let's talk about ******Follow

Social pathology is really just a scientific term in this context, it is not meant to label somnething as bad. Anything different from the norm could be labeled as such, and this does not make it bad. In fact one could argue that given the world population, it is a good thing. (I am not making that arguement just giving an example) I would consider it overall an adaptation.




Edited, Dec 28th 2006 11:40am by fhrugby

This sure is an elaborate way to come out of the closet, homeslice. Don't worry, I don't think any less of you.

Oh my. Where to start?

First of all, Hitler professed to be a Christian. Second, the man who said "religion is the opiate of the masses" was Karl Marx, who was never a dictator of anything. He wrote books.



And at one point in our history, an equal number of Americans thought African-Americans were less than human. A majority of Spaniards thought the Inquisition was a good thing when witches and heretics were regularly being burned at the stake. A majority of people at one point thought the Earth revolved around the Sun until Copernicus came along. At one point, a majority of people thought illness was caused by "bad humors." At one point, a majority of people thought mentally ill individuals were possessed by demons.

And, in all of these hopelessly wrongheaded ideas, religion was the driving force. It was science and reason that eventually showed people the error of their ways.

Thomas Jefferson said, "The majority is always wrong."



The reason you can't go into logic and reason to defend your faith is because logic and reason have nothing to do with it. Faith and reason are antithetical.



No it doesn't. See above.



Apparently, you feel the need to "loose" your ignorant opinions upon the world, backed up by the fact that a lot of people are just as hopelessly deluded as you are.

As to what you have to "lose," that's a whole other story. And your argument has been well-refuted on these forums and in many other places and I will refrain from further dignifying your silliness.



I couldn't say. I didn't see any.

Edited, Dec 28th 2006 11:07am by bloodywilliam

Oops.

Sun revolved around the Earth is what I meant to write, of course. I'll refrain from editing my post so your response will not cease to make sense.

I always knew Copernicus and Galileo were full of ****.

Not to pick nits but Blade Runner is one of my favorite movies and I couldn't help but notice ...


IF you were going for the quote from Blade Runner, the actual location should be


As in the star that constitutes the shoulder of the constellation Orion the Hunter.



Of course, if that's not the quote you were going for, then disregard what I just said and carry on... =)

What is this? KriegmaschineVondentoten corrects everything bloodywilliam says day?

Okay, okay. I'll CHANGE it. Thanks for shattering my image of myself as a tried and true BLADE RUNNER fanatic.

If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes.

Edited, Dec 28th 2006 12:40pm by bloodywilliam

What about that period of time when the Christians in Europe decided Christ was coming back any minute so they stopped showering and did nothing but pray, eat bread, drink water, and congregate? And then they helped spread The Black Death with all their deviant non-bathed prayer?

Good times.

Edited, Dec 28th 2006 1:04pm by bloodywilliam

Obvious connection between homosexuality and aids? Goodness gracious. Aids is a blood borne disease and can be transmitted just as readily between a man and a woman as between a man and a man or a man and a monkey.

The OP's question: I'd agree mostly with Kelvy that the relative proportions have remained more or less constant. If it's genetic, however, it would seem that over enough generations of 'accepted homosexuality' that the ****-gene would be bread out - simply because homosexuals, at least in current practices, don't make as many kids.

That would leave homosexualism being due to mutation, upbringing or perhaps some kind of teratogenic effect.

What I find even more perplexing, however, is that some people prefer vanilla over chocolate.

....

maybe you should persuade me into remaining hetero

Nah, women are ********

...

g'night folks!

So what about us non aids carrying monogamous gay couples? Do we still get to have unnatural gay sex?