Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

let's talk about ******Follow

#52 Dec 28 2006 at 1:34 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,735 posts
Master NixNot wrote:
So what about us non aids carrying monogamous gay couples? Do we still get to have unnatural gay sex?


Nix...this is varus.

It's like telling Singdall that MS is not the Antichrist.

Just nod, smile, rate down, and move along. He goes away after a while.
#53 Dec 28 2006 at 1:38 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
I think religion is offensive. Your blind adherence to nonsense is repulsive to my sense of logic and reason. And I wish you religos would stop blatantly waving it in everyone's face.
-------------------------------------------------------------

most sinners do. im sure hitler thought as much.


Yet again, shadowrelm demonstrates that he has no earthly clue about anything about which he's running his yap.

Hitler did not, in fact, find religion offensive. Just Judaeism. He frequently studded his public speeches with claims that the ***** were doing Gods work.

#54 Dec 28 2006 at 1:40 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
Homosexuals and rampant drug users are the ones in the high risk categories for contracting aids. Were homosexuality to be a natural endeavor it wouldn't be such a conduit for spreading such a lethal disease.


the logic is astounding. So then how do you account for ALL of the other fatal diseases out there>? Where is the conduit for those?

and once again, WHAT IS SO UNNATURAL ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY?
Dogs fúck cats don't they?

Dogs hump your leg don't they? Are they commiting bestiality!?

If it's because of **** sex.. well
How is is any more unatural then ANY **** sex for that matter? between wahtever gender?



Quote:
reality that aids isn't being spread in the heterosexual community


You are saying that AIDS is not spread in the heterosexual community? That's just plain retarded.



and as for your thing against Africans.. checked the AIDS rate in China lately? neither have they!
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#55 Dec 28 2006 at 1:50 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Virus via Kelvy wrote:
reality that aids isn't being spread in the heterosexual community


I'm not interested enough to go through the trouble of turning off my filter to confirm this, but did Virus actually make this claim? That is f'ucking hilarious.

Apparently he missed the memo that AIDS transmission amongst hets outstripped AIDS transmission among gays like, oh, nearly twenty years ago.

#56 Dec 28 2006 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
oh, nearly twenty years ago.


That's about how dated the info in the article is anyway.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#57 Dec 28 2006 at 2:10 PM Rating: Decent
**
302 posts
Hi, first time posting in this forum, infact i'd never even noticed until today and this subject caught my eye. It's something i've thought a lot about over the years having been prompted by discovering that my (EX) husband was extremely homophobic. It made me wonder why. Why is there such a stigma attached to this lifestyle?

Some personal conclusions and musings I have had are these.

According to medical data we all start "life" as a female foetus, later in development, somewhere within the first 5 weeks, the foetus either develops into a male or remains female. This is just the physical aspect, there is, of course the mental aspect too. To my mind, it strikes me as perfectly natural and perhaps, to some extrent to be expected that in adulthood some people find themselves attracted to the same sex. The scope for, well, for want of a better word, mistakes, is large. This isn't something that society has created or encouraged. It's just that as the world's population increases so does the occurrances of same sex attraction. As has already been said with the rat experimentation references. In other words it is a perfectly natural and expected occurence.

So why do some people find this to be 'icky' when it is natural? Well, this in particular i've thought about a lot. I've noticed that a large proportion of elderly people find homosexuality to be offensive and 'unnatural'. Also a great many conservative people, and, of course Christians. Now aside from Christians, who have other reasons aswell, there is something they all hold in common. This 'group' of people would also be offended if hetrosexual couples flaunted thier sexuality in thier presence. They are the people that stoically avert thier eyes from the pornographic magazines on the top shelf of the shops. The same ones that don't refer to 'that' shop that sells 'those' things. Of course, these things are easily avoided. There is no need to talk about them or acknowledge thier existence in thier lives, unless they want to. To a very large proportion of the population sex is something private, between intimates and not something to be exposed to public scrutiny. It exists, and they know it and accept it, but for the most part it is nothing that requires comment in day to day life.

