Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Yay! Conservatives get pimpslappedFollow

#1 Nov 08 2006 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
Link

It's nice to see that the ***-backwards, bible thumping, hypocritical cousin fuckers are getting pimpslapped by people with half a clue. I don't say this much, if ever, but; +1 USA. Looks good on ya. I'm most impressed by the win on "Gay marriage" and stem cell research. Not too impressed with Nevada and Colorado refusing to look at medical maryjane, but hey, you can't win them all.

Quote:
In a triple setback for conservatives, South Dakota rejected a law that would have banned virtually all abortions, Arizona became the first state to defeat an amendment to ban gay marriage and Missouri approved a measure backing stem cell research.

Nationwide, a total of 205 measures were on the ballots Tuesday in 37 states, but none had riveted political activists across the country like the South Dakota measure. Passed overwhelmingly by the legislature earlier this year, it would have been the toughest abortion law in the nation, allowing the procedure only to save a pregnant woman's life.

Lawmakers had hoped the ban would be challenged in court, provoking litigation that might eventually lead to a
U.S. Supreme Court reversal of the 1973
Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.

Many voters said they viewed the measure - which lost by a 55-45 margin - as too intrusive, using language that failed to guarantee the rights of victims of rape and incest.

"I still feel like there is a gray area in that particular matter," said Lance Weber, 49, of Sturgis, S.D. "I feel there needs to be some exceptions."

Arizona bucked a strong national trend by refusing to change its constitution to define marriage as a one-man, one-woman institution. The measure also would have forbidden civil unions and domestic partnerships.

"We knew all along that once voters were informed about the true impact ... they would oppose this hurtful initiative," said Steve May, treasurer for Arizona Together, which organized opposition to the measure. "They made the right decision."

A total of eight states voted on amendments to ban gay marriage: Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin approved them. Similar amendments have passed previously in all 20 states to consider them.

Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, noted that the bans that succeeded won by much narrower margins, on average, than in the past.

He said it was a sign that "fear-mongering around same-sex marriage is fizzling out."

Conservatives had hoped the same-sex marriage bans might increase turnout for Republicans, though the GOP had a rough night. Democrats had looked for a boost from low-income voters turning out on behalf of measures to raise the state minimum wage in six states. The wage hikes passed in Arizona, Colorado. Missouri, Montana, Ohio and Nevada.

The Missouri stem cell measure passed by a narrow margin. It had become a key factor in the state's crucial Senate race, won by Democratic challenger Claire McCaskill, who supported it, over incumbent Republican Jim Talent, who opposed it.

Celebrities also had plunged into the campaign: actor Michael J. Fox, suffering from Parkinson's disease, endorsed the amendment, while several sports stars spoke against it.

In Michigan, voters took a swipe at affirmative action, deciding that race and gender should not be factors in deciding who gets into public universities or who gets hired for government work.

Arizona voters faced the most ballot measures - 19. They approved four that arose out of frustration over the influx of illegal immigrants: One measure makes English the state's official language, while another expands the list of government benefits denied to illegal immigrants.

Voters weren't keen about another, more quirky Arizona measure: They defeated a proposal that would have awarded $1 million to a randomly selected voter in each general election.

In Ohio and Arizona, anti-smoking activists won showdowns with R.J. Reynolds Tobacco. Voters in each state approved a tough ban on smoking in public places and rejected rival, Reynolds-backed measures that would have exempted bars. Voters in Arizona and South Dakota approved increases in tobacco taxes, while similar proposals were voted down in Missouri and California.

Nevada and Colorado voters rejected measures that would have legalized possession of up to an ounce of marijuana by anyone 21 and older. South Dakotans voted down a proposal that would have allowed marijuana use for some medical purposes. A winning measure in Rhode Island will restore voting rights to felons on probation and parole.

Elsewhere, land use was a hot issue, part of a backlash against a 2005 Supreme Court ruling allowing the city of New London, Conn., to buy up homes to make way for a private commercial development.

Nine states approved eminent-domain measures barring the government from taking private property for a private use, while California rejected the idea. Arizona's winning measure went beyond the others, requiring state and local authorities to compensate property owners if land-use regulations lowered the value of their property: Idaho rejected a similar measure.

South Dakota voters defeated a measure that would have made their state the first to strip immunity from judges, exposing them to the possibility of lawsuits. In Maine, Nebraska and Oregon, voters defeated measures that would cap increases in state spending.

Pennsylvania voters gave the state the go-ahead to borrow $20 million so that nearly 33,000 veterans in the state who participated in the Persian
Gulf War could collect one-time payments up to $525.

