Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

The great somalian U-TurnFollow

#1 Jan 09 2007 at 12:24 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
What the hell is going on in Somalia?

Back in 1993, there was a failed intervention by the US/UN that led to the so called 'Black Hawk Down' event. It began with what was prolly the most televised 'invasion' ever, where the US troops coming ashore outside Mogadishu were pretty much outnumbered by the journalists camped out on the beach to cover the event, dubbed "Operation Restore Hope". The plan at the time was to disarm, capture and kill the warlords who were causing havoc.

After that 'triumphant' entrance, it wasn't long before the US decided that 60% casualty rates amongst its special forces was a price not worth paying to try and defeat the warring parties. They withdrew, leaving Somalia to turn into a place that made the Mad Max movies look like a fun place to live. The country as a whole, and the capital in particular degenerated into a landscape of small territories, that were controlled by 'warlords' who commanded their own private armies, and ruled by force, extracting taxes from the local population, raping pillaging and plundering and murdering with no mercy.

There was no government, no public services of any kind. A failed anarchic state. In response to this situation, a movement calling itself the Islamic Courts emerged to try and bring some order. the IC are NOT on the whole Islamic Fundamentalists. they are moderate muslims, who decided that there needed to be an end to the factional clan fighting, and Islam was the one thing that they could all agree on. The business and local communities supported the IC, and the situation tho far from perfect, improved to the point where the Intl airport was re- opened and there was some tentative foreign investment, garbage was being collected and basic services were being restored. Tourism was even being talked about. (Not sure I'd be up for it, but the surf can be quite good..) Life seemed to be improving for the people.

There was a so-called govt. installed, that was supposedly recognised by the intl. community, but they had no influence amongst the population, and other than the town they were based in, no territory to call there own.

Fast forward to today. The warlords have been flooded with weapons and cash by the US. The Ethiopean army under the direction of that countries dictator (GWB's staunchest ally in the Horn of Africa) has invaded Somalia, and been militarily supported by the US, they have routed the IC, and are now crowing about having liberated the Somali people from the 'terrorists'. The Somali people are historical enemies of the Ethiopeans and most see their actions as aggressive and huliating in the extreme.

Now that the US has thrown its hat in the ring with the warlords that they had previously vowed to destroy, aided and abbetted by the Ethiopeans, who are ruled by a thoroughly nasty dictator, and removed the Islamic Courts movement, who had bought some semblance of normality back to a truly fu'cked up country, all in the name of fighting The War Against Terror I would hazard a guess that muslims all around the world are having their suspicions confirmed that the US is out to kill muslims.

The IC has been 'linked', in the west, to Al Qaeda. If the reversal of the anarchy in Somalia was credited to the Islamic courts movement, and there is a perception that the US is now allied to the very warlords who inflicted that anarchy, I would assume that somewhere in a cave in asia, theres a very happy OBL laughing into his beard at the ineptitude of the latest efforts of US foreign policy. No doubt there are already new recruits for the movement beating a path to his hideout.


/golf clap


____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#2 Jan 09 2007 at 12:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
paulsol the Flatulent wrote:
Now that the US has thrown its hat in the ring with the warlords that they had previously vowed to destroy [...] all in the name of fighting The War Against Terror
This would only suprise someone whose drop off the turnip truck happened less than 20min ago.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Jan 09 2007 at 12:33 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
There over there and we're over here. so waht?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#4 Jan 09 2007 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
It's my understanding that the Ethiopean goverment is responding to requests by the (Internationaly recognized) Somoli goverment for help. Otherwise nice slant.
#5 Jan 09 2007 at 12:42 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I've heard people from there being very very upset that the warlords are being brought back to power... not in deference to the Islamists.. but out of fear and hatred of the warlords.
messed up all around I'd say.

Quote:
The great somalian U-Turn


I'd say donuts.

Edited, Jan 9th 2007 3:37pm by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#6 Jan 09 2007 at 12:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
They should move to Afghanistan. There, you get Islamic warlords running the show -- the best of both worlds!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#7 Jan 09 2007 at 12:47 PM Rating: Good
***
1,076 posts
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
There over there and we're over here. so waht?


