Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

This made me feel funny in the pantsFollow

#27 Jan 09 2007 at 8:23 AM Rating: Decent
The internet is way the hell more flexible than any brick and mortar classroom. It can be a supersize lecture for 1000s or a small chat room of 4-5 people. Plus, quicker and slower students aren't tied to the average speed of the class. You move at your own pace. Teaching is teaching, whether you're sitting in the front row, sitting in the back row, or sitting at home. Any problems you can think of regarding the learning experience can just as quickly and easily be solved through better on-line links.

All teaching methodologies, examples, etc. can and will be archived and filtered into the best examples. It's a ton more cost effective efficient, and it's a ton better quality (or will be). The internet can be a helluva lot more reactive than one teacher walking around a class of 30 students seeing how their arithmatic problems are going. Just take a look at mmorpgs, instant messaging, chat rooms, forums. Students can learn from each other, from professionals, from the elite very best. Again, the other 99.9% non-elite, non-very-best get the axe, because their efforts are a total waste of time, money, space, and duplicate effort.

That's the way it's trending. Your grand-children will graduate with the equivalent of PhDs in their teens because of it. Just think back to all the wasted time inherent in the school system, from walking to classes, taking attendance, drama and angst, disruptions, bullying, driving-walking-bussing, missing class because you're sick, it goes on and on.

You can sit in a virtual live classroom too, with fake 3d images of students sitting at desks, or with other live virtual student images. It can be sliced any and every way, in real time, with real time feedback measurements and results. It's magnitudes upon magnitudes more efficient, more cost effective, and better quality, exactly how the free market is magnitudes more efficient, more cost effective, and better quality than socialism.

With equal quality equal access available to all, if you want to keep robbing taxpayers to fund school buildings, teachers, adminstrators, athletics, then hopefully you and your kids will get reciprocal bombs going off in your schools and neighborhoods. Don't pretend you're not a theif by voting for taxes to fund public schools, espcecially when a better alternative exists for free.
#28 Jan 09 2007 at 9:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
That's the way it's trending.
No, that's the way you like to think it's trending. That's the way you'd like to see it trend. However, it's not moving there with any great speed.

Know what's missing from these MIT "courses"? Class credit. It's a great toy and self-learning tool but it won't get you a degree from MIT. Or even closer to a degree from anywhere. Online universities have yet to gain real acceptance. I was in my college counselor's office the other day when some girl came in wanting to transfer core courses from University of Phoenix. The lady behind the desk gave a sympathetic smile and said "Hrmm... they won't like that." A local college is derisive of UoP's English 101 course. Accredited universty online courses? Sure, they exist, but not to any great scale. The online history program from University of Illinois accepts 20 students per semester. That's not even a full brick classroom's worth of students for an entire online program. A far, far cry from a "trend" towards thousands of people getting their online PhDs.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#29 Jan 09 2007 at 11:53 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I think it depends on the course of study. True academics (psych, soc, humanities) can't help but look at online universities and degrees with disdain due to the lack of intellectual classroom discourse, but many IT and networking folks can effectively market those degrees. When I lived in VA, it didn't carry such a stigma. Back when I worked on the hill, the Undersecretary for Higher Ed under Rod Paige got her degree from UofP online, and it was highlighted on her list of qualifications. For some of the reservations that we served, it was the only way a student could attend schools.
#30 Jan 09 2007 at 11:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I don't think anyone but the psycho thinks this is leading to degrees from MIT. If you read the comments, most people are using this as a resource to supplement their own teaching or learning materials (which can be sparse in less-affluent areas), or to educate themselves (not as a degree mill but honestly trying to learn). Curiosity is a basic human motivator, after creature needs are met.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#31 Jan 09 2007 at 12:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
I don't think anyone but the psycho thinks this is leading to degrees from MIT.
Oh, I know and it's a good concept. I was responding specifically to said psycho Smiley: wink2
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Jan 09 2007 at 12:08 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
I don't think anyone but the psycho thinks this is leading to degrees from MIT.
Oh, I know and it's a good concept. I was responding specifically to said psycho Smiley: wink2
I responding to you, psycho.
#33 Jan 09 2007 at 12:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You're not the boss of me!

