Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

FDA nods at Morning After pillFollow

#1 Aug 24 2006 at 9:49 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
14,454 posts
Linky
Quote:

Morning-after pill to be available without prescription
Buyers must prove they're 18 or older


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Women can buy the morning-after pill without a prescription, the government declared Thursday, a major step that nevertheless failed to quell the politically charged debate over access to emergency contraception.

The manufacturer, lawmakers and other advocates said they will press the government to allow minors to purchase the pills over the counter.

The Food and Drug Administration said that women 18 and older -- and men purchasing for their partners -- may buy the Plan B pills without a doctor's note, but only from pharmacies.

Girls 17 and younger still will need a prescription to buy the pills, the FDA told manufacturer Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc., in ruling on an application filed in 2003.
Still at odds

The compromise decision is a partial victory for women's advocacy and medical groups, which say easier access could halve the nation's 3 million annual unplanned pregnancies.

"While we are glad to know the FDA finally ended its foot-dragging on this issue, Planned Parenthood is troubled by the scientifically baseless restriction imposed on teenagers. The U.S. has one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in the Western world -- anything that makes it harder for teenagers to avoid unintended pregnancy is bad medicine and bad public policy," president Cecile Richards said.

Opponents contend that nonprescription availability could increase promiscuity and promote use of the pills by sexual predators.

"If the FDA thinks that enacting an age restriction will work, or that the drug company will enforce it ... then they are living in a dream world," said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, who led the opposition.
Pregnancy risk reduced

Plan B contains a concentrated dose of the same drug found in many regular birth-control pills. Planned Parenthood estimates 41 other countries already allow women to buy emergency contraception without a prescription.

If a woman takes Plan B within 72 hours of unprotected sex, she can lower the risk of pregnancy by up to 89 percent. Plan B is different from the abortion pill: If a woman already is pregnant, Plan B has no effect.

The earlier the pills are taken, the more effective they are. Allowing nonprescription sales mean women won't have to hustle to get a prescription, something especially difficult on weekends and holidays, advocates said.

The FDA's long delay in deciding on Barr's application ensnared President Bush's nominee to head the regulatory agency. On Thursday, two senators said they would lift their Plan-B-related block on Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach.

In recent weeks, anti-abortion groups, angered that approval was imminent, had urged Bush to withdraw von Eschenbach's nomination. Bush said Monday that he supported the doctor's decisions.
Only at pharmacies

Barr hopes to begin nonprescription sales of Plan B by the end of the year. The pills will be sold only from behind the counter at pharmacies, but not at convenience stores or gas stations. Pharmacists will check photo identification.

There isn't enough scientific evidence that young teens can safely use Plan B without a doctor's supervision, von Eschenbach said in a memo. Over-the-counter use is safe for older teens and adults, the acting FDA commissioner added in explaining the age cutoff.

"This approach should help ensure safe and effective use of the product," wrote von Eschenbach.

Barr and others were disappointed that FDA imposed the age restriction. Bruce L. Downey, Barr's chairman, pledged to continue working with the agency to try to eliminate it.

The age restriction remains controversial even inside FDA, agency drugs chief Dr. Steven Galson told The Associated Press. Galson has acknowledged overruling his staff scientists, who concluded in 2004 that nonprescription sales would be safe for all ages.

"Let me be frank, there still are disagreements," Galson said in an interview. "There were disagreements from the first second this application came in the house."

The Center for Reproductive Rights said a lawsuit filed last year to do away with all age restrictions would continue.
Age-limit enforcement

As a condition of approval, Barr agreed to use anonymous shoppers and other methods to check whether pharmacists are enforcing the age restriction.

"I'm sure the FDA will follow through on that and make sure these important conditions are established and enforced," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.

Barr hasn't said whether it will raise the price of the pills, which now cost $25 to $40 in prescription form.

Planned Parenthood, the largest dispenser of the pills, expects some insurers to continue covering prescription sales. Whether that would be cheaper will depend on a woman's insurance.

Nine states -- Alaska, California, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Washington and Vermont -- already allow certain pharmacies to sell Plan B without a doctor's prescription to women of any age.

Minors won't see any change in those states, because the pharmacist already technically writes the prescription, the American Pharmacists Association said.

The FDA approved prescription-only sales of Plan B in 1999. The quest to change its status began in 2003. That year, agency advisers endorsed nonprescription sales for all ages, and FDA's staff scientists agreed.

