Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

North Korea tested a nukeFollow

#27 Oct 09 2006 at 6:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
For the record, the mere notion of a nuclear armed N. Korea is nothing new. North Korea has claimed to be nuclear armed for the last 18 months or so and the CIA has suspected North Korea of having nuclear weapons for well over a decade. The news here is that North Korea has successfully tested its nuclear ******* which was a step not previously taken.
In May 2005, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists wrote:
On February 10 [2005], North Korea announced for the first time that it possesses nuclear weapons. The claim grabbed headlines, but it is difficult to substantiate. In the early 1990s, the CIA concluded that North Korea had effectively joined the nuclear club by building one or possibly two weapons from plutonium it produced before 1992. Yet North Korea has never conducted a nuclear test, and although it has extracted weapon-grade plutonium, it has never conclusively demonstrated that it possesses operational nuclear warheads. (Nor has the United States been able to verify it.) It is known, however, that Pyongyang has a nuclear program. By cataloging the program's capabilities and quantity of separated plutonium, it is possible to estimate how many nuclear weapons Kim Jong Il's country might have.
Source
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#28 Oct 09 2006 at 7:06 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,755 posts
And everyone's suggestions are....?

bohdi and Ambrya, you seem to have the biggest mouths here....why don't you explain to us what we do and how you plan to do it. You know, to fix everything.
#29 Oct 09 2006 at 7:11 AM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
I think the real elephant in the room is that we, as a nation, just don't scare people the way we used to. We are no longer the golden child of the international political scene, our big stick isn't as large as it used to be, we aren't the leaders in technology anymore, our kids aren't the smartest, our culture not the most efficient,and we're ****-poor bad at not being first.

There's got to be a paradigm shift in the way this country thinks about itself and its place in the world, but we're not getting the message. It sucks, because although I remember my home country fondly, there's a reason I immigrated, and it's because I firmly believe that this nation is good at heart, and the best place to be at this point in time. I don't know if future events will cause me to reconsider this stance or not, but I certainly hope not. I hope that, as a people, we can see our global role needs to change, and we can do so with some grace and innovation.



I think it's cute how you say "we", brownie.

Course I also think you're spot on.


#30 Oct 09 2006 at 7:16 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
For a party that relies so heavily on personal responsibility and taking care of the consequences for ones own actions (especially if you are a single mother needing support) its kind of lame how they always try to fall back on 'like to see you do any better' in order to cover up for there own failings.

F'ucking cowards.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#31 Oct 09 2006 at 7:20 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,755 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
For a party that relies so heavily on personal responsibility and taking care of the consequences for ones own actions (especially if you are a single mother needing support) its kind of lame how they always try to fall back on 'like to see you do any better' in order to cover up for there own failings.

F'ucking cowards.


So, in conclusion, you have nothing.
Got it.
#32 Oct 09 2006 at 7:27 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
bodhisattva wrote:
For a party that relies so heavily on personal responsibility and taking care of the consequences for ones own actions (especially if you are a single mother needing support) its kind of lame how they always try to fall back on 'like to see you do any better' in order to cover up for there own failings.

F'ucking cowards.


So, in conclusion, you have nothing.
Got it.


So in conclusion neither did the Bush adminstration. The people in charge of the globes main super power. Somehow that is a little more appalling than a 25 year old poster on a MMO off topic forum not having it.

Don'tcha think?

The whole "You didn't do anything either" defense is f'ucking ridiculous in general. Please do yourself a favour and quit using it.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#33 Oct 09 2006 at 7:31 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
For a party that relies so heavily on personal responsibility and taking care of the consequences for ones own actions (especially if you are a single mother needing support) its kind of lame how they always try to fall back on 'like to see you do any better' in order to cover up for there own failings.

F'ucking cowards.


Actually I think it's a perfectly legitimate question, Bhodi. You can't have it both ways. It's lame to say "You fuckwits can't do anything right - Fix things." Besides, if you don't give your input in how things should be fixed... guess whose input is going to be used in the "fixing".



#34 Oct 09 2006 at 7:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
And everyone's suggestions are....?
Do I get a cabinet of geopolitical expert-type people and access to the nation's classified documents before I answer? Smiley: laugh

This was Bush's answer to what the Republicans considered a failure on the part of Clinton. Declare N. Korea part of the "Axis of Evil" and sword rattle at Kim Jong-Il and expect him to back down. It didn't work. Whether or not the hand of God touched my forehead last night and imparted me with the wisdom to solve the problem has nothing to do with the fact that Bush's plan isn't working.

The primary difference being that I'm not the one in the White House tasked with, and theoretically given the resources to, do something about it.

Your argument is laughable. I suppose that, when an airplane goes down due to mechanical error, I shouldn't point that out either unless I'm trained in airplane mechanics and could have fixed the engine myself Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#35 Oct 09 2006 at 7:34 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Celcio wrote:
bodhisattva wrote:
For a party that relies so heavily on personal responsibility and taking care of the consequences for ones own actions (especially if you are a single mother needing support) its kind of lame how they always try to fall back on 'like to see you do any better' in order to cover up for there own failings.

