Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Move over Sin City, Milwaukee is the King!Follow

#1 Aug 25 2006 at 4:48 PM Rating: Default
story here
Quote:
...Milwaukee ranks high for its drinking habits across the board. According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey 2004, more than 70 percent of adult Milwaukeeans reported that they had had at least one alcoholic drink within the past 30 days — the highest percentage on our list. Twenty-two percent of Milwaukee respondents confessed to binge drinking, or having five or more drinks on one occasion--also the highest on our list. And 7.5 percent of the population were reported as heavy drinkers — adult men that have more than two drinks per day, or adult women who have more than one drink per day...


Quote:
...Coming in second on our list is another chilly metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul. The twin cities ranked No. 2 for adults who reported having had a drink in the last month, No. 3 for binge drinkers and No. 12 for heavy drinkers.

Rounding out the top five drunkest cities are Columbus, Ohio; Boston; and Austin, Texas.

Curiously, several towns with a reputation for partying and drinking didn't rank very high on the list. You might be able to score a free cocktail in any Las Vegas casino, but overall, the city comes in at only No. 14. New Orleans is home to Bourbon Street and Mardi Gras, but it only ranked in 24th place. And spring-break party spot Miami placed all the way down at No. 33 of 35...


Las Vegas is loosing out. First the loss of 24 hour wedding service this week and now the booze. What happend to Sin City? On another note we need more booze in good old New Orleans. What would Mardi Gras be like with out beads, booze and boobs!
#2 Aug 25 2006 at 4:52 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
70 percent of adult Milwaukeeans reported that they had had at least one alcoholic drink within the past 30 days
Smiley: oyvey you call THAT drinking? most UK cites would be around 90%+ in a 7 day period.
#3 Aug 25 2006 at 5:07 PM Rating: Default
Hey to me one drink a day is alot. I maybe drink two or three times a month. Usually wine when the wife and I go to a nice resturant. I may have an occasional beer but I still have 9 out of 12 beers from a pack I bougth 6 months ago.

It all comes down to perspective I suppose.

#4 Aug 25 2006 at 5:08 PM Rating: Decent
I can agree with that whole heartdly, but not just Milwaukee...this entire state.

I moved out to Northern Wisconsin from Lower Michigan almost 3 years ago now. When I lived in Michigan I did not drink that often besides the occasional night out with the friends or during football games.

I used to think it was weird how everyone at my work talked about drinking all the time. I even got drunk at work with some co-workers after the day was over out in our shop. It seemed there was always a few cases of Bud Light sitting in the fridge out in the shop at work.

Well as time went on I started drinking more and more, hell I am tipsy atm.


Moral of the story is...well Wisconsin sucks and if you live here the only way to deal with it is with a buzz!

Go Packers....wait I hate the fucking Packers!
#5 Aug 25 2006 at 5:34 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
For fuck sake Fibroblast, what is it with you and posting crap? Your posts are so inane they make me sleepy. This not the sandbox, this is the Asylum. Please take your tripe there.


Seriously, has everyone taken their distemper shots this week? This moran is posting his mediocre pablum everywhere and no one is remarking on it.

Edit: Wanted to make clear who teh 'tard was .



Edited, Aug 25th 2006 at 6:40pm EDT by GitSlayer
#6 Aug 25 2006 at 5:58 PM Rating: Default
GitSlayer wrote:
For fuck sake Fibroblast, what is it with you and posting crap? Your posts are so inane they make me sleepy. This not the sandbox, this is the Asylum. Please take your tripe there.


Hey considering some of the crap content I has seen posted here off and on in the past, and considering that the current threads have been up a bit, why not try and start a new topic of conversation. I haven't seen you post in riviting topics recently. Back off or GFY.
#7 Aug 25 2006 at 6:44 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
I just keep thinking, "Fibroidblast".

Huh.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#8 Aug 25 2006 at 6:48 PM Rating: Default
A fibroblast is a connective tissue stem cell.
I wanted to set username that was different.
#9 Aug 25 2006 at 6:48 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Well, it's different in the "tumor" type of way.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#10 Aug 25 2006 at 6:49 PM Rating: Default
Hey cancerous growth is just a cell division away...
#11 Aug 25 2006 at 6:55 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
You said it.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#12 Aug 27 2006 at 4:43 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Fibroblast wrote:
A fibroblast is a connective tissue stem cell.
I wanted to set username that was different.


You tell us like we asked or even care what your stupid name is. So Fiberblast was taken?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 396 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (396)