I don't have a firm opinion of U. of Phoenix. I imagine that much of the prejudice against them comes from their "for profit" model which flies in the face of traditional pedagogy. I know that when I called them once for information, the guy I talked to called me relentlessly for several weeks before giving up. In fact, the first afternoon I talked to him, he wanted to schedule me in and get my first payment. That was a pretty big turn-off to me although not as much so as my own realization that I'd rather be stabbed in the face with a meat thermometer than take up accounting as a profession. On the other hand, if people are graduating from there and bettering their lives as a result, bully for them. I've no reason to criticise. As you said as well, UoP's focus is on business style studies rather than liberal or fine arts.

Anyway, my own opinions aside, the nice lady at the local college didn't seem real impressed. Which is all I was saying.

Edited, Jan 9th 2007 12:13pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34 Jan 09 2007 at 12:32 PM Rating: Decent
Credits, Degrees, Accomplishments, can be granted on-line. Is it hard to imagine taking the SAT, the ACT, MCATs, online? Students already do!

Many job interviews have tests, interviewers ask questions. Proficiency can be demonstrated in many ways, and easily moved on-line. You want to be a doctor? You can easily perform any number of operations on virtual patients to demonstrate your qualifications. Pilots train in flight simulators before taking the controls of 747s. All these skills can be greatly duplicated on-line. Is it that hard to imagine a Wi controller evolving into a scapel?

All these schools that grant degrees are accredited. All the courses have tests, have homework. Most of that can be easily replicated on-line, along with the easily posted video of lecturers, TA, sessions, student questions, teacher explantations.

Of course, on-line degrees have *yet* to gain real acceptance. The educational institution has replaced the medieval guild system. Instead of perfomring years of service as an apprentice and being granted charter by the King, you pay tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars for the degree pieces of paper. It serves as a union card filter toward a multitude of better paying jobs. It locks out competition in many fields, artificially raising the wages of doctors, lawyers, etc., and of course pays the professors, pays the K-12 teachers, pays the Dean's, pays the principals, etc.

Yeah, right now this material is supplemental. Back in the 1950s, pong type games on multi-million dollar super computers was supplemental material as well. The thing is, 6 figure degrees will eventually be competing with alternative lower priced standardized courses and accredidation. It's naive for those with degrees in say computer science from say MIT to pretend that degree shields them from competition. It's all about real knowledge and real skills, no matter the manner in which they may be gained. You don't need to be in the second grade school library to play the "Oregon Trail" history game. You can just as easily pass it or fail it from home. And that holds for anything and everything in the current educational system. And it's been trending that way since ever since the Apple Macintosh in the 1980s and that grade school Oregon Trail computer game. University of Phoenix and OCW are just intermediary steps.

Do you need to take a course to build your own computer? No, you find the information, you process the information, you order your stuff from newegg and put it together. You don't need a degree to henceforth get a job on a dell assembly line. Just like it's ridiculous to pay an American worker 50k for a tech support call center job that can be done by an Indian for 25k, just like it's ridiculous to pay an American programmer 125k for a programming job that can be done by a Chinese programmer for 40k, it just as ridiculous to pay MIT 125k for a degree that can be obtained for five dollars in the not too distant future. If you think Asian scientists outnumber American scientists now, wait until you see how many more there are in 20 years because the road to becoming a scientist has gotten super cheap, super quick, and super efficient.
#35 Jan 09 2007 at 12:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
That was a nice little dreamwork essay. Mind you, it completely failed to back up the idea that we're currently trending in the direction you claim.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Jan 09 2007 at 12:58 PM Rating: Decent
Huh? I gave you concrete examples. MCATs on-line. Series 7 financial qualifications, on-line. It goes on and on. Forums, like this, where ideas are occasionally debated, on-line. It's a thin string holding the government funded, government accredidation charter grants of license to perform services, together. Do you need a degree to learn Spanish? No, it's available for free on-line. Do you need a degree to put Spanish on your resume? No, you know it if you know it. Those are solid examples of a solid trend. And there's a ton more if you just glance.
#37 Jan 09 2007 at 1:02 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Huh? I gave you concrete examples. MCATs on-line. Series 7 financial qualifications, on-line. It goes on and on. Forums, like this, where ideas are occasionally debated, on-line. It's a thin string holding the government funded, government accredidation charter grants of license to perform services, together. Do you need a degree to learn Spanish? No, it's available for free on-line. Do you need a degree to put Spanish on your resume? No, you know it if you know it. Those are solid examples of a solid trend. And there's a ton more if you just glance.


