Jophiel wrote:
I'm hard pressed to think of a recent Western example that compares to the wide-spread regional flare-ups over this (or over the cartoons). Maybe you can help me out.
A bunch of lunatics threatening death because a doctor performs abortion. Laboratories being bombed, doctors threatened with death, because they perform animal testing. Rioters taking to the street every 1st May throwing bricks in shops and avocating violence agaisnt capitalists.
I'm not saying it's exactly the same. I'm not saying it's right. Just that there is an industry of "getting outraged". And that, unfortunately, Muslims are the prime consumer of this industry.
You have to put in into context. The Muslims that protest do not protest over this single issue, but about what they see as a conituous fight from teh West against islam. A fight whose every action is monitored by the people who benefit from it. This, like the cartoons, is just further "proof" to them.
Second, 1.6 billion Muslims. How many does it take to burn a flag in front of an embassy and chant "Daeth to the infidels"? 30? 50? 100?
Quote:
Well, first off, unless you have actual knowledge beyond your guessing that he "knew full well what would happen" your question is based on a flawed premise.
Come on man. Unless the pope has been in a coma for the last 20 years, he would know full well that quoting a guy to say that Islam is a religion of violence and oppression was bound to cause anger and resentment. You knew it, I knew it, every person with a shred of intelligence would know that making a public statement like this would cause a ruccus in Muslim countries.
Quote:
But, regardless of what the Pope said... hell, the Pope could have sat on stage and said "Islam sucks cock" over and over for twenty minutes... that doesn't excuse the actions of Muslims all over the region who need to declare death on the infidels and firebomb churches that aren't even Roman Catholic and basically act like barbaric asses while decrying a statement that they're, well, barbaric asses.
Nothing justifies what the protesters say. It's incitement to racial hatred, and it's wrong.
But the Pope is the religious leader of a lot of people, so he can't resposibly say "Islam sucks co
ck". Or if he does, it's not very professional, and people should expect their religious leader to have a bit more dignity, tolerance, and compassion, rather than stirring **** up for no reason.
Quote:
This "Well, the media doesn't report the nice people" bit is bullshit.
Is it not true?
Quote:
The point is that there shouldn't be any rioting and screaming for blood to be reported in the first place. And certainly not over the course of days or weeks. Why aren't these people marginalized and silenced by mainstream moderate Islam? Why aren't they viewed and treated in the same way that mainstream America views white supremacist rallies and back-mountain militias?
How do you know they are not? What makes you think this is the mainstream view? Are the majority of Muslims screaming "Death to the Infidels"?
Secondly, what are moderates supposed to do? Go up to the mob, confront it, and get killed? Go to the state-controlled media and ask for an interview? Blog on the web? Book a slot at CNN?
I'm asking genuinely by the way. I really don't know what moderates are supposed to do in countries where people carry guns openly, are not afraid to use them, and where the media is either non-existant or state-controlled.
Also, we have to keep in mind that many of these governments turn a blind eye, when they are not actively encouraging, these protests because it deflects tensions and attention on domestic issues.
Quote:
That's what'll end this shit instead of demanding by threat of violence and death that everyone pussyfoot around your religion for fear of getting suicide bombed. If you want to be accepted by a moderate civilization, you need to act civilized. And part of that is making it crystal clear to the nutjob element in your society that they will not be tolerated. And I'm not saying that it's easy and I'm not saying that it's painless, but it is absolutely essential unless you want the nutjobs to be the ones calling the shots and framing your society before the rest of the world.
I completely agree. But whose job is it? Akhmed Average? Should he go to the Danish embassy and scream at the angry AK-carrying mob that they are not being civilised?
The media? When they are not state-controlled, they often lead under fear of extremists. A lot more than you and me, cos these nutjobs live on their doorsteps. Fatwas are common place. The problem is that the fanatics are armed and not afraid to use them, whereas the "moderates" are not.
The governemnt? Hell, when they don't actively stoke up the protests, they just let it happen. It's great for them. And many of thiose governemtns are anti-Western themselves or non-existant. When they are pro-Western, it would be political suicide to ask them to prevent Muslims from protesting.
I agree with the idea. But it's so easy to tell moderate Muslims "Sort this **** out" and then wash our hands. We don't live amongst them. They are not our next door neighbour.
If I was a moderate Muslim with a family, would I go to the embassy, and tell the angry, armed and rioting mob to chill out and stop being so mean? Hell no. I would stay home, keep providing for my family, and hope that the Pope stops saying muslims are all murderers.