As a liberal, let me say...Follow

Makes sense.

Next vote:

Madonna: Would you?

I still get to keep the title though, right?

Surprisingly, no. She's been passed around a bit too much for the Nephmeister.

Be that as it may, it doesn't mean I need to be pleased with it nor with this jacking around with confidence votes which accomplishes nothing.

FTFY

Why must you insult married gays by assuming they're impotent?

Funny bit I noticed on my way in to work today.

On the Conservative radio station, you've got Sean Hannity railing on about Republicans dropping issues like Immmigration reform during this session right before the election.

On the Liberal radio station, Ed Shultz is railing on about Democrats pushing this useless Rumsfeld thing instead of pushing issues he thought they should be working on.

I just found it amusing that both were basically ******** about the exact same thing. Congress not doing what they want, and sticking to "tepid" issues instead.


It's looking to me like both parties have pretty much decided they're going to leave things as they are and not shake the bottle up between now and election time. It's already looking like the "key issue" that both are going to run on is the "I'm better for securing the US against terrorists" position. At least that's the only major issue that's actually being argued right at the moment. We'll see if that changes in the next month...

Or re-visit stem cells now that they've developed a process that can allow for harvesting without destroying the embryo. How hard would it be exactly to just make that one change and revote on it? If I were a Liberal, that's what I'd be pushing. Because if it passes you get some credit for accomplishing something valuable. If Bush vetoes it again (which is the only way it wont pass), then you've got that much more ammunition to use since now it can't be about "preserving life" anymore, but rather some opposition to the science itself.


Oh. And don't think I didn't notice the whole "See! I'm bashing Liberals..." bit. Don't worry. I'm giving you a point for that. Although you'd have gotten more if you'd actually named names (other then Rumsfeld, but that doesn't cout obviously), but it's the thought that counts. ;)

Mormon?

As a communist, let me say that I am disappointed that you have not thrown off the shackles of capitalism.

When do policiticans do anything that might actually help the nation?

That's crazy talk.

Bush isn't a big fan of admitting he was wrong.

Which is and isn't the point. It's not the point because whether or not Rumsfeld should be removed isn't really my gripe. At the same time it is the point because, even if Rumsfeld was drinking the blood of orphans on live TV, all the Senate votes in the world wouldn't make Bush yank him from his office.