Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I'm apologizing for what now?Follow

#27 Sep 18 2006 at 11:10 AM Rating: Decent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Quoting Al-Jazeera is like quoting a US news corporation.

Look for the press releases that A-J ignores just as blatantly as Fox/BBC/CNN etc.

Or better, next Friday, visit your local mosque, avoid preaching, and open your ears and your mind.

You will find a lot of peace-loving, frightened people.

You may find extremist nutters (just like you will at any Church, Synagogue or Gurdwara)
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#28 Sep 18 2006 at 11:12 AM Rating: Decent
**
448 posts
Nobby wrote:
Quoting Al-Jazeera is like quoting a US news corporation.


I didn't quote Al-Jazeera. I quoted a reader comment. With the story itself, I just had to laugh seeing the story skewed to get the other side of the world fired up, just like I laugh when I see American news orgs doing the same.

Different color, same dog.
#29 Sep 18 2006 at 11:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
King Nobby wrote:
You may find extremist nutters (just like you will at any Church, Synagogue or Gurdwara)


Especially if you go to the mosque down the street from my mom's house, where the 9/11 hijackers went!
____________________________
Do what now?
#30 Sep 18 2006 at 11:22 AM Rating: Default
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
but ISTR that Rajasthan is predominantly Sikh.


Nope. Its definately mostly Hindu. By a large margin.

And as far as the OP goes. Id just like to point out that Catholisism doesn't exactly have a clean slate when it comes to spreading Gods word by the sword.

They are (pretty much), all as bad as each other when it comes to claiming with absolute certitude that they are 'right' and the rest of us are destined to burn in some imaginary hell.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#31 Sep 18 2006 at 11:26 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
paulsol wrote:
And as far as the OP goes. Id just like to point out that Catholisism doesn't exactly have a clean slate when it comes to spreading Gods word by the sword.
The primary difference, in this case, being that when someone brings up the Crusades or Inquisition, you don't get rioting mobs in Latin America and Europe calling for death on the infidels for daring to bring it up.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Sep 18 2006 at 11:35 AM Rating: Decent
Granted the American press sucks and perhaps your right we don't get a good view of internal pressure being brought down on the radical elements of the Muslim world.

But that just plays to my original point, not coddling the radical elements of the Muslim world gives the internal moderating elements a chance to point out that burning and rioting isn't going to change anything.

Give these guys fifty people in the press to protest a week and at the very lest they'll run out of things to burn. Rioting on the streets is a good gig if you can make a living at it, but something tells me they're not getting paid to do that. We should just use fatigue to our advantage. One riot a week is entertainment, fifty is a freaking job and I don't care how much the mullah wants me out there I'd better be getting paid.

Let's face it, we're not going to do the right thing and build up their economics to off set some pretty high unemployment numbers in various regions. Or try to view the region's problems with anything like a balanced viewpoint. Might as well treat them as adults and tell them to get the hell over it.

Zium
#33 Sep 18 2006 at 11:36 AM Rating: Decent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Jophiel wrote:
paulsol wrote:
And as far as the OP goes. Id just like to point out that Catholisism doesn't exactly have a clean slate when it comes to spreading Gods word by the sword.
The primary difference, in this case, being that when someone brings up the Crusades or Inquisition, you don't get rioting mobs in Latin America and Europe calling for death on the infidels for daring to bring it up.
O RLY?

Spanish Expulsion of the Moors in 1492?
Illegitimisation of non-Christians throughout Europe from the 15th to 19th centuries?

And the other 'c' word you mentioned. The Crusades still echo down the years.

And arguing that that's "old history" is like denying African Americans the right to feel bitter about Slavery.

USA - Europe's Liberia Smiley: lol
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#34 Sep 18 2006 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
None of that had jack to do with my statement.

Unless you can find me an example of modern Catholics rioting at the mention of old transgressions, you're missing the mark.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#35 Sep 18 2006 at 11:42 AM Rating: Default
Pope: Muslims are violent.
Radical Muslims: NO WE AREN'T!!! NOW WE'LL WIPE YOU AND YOUR ENTIRE CULTURE OFF THE EARTH FOR SAYING THAT!!!

