.
#46 Jan 19 2007 at 6:44 AM Rating: Default
***
2,328 posts
MoebiusLord I find your name oddly appropriate. You just keep spitting out the same drivel over and over and over and over and over and over.
#47 Jan 19 2007 at 6:50 AM Rating: Decent
MoebiusLord wrote:
Quote:
Go right ahead while I pretend to know what you're on about.

Pearls before swine, I tell ya. Pearls before swine.


We have a saying:

The drooling of the toad does not reach the soaring eagle.

In relative terms, it means exactly the same thing.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#48 Jan 19 2007 at 6:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
MoebiusLord I find your name oddly appropriate. You just keep spitting out the same drivel over and over and over and over and over and over.

Coming from a UPer, I suppose I should be impressed you know what the word refers to, I suppose.
#49 Jan 19 2007 at 6:54 AM Rating: Default
***
2,328 posts
Theres 2 reasons to go to the UP: Mine copper and go to Michigan Tech or Northern Michigan University. I don't mine copper.

Edited, Jan 19th 2007 9:48am by Darkuwa
#50 Jan 19 2007 at 7:01 AM Rating: Default
Operation Blue to Green was a program where the military was "leaning" out their navy and air force numbers. In down sizing they were hoping more military members would take the option to go from Air Force or Navy to the Army instead of being force shaped out of the military entirely. It didn't work. Very few choose to go that route. With recruiting numbers down and no end to this war in sight, it may just come down to a draft. I need to find the article where I was reading that they are already looking for volunteers for a "dry run" of the draft committees.
#51 Jan 19 2007 at 7:03 AM Rating: Default
***
2,328 posts
To reinstate the draft I'm fairly sure they have to go through congress. Considering congress is controlled by the democrats right now its not going to happen.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 283 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (283)