Debalic wrote:
BBBD wrote:
Another thread ruined by MonxDOT.
Gbaji seriously if he were a Dem would you be saying this, hell it was Fidel Castro would you be defending him?
Well we could go digging and find out what he thought about the whole McGreevey thing.
I don't recall that issue at all actually. I don't think we even had a thread about in on this forum (hmmm... Wonder why not?).
However, I've been incredibly consistent with observations that people tend to term any sexual behavior with any minor "pe
dophilia". I've argued many times on this forum, that it's an incredibly missued term specifically because people like to use the harshest term possible when condemning someone's actions. I've made this argument long before I ever heard of Foley.
I'm also looking purely at the bits and pieces of emails and messages that have so far appeared in the press. While they do appear inappropriate, they aren't illegal. No moreso then dozens of conversations on this forum. Unless Foley actually engaged in sexual activity with someone underaged *and* the parents of that underaged person chose to press charges, he has not committed any criminal act. He may well be in a breach of ethics with regards to his job given both its public nature and the working relationship with the minor in question (although I thought the article said he as a "former page" and was no longer working there when the emails were sent), but that's a different matter.
I'm not saying it's wrong for him to have stepped down. That's his choice. However, unless he actually did something illegal or in violation of some ethical rule of the position he's in (which may be the case, but I'll let the experts figure that out), then it was a choice he made. He could well have continued his election bid for all I care. My observation is that his decision to drop out most likely had less to do with his concern for some crime being discovered then his own personal desire to avoid the discussion of the issue itself.
That and the media tends to have a field day with stories like this. For exactly the reasons I've already outlined. The fact that everyone keeps calling the guy a pe
dophile should be your first hint that this is the kind of thing that everyone exagerates.
What's more interesting to me is the timing of this. Do people really think that this information was just discovered now? Or do you think that someone knew, held the dirt until 5 weeks before the election and then released it? Kinda throws a kink into the motives of this whole thing doesn't it?