Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Effect of Tom Delay being on the ballotFollow

#1 Nov 08 2006 at 6:32 PM Rating: Good
**
811 posts
Linky

There's an interesting little nugget in the Texas Election Code that prohibits a candidate from withdrawing from a ballot after being nominated in their party primary. The election code also seems to had been put into place by Texan Republicans off in the 80's for added humor to those involved I suppose.

So for this year's election Tom Delay got to be on the ballot while the replacement Republican had to have her name written in, which has allowed a Democrat to win in one of the more conservative areas of Texas.


And for those not interested in following the link:
Quote:
Lampson's outlook went from underdog to favorite when DeLay quit Congress and courts prohibited the GOP from replacing him on the general election ballot.

Lampson is a former U.S. representative who had accumulated a multimillion-dollar war chest in anticipation of a nationally watched battle with DeLay.

The state GOP backed Sekula-Gibbs as its write-in candidate, and she mounted a strong, well-funded candidacy that included extensive television advertising showing voters how to cast write-in ballots.

DeLay trounced three challengers in March to win the GOP nomination for a 12th term. He announced his resignation in April amid a growing influence-peddling scandal that already had caused two of his former aides to plead guilty to federal charges. He also faces state campaign finance indictments in Austin, charges that he says were politically motivated.

He said he thought he could win re-election but that he did not want to be a lightning rod for Democrats to use to attack Republicans nationally.

DeLay tried to give his party the opportunity to replace him on the ballot by moving his legal residence to his condominium in Virginia while maintaining a home in Sugar Land. Republicans argued that made him ineligible to run or serve, and allowed them to replace him on the ballot.

Democrats sued to block Republicans from picking a nominee, arguing that the Texas Election Code prohibits a candidate from withdrawing from a ballot after being nominated in the party primary. The courts agreed, leading to the campaign in which Sekula-Gibbs earned the state GOP's blessing.
#2 Nov 08 2006 at 7:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Did it help? Of course it did. It also helped that DeLay redistricted the area to have more Democrats because he thought his own influence would be enough to keep the district Republican. It also helped that DeLay tried to circumvent the rules and take himself off the ballot. It also helped that Texas bought voting machines that make you use a thumbwheel to write in candidates. It also helped, of course, that DeLay got his dumb *** indicted.

Losing TX-22 was something DeLay & the Republicans did for themselves.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Nov 08 2006 at 7:01 PM Rating: Decent
Same thing happened with Foley, his name was on the ballot in my district. If you voted for Foley you were actually voting for the Repub replacement... that election was fairly close, and it's a conservative area, so it's likely the Republican would have won if his name was on the ballot.
#4 Nov 08 2006 at 7:23 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Did it help? Of course it did. It also helped that DeLay redistricted the area to have more Democrats because he thought his own influence would be enough to keep the district Republican. It also helped that DeLay tried to circumvent the rules and take himself off the ballot. It also helped that Texas bought voting machines that make you use a thumbwheel to write in candidates. It also helped, of course, that DeLay got his dumb *** indicted.


Wait! According to Smash, they redistricted to increase the Republican voters in Delay's district... ;)

Delay got his dumb *** indicted because in Texas the Dems pretty much control the legal system (which happens when you control the state legistlature for 80 years). How many grand jury's do you have to shop a case around to in order to get an indictment before you're "cheating"? Apparently, 4 isn't high enough in some books.

Quote:
Losing TX-22 was something DeLay & the Republicans did for themselves.


Nah. It was revenge against him for upsetting the Dem apple cart. It's just not that hard to find something that can be made to look illegal to a randomly selected group of people with minimal legal backround. Especially when you get to control what they see of the case and then get to keep putting the case in front of as many grand juries as it takes to get an idictment.

The purpose of the whole thing wasn't to convict Delay of any crime, but to get the indictment itself, knowing that would likely give Dems the seat down the line. The Republicans were at worst naive for assuming that the Dems wouldn't play dirty.

Edited, Nov 8th 2006 at 7:25pm PST by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#5 Nov 08 2006 at 7:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
It was revenge against him for upsetting the Dem apple cart.
*Shrug* If you say so. We debated the DeLay thing before and I'm in a good enough mood now not to care what you think of it Smiley: grin
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 231 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (231)