Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
Well sodomy, between a man and woman OR man and man is actually illegal in many states.... I think.
But do you concider **** sex between man and woman to be immoral?
Let's not ignore the fact that sodomy is in no way required for the spread of AIDS, whether between men and women, or men and men.
If infected fluid--vaginal or seminal--comes into contact with a mucous membrane, transmission may occur. Doesn't matter if the intercourse is oral, ****, or vaginal. In fact, of all these types of intercourse, vaginal intercourse is the most susceptible to transmission, at least from male to female.
The ******, after all, is nothing more than a sheath of mucous membrane--relatively speaking, that's quite a large surface area of extremely permeable tissue. This is why the rate of any STD transmission is much higher from males to females than from females to males--anatomically, the portion of the woman being exposed to male fluids is much more prone to transmission than then portion of the male anatomy being exposed to female fluids. After all, the ***** is comprised mostly of skin, which provides both physical and chemical barriers to infection. A man's main danger of infection comes from the small amount of vaginal fluid which might make its way into the urethra, and small abrasions on the *****.
The same can be said of the mouth, but in that case, the environment is much more hostile to due to salivary and gastric enzymes and acids.
And again, Virus ignores the fact that
heterosexual transmission of HIV has LONG SINCE outpaced homosexual transmission. It's passed male <--> female much, MUCH more often than male <--> male. The reason activism is much higher among gays is because of the early misconception that it was a gay-only disease, so they got started on the activism front much earlier than hets, and gained a lot of momentum before the het population jumped on the bandwagon.