{Hmmm.}
#36 Sep 18 2006 at 12:33 PM Rating: Decent
Matjlav wrote:
{I am an cnut.}
Good thing you auto-translated that one.
#37 Sep 18 2006 at 1:28 PM Rating: Decent
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Unless you can find me an example of modern Catholics rioting at the mention of old transgressions, you're missing the mark.
I got really angry when watching The Conquistadors on the History Channel, but instead of rioting I ate a sandwich. Does that count?
#38 Sep 18 2006 at 1:37 PM Rating: Decent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Unless you can find me an example of modern Catholics rioting at the mention of old transgressions, you're missing the mark.
I got really angry when watching The Conquistadors on the History Channel, but instead of rioting I ate a sandwich. Does that count?
Was it Halal?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#39 Sep 18 2006 at 1:54 PM Rating: Decent
*****
18,463 posts
King Nobby wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Unless you can find me an example of modern Catholics rioting at the mention of old transgressions, you're missing the mark.
I got really angry when watching The Conquistadors on the History Channel, but instead of rioting I ate a sandwich. Does that count?
Was it Halal?
It was alpaca.
#40 Sep 18 2006 at 1:55 PM Rating: Decent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
King Nobby wrote:
Was it Halal?
It was alpaca.
Now technically, I'm askew. Is that Cloven hoof or not?

Smiley: llama
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#41 Sep 19 2006 at 5:35 AM Rating: Decent
The funny thing was that the rioting and whining started 48 hours after the original speech was made. It's a bit like those cartoons.

There are some preachers, reporters, governements officials, tribal leaders, that make a living out of being outraged. All over the world it's the same. For Muslims, they go "Look, another sign that the West hates us, that they want to destroy us, that they insult us..." and all the crazy cnuts that have nothing better to do go out in the street and burn papier maché.

And then the media report it. And then some other fucker in Yemen sees it and says "Is that what they call outrage in pakistan? We'll show them!" and he burns some Vatican flag in front of news cameras.

Big deal.

It happens everywhere. Some Christians attack doctors that perform abortion, or abortion clinics. Animal rights activists threaten and bomb laboratories that perform animal testing. Anti-globalisation protesters take to the street and throw bricks in Nike or Starbucks. French farmers go and destroy GM crops, or run their tractor into a McDonalds.

A$$holes getting offended and making a fuss about it is nothing new. And the fact that no camera crew ever films the Muslims who didn't show up to the demo, or the article in the newspaper calling for calm, isn't new either.

So.. How come no one is asking why the fuck the Pope is quoting a Medieval King making an incendiary, stereotyped and ultimately pointless comment about Islam in the Middle-Ages, knowing full well what would happen? Am I the only one that finds this strange?

Edited, Sep 19th 2006 at 9:36am EDT by RedPhoenixxxxxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#42 Sep 19 2006 at 5:51 AM Rating: Default
Because that kings remark was dead on.
#43 Sep 19 2006 at 5:56 AM Rating: Decent
Abadd wrote:
Because that kings remark was dead on.


Do you ever say anything remotely relevant or intresting, or do you just post here to let us know you're a pointless racist dumbass with **** for brains?

Just curious...
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#44 Sep 19 2006 at 5:57 AM Rating: Default
I take it you disagree.



-
Quote:
God," the emperor, as the pope quoted, said, "is not pleased by blood -- and not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature.
- whoa now that is super offensive. Someone better riot.


Quote:
Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached



Whoa heaven forbid someone should give their honest opinion about a barbaric religion. **** off red.




Edited, Sep 19th 2006 at 10:03am EDT by Abadd
#45 Sep 19 2006 at 6:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
It happens everywhere. Some Christians attack doctors that perform abortion, or abortion clinics. Animal rights activists threaten and bomb laboratories that perform animal testing. Anti-globalisation protesters take to the street and throw bricks in Nike or Starbucks. French farmers go and destroy GM crops, or run their tractor into a McDonalds.
I'm hard pressed to think of a recent Western example that compares to the wide-spread regional flare-ups over this (or over the cartoons). Maybe you can help me out.
Quote:
So.. How come no one is asking why the fuck the Pope is quoting a Medieval King making an incendiary, stereotyped and ultimately pointless comment about Islam in the Middle-Ages, knowing full well what would happen? Am I the only one that finds this strange?
Well, first off, unless you have actual knowledge beyond your guessing that he "knew full well what would happen" your question is based on a flawed premise. Secondly, people have already questioned it.

