Quote:
Wasn't that the entire point? "We can do the exact same thing or even better!" and all that?
It's already been touched on, but it took a page and a half for the slow people to realize that everything which is taught in a classroom can similarly be taught on-line. For a page and half, you and the dolts couldn't come up with a single example of an educational concept learned in the classroom that can't be similarly learned on-line from the entire content range of K-PhD, even though you and the dolts claimed you could. If you got an 'A' understanding of that concept, we can move along to the finer detailed comparison of the relative strengths of Classroom vs. Internet. If you live in Tokyo, start running through the streets screaming.
The fact that teachers use the material which is on-line shows that that material is better than what they can provide themselves in class. Else why use it?
You yourself said smaller class sizes are better. In other words, the smaller the student:teacher ratio, ceterus paribus, the better the quality. Say the typical class size is 25 students for one teacher. All the material which is put together on-line, the pc educational games, the video lectures, etc. (which is constantly getting better) dramatically, incredibly reverses that ratio. Before: X teachers teaching Y students times Z classrooms. After: all the teachers teaching every single student in one classroom of one student simultaneously. Of course, we fire the duplicate inefficiency, we get rid of the lesser quality, and keep the best quality for all. The synthetic effect is that every teacher of the highest quality is individually teaching every student. We go from an effective ratio of something like 25:1 to 1:1,000,000.
Your own, personal, Sokr8s. I'll just stop there for now, since that's more than enough to show better quality. You don't just lose. You're obliterated. Capiche?
I'll sip on some sizzurp to that.