Actually things are starting to develope here. In Parma, Ohio they are holding a support ralley for a man who hid his ties to a terrorist organization and the U.S. allegidly Deported him. Which it is turning out to be more that they extradited him to the Israelis.


    http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/000704.php
#8 Jan 09 2007 at 12:47 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
We need to import some Nintendo Wii, some big screen TVs, some prozac, and some blow-up dolls to that place.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#9 Jan 09 2007 at 12:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
You know how they always show those starving etheopians? I figured out why they are all starving. I ate at an etheopian restaraunt down in houston once. Gah, the taste will haunt my deepest nightmares until my grave. If I lived there and had to eat that ****, i'd be starving too. Rancid meat and butter on sour sour sour "bread" (not to be confused with delicious sourdough) all topped off with just about the hottest chilli pepper i've ever encountered.

Not fun.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#10 Jan 09 2007 at 12:50 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
ccstwocents wrote:
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
There over there and we're over here. so waht?


Actually things are starting to develope here. In Parma, Ohio they are holding a support ralley for a man who hid his ties to a terrorist organization and the U.S. allegidly Deported him. Which it is turning out to be more that they extradited him to the Israelis.


    http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/000704.php


I was being cheeky.

but I think really that it all started to develope around 1948 or so.. and has been bouncing around the world like an out of control rubber ball in a small room ever sinse.... the ball ain't ever gonna stop... cause no one wants to touch it.... the just keep making sure it bounces away from them as far and fast as possible... keeping that momentum going...

Edited, Jan 9th 2007 3:47pm by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#11 Jan 09 2007 at 12:50 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Mmmm. I love ethiopian.
#12 Jan 09 2007 at 12:50 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
Mmmm. I love ethiopian.


Their food is good to!
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#13 Jan 09 2007 at 12:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
You can have mine if I ever go eat there again. I'll bring a sandwich.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#14 Jan 09 2007 at 12:51 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
what's a Nubian?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#15 Jan 09 2007 at 12:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Someone with a low post count, duh!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#16 Jan 09 2007 at 12:53 PM Rating: Good
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
what's a Nubian?
$500. Also, 10-15yrs if you get caught.





Edited, Jan 9th 2007 3:49pm by Elderon
#17 Jan 09 2007 at 1:28 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
The US has a fine record of recruiting extremists and fundamentalists to the cause of Al Qaeda and its affiliates. It backed Israel’s disastrous war with Hezbollah last summer. It has never accepted the Palestinians’ election of a Hamas Government. It cold-shouldered Iran even when the relatively moderate Mohammed Khatami was President. In each case it succeeded only in boosting the extremists.

The foreign policy dept. of the US govt is not only incompetant. Policy is made not only with imperfect knowledge but with a complete disdain for knowledge.

Its decisions are seemingly knee-jerk reactions, with little or no thought for the outcome. The latest US assistance to the (christian) Ethiopeans, in their incursion into (Muslim) Somalia, to remove the one faction that was bringing some sort of stability to the country, is idiotic in the extreme.

That is what’s really frightening about U.S. foreign policy and the decision-makers who have such an adverse impact on the lives of people around the world. These guys are wandering around in the dark, utterly clueless, and seemingly resistant to all advice that doesn't fit there own personal view of reality. Look at Bush's 'plan to send more troops (targets) to Iraq. Against the advice of pretty much everyone, he seems to think that, by digging the hole just a bit deeper, all will work out. Against all the advice and evidence, he cant see the futility of it.

Washington backed military intervention by Ethiopia’s barbaric govt. because it regarded the courts as a new Taleban, and accused them of harbouring al-Qaeda terrorists. It would have done better to try engaging the courts. But no! Islam = Terrorist. And because 'terrorists' hate your 'freedoms', then they need to be killed.

As Terry Jones (Monty Python) said in an article yesterday...
Quote:

In 2002 the house budget committee and the congressional budget office both guesstimated the cost of invading Iraq at approximately $50bn; $500bn seems a bit wide of the mark. What's more, with over half a million dead, it means that the world's greatest military superpower has spent a million dollars for every Iraqi killed. That can't be value for money!

Of course, there's another thing that George Bush could have done with the money: he could have given every Iraqi $18,700. I imagine that would have reduced the threat of international terrorism somewhat. Call me old-fashioned, but I can't help thinking that giving someone $18,700 brings them round to your side more quickly than bombing the hell out of them.



But 'talking' and 'negotiating' and other sorts of civilised behaviour are things that the paranoid, greedy selfish old men in the Whitehouse find completely alien. They would rather "keep that ball bouncing". (thanx Kelv)

Edited, Jan 9th 2007 4:27pm by paulsol
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#18 Jan 09 2007 at 1:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The paid every person bit is a pretty old canard.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#19 Jan 09 2007 at 1:50 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Fair comment Joph.