However, with homosexuality this is different. Due to past feelings of repression, many homosexuals feel the need to shout proudly 'I am Gay! Accept me!', Gay bars, gay clothes, gay marches, gay TV, gay rights, etc, etc. They key word here is "gay". It is an immediate reference to sex. It immediately summons up an imagine. We are all people, either male or female (well most of us) but by this lable a group have now segregated themselves as no longer people, but a sexual orientation instead. For a conservative minded person, to that person who views sex as something private and intimate, this is just pushing it into thier faces. It can't be ignored. As we all know, when something is pushed upon us, we grow angry and resentful to those pushing.

Of course there is always the exception to the rule, some people are just ********, to them there is not explanation, if it were not this it would be something else. Nothing and no one can change them. But for the most part, for the most people who have this 'icky' issue with homosexuality, then time will heal. As things stand, as much as it saddens me to say it, I believe that homosexuals are not accepted totally because they won't allow it themselves.

Sadly what it boils down to is:

The only person who needs to know your sexual orientation is the person you are trying to sleep with. Telling everyone is just too much info.

Grandma will be offended if you walk up to her and tell her you shag the oposite sex too.
#58 Dec 28 2006 at 4:59 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
However, with homosexuality this is different. Due to past feelings of repression, many homosexuals feel the need to shout proudly 'I am Gay! Accept me!'
Imagine that! Someone wanting acceptance in this modern society! In your mind, how is that different than late 1800 early 1900 feminism? People thought that women were inferior, and some brave souls stood up and said "I'm a proud woman, accept me."
Quote:
Gay bars,
Where else are they going to meet? ... You are aware of the reason a lot of people go to bars, aren't you?
Quote:
gay marches,...gay rights,
See my first comment.
Quote:
gay clothes, gay TV,
I'll give that to you, those things are usually over the top.
Quote:
As things stand, as much as it saddens me to say it, I believe that homosexuals are not accepted totally because they won't allow it themselves.
And sadly, I believe that women who wear provocative clothing shouldn't complain about rape. (Of course I don't, but since we were blaming the victim...)
Quote:
The only person who needs to know your sexual orientation is the person you are trying to sleep with. Telling everyone is just too much info.
If I can't let it be general knowledge, and you can't let it be general knowledge, how can we decide if we are going to sleep with one another? I'm all fine with don't ask, don't tell for the military, but to think that homosexuals should live their lives like that in society is very narrow minded.
Quote:
Grandma will be offended if you walk up to her and tell her you shag the oposite sex too.
Yeah? Well fuck grandma then. People don't have a right to not be offended.
#59 Dec 28 2006 at 7:30 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
This thread just reminds me once again that I am a hag without a ***.

[:cryingsmilieifihadpremium:]
#60 Dec 28 2006 at 11:42 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
My best friend is a ****


HAG 4 LIFE!!!!
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#61 Dec 29 2006 at 1:58 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
if you want to blatently wave it in every ones face


I enjoy guys and gals. Is that rubbing your face in it? Or do you mean to say you want me to rub one off on your face?

shadowrelm wrote:
i wont point a finger at homos and yell "sinner".


That's great because I'd just laugh at you if you did. Sin is such a funny concept to me.

shadowrelm wrote:
we are all sinners


Do me a favor and quit trying to fit me into your religious mosaic. In my mind, it's utter nonsense.

shadowrelm wrote:
but dont expect me to cry you a river about homos being persecuted by people or the church.


The thing is, it isn't any of your business what I do behind closed doors. If you or anyone else has issue with my lifestyle, ignore it.
#62 Dec 29 2006 at 2:04 AM Rating: Good
I got all my philosophy from All the Philosophy I Ever needed to Know I Learned from Choose Your Own Adventure Books too!

Sorry, I sincerely apologize if you might have taken offense from my remarks. I was just trying to test out whether the /view count counter was broken or just stuck.

I should've know the MonxDoT Thurs. evening package didn't have the same cache as the regularly scheduled programming. /poke wake up admins

hello? echo? echo? echooooo? echoooooo?

'Twas then that I learned middle forum was more likely to respond to the command, whoa, holy mudda of foddas, how did I end up posting to this thread? Fine, "later", I suppose. :( :P

Edited, Dec 29th 2006 5:31am by MonxDoT
#63 Dec 29 2006 at 2:27 AM Rating: Decent
**
302 posts
Quote:
Quote:
However, with homosexuality this is different. Due to past feelings of repression, many homosexuals feel the need to shout proudly 'I am Gay! Accept me!'
Imagine that! Someone wanting acceptance in this modern society! In your mind, how is that different than late 1800 early 1900 feminism? People thought that women were inferior, and some brave souls stood up and said "I'm a proud woman, accept me."


I had thought that my second paragraph had made it clear what my personal stance on the issue is. However, reading your comments I can see that is wasn't. Well, to clarify; My stance is what I said my stance is, and that is the second paragraph I wrote.

As I also went on to say clearly, these were some musings and conclusions I had come to based upon other peoples reactions. I don't know about other people, but if someones opinion/feelings differ from my own, then I try to understand why. I just want it to make sense to me so I think about it until I can find something that makes sense in my own head. Likening someones sexual preference to feminism isn't exactly a good comparison. Aside from the ability to be married in most - not all - Christian establishments, what else is repressed? Women were not allowed to vote, they were expected not to work. if they did work then they were paid a significantly lower amount than the men performing the same role. There were beaten and raped and there were no laws to protect/help them, society deemed a beaten woman as someone who deserved it, including the police, simply because that was normal. No, i'm sorry, but to my mind it is not the same at all. Not even close.

In saying that though, even for women, the acceptance didn't occur until the 'shouting' stopped and this has been the same throughout history for any groups of people.

Quote:
Quote:
Gay bars,
Where else are they going to meet? ... You are aware of the reason a lot of people go to bars, aren't you?


Yes I am aware. However, bars which actually say "Gay bar" on thier signs, to conservative minded people this is no different to a sign which says "Sex club" . I am NOT saying that I agree with this or that it is my view, because it isn't, but this is how it is. The word gay is a direct reference to sex. Again im not saying its right or wrong that this is so, but it is how society has made it. My point is that the majority of these small minded people that make objections are quite likely merely doing it due to thier own inhibitions regarding sex. Any sex. Thier objections would be the same if the sign read sex club or gay bar. I'm not saying all gay establishments are like this, the same as not all sex clubs are not like this, but too many are. All it takes is some descretion.


Quote:
Quote:
As things stand, as much as it saddens me to say it, I believe that homosexuals are not accepted totally because they won't allow it themselves.
And sadly, I believe that women who wear provocative clothing shouldn't complain about rape. (Of course I don't, but since we were blaming the victim...)


OK, an example of why that is my opinion. There is a healthy gay social scene in my locality. There has been for more years than I care to remember. Bar's clubs etc. A few of the bars are mixed, some predominately gay only. One of these bars has an extra sign up outside that reads Gay meeting place, the others just have thier respective names, nothing out of the ordinary. Huge attention is drawn to the one that has that one word hung up in big letters outside "Gay". Simply because the sign is there is invites anyone who sees it to form a thought. This is where the conservative people get all stupid. In all honesty I very much doubt they even realise themselves that it's just the shock of a public reference to sex that makes them act so, but whatever the cause they do. The thing is, irrelevant of wether the sign says "Gay" on it, everyone knows that gay people go there, the same as the ones without the signs. Thier trade doesn't suffer any. So why on earth invite small minded people to think badly if it isn't needed? Acceptence works two ways. The majority of people don't care what your sexual preference is but they also don't want references to sex thrown around everywhere. ANY sex. Now that is a complete other issue.

Quote:
Quote:
The only person who needs to know your sexual orientation is the person you are trying to sleep with. Telling everyone is just too much info.
If I can't let it be general knowledge, and you can't let it be general knowledge, how can we decide if we are going to sleep with one another? I'm all fine with don't ask, don't tell for the military, but to think that homosexuals should live their lives like that in society is very narrow minded.


