Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

See you in Hell, Bolton.Follow

#27 Nov 12 2006 at 10:34 PM Rating: Default
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
Everything that Yamadrogue just blurted....



Smiley: laugh Smiley: laugh Smiley: laugh
Smiley: laugh Smiley: laugh Smiley: laugh
Smiley: laugh Smiley: laugh Smiley: laugh

way to go!

dimwit

Edited, Nov 12th 2006 at 10:37pm PST by paulsol
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#29 Nov 13 2006 at 6:05 AM Rating: Decent
Yamadog wrote:
When the Inspectors said they didn't find any WMD's, did it occur to them they were hidding them?


No, you're right, it most certainly didn't occur to them.


Quote:
Top military officials said Saddam sent the WMD's to Syria before the U.S. invaded.


Yeah, you're right also, that's why we should go and invade Syria. And Iran, just in case.

Quote:
Just because something is old doesn't mean it can't be a threat anymore. Just look at all the WWII munitions left around today.


Yeah, that's a very good point. When I think of all those Howitzers and Panzers, i just can't sleep at night. For all you know, Germany might still hide some.

Sobering thought if there ever was one.

Quote:
Redphoenix, don't believe everything you see on CNN.


Thank you Yamadog. I shall take this nugget of wisdom to my grave.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#30 Nov 13 2006 at 6:16 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Yamadog wrote:
Just because something is old doesn't mean it can't be a threat anymore. Just look at all the WWII munitions left around today.
Or Indian arrowheads! Regions of the United States are still full of arrowheads just lying on the ground waiting to be discovered. Those are WAY older than degraded sarin shells from 1988 and you could STILL poke someone with them!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#31 Nov 13 2006 at 7:19 AM Rating: Good
What about the WWI munitions in France (Mustard Gas) that are being plowed up after darned near a century that cause problems. Also by International Red Cross standards, mine fields in Vietnam, Cambodia and Korea are listed as WMD yet mine fields in Iraq are not. Does the United Nations have a responsibility to the children of the Middle East to help with Ordnance Disposal? WMD does not equate to Nuclear Biological and Chemical Warfare only and I'm sure Hans Blitz has an understanding of his nation’s involvement in moving weapons through France from WWII to present to supply the Iraqi government with mines, mustard and sarin and the Guinness Book of World Records even has the Iraqi use of WMD's documented during the past. Irrespective of which publisher you wish to use a simple check of the library will document the problem from Time Life to Newsweek to Readers Digest. Now we can discuss the small pox epidemic in New York City transferring to indigenous peoples in the US till the cows come home, but if we're manufacturing Kevlar legs for Iraqi children who stumble across an IUD maybe we should look to DuPont in 2007 as trying to make amends. Kind of hard to point a democratic finger at DuPont and have the Union Labor give the accuser their choice of fingers while their brothers, sisters, parents and children are in the cross fire. Now can anyone supply me with the name of the arms dealer President Clinton pardoned on his last day in office? Ah yes, Marc Rich. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1184118.stm

I think we're looking at Sarin Gas from as late as 2000.


Edited, Nov 13th 2006 at 7:48am PST by Barrelhunter
#32 Nov 13 2006 at 8:04 AM Rating: Decent
*****
18,463 posts
gbaji wrote:
Tell me *exactly* why you think Bolton is a bad choice?

Because he's a ****-poor diplomat, which is what the UN Ambassador is supposed to be. I don't want a (wo)man who thinks that her/his opinions are what's important. I want a (wo)man in that job that understands just exactly what's at stake and how to compromise when (s)he needs to, not just say something incendiary and plug his ears with his fingers.
#33 Nov 13 2006 at 8:27 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Barrelhunter wrote:
I think we're looking at Sarin Gas from as late as 2000.
Do you have a cite for that thought?

As much fun as the "They had WMDs!" argument is, we're treading old ground. Here, read this (it gets good around the second half of page two) and get back to me with something new.

Edit: It took me some looking to find it again but re: landmines, I think we're more worried about what the United States government defines at a WMD rather than what the Red Cross says. According to the government...
The Law wrote:
FY97 National Defense Authorization Act
Public Law 104-201
September 23, 1996

TITLE XIV--DEFENSE AGAINST WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

SEC. 1403. DEFINITIONS. In this title:

(1) The term "weapon of mass destruction" means any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of--

(A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors;
(B) a disease organism; or
(C) radiation or radioactivity.


Edited, Nov 13th 2006 at 9:11am PST by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34 Nov 13 2006 at 10:00 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Barrelhunter wrote:
I think we're looking at Sarin Gas from as late as 2000.
Do you have a cite for that thought?

As much fun as the "They had WMDs!" argument is, we're treading old ground. Here, read this (it gets good around the second half of page two) and get back to me with something new.

Edit: It took me some looking to find it again but re: landmines, I think we're more worried about what the United States government defines at a WMD rather than what the Red Cross says. According to the government...
The Law wrote:
FY97 National Defense Authorization Act
Public Law 104-201
September 23, 1996

TITLE XIV--DEFENSE AGAINST WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

SEC. 1403. DEFINITIONS. In this title:

(1) The term "weapon of mass destruction" means any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of--

(A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors;
(B) a disease organism; or
(C) radiation or radioactivity.


