I'm simply pointing out that there's absolutely *nothing* in the story to support that assumption. The comments from One2believe's spokesperson were presumably in response to the news agency asking them what they thought about Toys for Tots not distributing the donated dolls
You're so right. It makes much much more sense that the news media would spontaniously stumble across this story from an unitrested party and then dillegently research it and contact the company then to think the company could possibly ever consider contating the media garnering free advertising and millions in PR right around their peak sales season.
It's silly to think anything else. I mean to assume other than you do, companies would have to be in the buisness of paying people to provide stories about them to the media. Thank Jesus we havn't gotten that cynical yet.
____________________________
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.