In Alaska, voters rejected a proposal to tax North Slope oil companies $1 billion a year until a natural gas pipeline is built. The tax would have been levied against the leaseholders of the North Slope's 35 trillion cubic feet of natural gas reserves until the gas starts flowing to market. Opponents of the measure said the tax would have killed the $25 billion pipeline project; proponents said it was the only way to force oil companies to commit to building a pipeline.
#2 Nov 08 2006 at 12:40 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Nevermind I missread that.

Edited, Nov 8th 2006 at 12:42pm PST by GitSlayer
#3 Nov 08 2006 at 12:41 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quite obviously the kind who enjoys hot cock up his **** cavity.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 Nov 08 2006 at 12:42 PM Rating: Good
The Glorious GitSlayer wrote:
You are "most impressed by the win on 'Gay marriage'?" What type of liberal are you?
..and stem cell research.

If the **** are married, then that means there are less of them looking at my ***. It's a win-win if you ask me.
#5 Nov 08 2006 at 12:44 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Quite obviously the kind who enjoys hot cock up his **** cavity.
Smiley: jawdrop Did typing that make you feel dirty?


For the record, I do not shove cooked chicken up my bunghole.
#6 Nov 08 2006 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,369 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Quite obviously the kind who enjoys hot cock up his **** cavity.
Smiley: jawdrop Did typing that make you feel dirty?


For the record, I do not shove cooked chicken up my bunghole.


Raw meat can be dangerous for your health.
#7 Nov 08 2006 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good
***
1,661 posts
Quote:
Arizona bucked a strong national trend by refusing to change its constitution to define marriage as a one-man, one-woman institution. The measure also would have forbidden civil unions and domestic partnerships.


I'm not religious, but asking for gay marriage seems like an open attack against most monotheistic religions.

I'm not against the civil union or domestic partnership of gays and lesbians though, and in my opinion classifying them as such would avoid a lot of future problems.

Quote:
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force


Can you imagine laying in your bed and suddenly your windows are broken out and your door knocked down by the "National Gay and Lesbian Task Force"?

Quote:
Democrats had looked for a boost from low-income voters turning out on behalf of measures to raise the state minimum wage in six states. The wage hikes passed in Arizona, Colorado. Missouri, Montana, Ohio and Nevada.


Have fun with your tax hike is all I gotta say.

Quote:
Celebrities also had plunged into the campaign: actor Michael J. Fox, suffering from Parkinson's disease, endorsed the amendment, while several sports stars spoke against it.
a


All for stem cell research. All against Micheal J. Fox and his random attack.

Quote:
In Michigan, voters took a swipe at affirmative action, deciding that race and gender should not be factors in deciding who gets into public universities or who gets hired for government work.


As it should have been when the subject was brought up originaly.

I understand that you've been descriminated against. But why cripple yourself instead of trying your best to become better than the "standards"? Especially when it is more detrimental in the end.

Quote:
A winning measure in Rhode Island will restore voting rights to felons on probation and parole.


Stupid. Plain and simple.

Once you become a felon, you give up your rights to become a socially acceptable individual, thus, your rights are monitored by the state. You can't eat your cake and have it.

Quote:
Nine states approved eminent-domain measures barring the government from taking private property for a private use, while California rejected the idea. Arizona's winning measure went beyond the others, requiring state and local authorities to compensate property owners if land-use regulations lowered the value of their property:


Nice
#8 Nov 08 2006 at 2:57 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I'm not religious, but asking for gay marriage seems like an open attack against most monotheistic religions.


Clearly. Just like interacial marrige was.

Back to the clan rally, Jetro.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#9 Nov 08 2006 at 2:59 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Have fun with your tax hike is all I gotta say.


Millionaires are efected by the minimum wage? Who knew. Because they're the only ones who will be seeing a tax hike. The middle class will, like allways, see LOWER taxes with Democrats in controll.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#10 Nov 08 2006 at 10:37 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"people with half a clue." --Elderon

Truer words have rarely been spoken.

Totem
#11 Nov 08 2006 at 10:43 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"Celebrities also had plunged into the campaign: actor Michael J. Fox, suffering from Parkinson's disease, endorsed the amendment..." --Sorcath

I saw a sound bite with Fox this morning on the news talking about last night's Dem win and that amendment. He looked for all the world like a white rapper doing that aggressive and belligerent arm movement thing where they point at you with their arms spread wipe and their head tilted sideways. I may burn in Hell, but I laffed at him at that moment.

Totem
#12 Nov 08 2006 at 11:46 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I may burn in Hell, but I laffed at him at that moment.


That would be one time more than I ever laughed at Family Ties or Spin City.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#13 Nov 09 2006 at 4:18 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Boy howdy, but Parkinsons has to be hard to deal with. Brushing your teeth you poke your eye out with the toothbrush, you pee standing up and it looks like you went to the bathroom with a Wagner Power Painter, and using crayons or magic markers makes you look like a bad imitation of Jackson Pollard.