But, regardless of what the Pope said... hell, the Pope could have sat on stage and said "Islam sucks cock" over and over for twenty minutes... that doesn't excuse the actions of Muslims all over the region who need to declare death on the infidels and firebomb churches that aren't even Roman Catholic and basically act like barbaric asses while decrying a statement that they're, well, barbaric asses.

This "Well, the media doesn't report the nice people" bit is bullshit. The point is that there shouldn't be any rioting and screaming for blood to be reported in the first place. And certainly not over the course of days or weeks. Why aren't these people marginalized and silenced by mainstream moderate Islam? Why aren't they viewed and treated in the same way that mainstream America views white supremacist rallies and back-mountain militias? That's what'll end this shit instead of demanding by threat of violence and death that everyone pussyfoot around your religion for fear of getting suicide bombed. If you want to be accepted by a moderate civilization, you need to act civilized. And part of that is making it crystal clear to the nutjob element in your society that they will not be tolerated. And I'm not saying that it's easy and I'm not saying that it's painless, but it is absolutely essential unless you want the nutjobs to be the ones calling the shots and framing your society before the rest of the world.

Edited, Sep 19th 2006 at 10:01am EDT by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#46 Sep 19 2006 at 6:28 AM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
I'm hard pressed to think of a recent Western example that compares to the wide-spread regional flare-ups over this (or over the cartoons). Maybe you can help me out.


A bunch of lunatics threatening death because a doctor performs abortion. Laboratories being bombed, doctors threatened with death, because they perform animal testing. Rioters taking to the street every 1st May throwing bricks in shops and avocating violence agaisnt capitalists.

I'm not saying it's exactly the same. I'm not saying it's right. Just that there is an industry of "getting outraged". And that, unfortunately, Muslims are the prime consumer of this industry.

You have to put in into context. The Muslims that protest do not protest over this single issue, but about what they see as a conituous fight from teh West against islam. A fight whose every action is monitored by the people who benefit from it. This, like the cartoons, is just further "proof" to them.

Second, 1.6 billion Muslims. How many does it take to burn a flag in front of an embassy and chant "Daeth to the infidels"? 30? 50? 100?


Quote:
Well, first off, unless you have actual knowledge beyond your guessing that he "knew full well what would happen" your question is based on a flawed premise.


Come on man. Unless the pope has been in a coma for the last 20 years, he would know full well that quoting a guy to say that Islam is a religion of violence and oppression was bound to cause anger and resentment. You knew it, I knew it, every person with a shred of intelligence would know that making a public statement like this would cause a ruccus in Muslim countries.



Quote:
But, regardless of what the Pope said... hell, the Pope could have sat on stage and said "Islam sucks cock" over and over for twenty minutes... that doesn't excuse the actions of Muslims all over the region who need to declare death on the infidels and firebomb churches that aren't even Roman Catholic and basically act like barbaric asses while decrying a statement that they're, well, barbaric asses.


Nothing justifies what the protesters say. It's incitement to racial hatred, and it's wrong.

But the Pope is the religious leader of a lot of people, so he can't resposibly say "Islam sucks cock". Or if he does, it's not very professional, and people should expect their religious leader to have a bit more dignity, tolerance, and compassion, rather than stirring **** up for no reason.

Quote:
This "Well, the media doesn't report the nice people" bit is bullshit.


Is it not true?

Quote:
The point is that there shouldn't be any rioting and screaming for blood to be reported in the first place. And certainly not over the course of days or weeks. Why aren't these people marginalized and silenced by mainstream moderate Islam? Why aren't they viewed and treated in the same way that mainstream America views white supremacist rallies and back-mountain militias?


How do you know they are not? What makes you think this is the mainstream view? Are the majority of Muslims screaming "Death to the Infidels"?

Secondly, what are moderates supposed to do? Go up to the mob, confront it, and get killed? Go to the state-controlled media and ask for an interview? Blog on the web? Book a slot at CNN?