If one examines textual narrative, one is faced with a choice: either accept realism or conclude that the collective is capable of intent, but only if Bataille’s model of postcapitalist rationalism is invalid. The main theme of the works of Stone is the dialectic, and eventually the absurdity, of textual class. Therefore, the substructural paradigm of discourse implies that the goal of the artist is social comment.

In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic culture. Many discourses concerning realism may be discovered. In a sense, if postconstructive theory holds, we have to choose between postcapitalist rationalism and materialist discourse.

Lyotard suggests the use of textual narrative to challenge capitalism. Thus, de Selby holds that the works of Stone are modernistic.

The characteristic theme of Brophy’s analysis of postcapitalist rationalism is the common ground between truth and sexual identity. But the subject is interpolated into a textual narrative that includes sexuality as a totality.

The rubicon, and thus the dialectic, of Baudrillardist simulacra intrinsic to Burroughs’s Port of Saints emerges again in Naked Lunch. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a textual narrative that includes culture as a whole.

If precapitalist theory holds, we have to choose between postcapitalist rationalism and dialectic desituationism. Therefore, Lyotard’s essay on textual narrative suggests that consciousness is fundamentally a legal fiction.
#38 Jan 09 2007 at 1:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Taking a multiple choice test over the internet is leagues away from the internet replacing the traditional classroom as the primary place of learning. And I'm not sure what professions you need a degree in Spanish for, aside from teaching Spanish. Which still requires an accredited degree (assuming you're not teaching privately).

Were those your best examples?

Edited, Jan 9th 2007 1:01pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Jan 09 2007 at 1:17 PM Rating: Decent
Watching your first grade teacher or watching your professor on tv on the internet is exactly the same as watching them from a classroom desk. All these CNN articles you and Flea link threads to don't replace the traditional newspaper? We all have to go to the corner newstand and shell out some spare change to read the words? Nope, wrong. Newspaper, replaced. Next stop, classroom. Knowledge and skills don't exist within a degree, knowledge and skills exist within a mind. I'm sure at schools like Illinois and Michigan State, plenty of students watch their lectures on campus tv. It's been trending away from physical presence inside classrooms, for a long time.
#40 Jan 09 2007 at 1:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
Watching your first grade teacher or watching your professor on tv on the internet is exactly the same as watching them from a classroom desk.
Sure. "Watching".

Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#41 Jan 09 2007 at 1:23 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Can I ask my teacher on the Tv why Trigger in his book Sociocultural Evolution is talking about the Bible giving Western Civilization a linear rather than cyclical view of time?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#42 Jan 09 2007 at 1:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
No but you can ask him because it'll be just like IRC as well!


Unfortunately, we're dealing with Monx's dream class of 10,000 people taught by one single super-elite instructor so it might take him a while to get back to you.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#43 Jan 09 2007 at 1:33 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
No but you can ask him because it'll be just like IRC as well!


Unfortunately, we're dealing with Monx's dream class of 10,000 people taught by one single super-elite instructor so it might take him a while to get back to you.
Who needs super-elite instructors when there is going to be super-elite robots?!
#44 Jan 09 2007 at 1:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Good point. After all, once upon a time we used to play Pong. Based on that stirring bit of evidence, I predict we'll have super-intelligent robot overlords before June.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#45 Jan 09 2007 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
All hail our Robot Overlords, may the knowledge that they disperse be rivaled only by their harsh but just tyrannical rule!

edit - hopefully they start with spelling and grammar!



