Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

WoWFollow

#1 Dec 19 2006 at 8:28 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
I'm actually really enjoying playing.

Sack up and quit being ********
#2 Dec 19 2006 at 8:35 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Send me a PM when you find a PvE Alliance server and start raiding or have PvP/PvE Horde server and start raiding.

Until then Shadowpriests melt faces, not my ice cold attitude towards WoW.

Edited, Dec 19th 2006 4:38pm by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#3 Dec 19 2006 at 8:41 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I've been having fun playing again too. Really looking forward to the expansion. I'd like to say I won't make one of the new characters, but I know better.
#4 Dec 19 2006 at 8:53 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
I too am vastly enjoying the game again. It's just too bad I'm nowhere close in level to anybody else. Ony and Psichi are trying to catch up to Moe, who is trying to catch up to me, who is trying to catch up to Aadynn.

In either case, it'll be along time before we start raiding, bhodi. However, with the current look of things, I might be starting anew, since TFS has pretty much told all its lower-level players that they won't be participating in the raids come expansion time. If I do start again, it'll definately be horde; I've only played alliance with any real consistency, and I'd like to see the other side of the game.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#5 Dec 19 2006 at 8:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
However, with the current look of things, I might be starting anew, since TFS has pretty much told all its lower-level players that they won't be participating in the raids come expansion time.


That's their answer to the smaller raid sizes? Seems pretty short-sighted.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#6 Dec 19 2006 at 9:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
They didn't come right out and say it. Instead, they said:

Quote:
Raid attendence will mean something to this guild in a VERY short time. Those that never show up, will not be asked to come on 25-man raids, simply because we won't have space. We work fantastically as a team. Our core members can progress through content very rapidly. So when only our core members are necessary, our guild will be one of the top raiding guilds on the server, EVEN IF WE ONLY RAID A FEW TIMES A WEEK.


And:

Quote:
Raids will be 25-man in the XPac. Ultimately raid space is going to become a premium commodity. If we field one team, then yes, 25 people will get to raid come raid night, and the rest will sit the bench.


So basically, those that can't make a serious time commitment to show up at nearly every raid will just have to sit on the bench, unless there are enough bench warmers to field another raid, and those that aren't even raiding yet (i.e. me, Moe, Onyxia, Psichi, and any other Asylumite that just started up again) are going to be doing PuGs because the "core members" are too busy making sure that their raid attendance is perfect to do anything else.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#7 Dec 19 2006 at 9:21 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
I like casual raiding. Which 25 man raids provide.

In EQ2 where it is 24 man raids the guild myself and DSD were in managed to raid 3 nights a week with about 30-35 players. 30-35 meant that few people ever had to sit on the bench. Also meant that people with kids, real life stuff could miss a raid and things would still move along.

With the Asylum people we could probably snatch a core group of gamers say in 10-15 steady and then only have to shop for say 15 more (which we could easily poach from TFS or other guilds).

Set up a casual raid guild of like minded people, 25 people means less competition for uber lewts so less of a dkp nightmare.

I'd be interested but there is no way in hell I am leveling another toon up to 1-60. Only works if I can transfer.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#8 Dec 19 2006 at 9:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Alright. If we get enough people interested in an Asylum guild in WoW (again) with the express purpose of raiding, I'll be down. Of course, we'd have to decide between alliance and horde, and as you said, I don't relish the idea of leveling a toon from scratch AGAIN, which would mean I'm partial to alliance.

Is anybody else interested besides me and bhodi, or is everybody else just in this for the casual kicks and not the end-game experience?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#9 Dec 19 2006 at 9:46 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
I really despise the whole no pvp/Pve transfer deal. If it wasnt for that it would be fairly simple for all of us to congregate, even if it was only to do 5 man strat runs or the occassional 10man ubrs.

We are however limited and there will always be divides over pvp vs pve and alliance vs horde.

Oh well until you guys have things hammered out I will be raiding in eq2.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#10 Dec 19 2006 at 10:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
With the Asylum people we could probably snatch a core group of gamers say in 10-15 steady and then only have to shop for say 15 more (which we could easily poach from TFS or other guilds).

Set up a casual raid guild of like minded people, 25 people means less competition for uber lewts so less of a dkp nightmare.

I'd be interested but there is no way in hell I am leveling another toon up to 1-60. Only works if I can transfer.


Yeah, for the 20 minutes it would last.

No, thanks. Stayin' where I am.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#11 Dec 19 2006 at 10:44 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Yeah, what Sam said. Stayin' on Steamwheedle, tyvm.
#12 Dec 19 2006 at 1:12 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
From the begining I said I wasnt in it for the raids.

I dont have the time to dedicate.

Edit: I never stopped having fun.. well, until you pigfuckers abandoned me.

Edited, Dec 19th 2006 4:17pm by PsiChi
#13 Dec 19 2006 at 1:51 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
I just barely got my warrior to 60 and got an epic mount. I'm not going anywhere. Unless it's on Shadow Council Alliance I doubt I'll be going anywhere for you MMO-ADD whores.
#14 Dec 19 2006 at 2:51 PM Rating: Decent
I have 3 level 60 toons on Silverhand (2 horde, 1 alliance) Wouldn't take too much to get another to 60 on another server, but I would have to take a break from EQ2 and Silverhand to do it.
#15 Dec 19 2006 at 3:59 PM Rating: Decent
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
However, with the current look of things, I might be starting anew, since TFS has pretty much told all its lower-level players that they won't be participating in the raids come expansion time.


