Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Negative Campaign Ad's work!Follow

QuoteReply
#1 Oct 26 2006 at 10:32 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1594570947417
Scholar
****
6,318 posts
...just not as intended

This ad (NWS) is quite possibly the funniest mudslinging ad I have ever seen. If I lived in Wisconsin I would vote for Ron Kind. He is all right in my book. (ignore all the whiny douches after the end of the commercial. This was the only copy I could find)


Quasi-Transcript for those that can't watch the video:
Quote:
Taken from article at JSOnline
...
"Ron Kind has no trouble spending your money, he'd just rather spend it on sex. That's right. Instead of spending money on cancer research, Ron Kind voted to spend your money to study the sex lives of Vietnamese prostitutes. Instead of spending money to study heart disease, Ron Kind spent your money to study the ************ habits of old men,"

...

"Ron Kind," the ad continues, "even spent your tax dollars to pay teenage girls to watch pornographic movies with probes connected to their genitalia. Ron Kind pays for sex but not for soldiers."


Like I said, this Ron Kind guy is right up my alley. We need more guys like him in office.

What does his opponent have against octogenarian self love and engorged 18 year old clitori? Those two things are almost as American as apple pie and keeping a mistress that is three shades darker than you. If this other guy (John R Nelson IIRC) is so uptight that he is against co-eds with electrodes in their nether region (which is hella hawt), then he has no business in office. I mena, damn, normally I have to go to some Tawianese site to see that stuff, but Ron Kind is going to make it an everyday occurance!

Ron Kind gets my stamp of approval, and I urge everyone in that silly cheese state to vote for him.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#2 Oct 26 2006 at 10:46 AM Rating: Good
__DEL__1695601009560
Guru
*****
18,463 posts
I heard about this the other day. Apparently the beef is with some money that he voted for to go to NIH, which ran this study along with hundreds of others. Nice way to isolate it and make it seem like this was the intended use of the funds, though. Once the money goes to NIH, they decide the grantees.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#3 Oct 26 2006 at 10:59 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1594570947417
Scholar
****
6,318 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
Nice way to isolate it and make it seem like this was the intended use of the funds, though. Once the money goes to NIH, they decide the grantees.
But how is that different than any of the other negative ads going around right now?

Like I said, I just thought the comercial was funny, since it was geared to make Ron Kind look like a scumbag, and even if I took that ad at face value I would have thought Ron Kind was a great guy.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#4 Oct 26 2006 at 2:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel
View User Forum
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Ron Kind wants illegal aliens to BURN OUR FLAG! (YouTube link)
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#5 Oct 26 2006 at 2:51 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1592347379217
View User Forum
Scholar
***
1,180 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Ron Kind wants illegal aliens to BURN OUR FLAG! (YouTube link)


Messicans or these guys?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#6 Oct 27 2006 at 8:54 AM Rating: Good
__DEL__1695601009560
Guru
*****
18,463 posts
Princess PsiChi wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
Nice way to isolate it and make it seem like this was the intended use of the funds, though. Once the money goes to NIH, they decide the grantees.
But how is that different than any of the other negative ads going around right now?
That's not the way I looked at it. I was a little surprised at the insult to the intelligence of their audience.If the bill is an appropriations bill, which it undobtedly is, it requires an agreement from the majority of both houses, some of which are also undoubtedly Republican.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#7 Oct 27 2006 at 9:42 AM Rating: Good
Kelvyquayo
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
"Ron Kind even spent your tax dollars to pay teenage girls to watch pornographic movies with probes connected to their genitalia. Ron Kind pays for sex but not for soldiers."



Smiley: thumbsup +1
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#8 Oct 27 2006 at 9:47 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1622420402685
Scholar
*****
19,369 posts
Ron should make a rebuttal ad that states 'Make love, not war'.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#9 Oct 27 2006 at 11:59 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1594570947417
Scholar
****
6,318 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
That's not the way I looked at it. I was a little surprised at the insult to the intelligence of their audience.If the bill is an appropriations bill, which it undobtedly is, it requires an agreement from the majority of both houses, some of which are also undoubtedly Republican.

I am sure that both sides voted for it..

But do you honestly think that the people that would be swayed by this type of ad are smart enough to think about anything other than what they are told?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#10 Oct 27 2006 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1695601009560
Guru
*****
18,463 posts
Princess PsiChi wrote:
But do you honestly think that the people that would be swayed by this type of ad are smart enough to think about anything other than what they are told?
Or to realize they're being insulted? Probably not.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#11 Oct 27 2006 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1594570947417
Scholar
****
6,318 posts
And you have to remember, this ad was shown in Wisconsin. What do they know other than making cheese and fucking cows?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#12 Oct 27 2006 at 12:55 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1695601009560
Guru
*****
18,463 posts
Princess PsiChi wrote:
And you have to remember, this ad was shown in Wisconsin. What do they know other than making cheese and fucking cows?
How to scrape bugs off their cars?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#13 Oct 27 2006 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
Kelvyquayo
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Quote:
"Ron Kind even spent your tax dollars to pay teenage girls to watch pornographic movies with probes connected to their genitalia. Ron Kind pays for sex but not for soldiers."



Smiley: thumbsup +1


Barkingturtle, this was your cue, waht the hell are you doing?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#14 Oct 27 2006 at 1:12 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1622420402685
Scholar
*****
19,369 posts
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Quote:
"Ron Kind even spent your tax dollars to pay teenage girls to watch pornographic movies with probes connected to their genitalia. Ron Kind pays for sex but not for soldiers."



Smiley: thumbsup +1


Barkingturtle, this was your cue, waht the hell are you doing?


He's on his way to Wisconsin.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#15 Oct 27 2006 at 4:06 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1594570947417
Scholar
****
6,318 posts
MentalFrog wrote:

He's on his way to Wisconsin to see teens with electrodes on their engorged clitori.

fixed
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#16 Oct 27 2006 at 5:05 PM Rating: Default
__DEL__1672618693847
View User Forum
Scholar
*****
15,787 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Quote:
"Ron Kind even spent your tax dollars to pay teenage girls to watch pornographic movies with probes connected to their genitalia. Ron Kind pays for sex but not for soldiers."



Smiley: thumbsup +1


Barkingturtle, this was your cue, waht the hell are you doing?


He's on his way to Wisconsin.
He knows I'd kick him out...
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#17 Oct 29 2006 at 3:54 AM Rating: Default
__DEL__1592343335444
***
2,480 posts
The Founders were smart enough to anticipate a Brewsters Millions-esque none-of-the-above vote. Revolution. Divorce. "Gender" expansion. My @$$. Etc. Hawt. Discuss. Gradation. Picasso. Wielding. Whipping it out. And for good measure, bringing out the tape Ruler.
▲ Page top
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 229 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (229)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC