Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Personal Freedoms and Second Hand SmokeFollow

#102 Sep 12 2006 at 1:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
sulleih wrote:
We lose freedoms every day. Recently, we are no longer able to take liquids on airplanes. Even a child's medicine is now suspect when carried through the terminal gates. They're allowed, though, in the interest of protecting the children.
How is making an exception to an air travel ban in the name of the children a "loss of freedom"?

The ban itself is perhaps a loss of said freedom. Being able to take children's medicine on board is just the opposite.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#103 Sep 12 2006 at 1:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Crowefm wrote:
You serious or what? this is wut u do on the forums?
Forums nothing. You should try having lunch with this asshole.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#104 Sep 12 2006 at 1:50 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Forums nothing. You should try having lunch with this asshole.
How was I supposed to know that the one time I invite you over for hotpockets was going to be the day mom decided to clean the basement? You are just bitter because she whipped your *** at Tekken.
#105 Sep 12 2006 at 2:00 PM Rating: Good
**
448 posts
Jophiel wrote:
How is making an exception to an air travel ban in the name of the children a "loss of freedom"?

The ban itself is perhaps a loss of said freedom. Being able to take children's medicine on board is just the opposite.


Kind of convoluted, but you've hit the nail on the head. The loss of freedoms happens all the time. The exception just shows that the rules tend to change when kids are involved. Many people refuse to or simply can't give up things they hold personal (like smoking). I don't believe this law is a bad thing in that it forces those people who think about themselves more than the kids to be more responsible. The bottom of our society tend to force the responsible ones to take a hit to their freedoms. I don't think this is a hit we can't live with.

Beyond that, this law will be challenged and I think it'll end up either not being enforced or just being ignored. For example, if I were to get in a friend's car with their child, and my friend is ignoring the booster seat law, am I supposed to bring along a scale to see if the kid weighs over 60lbs before I light up? Doesn't wash. Still, I continue to agree with the spirit of the law.
#106 Sep 12 2006 at 2:07 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Crowefm wrote:
This is a **** retarded law.

Ima smoker soon to quit, & aint no way in hell ppl r gunna actually follow this law, i can understand restaurant etc but in your very own car?.. gtfo here.

Its not like ppl hotbox cigs in the car with kids & blow smoke in their faces...jeez.

Usually windows r open & that hand holdn the cig is out the window as well


Its like these guys were bored & just decided to make up new laws for the @#%^ of it. O well i feel sorry 4 da smokers in CA. /comfort

Seriously instead of focusing on real sh*t, they focus on the dumb sh*t. America is going down the tubes, like the BS laws from demolition man coming true, nuuu, save us tom cruise save us!

Protest i say!


edit - typos on 1st word on every paragraph

Edited, Sep 12th 2006 at 2:16pm EDT by Crowefm


BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
#107 Sep 12 2006 at 2:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Off track a moment, each week in one of my classes we have to write an analysis/opinion piece on a news article. I think I'll do this one this week.

My previous two were me writing about Democratic expectations in the upcoming election and how I thought they were being overly optimistic and a piece discussing the UN "victory" of Israel lifting its blockade of Lebanon and how I thought the UN peacekeeping would prove ineffective.

Add to that me complaining about this California law and my instructor is going to think that I'm a raving Pubbie Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#108 Sep 12 2006 at 2:31 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
The Iraq War - For the Children.

Has a nice ring to it.
#109 Sep 12 2006 at 3:27 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
my instructor is going to think that I'm a raving Pubbie Smiley: laugh
Maybe you are.
#110 Sep 12 2006 at 3:35 PM Rating: Default
Coming out of the closet Joph?

I like this law. I think it will be overly tedious to carry it out though. People want to cry about their personal rights, those same people are selfish, self centered and generally pains in the asses. The "Man" is not out to get you. He is out to try to help those who cant help themselves though. A child cannot tell a parent to not lite up. A child cannot open the door to the house or the car and just run off while Mommy and Daddy lite up.

I can just see it now, "I'm sorry I increased your chances of lung cancer, Son. I just didnt want my personal freedoms to be taken away."

Or better yet, "It's the scented toilet paper that contributed to your lung cancer, Son. We both know that the second hand smoke theory isnt founded.".

What about your kids rights? If by you not being able to smoke in the car is big brother over stepping his boundaries, what is it when you submit your innocent child to harmful second hand smoke?
#111 Sep 12 2006 at 3:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The One and Only Katie wrote:
Coming out of the closet Joph?
I generally find the Nanny State to be just as odious a concept as the Big Brother State. Just different terms depending on which party is trying to poke around in your private affairs "for your own good".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#112 Sep 12 2006 at 9:42 PM Rating: Good
**
448 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I generally find the Nanny State to be just as odious a concept as the Big Brother State. Just different terms depending on which party is trying to poke around in your private affairs "for your own good".


I agree. Generally.

Don't tell me what I can and can't do. But *do* tell those mutha effers that want to smoke around my kids to knock it off.

It's all about the gray areas.
#113 Sep 12 2006 at 11:02 PM Rating: Good
sulleih wrote:

Don't tell me what I can and can't do. But *do* tell those mutha effers that want to smoke around my kids to knock it off.


FUck you and the weak-lunged little cOck accidents you call kids.

Now that we have our introductions behind us, I just wanted to point out how superior the Chuck Palahniuk quote in my sig is compared to the over-used emo-adopted one you carry. No offense meant toward your kids, I just find it in poor taste to comment solely on a poster's sig, while ignoring the topic at hand. You understand, I'm sure.
#114 Sep 12 2006 at 11:18 PM Rating: Default
First of **** every smoker all over the world, you disgusting smelling, tar kissing, arrogant sons of ********

Smokers have never cared about anyones rights but their own, hell I had some dopey smoking ***** in front of me at the pedestrian crossing and took a drag, blew it in the air straight into me face.

