Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Four and a half weeks and countingFollow

#27 Oct 02 2006 at 7:35 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Quote:
Foley, a Republican, abruptly quit Congress on Friday after reports surfaced that he'd sent sexually charged electronic messages to boys working as pages. In the statement, Foley said the "events that led to my resignation have crystalized recognition of my long-standing and significant alcoholism and emotional difficulties."

"I deeply regret and accept full responsibility for the harm I have caused," Foley said. He also expressed "gratitude for the prayers and words of encouragement that have been conveyed to me."
Well, I'm glad that he didn't make it sound like alcohol turned him gay or much less pedo, 'cause that would be ignorant.

Quote:
Hastert issued his strongest statement yet on Monday, saying he was "outraged and disgusted with Congressman Mark Foley's actions."

Why does Hastert hate alcohol? Smiley: confused

Quote:
White House press secretary Tony Snow, asked about that Monday on ABC's "Good Morning America," urged greater efforts to "figure out what happened here." He called it "a terrible story" and said he considered it unfortunate that "people are thinking, 'OK, can I get political advantage out of this'."
You bet your sweet patoot. If you're enough of a moran to do it, don't cry when it's used against you.

Edited, Oct 2nd 2006 at 8:41am PDT by Atomicflea
#28 Oct 02 2006 at 7:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Yes - the story Tare linked specifies that "recent events have crystallized [his] problems with alcohol and underlying emotional problems," which tells me that he's toeing the party line that skeeterphilia is just a bad habit.

Good luck treating that, Mr. Foley. Do let us know how you progress.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#29 Oct 02 2006 at 7:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I imagine that, barring evidence of a widespread cover-up, any political advantage will be limited to FLA-16. Hastert isn't up for election and few people are likely to say "That guy in Florida is a sicko so I'm voting Democrat in my Nebraska election." Things like corruption ripple through the party because everyone assumes that politicans are corrupt anyway so you think "I wonder how my guy was involved." The same can't be said for courting teenaged boys via e-mail.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#30 Oct 02 2006 at 8:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
While I wait for Jophiel's post to appear, I'll just add that this made me laugh:

ABC news wrote:
In one message Foley wrote to one page: "Do I make you a little horny?"


Austin Powers? Dat j00?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#31 Oct 02 2006 at 8:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Were you waiting breathlessly?

All of my posts are worth waiting for breathlessly.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Oct 02 2006 at 8:20 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
MonxDoT wrote:
Well, thank you for letting us know, in your one and only usual tricky style.

On behalf, I just want to let you know, we appreciate, as you approach your 10-thousand-th post-day. Hip hip ... ludicrousness eh? Strange references indeed. Don't stop responding til you get enough responding. /beep

Edit: /peek-a-boo-cringe, Nope, still at "default" decent, the only piece in this forum=?. /swanter + /sway_hair_to-the-side_on

Edited, Sep 30th 2006 at 9:42pm PDT by MonxDoT


Smiley: clap Take that tricky!
#33 Oct 02 2006 at 8:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
WTF does "swanter" mean? Swaggering canter?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#34 Oct 02 2006 at 2:44 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Debalic wrote:
BBBD wrote:
Another thread ruined by MonxDOT.

Gbaji seriously if he were a Dem would you be saying this, hell it was Fidel Castro would you be defending him?

Well we could go digging and find out what he thought about the whole McGreevey thing.


I don't recall that issue at all actually. I don't think we even had a thread about in on this forum (hmmm... Wonder why not?).

However, I've been incredibly consistent with observations that people tend to term any sexual behavior with any minor "pedophilia". I've argued many times on this forum, that it's an incredibly missued term specifically because people like to use the harshest term possible when condemning someone's actions. I've made this argument long before I ever heard of Foley.

I'm also looking purely at the bits and pieces of emails and messages that have so far appeared in the press. While they do appear inappropriate, they aren't illegal. No moreso then dozens of conversations on this forum. Unless Foley actually engaged in sexual activity with someone underaged *and* the parents of that underaged person chose to press charges, he has not committed any criminal act. He may well be in a breach of ethics with regards to his job given both its public nature and the working relationship with the minor in question (although I thought the article said he as a "former page" and was no longer working there when the emails were sent), but that's a different matter.


