I'm still grinning like a cheshire cat about the outcome of the elections, and agree with most of Smash and Flea's lines of thinking. (No surprises there).
I watched Bush's speech and saw some sign of political astuteness that he has to now mollify the house.
So what does this mean for the world outside of the USA of Ame'cuh?
Tony Bliar's now (potentially) even more isolated and standing (very shakily) alone where Iraq's concerned. He might use the anticipated softening of Washington's stance to be less gung-ho and appease his own simmering party members.
It might be the tipping point for his imminent handover to Gordon 'laughing boy' Brown (long odds on that though - still reckon Tony will hold out til June '07)
Will Palestine be given a sense that Israel can no longer do what the fUck it likes without challenge? Enough to contain the Hamas hardliners long enough for meaningful dialogue between Jerusalem and Jericho?
Might it mean some serious support for the range of environmental treaties that USA has undermined by either vetoing or stepping away from?
Could we start seeing other nations backing the US, British and Canadian troops in Afghanistan? I know there are others there, but not in serious numbers. NATO and the UN have been calling for other countries (France & Germany in particular) to ante up and back the campaign seriously.
I know some of those are tenuous, and I suspect as time wears on we'll see the downside of a weakened Oval Office, but the possibilities are intriguing.
You might almost call them 'unknown unknowns'