I'm asking genuinely by the way. I really don't know what moderates are supposed to do in countries where people carry guns openly, are not afraid to use them, and where the media is either non-existant or state-controlled.

Also, we have to keep in mind that many of these governments turn a blind eye, when they are not actively encouraging, these protests because it deflects tensions and attention on domestic issues.


Quote:
That's what'll end this shit instead of demanding by threat of violence and death that everyone pussyfoot around your religion for fear of getting suicide bombed. If you want to be accepted by a moderate civilization, you need to act civilized. And part of that is making it crystal clear to the nutjob element in your society that they will not be tolerated. And I'm not saying that it's easy and I'm not saying that it's painless, but it is absolutely essential unless you want the nutjobs to be the ones calling the shots and framing your society before the rest of the world.


I completely agree. But whose job is it? Akhmed Average? Should he go to the Danish embassy and scream at the angry AK-carrying mob that they are not being civilised?

The media? When they are not state-controlled, they often lead under fear of extremists. A lot more than you and me, cos these nutjobs live on their doorsteps. Fatwas are common place. The problem is that the fanatics are armed and not afraid to use them, whereas the "moderates" are not.

The governemnt? Hell, when they don't actively stoke up the protests, they just let it happen. It's great for them. And many of thiose governemtns are anti-Western themselves or non-existant. When they are pro-Western, it would be political suicide to ask them to prevent Muslims from protesting.

I agree with the idea. But it's so easy to tell moderate Muslims "Sort this **** out" and then wash our hands. We don't live amongst them. They are not our next door neighbour.

If I was a moderate Muslim with a family, would I go to the embassy, and tell the angry, armed and rioting mob to chill out and stop being so mean? Hell no. I would stay home, keep providing for my family, and hope that the Pope stops saying muslims are all murderers.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#47 Sep 19 2006 at 6:33 AM Rating: Default
Red wrote:
Do you ever say anything remotely relevant or intresting, or do you just post here to let us know you're a pointless racist dumbass with sh*t for brains?


Abadd wrote:
Whoa heaven forbid someone should give their honest opinion about a barbaric religion


Thought so.

Edited, Sep 19th 2006 at 10:33am EDT by RedPhoenixxxxxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#48 Sep 19 2006 at 6:35 AM Rating: Default
Red , since you are all knowing, can you explain to me how Islam is NOT a religion of oppression and violence?



...or is being afraid of a woman with an edcuation, and no bag on her head, a sign of enlightenment?

Edited, Sep 19th 2006 at 10:40am EDT by Abadd
#49 Sep 19 2006 at 6:36 AM Rating: Default
Joph, look at the article you quoted:

Tribune wrote:
An al-Qaida-linked extremist group warned Pope Benedict XVI...


Tribune wrote:
The Mujahedeen Shura Council, an umbrella organization of Sunni Arab extremist groups that includes al-Qaida in Iraq, issued a statement...


Not exactly your average Joe making these comments, is it...
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#50 Sep 19 2006 at 6:41 AM Rating: Default
Where are the average joes to condemn this crap then, Red? Where are the "peaceful" leaders of Islam to say " stop ******* things up for us?" ?
#51 Sep 19 2006 at 6:46 AM Rating: Default
Abadd wrote:
Red , since you are all knowing, can you explain to me how Islam is NOT a religion of oppression and violence?


Please read the Koran. Then read the Old Testament. Tell me which one is the most violent.

That some men decided to intepret it in the most brutal, elementary, and subjective way possible is a historic hic-up. They highlight and emphasise the violent passges (2%), and leave out the peaceful ones (98%). Just like the Inquisition did before. Just like the Christains who massacred the Protestants did. Just like those fanatics Buddhist Monks that preach violence in Sri Lanka. And man, you have to try freaking hard to find a message of violence in Buddhism.

All this is not "religion". It is man interpreting religion. It is the stupidity and hatred of man. If it wasn't religion, it would be communism, or nationalism, or their fucking football team, or some other stupid ideology people rally to when they have nothing else.

Read books on Islam, written by Muslims. Tariq Ramadan is very good. He's not too pro-Western, and is very clever. And modern. Maybe he can explain to you what Islam means. And even then, it will be his interpretation. Because religions are nothing without the men behind it.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 339 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (339)