Edited, Nov 13th 2006 at 9:11am PST by Jophiel


White Phosphorus would be covered by that definition. Personaly I'd include lead as being a toxic chemical by that definition.
#35 Nov 13 2006 at 10:53 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smiley: laugh Well, if that's your BEST argument...
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Nov 13 2006 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Tell me *exactly* why you think Bolton is a bad choice?

Because he's a ****-poor diplomat, which is what the UN Ambassador is supposed to be. I don't want a (wo)man who thinks that her/his opinions are what's important. I want a (wo)man in that job that understands just exactly what's at stake and how to compromise when (s)he needs to, not just say something incendiary and plug his ears with his fingers.


Can you honestly say you hold this position because you've watched him speak, or read some transcripts of his, or otherwise looked at his record both before and after filling the post at the UN?

Or is your entire knowledge of Bolton's capabilities based on just repeating stuff you heard other people say?

Can you name one mistake he's made? One thing he's done wrong? One opportunity he missed that hurt the US diplomatically?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#37 Nov 13 2006 at 4:30 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Can you honestly say you hold this position because you've watched him speak, or read some transcripts of his, or otherwise looked at his record both before and after filling the post at the UN?


Yup. Have you done any of those things? Nope.


Or is your entire knowledge of Bolton's capabilities based on just repeating stuff you heard other people say?


Nope. Do you know anything about the man at all that you didn't Google five seconds before posting? Nope.


Can you name one mistake he's made? One thing he's done wrong? One opportunity he missed that hurt the US diplomatically?


Yup. Dozens. Can you name one accomplishment he has as UN ambassador? Nope. Look out Google, here you come!



Edited, Nov 13th 2006 at 4:34pm PST by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#38 Nov 13 2006 at 7:41 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Can you honestly say you hold this position because you've watched him speak, or read some transcripts of his, or otherwise looked at his record both before and after filling the post at the UN?


Yup. Have you done any of those things? Nope.


I've watched him give press releases of the goings on at the UN many many times. He's succint, intelligent, and lays it out like it is. The guy can certainly speak intelligently on the issues facing us in the UN and doesn't come off as a brown nosing yes-man.

Quote:

Or is your entire knowledge of Bolton's capabilities based on just repeating stuff you heard other people say?


Nope. Do you know anything about the man at all that you didn't Google five seconds before posting? Nope.


Again. I've watched dozens of his press conferences Smash. I watched his take on the evolving Lebanon/Isreal conflict, and I also watched as he worked through the UN to get 6 party talks going with North Korea.

Have you? More importantly, has Flea? She was the one with the automatic "he's a ninny" position. I was simply trying to get her to assess whether her beliefs about the man are based on fact, or she's just repeating what she's heard others say about him. Because I've seen the guy talk and act, and I can't figure out why some people have such an inate dislike for the guy. It's not like Flea met him at a party and he threw up on her or something...

Quote:

Can you name one mistake he's made? One thing he's done wrong? One opportunity he missed that hurt the US diplomatically?


Yup. Dozens. Can you name one accomplishment he has as UN ambassador? Nope. Look out Google, here you come!


Ok. Go ahead then. I've already listed off several things I've personally followed along with in terms of his job performance. How about you do the same? What mistakes has he made?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#39 Nov 13 2006 at 7:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
He picked the Tuna salad on meatloaf day last wednesday. That's a mistake we all payed for...
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#40 Nov 13 2006 at 8:01 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,784 posts
I bet Bush has Bolton, on his I-pod too.

Fuckin evil.
#41 Nov 13 2006 at 9:55 PM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
Smiley: laugh Well, if that's your BEST argument...


We could go with Abraham Lincolns Executive Order #100, as I believe it is far more appropriate. I'm old school so forgive me if it's old news or hasn't made Wiki or CNN. At times though I have to contemplate what the Commander of an Illinois Militia Unit was contemplating as he signed papers coming across his desk. Could Clara Barton have been his psychic reader?
#42 Nov 13 2006 at 10:22 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
In fact they have found some old WMD's that were decaying


Show me one damn iota of truth in this statement and i will recognize you as lord of All.















No really, show me.
#43 Nov 14 2006 at 1:30 AM Rating: Decent
TheLastReasonableMan wrote:
Quote:
In fact they have found some old WMD's that were decaying


Show me one damn iota of truth in this statement and i will recognize you as lord of All.















No really, show me.


A scud missile is a delivery device for chemical munitions. In as much as we found scuds we have found WMD delivery devices. As such, we do not consider Iraq to not be using Wal-Mart Logistics and have a stock pile of various chemicals that could be housed in those devices. In as much as Greek Fire falls under the UN Mandates as a WMD for it's "radiation" value I'm thinking some of those nice Hazmat explosions seen on "pick your favorite liberal news cast" would equate to proof of the existence of a WMD. Hence grounding in coming flights from England not too long ago and looking for incendiary munitions. The thought would be that Dresden and London during WWII and the Japanese Balloons in Washington State, California, Oregon and Texas would constitute WMD's and the Triple Nickel a group of NWA smoke jumpers remembering their contribution to WWII "might" have provided an insight. Darned lazy darkies taking the easy way out then joining the FFA under the AFL CIO.