Ok, let me clarify. My framily and friends know my sexual orientation. The chap that lives down the road, that I rarely see probably doesn't. Neither does the person in the next city i've never met. In the past, whenever I'd meet someone I liked sexually, then they would know my sexual orientation and I would know thiers. Whatever your sexual preference is, you really don't need to tell everyone you meet. Shouting one minute 'I want to be accepted, treat me the same as everyone else' and then the next announcing 'I am gay!' Is frankly laughable. You are the bloody same! Except that you're some weirdo shouting your sexual preference to everyone. You'd get the same reaction if you shouted "I like cabbages!" - no one cares, we don't need to know.






#64 Dec 29 2006 at 2:37 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Haha, I loved the wiki article I read about Neil Patrick Harris.

Quote:
"The public eye has always been kind to me, and until recently I have been able to live a pretty normal life. Now it seems there is speculation and interest in my private life and relationships. So, rather than ignore those who choose to publish their opinions without actually talking to me, I am happy to dispel any rumors or misconceptions and am quite proud to say that I am a very content gay man living my life to the fullest and feel most fortunate to be working with wonderful people in the business I love."
Link


I read that somewhere else first (probably The A.V Club) and it put a humorous spin on it.

Is that rubbing peoples faces in it? I'm trying to get the hang of this.
#65 Dec 29 2006 at 2:48 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
As I also went on to say clearly, these were some musings and conclusions I had come to based upon other peoples reactions.


Bad. Dirty. Nobody should be free to think anything but. Good. Clean. Explanations. Excuses. So basically, you're losing until they're dead or you're dead. Gang banging indeed. Tolerance is such a post-Constantinian concept.

Edited, Dec 29th 2006 5:56am by MonxDoT
#66 Dec 29 2006 at 2:58 AM Rating: Good
That Neil Patrick Harris confession is then nothing but an oily-sandy massage lie. Why would he play a hetero sex-starved celebrity ******* in as recent a movie as Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle? I guess even Doogie Houser M.D. loses patience now and then. And thus the zealots religiously and culturally convert. Doogie. Strippers. Hell, I remember the mini McCaully Culkin strip club scandal. I mean it's such total discrimination to have faqs playing str8s, now Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle is ruined for me in exactly the same way Six Days, Seven Nights is ruined for me.
#67 Dec 29 2006 at 3:07 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Always glad to help out Monx. Let me know if you need anything else ruined.
#68 Dec 29 2006 at 3:16 AM Rating: Good
Yeah, you could tell me interacial black schlongs can't be mine. :P
#69REDACTED, Posted: Dec 29 2006 at 7:20 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) What amazes me is the blinders you people are willing to wear to ignore the situation in a feeble, and obvious, attempt to feel good about yourself because you're so "understanding."
#70 Dec 29 2006 at 7:27 AM Rating: Decent
MonxDoT wrote:
That Neil Patrick Harris confession is then nothing but an oily-sandy massage lie. Why would he play a hetero sex-starved celebrity @#%^ in as recent a movie as Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle? I guess even Doogie Houser M.D. loses patience now and then. And thus the zealots religiously and culturally convert. Doogie. Strippers. Hell, I remember the mini McCaully Culkin strip club scandal. I mean it's such total discrimination to have faqs playing str8s, now Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle is ruined for me in exactly the same way Six Days, Seven Nights is ruined for me.


If Neil Patrick Harris' being gay ruins HAROLD AND KUMAR for you, that's just sad and you need to get over yourself.

If Anne Heche's being gay ruined SIX DAYS, SEVEN NIGHTS for you, then you have very bad taste in movies. The only thing that should have ruined that movie for you is the fact that it was so predictably mediocore.

Also, Anne Heche being a lesbian only makes her ALL THE MORE HOT!

Never trust a man who doesn't like lesbians. That's my motto.
#71 Dec 29 2006 at 7:46 AM Rating: Good
OMG! Anne Heche is a lesbian too!

Quote:
She's a lesbian! A lesbian! I know, she told me ... does that make him gay? --Slapshot


The disclosure just gets more cruel and unusual. I thought she just had "small" tits and was too opinionated. Now she's a lesbian too? Like Doogie? No, no, no, please stop. I've got enough.

