Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

The unfortunate situation on one of the forumsFollow

#52 Sep 12 2006 at 10:30 AM Rating: Default
****
6,318 posts
Smiley: king
#53 Sep 13 2006 at 1:53 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Actually, very few of my posts ever were concerning MMORPGs; but rather the vast majority were spent running whine-y gnats like you off our forum. Needless to say, I've been quite effective. So much so that I expect you'll drop from sight quite soon. See ya around, D1ckfore.

Totem


Yep I'll drop from sight quite soon, move on and not care about my rant in a few days. And you'll be still posting crap to everyone on the forum for many years to come. I maybe a moany @#%^ for a couple of days cause I found one little thing offensive but you'll be a moany @#%^ forever

Quote:
You know, I've met some people that played MMORPGs that aren't total @#%^nuts, but you sir, are not one of them.


I'm not a total @#%^nut, I'm just a @#%^nut on this particular forum :)

Quote:
No one "attacked a baby", you overwrought ****.


If no one attacked a baby I WOULDN'T HAVE @#%^ING POSTED THIS @#%^ING POST IN THE @#%^ING FIRST PLACE. Jees Saying that someone's baby has been cast a baby with down syndrome and suggesting that they should be killed off along with the onscreen character IS @#%^ING ATTACKING THE BABY. Thus making you a nieve ****.

BTW why isn't **** censored? like F uck or C unt

Edited, Sep 13th 2006 at 2:54pm EDT by TheBT
#54 Sep 13 2006 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Just let it go, TheBT. Your 15 is up.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#55 Sep 13 2006 at 2:00 PM Rating: Decent
Fat ******* wrote:
I'm bigger than you and higher up the food chain. Get in ma belly!
#56 Sep 13 2006 at 2:07 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
TheBT wrote:

BTW why isn't **** censored? like F uck or C unt


You're right a **** like you should be censored.
#57 Sep 13 2006 at 2:18 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
If no one attacked a baby I WOULDN'T HAVE @#%^ING POSTED THIS @#%^ING POST IN THE @#%^ING FIRST PLACE. Jees Saying that someone's baby has been cast a baby with down syndrome and suggesting that they should be killed off along with the onscreen character IS @#%^ING ATTACKING THE BABY. Thus making you a nieve ****.


You are not ONLY an overwrought ****. You are in fact an incorrect overwrought ****.

I'm sure you're used to that by now.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#58 Sep 13 2006 at 3:14 PM Rating: Default
No U!!!



Edited, Sep 13th 2006 at 4:20pm EDT by TheBT
#59 Sep 13 2006 at 3:17 PM Rating: Decent
TheBT wrote:
NO, U!!!!!



Fixed for simplicity.
#60 Sep 13 2006 at 3:18 PM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
TheBT wrote:

Your the one who is incorrect. Dumbass


Irony.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#61 Sep 13 2006 at 3:22 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Smiley: laugh

Thank you for preserving that, Kakar.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#62 Sep 13 2006 at 3:32 PM Rating: Default
The Dictionary wrote:
Attack 2-An expression of strong criticism; hostile comment



I wrote:
suggesting that they should be killed off along with the onscreen character


please explain how that is not describing a hostile coment, thus an attack. Of course someone like you(the sort of pond life scum that no one would **** on if they where on fire) wouldn't know that
#63 Sep 13 2006 at 3:38 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
There's a difference between definition and usage, you know (or, actually, you probably don't). In order for someone to be attacked, they are generally understood to be in danger of suffering some sort of damage, whether it be physical, social, financial or psychological.

An offensive statement on an internet forum does none of these. In fact, the people referenced would have no way of knowing that they had ever been "attacked"; thus, no attack occurred.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#64 Sep 13 2006 at 3:52 PM Rating: Default
Ok wow, thank you first of all for a proper argument, and your right the baby can't feel the affects of written abuse on the internet and I shall rewrite my complaint about taistyles comments in the way it should be writeen,


I believe It is wrong for someone to make abusive comments abouts someone else's baby in order to attack that person, It is below the belt and when you have a problem with a person you should direct any hostility towards them rather then someone who can't fight back.

#65 Sep 13 2006 at 3:56 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
I'm filing this one under "he just doesn't get it" and we'll move on, ok?

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#66 Sep 13 2006 at 3:56 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
There! Was that so hard?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#67 Sep 13 2006 at 4:49 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
I believe It is wrong for someone to make abusive comments abouts someone else's baby in order to attack that person, It is below the belt and when you have a problem with a person you should direct any hostility towards them rather then someone who can't fight back.


YOUR MOTHER!
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#68 Sep 13 2006 at 4:56 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
TheBT wrote:
Ok wow, thank you first of all for a proper argument, and your right the baby can't feel the affects of written abuse on the internet and I shall rewrite my complaint about taistyles comments in the way it should be writeen,


I believe It is wrong for someone to make abusive comments abouts someone else's baby in order to attack that person, It is below the belt and when you have a problem with a person you should direct any hostility towards them rather then someone who can't fight back.



Smiley: oyvey
#69 Sep 13 2006 at 5:11 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Tare wrote:
I'm filing this one under "he just doesn't get it" and we'll move on, ok?



It's still ok to laugh at them though, right?
#70 Sep 13 2006 at 5:21 PM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
Judging by TheBT's response to all this, I'm beginning to suspect that he is the Downs Syndrome kid that was being made fun of. He just hasn't realised it yet.

Totem
#71 Sep 13 2006 at 5:44 PM Rating: Decent
GitSlayer wrote:
Tare wrote:
I'm filing this one under "he just doesn't get it" and we'll move on, ok?



It's still ok to laugh at them though, right?


As long as you don't point. Cause pointing is rude.
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 247 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (247)