Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Happy Feet is gay.... wtf?Follow

#1 Nov 30 2006 at 9:10 AM Rating: Decent
Per Demea's request for new posts (so blame him):



There's a video on www.cnn.com to the effect of conservatives claiming that the movie Happy Feet is both a environmentalist statement and the story of the main character is a metaphor about homosexuality.


I lost a few brain cells trying to figure out the logic of the last part of that. There's a theme of "Different = good thing", which one would think would be a positive message to send out (It could be applied to race, nationality, sexual orientation, even being emo and such. Not to FFXI though.), but to blindly narrow it down to "omg t3h gheyz!!" hurts me in the head.
#2 Nov 30 2006 at 9:25 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
So good dancer=ghey?
#3 Nov 30 2006 at 9:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
+1.

In any case, I find it hilarious that American culture tries to hard to encourage kids to be "different" and "unique", then turns around and bashes people for their lack of conformity to the American ideal.

As to the movie, it may or may not be gay, but it is so totally ghey.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#4 Nov 30 2006 at 9:26 AM Rating: Decent
**
703 posts
Why does everything have to labeled as something other than what it is? This is a cartoon about a dancing penguin. That's it. Not every movie is made with an ulterior motive or some deep, hidden meaning.
#5 Nov 30 2006 at 9:29 AM Rating: Good
MissMandie wrote:
Why does everything have to labeled as something other than what it is? This is a cartoon about a dancing penguin. That's it. Not every movie is made with an ulterior motive or some deep, hidden meaning.
How dare they question the sanctity of cartoon movies! For shame!






Edited, Nov 30th 2006 12:35pm by Elderon
#6 Nov 30 2006 at 9:31 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I don't know about CNN, but there's an op-ed in USA Today that includes Happy Feet as part of a larger commentary on children's culture in general, but the complaint about gay overtones is actually referring to a children's book: And Tango Makes Three.

Here ya go.
They misspelled pwns.

Quote:
A few families of students in Shiloh, a town of 11,000 people 20 miles east of St. Louis, object to the general availability of And Tango Makes Three, an illustrated storybook that loosely follows the real-life story of two male penguins at New York City's Central Park Zoo who adopted a fertilized egg and raised the chick as their own. With its enthusiastic celebration of little Tango's good fortune at possessing "two fathers," and with the narrative's fanciful suggestion that the zoo keeper "thought to himself ... they must be in love," the book clearly took a position in the ongoing arguments about same-sex coupling and homosexual families. In fact, the story concludes with the observation that Silo and Roy "discovered each other in 1996 and have been a couple ever since."



Happy Feet was criticized because the content was deemed too dark for young children.
Quote:
The studio promoted the picture as a feel-good frolic for the whole family, featuring an endorsement quote that promised, "Adults and kids alike will be dancing in the aisles."
Then later,
Quote:
The endearing creatures on screen face the deadly menace of leopard seals, killer whales and, most of all, human pollution, overconsumption and exploitation. In the advance screening I attended, one worried mother of a 5-year-old took her anxious, fretful, anguished little boy from the theater during the film's relentless scenes of cute and cuddly penguins in intense pain and deadly peril.


Edited, Nov 30th 2006 11:34am by Atomicflea
#7 Nov 30 2006 at 9:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
MissMandie wrote:
Why does everything have to labeled as something other than what it is? This is a cartoon about a dancing penguin. That's it. Not every movie is made with an ulterior motive or some deep, hidden meaning.

That doesn't stop people from extrapolating hidden meaning from everything, though. Look at modern art; show me a painting of a naked woman cradling a bowl a peaches on a snowbank, and I'll give you a dozen different hidden meanings behind it, none of which are probably the original intent of the artist.

Just because the movie wasn't intended to be a gay euphamism doesn't mean that it isn't.

Edit: Cuz eye kant spel

Edited, Nov 30th 2006 11:37am by Demea
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#8 Nov 30 2006 at 9:35 AM Rating: Decent
Here's some of the stuff being said about the movie:

http://www.stonescryout.org/archives/2006/11/mocking_religio.html wrote:
Mocking Religion, Happy Feet is Not a Friendly Little Film
I can't remember coming out of movie theater more furious than I did this Thanksgiving holiday after watching the animated and PG-rated Happy Feet. With relatives visiting from around the country, how could we go wrong taking both kids and adults to a cute little penguin story with lots of singing and dancing, with warm and fuzzy animal themes?

I'm not a movie prude; we check out many kinds of movies. And I expect most anything coming out of Hollywood, with any rating, to include something contrary to my values. I let most of it roll off my back. But with Happy Feet, I didn't expect my conservative Christian family to be assaulted with what we all recognized as a anti-Christian screed, with open mockery of traditional Christian preaching against values and lifestyles contrary to church teachings. It was abundantly clear that Happy Feet substituted homosexuality with dancing as the "different" lifestyle that was the unfair target of an Inquisition on ice. It was Dirty Dancing and Footloose all over again, but with the rhetoric and situation developed to make religious criticism of homosexuality counter to everything good and pleasing.

Did they think Christians wouldn’t notice? I suppose the creators just didn’t care. We had four families attending Happy Feet, with children of all ages. Independently, parents concluded during the film that they would walk out if it wouldn’t be a disruption to others in the large group of family members who had come to the movies together.

Clearly, we should have all left together.

The creators of Happy Feet should have taken less time mocking Christians and more time making sense out of the wild leaps at the end of the film, when the dancing penguin so impresses crowds in the aquarium that they release him back into the wild. And when the community of penguins gets happy feet, the commentators of the world decide its time to stop disrupting their food supply. (Of course the humans are to blame for all the animal woes; a long movie-making tradition that goes back to Bambi).

Wild leaps, even with happy feet.