That's their answer to the smaller raid sizes? Seems pretty short-sighted.


I'd love to hear your guys' solution.

Here's what we got.

We have 25ish players that show up and attend every single raid, and have since they joined.

When the expansion rolls around and there are new dungeons, with the largest being 25 man, what are we supposed to tell them? If there was/is an alternative our guild will work to achieve that, but i just dont see how we can cram the 40 people that want to raid in a 25 man instance.

You guys are making it sound like we are a bunch of pricks when the only reason it's a problem is because of the new caps. With the current 40 mans everyone does get to raid, since we have near 40 people that want to. It's pretty basic.

If you have some ideas that don't tell our members that have put some serious time into this guild (what we are calling our "core members") to sit out ever we'd love to consider it. Otherwise it's just not fair to make those people sit on the sideline when we know we can count on them. Ideally a static raid group is the way to go. You dont have to explain things over and over and everyone knows what everyone else does.

So please, enlighten me.
#16 Dec 19 2006 at 4:01 PM Rating: Good
****
5,492 posts
I dont Raid... I love hangin out with TFS... I WON'T join another Asylum/Allah guild because, lets face it, yall are fickle fuckers and I like where im at. Stability FTW.

I plan to PvP to get my gear which will be comparable to Raid gear.

#17 Dec 19 2006 at 4:54 PM Rating: Decent
Demea wrote:
TFS has pretty much told all its lower-level players that they won't be participating in the raids come expansion time.


That's patently, if not blatantly, false. Nothing was ever said about lower levels not being able to raid. As people said repeatedly on our forums and as KT said here already, if the cap is 25 people, only 25 people can be in the raid. If more people than that show up for a raid, there has to be some way to discern who'll be raiding and who won't. Here's the important part, so I'll bold it for emphasis: nobody has decided what that method will be. How you came about this notion that people who aren't 60 now won't be able to raid is beyond me.

If you still think you won't be able to participate in raids when you hit 60 (or 70 as the case may be), despite numerous people saying otherwise, then I guess nobody can stop you from leaving. However, if you decide to give me the benefit of the doubt, level to 60/70 and then want to raid, I give you my word as someone who's been in the guild since before we even had 4 level 60s that you'll be able to.
#18 Dec 19 2006 at 5:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Well, some big ol' DEFENSIVE buttons got pushed.


____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#19 Dec 19 2006 at 5:21 PM Rating: Good
***
2,196 posts
I'm sort of just leveling up a toon on each of the following servers, depending on who's on to chat with: Shadow Council, Anetheron, and Cenarion Circle.

It's been fun getting back into the game. TFS guild is a lot of fun on Anetheron, it's great chatting with Neph and Goat on Shadow Council, and Cenarion Circle is cool because it's a PST server and I'm guilded with folks on another board I frequent.

I'm definitely going to roll up a Draenei and Blood Elf. As to where, well, most likely Shadow Council. Everyone here seems to still have some toons on there in some form or another.

Any which way, I'm restarting from scratch (unless I go back to Feathermoon where my wife plays, but its server queues are hideous). It will be quite a while before I can even consider raiding - something I would like to do at some point. Maybe by then, things will have fallen into place.



____________________________
'Lo, there do I see, the line of my people, back to the beginning, 'lo do they call to me, they bid me take my place among them, in the halls of Valhalla, where the brave...may live...forever.

X-Box 360 Gamer Tag - Smogster
#20 Dec 19 2006 at 5:26 PM Rating: Decent
Sure I'm being defensive, but at the same time I enjoy having Saern, Aadynn, Psichi and the like in the guild, so I'd rather them not quit because of what is essentially miscommunication.
#21 Dec 19 2006 at 5:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Understood, of course.

Always good to have a pool of good players to draw from, since your regulars can't possibly make every raid every week, unless they have no lives at all. If they're happy PVP'in' while the rest of you raid, that works. /shrug
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#22 Dec 19 2006 at 5:54 PM Rating: Decent
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Yeah i was being 100% sincere. I would love it if everyone could raid with everyone as i like the vast majority of the guild, but I really dont see a way thats gonna happen with the new caps.

Not about disliking anyone, or not wanting to include anybody. The guild just doesnt have a whole lot of choice as far as i can see.

#23 Dec 19 2006 at 6:18 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
Samira wrote:
Well, some big ol' DEFENSIVE buttons got pushed.


One of the resident "I have sand in my ******" ***** was his or her normal brash self when this issue came up and things were blown out of proportion.




mchao wrote:
Sure I'm being defensive, but at the same time I enjoy having Saern, Aadynn, Psichi and the like in the guild, so I'd rather them not quit because of what is essentially miscommunication.
I wouldnt leave out of fear of not being able to raid. I know I dont have the time to dedicate to being a raider, so it was never a concern of mine. Hell, I usually don't have time to run through DM or Stocks, how would I be able to do a raid?
#24 Dec 19 2006 at 6:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
Well, some big ol' DEFENSIVE buttons got pushed.
Plus they managed to find a way to make guild drama boring...
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Dec 19 2006 at 7:15 PM Rating: Good
****
5,492 posts
mchao wrote:
Sure I'm being defensive, but at the same time I enjoy having Saern, Aadynn, Psichi and the like in the guild, so I'd rather them not quit because of what is essentially miscommunication.
Learn2Read my above post you nublet....
#26 Dec 19 2006 at 7:42 PM Rating: Decent
I just like lumping all you in one group so I can blame stuff on "them there Asylumers".
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 268 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (268)