Edited, Dec 29th 2006 10:44am by MonxDoT
#72 Dec 29 2006 at 8:17 AM Rating: Decent
MonxDoT wrote:
OMG! Anne Heche is a lesbian too!

Quote:
She's a lesbian! A lesbian! I know, she told me ... does that make him gay? --Slapshot


The disclosure just gets more cruel and unusual. I thought she just had "small" tits and was too opinionated. Now she's a lesbian too? Like Doogie? No, no, no, please stop. I've got enough.

Edited, Dec 29th 2006 10:44am by MonxDoT


SMALL TITS?!

Jesus Christ, man! Have you not seen GIRLS IN PRISON?! Have you not seen her gettin' down widda hot ***** action with Joan Chen in that movie whose name I cannot remember? Her tits are like... PERFECT!

AND SHE'S A LESBIAN! BONUS!!

What's wrong with you?
#73 Dec 29 2006 at 8:22 AM Rating: Good
Hey, that's why I put it in "quotes". Harrison Ford said it, not me. I like 'em on the smaller side myself (no, not underage, you sickos), and find implanted artificial ones the most disgusting detestable abominations you could ever /laugh at.
#74 Dec 29 2006 at 8:36 AM Rating: Good
Sadly what it boils down to is:

The only person who needs to know your sexual orientation is the person you are trying to sleep with. Telling everyone is just too much info.

Grandma will be offended if you walk up to her and tell her you shag the oposite sex too.
--------------------------------------------------------------
absolutly agree. the mental immage of two men kissing has the same impact on me as two 100 year old people having sex. icky. to have a bunch of people try and shove that immage on me is 1. offending 2. rude 3. unnecessary.

i dont care who sleeps with who. really. i dont care who marries who, who shacks up with who, who cheats with who. i really dont care. go ahead. have at it.

but if your going to slap me in the face with it, then ill slap you in the face with my intollarance. something the republicans figured out and played like a trump card in the last few elections. the more they yelled anti gay stuff, the more gays stood up and shouted back, the more non-gays fought back at the polls.

we are such pawns.

the whole thing about aids is just stupid. it spread faster in the gay community because of unprotected sex with multiple partners. most gays just cant find lasting committment like non-gays. adn thus, it is more likely to spread in that envoroment. currently, the fastest growing population of people getting aids is teens and young adults, not gays. the more treatments we have, the longer they live, the less people are threatened by it, the more unprotected sex with multiple partners.

aids is just repeating a pattern we have seen through out history with siphilis, gonerreha, and herpies. all of which were deadly in their time. the only differance is aids is 100 percent fatal. its not if, just when.

sexually transmitted desiese is a result of sexual promiscuity. something that has always been part of humanity and will probably always be. its not a gay thing, its a sex thing.

you want to be gay? go ahead. no one really cares untill politicans bring it up during election time. it has always been part of us, will always be part of us.

you want to shove something in the face of the other 95 percent of the population who find it repulsive? be prepared to be buried and ostracized in a most public way. stupid is as stupid does.

close the door and do what you will. no one cares. no one. but dont stand on a pedsital and try to make people care. most of us find it repulsive. im not talking from a moral point of view either, or a religious one. im talking on a basic subconscious level, a part of me that just says....ewwwww.
#75 Dec 29 2006 at 8:37 AM Rating: Decent
****** ARE PEOPLE, TOO!

And in other news, lesbians are AWESOME. Lesbians who are "gay for pay," and who engage in lesbianatic activities purely for the sake of my own personal arousal, are the best human beings on the face of the earth. *****-swapping lesbians are the most awesome beings in the universe.

That is all.

EDIT: To make it more family-friendly.

Edited, Dec 29th 2006 10:35am by bloodywilliam
#76 Dec 29 2006 at 8:40 AM Rating: Good
Don't go digging your sexual-orientation ***** too deep, bloodywilliam the Brilliant. I believe we're on Orange Alert in this forum. Fine, I'll even throw in a 10% off Barbarella coupon.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 360 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (360)