Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Zam.comFollow

#1 Aug 31 2006 at 3:36 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
What an ugly freakin website. Nothing but lame links to crap no one cares about. Good job Alla. Way to send your sh'it down the sinker. Smiley: disappointed

Zam.com
#2 Aug 31 2006 at 3:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
How come the Asylum isn't represented under "Recent Comments"?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Aug 31 2006 at 3:41 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
They don't want to advertise us, for Bob's sake.

By the way, that grey background is f'ugly.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#4 Aug 31 2006 at 3:41 PM Rating: Decent
Moogle mongering ****'s. Smiley: mad
#5 Aug 31 2006 at 3:42 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Jophiel wrote:
How come the Asylum isn't represented under "Recent Comments"?

I don't know, but half of the most recent posts seem to come from here.
#6 Aug 31 2006 at 3:43 PM Rating: Decent
Wait wait wait wait.


People still play SWG?
#7 Aug 31 2006 at 3:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Asylum doesn't spam nearly as much as other formats..

And I've been using that stylesheet since we came up with it, like, a year ago. Jeez, get with the program!
____________________________
Do what now?
#8 Aug 31 2006 at 4:09 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I was about to say, that stylesheet is old news.
#9 Aug 31 2006 at 4:15 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Heh, that's the stylesheet I use, too.
#10 Aug 31 2006 at 4:17 PM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Althrun wrote:
Wait wait wait wait.


People still play SWG?


Get with the fucking program. You have 1500 posts and in all the times you've been to this website, you never saw SWG at the top of the screen?




Well I suppose if you post like Kupo or Linus, you've only been here once.
#11 Aug 31 2006 at 4:21 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
And I've been using that stylesheet since we came up with it, like, a year ago. Jeez, get with the program!


It's still ugly. <shrug>

I use the old brown one.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#12 Aug 31 2006 at 4:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I use the EQOA stylesheet because I hate life.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#13 Aug 31 2006 at 4:26 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
I use the ffxi stylesheet because I was a mooglefUcker.
#14 Aug 31 2006 at 4:29 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I use the news stylesheet because color-naming times are longer for lists that contain conflict items such as the word green printed in red than they are for lists that consist of control items such as red squares or red swastikas. Stroop attributed color-word interference to the difference in the strength of association between stimuli and responses: The association between a word stimulus and a reading response is stronger than the association between a color stimulus and a naming response. Stroop tested the strength of association interpretation by training the color-naming response to conflict stimuli over 8 days. There was a 34% gain (from 49.6 s to 32.8 s) in color-naming speed over 8 days, although the time the participants took to name the colors of conflict stimuli (24.7 s) was still not as fast as the time they took to name colors of control items (i.e., swastiskas). After the participants had been trained in color naming, Stroop switched the task to word reading. Reading time for conflict stimuli increased by 79% relative to the time taken before training on color naming (i.e., from 19.4 s to 34.8 s).

MacLeod (1998) also reported that color-word interference might be reduced but not eliminated by training on color naming. One should note, however, that MacLeod included congruent displays (e.g., the word red printed in red), which might have altered the way in which participants prepared for incongruent displays (Monahan, 2001). The color-word interference reflects the cost of resolving the conflict that arises from the color-name responses that are activated by each dimension of a conflict display. Although the color-naming task demands a response on the basis of the color of print dimension, a response on the basis of the name of the word is activated unintentionally. (The degree of activation is affected by an attentional--allocation strategy; see MacLeod, 1991, for a review of data and theory on color-word interference.)
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#15 Aug 31 2006 at 4:31 PM Rating: Good
That's funny, Kelvy, me too.
#16 Aug 31 2006 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Ever take a Stroop test? Drives me insane.


#17 Aug 31 2006 at 4:36 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
ha!
I pass those with flying colours.


____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#18 Aug 31 2006 at 4:43 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
The EQ2 sheet isn't bad. The EQOA one is gawd awful, Joph, you are right.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#19 Aug 31 2006 at 4:48 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I used to use the FFXi ones, but the giant image that said FINAL FANTASY with the pictures of Elvaan archers and giant chickens at work kinda sketched me out.

The new one does waht it is supposed to; keeps it on the DL. Now I find that in my old age it's easier on the eyes as well.Smiley: frown
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#20 Aug 31 2006 at 5:25 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
I use the news style sheet. Everything else makes me want to scream and throttle whoever came up with all the color schemes. Except maybe the EQ1 syle


#21 Aug 31 2006 at 5:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jawbox wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
How come the Asylum isn't represented under "Recent Comments"?

I don't know, but half of the most recent posts seem to come from here.


That spam = 25% of my total post count. Holy.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#22 Aug 31 2006 at 5:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Bad j00 j00
Avatar
***
2,159 posts
I use the eve stylesheet, although the daoc one isn't bad either.
#23 Aug 31 2006 at 6:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Wow, that one thread apparently just caused a .18 drop in sockpuppette's karma.

Hint: Don't post all your stuff in one thread
____________________________
Do what now?
#24 Aug 31 2006 at 6:08 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
how come exo isnt listed as an admin? You hate his Smiley: cheese?
#25 Aug 31 2006 at 6:31 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
Wow, that one thread apparently just caused a .18 drop in sockpuppette's karma.

Hint: Don't post all your stuff in one thread


Hi-larious.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#26 Aug 31 2006 at 8:54 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,735 posts
Princess PsiChi wrote:
how come exo isnt listed as an admin? You hate his Smiley: cheese?


ChanServ hates spics.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 402 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (402)