I'm not saying it's wrong for him to have stepped down. That's his choice. However, unless he actually did something illegal or in violation of some ethical rule of the position he's in (which may be the case, but I'll let the experts figure that out), then it was a choice he made. He could well have continued his election bid for all I care. My observation is that his decision to drop out most likely had less to do with his concern for some crime being discovered then his own personal desire to avoid the discussion of the issue itself.

That and the media tends to have a field day with stories like this. For exactly the reasons I've already outlined. The fact that everyone keeps calling the guy a pedophile should be your first hint that this is the kind of thing that everyone exagerates.


What's more interesting to me is the timing of this. Do people really think that this information was just discovered now? Or do you think that someone knew, held the dirt until 5 weeks before the election and then released it? Kinda throws a kink into the motives of this whole thing doesn't it?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#35 Oct 02 2006 at 8:10 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
nevermind



Edited, Oct 2nd 2006 at 9:12pm PDT by trickybeck
#36 Oct 02 2006 at 8:38 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
gbaji wrote:
Debalic wrote:
BBBD wrote:
Another thread ruined by MonxDOT.

Gbaji seriously if he were a Dem would you be saying this, hell it was Fidel Castro would you be defending him?

Well we could go digging and find out what he thought about the whole McGreevey thing.


I don't recall that issue at all actually. I don't think we even had a thread about in on this forum (hmmm... Wonder why not?).

Yeah, I forgot protocol and didn't link it. Didn't cause much commotion. No big deal, just something I remember from listening to WCBS-News every day back then.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#37 Oct 03 2006 at 1:35 AM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:
Unless Foley actually engaged in sexual activity with someone underaged *and* the parents of that underaged person chose to press charges, he has not committed any criminal act.


So just having sex with minors is not a criminal act? Pedophilia is ok as long the parents dont press charges? Well, better get ready for a big inlfux of old men into your country...



Quote:
That and the media tends to have a field day with stories like this. For exactly the reasons I've already outlined. The fact that everyone keeps calling the guy a pedophile should be your first hint that this is the kind of thing that everyone exagerates.


Man, when an odl Senator starts emailing random 16-year-olds sexually implicit messages, you can assume it's not to form some philosophical book club with the kid. This whole story stinks of pedophilia, it seems odd that you're the only one not finding it slightly disturbing.


Quote:
What's more interesting to me is the timing of this. Do people really think that this information was just discovered now?


Of course not. Republicans have known about it for months! They just, erm, forgot.

Quote:
Or do you think that someone knew, held the dirt until 5 weeks before the election and then released it? Kinda throws a kink into the motives of this whole thing doesn't it?


What?? Are you saying people release information before an election in order to "smear" a political opponent?! How outrageous! Damn, those Democrats really have no morals. I can't ever think of Republicans doing that. Nope. Never. Not in a million years.

Guess they're too busy pretending to be 16-year-olds on MySpace.

Edited, Oct 3rd 2006 at 2:37am PDT by RedPhoenixxxxxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#38 Oct 03 2006 at 4:25 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Unless Foley actually engaged in sexual activity with someone underaged *and* the parents of that underaged person chose to press charges, he has not committed any criminal act.


So just having sex with minors is not a criminal act? Pedophilia is ok as long the parents dont press charges? Well, better get ready for a big inlfux of old men into your country...

Hey, it doesn't count unless you get caught! So make sure you don't leave any marks.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#39 Oct 03 2006 at 4:28 AM Rating: Decent
Debalic wrote:
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Unless Foley actually engaged in sexual activity with someone underaged *and* the parents of that underaged person chose to press charges, he has not committed any criminal act.


So just having sex with minors is not a criminal act? Pedophilia is ok as long the parents dont press charges? Well, better get ready for a big inlfux of old men into your country...

Hey, it doesn't count unless you get caught! So make sure you don't leave any marks.


The Law according to gbaji. Beautiful.

I think a requirement of 4 witnesses that were present when the rape occured would be good too. You know, better safe than sorry.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#40 Oct 03 2006 at 4:50 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Debalic wrote:
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Unless Foley actually engaged in sexual activity with someone underaged *and* the parents of that underaged person chose to press charges, he has not committed any criminal act.