Bombing people into the stone age is an expensive business tho. And doesn't appear to be a very constructive way of solving problems.

I wonder how much it would have cost to pay Sadaam to f'uck off to retire somewhere. Would have saved a lot of trouble.

But on the other hand, TV viewers worldwide wouldn't have had the satisfaction of seeing the New Democratic Iraqi Justice system in action.

Worth $500 billion plus? Not so sure myself....
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#20 Jan 09 2007 at 4:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Yeah, 'cause that whole appeasement thing worked out realy well for the world last time they tried that right?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#21 Jan 09 2007 at 5:02 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
So once again we **** up trying to undo out past mistakes.

We are not the first "Super Power" to mess up trying to fix our mistakes around the world, but we do seem to bring our own brand of stupidity to foreign policy.

At least the Brits got Gin and Tonics, while I am stuck with empty bottles, trying to not remember that Bush is going try to explain his new Iraq policy to the Nation at 9 tonight, so I have an excuse not to listen to him again.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#22 Jan 09 2007 at 5:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
paulsol the Flatulent wrote:
The US has a fine record of recruiting extremists and fundamentalists to the cause of Al Qaeda and its affiliates. It backed Israel’s disastrous war with Hezbollah last summer. It has never accepted the Palestinians’ election of a Hamas Government. It cold-shouldered Iran even when the relatively moderate Mohammed Khatami was President. In each case it succeeded only in boosting the extremists.


Ok. So what should the US have done in response to the Hezbolla and Hamas situations? I'm just curious, since you seem to be so sure that opposing them was the wrong thing...

Both of those organizations were terrorist organizations *before* they involved themselves in conflict with Israel. Are you saying that we should support terrorist groups when they attack other countries? Cause I'm not sure what else you're saying here.

I'm also curious what measurment you're using when you're saying that the US's position on these issues only "boosted the extremists". Ever consider that "the extremists" would have even more power and position if we hadn't opposed them? Or are you a firm "out of sight out of mind" kind of guy?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#23 Jan 09 2007 at 5:27 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
I'm diggin' that Spooky lit up some skinnies. Nothing like the Finger of God to put the fear of SpecOps in yas.

Totem
#24 Jan 09 2007 at 11:29 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:

I'm also curious what measurment you're using when you're saying that the US's position on these issues only "boosted the extremists".


I would be interested to know what makes you believe that killing a bunch of by-standers while bombing their country, ostensibly while after a group of three fellas, namely, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed,(thought to be behind behind the 1998 attacks on the U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, , that killed 225 people, and accomplices Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan and Abu Talha al-Sudani), is a fine honorable and productive way to sort out your problems?

Methinks the innocent by-standers would become pretty radicalised. I know I would. Same goes for any person in any country, including yours.



As for the rest of your post.

Why do you always get your words and meanings all mixed up and twisted around?

'Appeasement' 'support the terrorists' are not the same as 'negotiation' and 'dialogue'. Both work a lot better than dropping hi-explosives onto kids, when it comes to sorting out your differences. Honest!
Quote:

Are you saying that we should support terrorist groups when they attack other countries?


Are you having a laugh?

The Iraqi people (or government) did NOT attack you. They were NOT a threat to you.

The Somali people are NOT a threat to you.

The only terrorists who have attacked your country are home grown ones, and a bunch of mostly Saudis. I wonder how much Saudi Arabia is being supported by you and your armaments industry?

On the other hand you did destroy Iraq and a shedload of their 'innocent by-standers'. Not that they had anything to do with 9/11 of course.



And as a point of order, Hezbollah was formed as a response to the invasion and occupation of southern Lebanon by the Israelis.


If poeple have problems, they need to solve them with DIALOGUE. Not fuc'kin weapons.

Its the 'civilised' thing to to do, surely.


____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#25 Jan 10 2007 at 5:07 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
They're gonna kill all the Jedi next I tell you. It will restore the balance.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#26 Jan 10 2007 at 7:18 AM Rating: Decent
god damn paulsol is a whiny little *****.

Quote:
nvasion and occupation of southern Lebanon by the Israelis.



So when someone in a neighboring country is tossing bombs/ rockets at you, you should just put up with it, right? Shut it you ****.

Edited, Jan 10th 2007 9:14am by Abadd
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 282 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (282)