F'ucking cowards.


Actually I think it's a perfectly legitimate question, Bhodi. You can't have it both ways. It's lame to say "You fuckwits can't do anything right - Fix things." Besides, if you don't give your input in how things should be fixed... guess whose input is going to be used in the "fixing".


I think Jophiel covered that.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#36 Oct 09 2006 at 7:34 AM Rating: Decent
bodhisattva wrote:
The whole "You didn't do anything either" defense is f'ucking ridiculous in general. Please do yourself a favour and quit using it.


It's even worse than that.

They ***** up everything, and say "So, how are y'all gonna fix all this mess we made?"

Having said that, the solutions are pretty obvious and not that complicated. But since it doesnt involve nuking/invading foreign countries, I doubt you'll be interested.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#37 Oct 09 2006 at 7:34 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Do I get a cabinet of geopolitical expert-type people and access to the nation's classified documents before I answer?


I thought that's what the asylum was. I was mislead :(

#38 Oct 09 2006 at 7:43 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
See I don't really think he did.

While I laughed at the plane analogy there are a few things that don't work there.

1.) I don't get a voice in who the airline mechanics are.

2.) There's one desired result in Joph's scenario - the plane stays in the air. There are quite a few varying desired results in politics. Bush and friends have an agenda - I'm sure that's not news to anyone. They're pursuing the path that they hope will acheive that objective. Others don't quite have the yen to dominate the world and be in charge, those paths might be a little different.

2a.) He also assumes that Bush wants Kim Jong-Il to back down.





#39 Oct 09 2006 at 7:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Aww, they just want to be loved.

Quote:
The U.N. Security Council should congratulate North Korea for its nuclear test instead of passing "useless" resolutions or statements, North Korea's U.N. ambassador said Monday.

Pak Gil Yon told reporters he was proud of the North Koreans who conducted the test, and said the Security Council ought to be, too. Asked if the North planned any more tests, Pak said: "That will be enough. You don't think so?"


Smartass diplomats.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#40 Oct 09 2006 at 7:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Others don't quite have the yen to dominate the world


Or the dollars, anymore.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#41 Oct 09 2006 at 7:49 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Well, when Bush's plan here turns out to be brilliance, let me know Smiley: wink2

The analogy works well enough -- Neph was saying that unless one has the answers, one has no right to criticise. That's foolishness; noting that something doesn't work has nothing at all to do with noting how to repair it. I could come up with a bajillion examples of when someone might notice a flawed effort without being able to correct it themselves. You could probably find a bajillion differneces in each but that's why it's called an analogy and not an equivalency.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#42 Oct 09 2006 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Of course those would hold true if I had actually said "You f'uckwits cant do anything right, fix things"

In reality all I said "You f'uckwits can't do anything right".

Also I have no more say on elected officials in america (being Canadian) as you do on who airplane mechanics are.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#43 Oct 09 2006 at 7:58 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Well, when Bush's plan here turns out to be brilliance, let me know


Oh I'm sure we'll all be able to tell by the huge finger of god in the sky. He's got arthritis, makes his fingers look like mushroom clouds, really.

(and I never said it was a brilliant plan)

I also, apparently, misunderstood what Neph was saying. To me it sounded less like what you said and more like someone saying "I don't like where this is going" without saying where they would rather go. You know, kind of like that annoying girl you dated where you ask her where she wants to go, she says "I don't care" and then pisses and moans the whole time.

#44 Oct 09 2006 at 8:04 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
Celcio wrote:
Oh I'm sure we'll all be able to tell by the huge finger of god in the sky. He's got arthritis, makes his fingers look like mushroom clouds, really.


<----- Like this.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#45 Oct 09 2006 at 8:05 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
Close! But I think there's an extra finger in that pic.

#46 Oct 09 2006 at 8:10 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Until we chuck our entire nuclear ******** I don't see how we're in the position to tell any nation they can or can't have nukes.

But we do need to do something when North Korea starts having "military training exercises" near the de-militarized zone. Are we going to "negotiate"? Are we going to lift sanctions, and in exchange NK will withdraw from the border? Are we going to offer billions of dollars in "humanitarian aid to the struggling people of NK" so that Krazy Kim backs down (for now) with his big fat nuclear stick? How many times do we go through that routine? That's not really the way to go, is it?

What if a North Korean nuke makes its way to Hezbollah via Iran?

It's easy to endlessly ridicule actions that have been taken. Hell, I agree that the whole "Axis of Evil" idea was a mistake. And I know invading Iraq was a bad idea in hindsight.

But that's easy to say and it does nothing to actually improve these situations. It's a little more difficult to come up with a better idea. You people are supposed to be, like, smert and stuf, so get busy. Ok.... go!

