Someone Said
Quote:
The liberal media was shouting about the lack of a connection. However, they shouted about it even as Bush never made any connection. And by continually pointing at the Bush administration and saying "OMG!!! They're wrong because there's no connection between Iraq and 9/11", they created the impression that the Bush administration was making that connection.
The argument being, that the more the Bushies didn't connect Iraq and 9/11, the more the liberal press shouted that there wasn't a connection, thereby fooling us all into believing that there was a connection.
So, anyone have any thoughts on why the liberal press would do [link=[IMG]http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/9843/3092606bc2smyv3.jpg[/IMG]]this[/link]
Because, if the liberal press is at it again, i think we should have some sort of explanation. I mean, really! is the story about the the resurgence of the Taleban NOT as important to the american readers, as it is to the readers in the rest of the world?
Or, more likely, taking into account the sneaky liberal press types, is the hope of the magazines' (commie, no doubt!) editor to get the people of America to buy a copy of his rag, thinking they were gonna get a story about a photographer of 'celebrities', when in fact they were gonna get a story on the sorry state of affairs in Afghanistan? thereby manipulating their feelings against the progress of ****.
Insideous! thats what it is.....