Edited, Jan 9th 2007 9:37pm by bodhisattva

Edited, Jan 9th 2007 9:41pm by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#46 Jan 09 2007 at 1:58 PM Rating: Decent
Elderon wrote:

Quote:
contextual narrative mumbo jumbo nonsense


You desperately need to read some Mises Human Action

Here it is, for free:

http://www.mises.org/humanaction.asp

Join the early 20th century state of socio-politico-philosophical knowledge.

Quote:
Can I ask my teacher on the Tv why Trigger in his book Sociocultural Evolution is talking about the Bible giving Western Civilization a linear rather than cyclical view of time?


Quote:
No but you can ask him because it'll be just like IRC as well!


Unfortunately, we're dealing with Monx's dream class of 10,000 people taught by one single super-elite instructor so it might take him a while to get back to you.


Lol, once he or anyone else answers your question, it can be archived and viewed simultaneously by millions of others. What's this meager 10,000 person classroom? It's archived. If someone comes along and gives a better answer, it's archived too. If a TA session has an awesome 50 minute discussion about it, it's archived. The best is filtered in, and the old junk is filtered out.

You're getting schooled in real time right now, by me, for free. :P There's millions and millions of other examples from every other subject as well. People aren't stuck any longer in physical classrooms, physical libraries, in limited time class sessions and limited time office hours of the professor.
#47 Jan 09 2007 at 2:01 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:

You're getting schooled in real time right now, by me, for free.


See, this points up the basic problem. Because there is no real time feedback loop, you're left to believe whatever YOU decide is true - which may not, and in fact will most likely not, reflect what any sane person would think.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#48 Jan 09 2007 at 2:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
You're getting schooled in real time right now, by me, for free.
And worth every penny of it!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#49 Jan 09 2007 at 2:37 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
you're left to believe whatever YOU decide is true


When is that ever not the case, whether you're sitting in a college class or sitting at your computer? Just because somebody else says something it must be true? If they have a degree in a particular area of expertise they are infallible?

When it comes to analyzing human behavior, we look at what people actually do. But maybe you're ready for some advanced Epistemological Problems of Economics:

http://www.mises.org/epofe.asp

I never got this stuff at the #1 university in the world for economics. Why is that? There's better stuff on-line for free than paying 125k for a UofC Econ degree (I can mathematically ********** on my own time), you're ticket to trading jobs, investment banking at the likes of Goldman Sachs, etc., along with some filler MBA degree to move up the corporate management ranks if that's your cup of tea.

A piece of paper degree, though, doesn't change facts, discern correct and incorrect, true or false, knowledge and skill. You can daily read examples of the broken window fallacy, i.e. hurricaines are good for the economy because people need to rebuild, from "educated" politicians and pundits. They're st00pid. They get laughed at. And that knowledge of why is filtering through, and it's not coming from the so-called elite economic departments from the likes of MIT, Berkely, et al. People do papers on mmorpg economies. I first started posting regularly at alla because of arguments on the main forum about inflation. Now here I am teeing off on forum=4. All outside of the traditional classroom. It's a *big* trend.
#50 Jan 09 2007 at 2:59 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
When? I said when: when there is no real time feedback. There's no living person there to see the blank looks that say, "I don't get this."

I assume you've never taught.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#51 Jan 09 2007 at 3:11 PM Rating: Decent
Real teachers skip over blank "I don't get this" looks all the time in the name of covering a certain amount of material over a certain period of time. Sharper faster students twiddle their thumbs as the teacher explains it again and again to the slow students. {Yawn}. That's inefficient, especially compared to on-line material being individuallly tailored to each student's speed and ability.

If you don't get it, re-read, do more problem sets, click on further explanation links. Then, when you finally do get it, you can get an 'A' on the on-line exam rather than being rushed through to a C- grade.

You can practice perfect foreign language pronunciation with a microphone, until you get it, when you feel like getting it.

Teachers, especially the K-12 breed, are akin to washing your clothes with a stick in a stream. It's outdated.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 254 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (254)