If it isnt a blonde haired, blue eyed baby boy just toss itFollow

Alpha children are Gurus. They work much harder than we do, because they're so frightfully clever. I'm really awfuly glad I'm a Sage, because I don't work so hard. And then we are much better than the Scholars and Defaults. Sub-Defaults are stupid.

Gattaca anyone?

Is that really a bad thing?

We will all dress fabulous and the obesity epidemic in this country (since teh ghey seem to enact their mating rituals at the gym)

Damn I'm glad that all my children are blonde and blue eyed then! Only one girl, out of 4 so not too shabby!

My major is molecular biology and genetics.

It's only ethical as long as it's used for screening genetical defects. People should stop being sexists and be thankful for having healthy kids.

The ratio of each genders in population is balanced and any outside force to manipulate this will only cause problems if we consider some cultures which value having male offsprings over female ones.



One thing rules the world after all and it's money. Of course they'll do anything to get it. Sad.. Science shouldn't be a tool for such nonsense.

Actually, my wife and I looked into this - to have a girl. We decided against it. Turns out, at the time we investigated, statistically it is no better then what you can do at home, for free. And it was pricey.

Now we have a baby girl. No need to think about it, as we only wanted at least one girl. We plan to have two, so before the first, the odds were 25% for no girls - which is pretty big.

lets find the farthest right conservative republicans there are, and they can regulate it.... I weep for the future :(
Why must ppl insist that the government have there hands in how we do any thing?

I don't know if you've been paying attention to society at large for the last decade or so, but there's been quite the little suppression of those aggressive instincts in the human male. Or, if that's too obtuse, they're all becoming complete saps.

Not everywhere, not all the time, but there is a definte shift.

That aside - where the hell do you get "aggression == crime"?? Maybe it just means that Rugby will become a world sport; and forthright, ambulance chasing lawyers become gods in our eyes.

Besides, I think we've skewed natural selection more with societal change than we ever would with science.

No, I will ask you if you really think those in power are representative of the populace as a whole.



Really? Please provide documentation where it is the ONLY factor in crime surges.



So wait - you agree with what I say yet you're still arguing against me? WTH? I should stop now, but I like the punchline.



Better legal systems lower the innate aggression of males?



Again, please explain how maleness is the ONLY factor in this crime surge.



Yes I'm quite impressed. Largely by the depth of your stupidity in dismissing a sport or other activites and not realizing that there's more than one outlet for aggression besides crime. Anyway, admit it - you only played for a year because you were there to pick up guys. Then you either got banged by the team or found yerself a nice little fishy love affair.

It's all experimentation in high school, it's ok. Just post pics for the "boys" here.

Not they're not but they didn't grow up on another planet either.



Celcio... Please.. Did I say that? Did I say aggression is the ONLY reason of crime?



In some cases, yes. I know some cases that have been worked on where the criminal prefers wounding someone instead of killing because the former one has a milder punishment? I'm neither a criminologist nor a profiler, just stating my thoughts.



I never used the word ONLY yet you're taking words out of **** again.



I tried to keep the level of discussion decent but your arrogance and stupidity proved me wrong. I never said aggression is the freaking only reason for crime. And what made you such an arrogant ******* Celcio, lack of female attention? And no thank you I never had to do anything to to catch the attention of males. Because I prefer staying away retards like you.

No....the ones with defects are never being born.

If it came to being mentally handicapped or not existing, I'd choose the latter.














[Foresees some retort of or relating to "Then why are you alive?"]


As far as choosing what my child is as far as male/female, eye color, hair color, etcetera, I'll let nature do the work there.

Do I think it should be regulated? Absolutely. Not for ethics but accuracy and it should definitely be regulated if failure causes an undesired effect; which it probably will.

And what have we been talking about this entire thread now, hmm?