Higher-ranking officials rejected that recommendation, citing concerns about young teens using the pills without oversight. Barr reapplied, asking that women 16 and older be allowed to buy Plan B without a prescription. Then last August, the FDA postponed a final decision indefinitely, saying the agency needed to determine how to enforce the age restrictions.

FDA's handling of Plan B sparked a firestorm, with allegations of political meddling, high-profile resignations, lawsuits and congressional investigations.

The controversy appears to have helped Plan B sales, which are up an estimated 30 percent this year, according to IMS Health Inc., a health care consulting company. Barr estimates pharmacists dispense about 1.5 million packs a year.


I'm glad the FDA finally has approved this drug for adult women. And I find myself in a new corner with this article, because I approve of the age restriction without a prescription.

Thoughts?

Edited, Aug 25th 2006 at 3:54pm EDT by DSD
#2 Aug 24 2006 at 9:49 PM Rating: Decent
Ha, I beat you to it by like 30 seconds...
#3 Aug 24 2006 at 10:01 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
I got no problem with it, but it should probably be 21 or older without a prescription instead of 18.
#4 Aug 24 2006 at 10:19 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
I got no problem with it, but it should probably be 21 or older without a prescription instead of 18.



Why is that? I know that you americans have some strange obsession with the number 21, but what real advantage is there to making the age 21?
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#5 Aug 24 2006 at 10:22 PM Rating: Decent


Mis-use of this product can be concerning. Men of the correct age can also make the purchase. Quite a lot of guys dating and having sex with younger girls. High schools have this happen often. What's the common age for young teenage sex experimenters? How many MTV gurls dance around their room to that hot new band, with posters of the older guy on her wall? How will this pill effect the insides of a young girl, not of the age 18? Given this pill by her older, pushy boyfriend. Maybe a girl thats only 13 or 15, dating a 19 year old upperclassman.
It's just that, i was in High school once. I know how guys were then, and now. I was an *** to lots of people. But maybe kids who don't have protected sex, shouldn't become parents. And maybe making it easier for them to stop the child making process can be positive for their comminity and their future. But does that mean their insides deserve to be punished?



#6 Aug 24 2006 at 10:28 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
But maybe kids who don't have protected sex, shouldn't become parents. And maybe making it easier for them to stop the child making process can be positive for their comminity and their future. But does that mean their insides deserve to be punished?


Regardless of this fact, it should be freely available to anyone of any age who wants it. There are a lot of things that people of these ages do that harm their insides, it's their choice to do these things though, and they should at least have the option to use something that could help prevent becoming teen parents.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#7 Aug 24 2006 at 10:36 PM Rating: Decent


I agree, I believe we should all be able to choose our poisons. I guess this "Pill good or bad?" debate is really just a pro-life or pro-choose issue. If I was a young soon to be parent. I would consider this option for our needs.


#8 Aug 24 2006 at 10:49 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Driftwood the Eccentric wrote:
Quote:
I got no problem with it, but it should probably be 21 or older without a prescription instead of 18.

Why is that? I know that you americans have some strange obsession with the number 21, but what real advantage is there to making the age 21?

You just turned 19 right? Smiley: laugh
#9 Aug 24 2006 at 10:50 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
True, but I have said things like that before too. And I really am curious, why the ridiculous age of majority for America?
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#10 Aug 24 2006 at 10:54 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Driftwood the Eccentric wrote:
True, but I have said things like that before too. And I really am curious, why the ridiculous age of majority for America?

Age of majority? Smiley: dubious
#11 Aug 24 2006 at 10:57 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
I'm canadian, humor my odd vocabulary, the card I have that says I'm 19 and old enough to buy alcohol and cigarettes, is called an age of majority card, hence I assumed the age where one wouldn't be stopped from doing things because of their age would be called age of majority.

____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#12 Aug 24 2006 at 11:07 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
So in Cananananannada the majority of people are the magical number of 19. Got it.
#13 Aug 24 2006 at 11:24 PM Rating: Good
SothsayerAtlantis wrote:


What's the common age for young teenage sex experimenters? How many MTV gurls dance around their room to that hot new band, with posters of the older guy on her wall? How will this pill effect the insides of a young girl, not of the age 18? And maybe making it easier for them to stop the child making process can be positive for their comminity and their future. But does that mean their insides deserve to be punished?