And before anyone asks me to provide a linky, I'd suggest waiting for the movie or Google it your darned self. And no, I'm not clicking every freaking link on the net. I'm old school and can figure when I'm being hosed by an Alabama Black Snake and appreciate it when my jacket is smoldering. It's not like I've never worked with Frogs, Brits, Spaghetti Benders and them Bama boys before.
#44 Nov 14 2006 at 1:49 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
It's not like I've never worked with Frogs, Brits, Spaghetti Benders and them Bama boys before.



.
Quote:
Darned lazy darkies


Racist idjit Smiley: glare
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#45 Nov 14 2006 at 2:02 AM Rating: Decent
paulsol the Flatulent wrote:
Quote:
It's not like I've never worked with Frogs, Brits, Spaghetti Benders and them Bama boys before.



.
Quote:
Darned lazy darkies


Racist idjit Smiley: glare


The Triple Nickle was a WWII black parachute regiment assigned to the Pacific North West and Colorado tasked with jumping into forest fires. Members of the unit joined the FFA under the AFL CIO as fire fighters when they returned home. Yes I'm Racist just not in the bad way. Go out and interview one of the surviving members of the unit and you might just learn something.
#46 Nov 14 2006 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
Yes I'm Racist just not in the bad way.



So you don't mind black parachutists jumping into forest fires, and you have worked with some foreigners before, but you do have a problem with brown people from the middle east.....

Excuse me for mistaking your unequivocally equality minded racial stance as being something less than the epitomisation of fairness to all races creeds and colours.

I mistook you for one of those "bad" racists for a moment there.....My mistake.

____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#47 Nov 14 2006 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
gbaji wrote:
Have you? More importantly, has Flea? She was the one with the automatic "he's a ninny" position. I was simply trying to get her to assess whether her beliefs about the man are based on fact, or she's just repeating what she's heard others say about him. Because I've seen the guy talk and act, and I can't figure out why some people have such an inate dislike for the guy. It's not like Flea met him at a party and he threw up on her or something...
If I ever did meet him at a party...wha?
Christ you're simple.Smiley: disappointed

I'll make this very plain, so that you can understand. I'm not the kind of person that absentmindedly parrots the opinons of others, and that is why you don't understand my dislike of Bolton. Warm the cockles of your heart with the knowledge that my dislike of him is justfied and informed while I can roll around in the happy mud of my total disregard of your investment in my opinion.
#48 Nov 14 2006 at 10:46 AM Rating: Decent
Atomicflea wrote:
...... while I can roll around in the happy mud....



Is this a pre-cursor to mud wrestling then?

Thumb, jump in there!

Joph, get the vid-cam set up!

Go go go!
#49 Nov 14 2006 at 1:39 PM Rating: Decent
paulsol the Flatulent wrote:
Quote:
Yes I'm Racist just not in the bad way.



So you don't mind black parachutists jumping into forest fires, and you have worked with some foreigners before, but you do have a problem with brown people from the middle east.....

Excuse me for mistaking your unequivocally equality minded racial stance as being something less than the epitomisation of fairness to all races creeds and colours.

I mistook you for one of those "bad" racists for a moment there.....My mistake.



I have no problems working with Smoke Jumpers of any race, color, creed or sex. The triple nickel jumped with white soldiers for that matter as well as aboriginal peoples from this side of the pond. I've worked with Kuwaiti fire fighters and enjoyed it. I've recently worked with the Red Cross/Red Crescent and when necessary kept kosher out of a mutual respect.

My mother’s father had no problem entering combat in Italy with the 442nd Infantry and my family reunions look like the United Nations with an attitude. Sorry but if you’re looking for a Liberal Democrat or Conservative Republican here your looking at the wrong Indian. Dad looked like Crazy Horse and mom looked like a normal white woman. Then again, the Presidents wife is "Hispanic".

Welcome to the US of A. I say the Pledge of Allegiance with Under God, take the Holy Sacrament, and sit a sater super with a Rabbi. I also kiss a Vietnamese girl every time I see her, as she's a friend and a nurse. For some reason when I'm assigned to an ambulance I don't say ewwww, you’re... I'm racist and sexist and require all my friends to have one.
#51 Nov 14 2006 at 5:29 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
TheLastReasonableMan wrote:
Quote:
In fact they have found some old WMD's that were decaying


Show me one damn iota of truth in this statement and i will recognize you as lord of All.


Wow. You live under a rock or something?

How about this recently unclassied document (PDF).

First freaking paragraph:

Quote:
Since May 2004, Coalition forces have more then 500 munitions, some of which contained degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent.



Want to try for the bonus lighning round in the "I've swallowed every bit of rhetoric from the left while ignoring the facts around me" game?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 357 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (357)