Nexa wrote:
I understand what you're saying, but racism is *already* institutionalized by our society at the most basic levels. AA seeks to *counter* an already existing institutionalization of racism in the only effective way that the government can at this point, unattractive as it is to you and I. Once AA is unnecessary to put all of our citizens on equal footing (or at least try to), I'm all for ditching it. You know, in a perfect world...
No. An institution is an "official" part of some structure. Racism
occurs in our society. It
exists. It is not institutionalized. Unless you can show me where in the law it says that black folks can't get the same opportunities as white folks, you can't say it's institutionalized. Well. You can, but then you're not using the word correctly.
Can we please acknowledge that there is a huge difference between something we don't like occuring in violation of the law within a country, and the country actually creating laws that require that this same bad thing occur? You can't hope to prevent the small percentage of people who'll apply racist ideas by creating laws that create more racial division. You'll only make the problem worse, not better.
If the government provided a 15% subsidy to white owners of mexican-food restaraunts on the thinking that mexican's have an unfair advantage in that field due to their historically superior burrito cooking skills, would you not agree that was unfair? Now explain how it's fair to apply similar subsidies to mexican business owners seeking contract work purely because historically white folks have gained the majority of past contracts?
It's the same inequity. And the fact that most people actually think those two are different is a huge part of the problem. More interetingly when you analyze *why* you might think that the subsidies for government contracts for the mexican employer is ok, but the same for a white owner in a traditionally mexican field is wrong is based entirely on racism itself. When you treat two groups differently solely based on their race, that is racism. Period. It does not matter who's gaining an advantage. It's still racism. And it's still wrong. No matter how noble your reasons.