Frankly if you need to smoke, go get a gun and shoot yourself you will save us all a lot of money when you lungs shrivel up and you can't talk.

Joph you disappoint me you sounded like a sock for gbaji at times. Are you drinking George W's kool-aid?
#115 Sep 13 2006 at 12:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
BBBD wrote:
Joph you disappoint me
So that's what's been keeping me up at night.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#116 Sep 13 2006 at 1:53 AM Rating: Default
That and Viagra of course
#117 Sep 13 2006 at 2:08 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
BBBD wrote:
First of @#%^ every smoker all over the world, you disgusting smelling, tar kissing, arrogant sons of ********

Smokers have never cared about anyones rights but their own, hell I had some dopey smoking ***** in front of me at the pedestrian crossing and took a drag, blew it in the air straight into me face.

Frankly if you need to smoke, go get a gun and shoot yourself you will save us all a lot of money when you lungs shrivel up and you can't talk.

Joph you disappoint me you sounded like a sock for gbaji at times. Are you drinking George W's kool-aid?

Hey, don't hate us just coz your mom used to stub out butts on your fetus head.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#118 Sep 13 2006 at 3:27 AM Rating: Decent
The only California Smoking Law I have a problem with is smoking in bars.


Now, in a dance club, sure, I'll give that to you, but a bar? Come on. I know plenty of non-smokers that expect it in a bar; smoking and drinking at a bar... Just goes hand-in-hand like socks and shoes.


As for smoking with children in the car. Personally, I don't think it should be done, however I don't think it's the States place to say how people choose to raise their children. If I had children I wouldn't smoke around them just because reasons DSD listed.

In many of the cities in California, the air quality is so damn poor that smoking around children is seemingly a pointless worry. In my area, I haven't seen "Excellent" air quality on the news since I got here; that covers 7 years.

Edited, Sep 13th 2006 at 4:27am EDT by Rimesume
#119 Sep 13 2006 at 4:14 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
No? You don't think a second-grader with a racking cough and debilitating asthma is just as sickly as a child who is being underfed?


There has been a large increase in asthma occurance despite the large decrease in people smoking over the last 20 years. Asthma in children is not primarily caused by smoking. FYI. Excessive cleanliness is one theoretical cause, for example.
#120 Sep 13 2006 at 4:26 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
oops

Edited, Sep 13th 2006 at 5:27am EDT by Patrician
#121 Sep 13 2006 at 12:06 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Rimesume the Shady wrote:
In my area, I haven't seen "Excellent" air quality on the news since I got here; that covers 7 years.


/nod The two base schools have to keep the children who have ashtma or bad allergies indoors at least twice a week because the air quality was flagged as bad.

It doesn't hurt either that the crop dusters are right next to housing.
#122 Sep 13 2006 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
Thumbelyna Quick Hands wrote:
Rimesume the Shady wrote:
In my area, I haven't seen "Excellent" air quality on the news since I got here; that covers 7 years.


/nod The two base schools have to keep the children who have asthma or bad allergies indoors at least twice a week because the air quality was flagged as bad.

It doesn't hurt either that the crop dusters are right next to housing.


Yep and the Base doctors say we all had bad colds each October.

Moving back east improve my 3 girls health greatly. Only one shown signs of asthma or very bad allergies since we moved back. We also had a problem with fungal infections while living in Lemoore, as long as they were in diapers. Youngest was still in diapers when we moved away and the problem clear up completely.

But then there were clear days, when I could see the mountains from the back windows. Lived right at the edge of base on Philippine Sea, during first tour there.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#123 Sep 13 2006 at 12:52 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
ElneClare wrote:
But then there were clear days, when I could see the mountains from the back windows. Lived right at the edge of base on Philippine Sea, during first tour there.


Ha ha ha. Your house was right around the corner from our first house. We were on Boxer. That whole section is being torn down to make way for new housing. It should be all gone by March of next year. I told my husband I want to take the street sign when they do tear it all down.
#124 Sep 13 2006 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
Banning smoking, anywhere, is justified.

Don't use that "free will" crap, it's just common sense for christ sake.

Good move, but like many have said, the ban might not be enough to make people actualy not smoke.
#125 Sep 13 2006 at 3:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The Honorable Bludfury wrote:
Banning smoking, anywhere, is justified.

Don't use that "free will" crap, it's just common sense for christ sake.

Good move, but like many have said, the ban might not be enough to make people actualy not smoke.


In view of the fact that cigarette smoking is still legal, this position makes no sense.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#126 Sep 14 2006 at 7:25 AM Rating: Decent
**
448 posts
[************* you and the weak-lunged little **** accidents you call kids.

Now that we have our introductions behind us, I just wanted to point out how superior the Chuck Palahniuk quote in my sig is compared to the over-used emo-adopted one you carry. No offense meant toward your kids, I just find it in poor taste to comment solely on a poster's sig, while ignoring the topic at hand. You understand, I'm sure.[/quote]

Wow, grampa, you missed your daily rum ***** today. You seem cranky. I have just the thing for you ... a nice long ride in a Geo Metro with 3 chainsmokers. Don't worry, there won't be any kids in there ;-)

Lucky for you, I didn't even read the quote. I, like many others, saw it in the movie. Not only that, I'm pretty sure I ****** it up too. I still like it, though, so I think I'ma keep it awhile yet. I'll let you know when I get something else so you can tell me whether it suits your taste.

Edited, Sep 14th 2006 at 8:25am EDT by sulleih
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 219 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (219)