So just having sex with minors is not a criminal act? Pedophilia is ok as long the parents dont press charges? Well, better get ready for a big inlfux of old men into your country...

Hey, it doesn't count unless you get caught! So make sure you don't leave any marks.

The Law according to gbaji. Beautiful.

I think a requirement of 4 witnesses that were present when the rape occured would be good too. You know, better safe than sorry.

A videotape for proof should be necessary. And it can be viewed online for a fee, to help pay for the legal bills.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#41 Oct 03 2006 at 5:29 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
View results from: Dictionary | Thesaurus | Encyclopedia | the Web
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source
pe‧do‧phil‧i‧a  /ˌpidəˈfɪliə/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[pee-duh-fil-ee-uh] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun Psychiatry.
sexual desire in an adult for a child.
[Origin: 1905–10; < NL; see pedo-1, -philia]
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source
ped·o·phil·i·a (pd-fl-, pd-) Pronunciation Key Audio pronunciation of "pedophilia" [P]
n.

The act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children.


pedo·phili·ac (-k) adj. & n.

(Download Now or Buy the Book)
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
American Heritage Stedman's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source

ped·o·phil·i·a (pd-fl-, pd-)
n.

The act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children.

pedo·phile (-fl) n.
pedo·phili·ac (-fl-k) adj. & n.
The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source

Main Entry: pe·do·phil·ia
Pronunciation: "pEd-&-'fil-E-&, "ped-
Variant: or chiefly British pae·do·phil·ia /"pEd-/
Function: noun
: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary, © 2002 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
WordNet - Cite This Source

pedophilia

n : sexual activity of an adult with a child [syn: paedophilia]
WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University


All 6 results from Dictionary dot com, and it seems Mr Foley fill all of them, how interesting.
#42 Oct 03 2006 at 5:34 AM Rating: Decent
Debalic wrote:
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Debalic wrote:
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Unless Foley actually engaged in sexual activity with someone underaged *and* the parents of that underaged person chose to press charges, he has not committed any criminal act.

So just having sex with minors is not a criminal act? Pedophilia is ok as long the parents dont press charges? Well, better get ready for a big inlfux of old men into your country...

Hey, it doesn't count unless you get caught! So make sure you don't leave any marks.

The Law according to gbaji. Beautiful.

I think a requirement of 4 witnesses that were present when the rape occured would be good too. You know, better safe than sorry.

A videotape for proof should be necessary. And it can be viewed online for a fee, to help pay for the legal bills.


Fraps + Google Video or it didn't happen.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#43 Oct 03 2006 at 6:09 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
gbaji wrote:
I'm not saying it's wrong for him to have stepped down. That's his choice. However, unless he actually did something illegal or in violation of some ethical rule of the position he's in (which may be the case, but I'll let the experts figure that out), then it was a choice he made.

Thanks, I will.

The House Ethics Manual, Ch. 5 wrote:
STAFF RIGHTS AND DUTIES
The House has adopted specific laws, regulations, and rules governing the employer-employee relationship. This chapter discusses restrictions against discrimination in hiring and compensation; nepotism; protection of employees from ``kickback'' schemes and other illegal hiring, firing, and compensation practices; regulations on pay; and guidelines affecting interns and volunteers. Outside employment and campaign activity by House employees are also briefly addressed. (FOOTNOTE 1)


Then, under the heading of 'discrimination', it wrote:
The Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is charged with investigating alleged violations of the Code of Official Conduct. (FOOTNOTE 9) In the 101st Congress, the Committee undertook a Preliminary Inquiry into charges that a Member had sexually harassed two female employees on his personal staff. In that case, the Committee affirmed that sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination, that the Member charged had indeed harassed his employees, and that this behavior violated the Code of Official Conduct. The Committee report stressed that clause 9 tracks the language of Title VII of the Civil Rights Law of 1964 and should be interpreted in light of judicial and administrative (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) decisions construing that law. (FOOTNOTE 10)

#44 Oct 03 2006 at 6:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Well we could go digging and find out what he thought about the whole McGreevey thing.
I don't recall that issue at all actually. I don't think we even had a thread about in on this forum (hmmm... Wonder why not?)
Me too. Oh, wait... because we did have a thread about it. Huh.