Gotta be rough. On the other hand, when Mrs. Fox climbs on board for a little nookie, she just bought an E-ticket to Space Mountain, baby.

Totem
#14 Nov 09 2006 at 8:44 AM Rating: Decent
South Dakota, as I recall, is an EXTREMELY conservative state, so it's good to see they have their heads together.

I'm sad to say that here in Tennessee, the voters approved a measure to rewrite the TN constitution to define marriage as "the sacred union between a man and a woman." I read that and voted...

BWAR-HAR-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAR!

What's really ironic is that most of the people endorsing this measure are probably divorced or have cheated on their wives. Foley was a big endorser of this nonsense. As was Ted Haggard.

Marriage is SO friggin' sacred.

Personally, I think marriage is pretty lamebrained anyway. If gays want the right to be miserable, why should we stop them?

And how does it "damage" the "sacred" (BWAR-HAR-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAR!) institution of marriage if a man and a man or a woman and a woman want to get married?

Personally, I don't trust ANY MAN who defines marriage as "sacred." Religion is for women.

Also, I don't trust ANY MAN who is idealogically opposed to lesbianism--which is the most beautiful thing ever.

Edited, Nov 9th 2006 at 8:47am PST by bloodywilliam
#15 Nov 09 2006 at 10:24 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Straight rednecks just want to have *something* that makes them special. I mean, they even let brothers into Nascar, not to mention the gays. The gays are so much better at everything else, raising children, disco, curtain design, they straights just want something. Throw them a fricken bone, just not a meaty one.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16 Nov 09 2006 at 10:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
they straights just want something. Throw them a fricken bone, just not a meaty one.


So to speak.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#17 Nov 09 2006 at 10:31 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Elderon the Wise
Sage
Avatar

****
9182 posts
Score: Default
Smiley: lol

It appears that some cousin fucking rednecks have computer access (read: local library) and read the interwebs! Damn I'm good.
#18 Nov 09 2006 at 10:43 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Quote:
Elderon the Wise
Sage
Avatar

****
9182 posts
Score: Default
Smiley: lol

It appears that some cousin fucking rednecks have computer access (read: local library) and read the interwebs! Damn I'm good.


That, or people are bored to tears of Canadiuhns trying to play on the playground with the big kids by throwing around any possible buzz-words they can.
#19 Nov 09 2006 at 9:49 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,661 posts
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not religious, but asking for gay marriage seems like an open attack against most monotheistic religions.


Clearly. Just like interacial marrige was.

Back to the clan rally, Jetro.


Uh, thanks for making a connection that absolutely isn't there? That was about the most random insult I've seen here yet. Try sticking within the subject next time please.

Interracial marriage has nothing to do with the subject, and to that matter, has been an active part of marriage for centuries across the globe.

Marriage is a popularized biblical ceremony; binding the souls of a male and female in holy matrimony under the name of "god". Only a male and female may enter such a union in his name, for homosexuality is a sin in his eyes.

Even to me, asking for the state to make religions wed individuals their faith clarify as a sin, looks like an open attack against their faith.

Quote:
Quote:
Have fun with your tax hike is all I gotta say.


Millionaires are efected by the minimum wage? Who knew. Because they're the only ones who will be seeing a tax hike. The middle class will, like allways, see LOWER taxes with Democrats in controll.


Why would you see if so simply as that? Haven't you realized yet that when an advantage presents itself, business will be there to seize upon it?

Even if it were as simple as saying "Oh, we're raising minimum wage. So big/small businesses, you're not allowed to raise your prices proportionate to increased income.", there still would be the problem of employment. Because when businesses can't afford to pay employees anymore, they are released.

Try less insulting next time. You sound more educated when presenting an argument.

Edited, Nov 9th 2006 at 9:52pm PST by Sorcath
#20 Nov 09 2006 at 10:11 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:


Marriage is a popularized biblical ceremony; binding the souls of a male and female in holy matrimony under the name of "god". Only a male and female may enter such a union in his name, for homosexuality is a sin in his eyes.


Ok, our modern marriage ritual are a patchwork of cultural traditions that date back beyond ancient Greece.
All Christian themes were tacked on to those... a few pronouns replaced and bingo. So stop claiming that the traditions of marriage are of Biblical origins. They are not.
Come to think of it, I can't think of any references to homosexual marriage in the Bible....
and further more, a majority of the anti-gay sentiments in the Bible seem to be more refering to pagan orgies and depraved molestation.
Quote:

So big/small businesses, you're not allowed to raise your prices proportionate to increased income.", there still would be the problem of employment. Because when businesses can't afford to pay employees anymore, they are released.


Now think about this.

