Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Gay marriage no, gay massage yesFollow

#77 Nov 07 2006 at 2:14 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
/shrugs

It looks like I'm the only one squeamish about the thought of a$$ play around here. That gives new meaning to you guys being open to new ideas. Uhh, RACK you guys for being so sophisticated and cosmopolitan... I guess.

I do find this little bit from Ambryra's refutation funny though, especially since she used it to suggest I'm the only one whose got a weak stomach for taking cack in the colon-- "Since data on homosexual and bisexual sexual behavior tend to arouse such controversy, it is difficult to draw reliable conclusions in this area."

Totem


Edited, Nov 7th 2006 at 2:16pm PST by Totem
#78 Nov 07 2006 at 2:25 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Totem wrote:
she used it to suggest I'm the only one whose got a weak stomach for taking cack in the colon--
I think it's safe to say you're not.
#79 Nov 07 2006 at 2:35 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Totem wrote:
especially since she used it to suggest I'm the only one whose got a weak stomach for taking cack in the colon


Actually, that's not what I said at all. I said your supposition about men's objections to gay sex being a result of general squickiness toward scat was incorrect, for three reasons:

1) gay sex =/= **** sex
2) plenty of men who object to gay sex have no objection to **** sex with women
3) **** sex =/= scat

I left the disclaimer at the bottom of that paragraph in quite deliberately, because I felt in fairness one must acknowledge that sometimes getting data on these subjects is difficult. But still, I think the 20-50% margin covered by the various studies more than supports my assertion that a "large portion" of gay men do not engage in **** sex.

You lose at reading for comprehension.



Edited, Nov 7th 2006 at 2:38pm PST by Ambrya
#80 Nov 07 2006 at 2:48 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Quite the contrary, A. I win at interpreting what I read the way I want it to read ftw. And what I read in your post is that you are a bonehead-- not to be confused with taking the head of a bone in your a$$, which, apparently, is something you don't object to.

For your average beer swilling guy who digs on chicks, gay = a$$ play, regardless of the questionable evidence you cited. I'd go so far as to suggest that dudes who want to nail their honey in the choclate Cheerio are likely to have latent homosexual tendencies, but I have no controversial evidence to back that up. Just call it a hunch. And **** sex does equal scat assuming you're not wearing a Level 3 biohazard suit since that is where those annoyingly stinky turds emanate from-- unless you're BT, who can go bareback, since sheep tend to **** out hard little nuggets which, conveniently, tends to keep his d1ck ****-free.

Totem
#81 Nov 07 2006 at 2:53 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Uh huh. So, what you're saying then is that facts don't matter to you, you'll just concoct any bullsh'it theory you want to and pretend it has some validity, regardless of the truth of the matter.

Okay then. Off ya go.

#82 Nov 07 2006 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
****** hating ****** somehow makes you feel like less of a bigot, we get it Totes.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#83 Nov 07 2006 at 2:56 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
For your average beer swilling guy who digs on chicks, gay = a$$ play,


Why do you hate.....

































Yourself?
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#84 Nov 07 2006 at 2:57 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Hey, it's always worked well for me. Like I said before, perhaps in your sophisticated circle of limp wristed friends and acquaintances being gay means a handjob, but to Joe Sixpack that's just another term for a reacharound.

To each their own, I suppose.

Totem
#85 Nov 07 2006 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
No hating here, bhodi. After all, I'm the one beside gbaji who is saying that it isn't necessarily hypocrisy that Haggard could denounce homosexuality but be drawn to it or politic against it. You guys are the ones who equate religion with intolerance, not me.

I've just made the observation that in my experience heterosexuals are generally ok with homos as long as they don't have to think of the specifics of the ummm, dirty end of the business. You guys disagree. No problem, but that doesn't surprise me considering that the Asylum has always collected odd people (BaldisKing, Sab, that guy who liked to see his wife get gangbanged can't remember his name, Elneclare's ex-husband, among many others).

Most of this stuff is just joking around for alot of us, but for those people I've mentioned "alternative lifestyles" are very much what they are into, so, no, thinking about taking in the a$$ is just foreplay for them and doesn't bother them one wit. To each their own, but it's not going to stop me from mocking them, because at its heart being gay or taking a cack in the sphinter is just plain funny.

Totem

Edited, Nov 7th 2006 at 3:12pm PST by Totem
#86 Nov 08 2006 at 12:09 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Now Doogie Howser can give Haggard massages. He's been "lanced," lol.

Totem
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 228 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (228)