You know, you'd sound a lot less stupid and slightly less like a tool if you dropped the omnipresent "Gee, let me insinuate some bias into this conversation" bit. One would hope that you'd have learned by now that it falls flat every time.

Anyway, moving on along to Dennis Hastert...
The Washington Times wrote:
House Speaker Dennis Hastert must do the only right thing, and resign his speakership at once. Either he was grossly negligent for not taking the red flags fully into account and ordering a swift investigation, for not even remembering the order of events leading up to last week's revelations -- or he deliberately looked the other way in hopes that a brewing scandal would simply blow away. He gave phony answers Friday to the old and ever-relevant questions of what did he know and when did he know it? Mr. Hastert has forfeited the confidence of the public and his party, and he cannot preside over the necessary coming investigation, an investigation that must examine his own inept performance.
Not that I'd dare let myself dream that this scandal will take Hastert down but, if it did, it would make me giddy as a schoolgirl. The pettiest of reasons for this is that, in the town my sister lives in, the mayor recently renamed one of the major streets "Hastert Drive" and I'd like to see how quickly it gets re-renamed after Hastert resigns due to a pedophilia scandal. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#45 Oct 03 2006 at 6:34 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Holy crap! That actually means something, coming from the Times, which, for those of you not from the area, is a conservative rag. Pubbies must really need a head for that pike.
#46 Oct 03 2006 at 12:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"That was Alexander's page!"
"Yeah, but he told Shimkus!"
"No way, I told Boehner about it!"
"Hey man, I let Hastert know!"
"Nuh uh, if he told me it was with a bunch of other stuff! I can't remember all that!"
...

"I know! It's the Democrat's fault!!!"
Jim Boehner, in a letter to the Washington Times wrote:
We also need to know why these messages surfaced only last week, on the final day of legislative business before the November elections. If this evidence was withheld for political purposes, one can only speculate as to how many additional children may have been endangered before this information was finally revealed.
There's no actual evidence of this mind you other than the unfortunate timing but, hey, when you're circling the wagons there's no reason to let facts stand in the way of a good defense.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#47 Oct 03 2006 at 12:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
And the story itself just gets better and better...
CNN.com wrote:
Former Rep. Mark Foley allegedly had Internet sex with a former page before going to a vote on the House floor in 2003, ABC News reported Tuesday.

The network published a partial transcript on its Web site but did not quote the exchanges in which it said the congressman and the high school student apparently had orgasms.

Former pages gave ABC News the transcripts, which were dated 2003, the network reported.
No doubt the pages who forwarded the transcripts are all Democratic pawns.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#48 Oct 03 2006 at 1:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
So is Boehner pronounced "*****"?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#49 Oct 03 2006 at 1:16 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Quote:
"Either he was grossly negligent for not taking the red flags fully into account and ordering a swift investigation, for not even remembering the order of events leading up to last week's revelations -- or he deliberately looked the other way in hopes that a brewing scandal would simply blow away."
Preach!
#50 Oct 03 2006 at 1:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
We have Limbaugh now pitching the idea that the Democrats bribed this kid over a year ago to seduce Foley so they could use the material now.
Rush Limbaugh wrote:
I'm just thinking out loud here. What if somebody got to the page and said, you know, we want you to set Foley up. We need to do a little titillating thing here. Keep it and save it and so forth. How would you get a kid to do that? Yeah, who knows? You threaten him or pay him. There's any number of ways given the kind of people that we're dealing with and talking about here.
It'd be funny if it wasn't so sickeningly pathetic.

I'm sure Gbaji will be presenting the theory soon though since it showed up on the Limbaugh program Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#51 Oct 03 2006 at 1:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Yeah, Drudge said something similar to Rush (amazing, I know), and further implied that "these 17-year-old beasts" were deliberately trying to entrap Foley.

Bear in mind, pages have to have a B or better GPA and three letters of recommendation to be considered for the program. It's not like they're the dregs of society on the make.

I was glad to see other, more rational conservative columnists give the Pubbies a solid scolding for letting down the team.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 277 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (277)