Do you really think that a buisness that actually has employees working for minimum wage is really gonna cause that much of an economic backlash for the average person? Is McDonalds going to raise the price of their Big Macs? I'm personally not that concerned.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#21 Nov 09 2006 at 10:21 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Uh, thanks for making a connection that absolutely isn't there?


You mean like gay people being able to apply the same legal standards of marriage as striaght people being related in any way to religion?

I'd never do such a thing.

Sucker.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#22 Nov 09 2006 at 10:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Sorcath wrote:
Marriage is a popularized biblical ceremony
"Marriage", in the eyes of the State, is a contract between two parties concerning itself mainly with joint property ownership.
Quote:
Even to me, asking for the state to make religions wed individuals their faith clarify as a sin
No one is making any religion do that. Right now I can legally marry a woman. Right now, I could go into a synagogue and have the rabbi refuse to wed a woman and I because we are not Jewish. But, even after the local synagogue, mosque, temple, church and Wiccan grove turn us away, we can still go to the courthouse and be married by the state.

Understand yet?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#23 Nov 09 2006 at 10:23 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,136 posts
Sorcath wrote:
I'm not religious, but asking for gay marriage seems like an open attack against most monotheistic religions.

I'm not against the civil union or domestic partnership of gays and lesbians though, and in my opinion classifying them as such would avoid a lot of future problems.
All civil unions are is a stalling tactic. Religious extremists don't want gays to exist (period), but they've realized they've lost the war on gays, and now they're just stalling, and causing our legal system to be tied up making redundant duplicate laws that are a waste of time and money.

All we have to do is say "gays can get married" and we save a ton of time and money, which is what a real conservative would want to do - save money and time.


They've lost the war on gays, and now they're just aruing semantics. It's stupid and childish, and stupid... did I mention it's stupid?
#24 Nov 09 2006 at 10:24 PM Rating: Good
***
1,661 posts
Kelvy wrote:
Ok, our modern marriage ritual are a patchwork of cultural traditions that date back beyond ancient Greece.
All Christian themes were tacked on to those... a few pronouns replaced and bingo. So stop claiming that the traditions of marriage are of Biblical origins. They are not.
Come to think of it, I can't think of any references to homosexual marriage in the Bible....
and further more, a majority of the anti-gay sentiments in the Bible seem to be more refering to pagan orgies and depraved molestation.


understand that Christianity and such religions are a collective hodge podge of previous faiths collected in effort to sway conversion, and along those lines marriage is an adopted portion(not wholly a monotheistic creation.

That's not my argument and nor does that partain to modern days. Tell me, what is the percentage of those participating in the faiths they adopted?

So in a large world we work by majority. When we say "marriage", more than not, we think of a holy union in the name of god am I right?.

Kelvy wrote:
Do you really think that a buisness that actually has employees working for minimum wage is really gonna cause that much of an economic backlash for the average person? Is McDonalds going to raise the price of their Big Macs? I'm personally not that concerned.


Kelvy, did you miss the whole:
Quote:
there still would be the problem of employment. Because when businesses can't afford to pay employees anymore, they are released.
?

Businesses don't have an infinite source of income, especially since 75% of Americas employment is done by small time businesses.
#25 Nov 09 2006 at 10:25 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Sorcath wrote:
So in a large world we work by majority. When we say "marriage", more than not, we think of a holy union in the name of god am I right?.


Nope, but I'm sure you are stupid enough to think you are.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#26 Nov 09 2006 at 10:25 PM Rating: Good
**
811 posts
Sorcath wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not religious, but asking for gay marriage seems like an open attack against most monotheistic religions.


Clearly. Just like interracial marriage was.

Back to the clan rally, Jethro.


Uh, thanks for making a connection that absolutely isn't there? That was about the most random insult I've seen here yet. Try sticking within the subject next time please.

Interracial marriage has nothing to do with the subject, and to that matter, has been an active part of marriage for centuries across the globe.

Marriage is a popularized biblical ceremony; binding the souls of a male and female in holy matrimony under the name of "god". Only a male and female may enter such a union in his name, for homosexuality is a sin in his eyes.

Even to me, asking for the state to make religions wed individuals their faith clarify as a sin, looks like an open attack against their faith.


Are you of the impression that recognizing gay marriage would force churches and temples and such to marry people who are not a part recognized as a part of their faith? Or is it the idea of people are considered sinners are getting married? Or possibly the notion that people that are not a part of your faith practice a ceremony and legal arrangement that don't conform to your faith? Or is it that you feel insulted when people you don't like try for similar rights as yours?

Because recognizing gay marriage wouldn't force churches to accept marrying anyone, and people on death row can get married even though they've probably committed a few sins, along with Atheists who are probably sinning by worshiping the false idol of science or something.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 328 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (328)