For Christians who have not seen Happy Feet and are considering it as a friendly, family film—make another choice. This film is not good for children or families, and it is another Hollywood example of open mockery of Christian traditions.



Mind you this is just one random person, but there's enough out there that they're getting mention in the news, so...
#9 Nov 30 2006 at 9:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Quote:
But with Happy Feet, I didn't expect my conservative Christian family to be assaulted with what we all recognized as a anti-Christian screed, with open mockery of traditional Christian preaching against values and lifestyles contrary to church teachings.

Oh noes! They don't conform to the same ancient, outdated, discriminatory dogma that I do! Call in the lawyers!

Quote:
Did they think Christians wouldn’t notice?

More importantly, did they think Christians wouldn't strap a cross on their backs and raise all hell to try and influence an audience that just won't listen to them anymore?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#10 Nov 30 2006 at 10:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
I can't remember coming out of movie theater more furious than I did this Thanksgiving holiday after watching the animated and PG-rated Happy Feet.


I couldn't even get past the first sentence without snarfing.

I am *so* going to hell.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#11 Nov 30 2006 at 10:32 AM Rating: Good
Is this from the same folks that stated the Hyenas in the Lion King were Drugged up ****** Homosexuals?
#12 Nov 30 2006 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"So good dancer=ghey?" --FleaJo1

No, just Robin Williams' comedy routines are ghey. He hasn't been funny since... ummm, never.

Totem
#13 Nov 30 2006 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
I can't remember coming out of movie theater more furious than I did this Thanksgiving holiday after watching the animated and PG-rated Happy Feet.


I couldn't even get past the first sentence without snarfing.

I am *so* going to hell.


S'ok, Ive got a first class ticket joining you. I laughed my *** off reading that.
#14 Nov 30 2006 at 10:36 AM Rating: Decent
Atomicflea wrote:
The endearing creatures on screen face the deadly menace of leopard seals, killer whales and, most of all, human pollution, overconsumption and exploitation. In the advance screening I attended, one worried mother of a 5-year-old took her anxious, fretful, anguished little boy from the theater during the film's relentless scenes of cute and cuddly penguins in intense pain and deadly peril.


Well now we know why it beat the new Bond movie.

Edited, Nov 30th 2006 7:40pm by Kaelesh
#15 Nov 30 2006 at 11:02 AM Rating: Decent
Thinking about it, I can't help but giggle at the lunacy of this statement:

Quote:
Of course the humans are to blame for all the animal woes; a long movie-making tradition that goes back to Bambi


Well if we're not doing it, who is? Aliens? Oh wait, there's no life on other planets, right?

/duh
#16 Nov 30 2006 at 1:45 PM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
Kermit the frog is gay?
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#17 Nov 30 2006 at 2:23 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
A bunch of little penguins dancing sounds like a gay movie to me.
#18 Nov 30 2006 at 3:14 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Flea quoted earlier:
Quote:
The endearing creatures on screen face the deadly menace of leopard seals, killer whales and, most of all, human pollution, overconsumption and exploitation. In the advance screening I attended, one worried mother of a 5-year-old took her anxious, fretful, anguished little boy from the theater during the film's relentless scenes of cute and cuddly penguins in intense pain and deadly peril.


and my mind boggled. Did these people ever watch Bambi? The Aristocrats? Snow White? Sleeping Beauty? Read Charlottes Web? Recite those grisly poems and nursery rhymes like Ring around the rosey or Rockabye baby?

Most childrens stuff out there when stripped of its cute cuddliness has a story to tell, and a lot of the times, it can be pretty gruesome. But I dont think any of us could say we left disturbed after watching a Disney Classic or reading a bedtime nursery. I keep thinking of that skit with Jim Carey still attatched to his umbillical cord and mother as a 30 yr old adult. Many of todays parents have got to learn how to loosen them apron strings
#19 Nov 30 2006 at 3:38 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
So good dancer=ghey?


gay or brown.

Either way the conservatives would be pissed off.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#20 Nov 30 2006 at 3:58 PM Rating: Decent
Being a conservative, even I'll admit that the notion that Happy Feet promotes homosexuality is absurd. I don't feel like my beliefs were "assaulted."

that article linked wrote:
he League's complaint: that Disney is planting subliminal sex messages in its animated films, such as an erection in The Little Mermaid and clouds of dust in The Lion King that spell out S-E-X.


This is true, though. You can look on the cover of the video's box and one of the towers clearly looks like a phallus. I have freeze framed The Lion King at that moment, and it did spell out S-E-X. Quite a bit of innuendo in "The Road to El Dorado" as well.
#21 Nov 30 2006 at 11:05 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Aha! I've been spending weeks telling the guys at work that liking Happy Feet is gay! There's a trailer for it on our demo feed at work, and one guy plays it constantly, all the time. I'm so sick of it now and constantly have "Somebody to Love" stuck in my head.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#22 Dec 01 2006 at 5:54 AM Rating: Default
was happy feet good or was it gay or what i wanna see it cus tapdanceing pinguins are adorible...arg bad grammer
#23 Dec 01 2006 at 9:26 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
illg wrote:
was happy feet good or was it gay or what i wanna see it cus tapdanceing pinguins are adorible...arg bad grammer


Seriously...what the fuck.
#24 Dec 01 2006 at 9:28 AM Rating: Good
Iamadam wrote:
Kermit the frog is gay?
What else do you call a male frog that's always walking around with a guys hand up his ***? Other than "Bodhi".
#25 Dec 01 2006 at 9:32 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Lol. **** bhodi jokes are always fresh.

Totem
#26 Dec 01 2006 at 9:46 PM Rating: Decent
the penguin is trying to mate with another penguin voiced by brittany murphy, so hes clearly not gay. it is heavily environmentalist though
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 357 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (357)