Rumsfeld: Gone.Follow

"On the audio tape made available on militant Web sites, the al-Qaida in Iraq leader also welcomed the Republican electoral defeat that led to the departure of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld." If they are so effective against a Rumsfeld-led American Army, then why be glad that is changing?


Yes, indeed. Why are people ever glad when they are so effective it leads to major changes in leadership. Why did US troops celebrate VE-Day when they were so effective in fighting in Europe? Why, Totem, why??


"Al-Muhajir, also known as Abu Ayyub al-Masri, also urged the U.S. to stay in Iraq so his group would have more opportunities to kill American troops. 'We haven’t had enough of your blood yet,' he told the U.S." Again, why welcome the change in parties in Washington if it leads to US troops leaving sooner then?


Why indeed! Why do Republicans laud Regan as a hero for "winning the cold war" when they had explained over and over how prepared they were to fight them missile for missile forever? Why, Totem, why??


"Describing President Bush as 'the most stupid president' in U.S. history, al-Masri reached out to the Muslim world and said his group was winning the war in Iraq faster than expected due to U.S. policies." Not to belabor the point, but if they are so effective against this administration, then why encourage a policy change which would negate those gains? Unless they expect US policy to be even more ineffective now that Democrats are in control of Congress...


I'd hope you see how silly this lack of a line of thought is at this point, right?

My momma and my dog just died. ; ;