#47 Oct 09 2006 at 8:15 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The honest answer is that there isn't a bob damned thing you can do about North Korea now that they are nuclear armed. Even when they weren't the options using force were pretty slim.

Of course republicans will try to trace this back to Clinton and not own up to the 5 years they were in power and were completely ineffectual.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#48 Oct 09 2006 at 8:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Back to the Korea to the North, I (in my admittedly amateur opinion) would assume that we had two real choices on N. Korea. Either (A) Attempt to bring it into the fold of 'civilized' nations via economic/diplomatic/technological incentives or else (B) Cripple it decisively via military or economic means.

The problem with (B) is that:
(1) We couldn't do so militarily without putting S. Korea to the torch. And this is discounting the notion of N. Korea's existing, though untested, nuclear *******
-and-
(2) We have no muscle in economically crippling N. Korea because of their trade with Russia & China and we have no sway over those nations. You could also tie China's alliance with N. Korea back into (1)

Clinton was attempting (A), for which he's now blamed by some as allowing N. Korea's program to progress. I already argued in another thread why this wasn't really accurate but, ignoring that, I'll also point out that (B) was no more an option in 1996 than it was in 2005.

Bush, from what I've seen, was trying to toe the line with (B) but everyone knew that he could not commit to it. So instead he obliquely threatens N. Korea after 9/11 and tries to play tough but he really doesn't have any muscle to back it up. Not with N. Korea, not with China and not with Russia. If he had a plan behind this aside from "saber rattle and hope for the best", I'd be interesting in hearing how he thought this was going to go.

Edit: I should add that, at this point, I don't see a whole lot of hope for (A) either. As it stands, it's just something we're going to have to work with.

Edited, Oct 9th 2006 at 9:30am PDT by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#49 Oct 09 2006 at 8:36 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Bush's pre-emptive strike doctrine + Faulty Intelligence = international nervousness.

Of course, NK fully intended to become nuke capable before Bush was ever elected, but his foreign policy and his foreign policy blunders give them (as well as Iran) all the justification they'll ever need to build nukes.
#50 Oct 09 2006 at 8:38 AM Rating: Default
Besides the potential arms race scenario, anyone else see why testing a nuke would cause a problem? I mean, they're just irradiating their country, and we care why?

N.K.: We tested a nuke! Give us monies!

Sane World: No. Test 100 more and then maybe we'll take you seriously.

N.K.: Fine! We'll test 100 at one time!

Sane World: Yeah, you do that. Bye.


If a nuke detonates on American, European, Canadian, hell Anyan soil in the next few months, we all know where to point our missles. Problem solved. Sure it might take some loss of life on our side, but apparently pre-emption makes everyone hate you. So we just wait for a major city to explode, then end their existence. Game, set, match.

They shouldn't get a dime from us though...not a single dime. We already helped them build the weapons with which they now threaten us. This pisses me off more than Paris Hilton. No more wheeling and dealing, just let them starve while spending all of their available resources on nuclear testing, and enjoy the show.
#51 Oct 09 2006 at 8:42 AM Rating: Decent
I don't think it's either that dire a situation, or that hard to find a solution. The US dealth with the Soviet threat, which was ten times more dangerous.

N.Korea has a few nukes. The US has thousands. So you can bet your bottom dollar that the day N. Korea really threatens someone with a nuke, they will receive one first. It sucks, but when you play with fire...

Second, I agree that Joph's idea or bringing N.Korea into the fold of civilised nation is a good one. But it will be hard, and will require China, S.Korea, and Japan's total comittment to the cause. Not impossible, though.

Another option, which I think the Rep would like, would be to build your super-duper Shield of Missile Protection that shoots Nukes from space, or something. After all, yu guys would've done it if it hadn't been for 9/11. So I am sure it's still on the cards somewhere in the WH.

The only reason the US should really worry about N.K. is in the distinctly improbably scenario that it would sell one of three nukes it has to some terrorist group. But NK are quite a way from being able to do that. I would worry much more about Pakistan, or some elements in the Pakistani government, doing that then NK.

So, if NK is unlikely to sell its nukes, why should the US worry? The chances of the US being hit are tiny. NK does not have the capabilities to do that yet.

Hence, the real playa in all this is China. They have nukes. They can talk to NK. The trade with NK. And, most important of all, they dont want some dumb-*** two bob puppet dictator fucking around with their economic development. So China, not the US, is the one that has the most to lose in all this. And they are the ones who should really move their asses to find a solution. You guys have enough problem in the ME as it is.

And the chances are that China will act. There is too much at stake. Whether they will act through cute diplomacy (trying to bring them into the civilised world), or hardcore diplomacy (threatening sanctions and more), remains to be seen.

But it would be naive to think China is just sitting pretty worrying about the Euro 2008 qualifiers while all this is going on.

I think you guys should be much more worried about whats happening in Afghanistan right now, than in NK.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 245 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (245)