God, it's like you can read my mind. Now what were we talking about?
#14 Aug 24 2006 at 11:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
SothsayerAtlantis wrote:
How will this pill effect the insides of a young girl, not of the age 18?
[...]
And maybe making it easier for them to stop the child making process can be positive for their comminity and their future. But does that mean their insides deserve to be punished?
It'll affect her insides about the same as birth control pills do now since it's the same chemicals. It's "Plan B" though, not "Plan A" -- it's not intended for daily use or the first line of birth control. I suppose (I'm in no position to say for sure) that taking it daily or even weekly wouldn't do your body any favors. But you can say the same about the abuse of any medication.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Aug 25 2006 at 6:33 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Jawbox wrote:
So in Cananananannada the majority of people are the magical number of 19. Got it.


18 in Alberta. Smiley: wink

Anywhooo, I am glad they made it OTC too. I'm hoping it will be an effective contraceptive for both adults and teens that use it. Of course, it doesn't do a damn thing to prevent STDs, but so it goes.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#16 Aug 25 2006 at 8:21 AM Rating: Decent
Awesome! While I'm straddling the fence on having an age limit, I can see where girls can go to an family planning center and get the doctors note to pick up the pill if they are under 18 and dont want their parents to know. I'm also imagining people thinking they will be able to buy this in bulk, but I bet its not cheap even if it is OTC.
#17 Aug 25 2006 at 9:09 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
In the US 18 is the makority age, except for consuming alcohol. I never did understand why you were allowed to sign up and die for your country but couldnt have a beer.

One of the reasons I feel the age restriction without a prescription is a good idea is due to the fact that teenagers, minors, do tend to experiment sexually a lot. Not everyone does, but enough do. And while I think that sex ed needs to be aggressive on all options of birth control, geting the info out to the masses, I feel that to allow the Plan B as an OTC non prescription option to minors could backfire on the other types of BC.
If the ability to get your hands on Plan B is as easy as getting condoms, and kids aren't educated enough or "forget" about STDs in the heat of passion, many may adopt a carefree attitude in the heat of the moment, thinking they could just "grab a plan B" in the next couple days and all will be well. It might help with less teen births, but I question the validity of it. If needed a prescription, it may make the teens and anyone else for that matter, think twice before letting things fly without a care.

Just my 2 cents
#18 Aug 25 2006 at 9:15 AM Rating: Decent
I think they should make BC an OTC as well.
#19 Aug 25 2006 at 9:20 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Any girl who uses this pill as her first line of defense will never do so again after the first couple of times, if she can help it. I've had to use it twice, both times due iffy condoms (I hate condoms now and don't trust 'em), and I was 19 and 20, respectively. I was glad I had the option then, but the second time was horrid due to the memory of the first. The first dose brings on the worst nausea and vomiting of your life, and if you vomit up the second dose of the pill, you have to take it all over again, and the effectiveness decreases the longer you wait. I knew a girl who waited a full day after sex, took Plan B, and got pregnant anyway.

I'm glad it's out there for girls who have protected themselves and had something unexpected come up, but it wouldn't be a 'go-to' option, trust me.
#20 Aug 25 2006 at 9:26 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
DSD wrote:
In the US 18 is the makority age, except for consuming alcohol. I never did understand why you were allowed to sign up and die for your country but couldnt have a beer.

One of the reasons I feel the age restriction without a prescription is a good idea is due to the fact that teenagers, minors, do tend to experiment sexually a lot. Not everyone does, but enough do. And while I think that sex ed needs to be aggressive on all options of birth control, geting the info out to the masses, I feel that to allow the Plan B as an OTC non prescription option to minors could backfire on the other types of BC.
If the ability to get your hands on Plan B is as easy as getting condoms, and kids aren't educated enough or "forget" about STDs in the heat of passion, many may adopt a carefree attitude in the heat of the moment, thinking they could just "grab a plan B" in the next couple days and all will be well. It might help with less teen births, but I question the validity of it. If needed a prescription, it may make the teens and anyone else for that matter, think twice before letting things fly without a care.

Just my 2 cents


It's $25-$40 per dosage. I don't think the average kid is going ot supplement birtch control for this. Plus what Flea said. It's nasty stuff.
#21 Aug 25 2006 at 12:13 PM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
I think they should make it available to 16 year olds. It would certainly make me feel better.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#22 Aug 25 2006 at 1:59 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Any girl who uses this pill as her first line of defense will never do so again after the first couple of times, if she can help it. I've had to use it twice, both times due iffy condoms (I hate condoms now and don't trust 'em), and I was 19 and 20, respectively. I was glad I had the option then, but the second time was horrid due to the memory of the first. The first dose brings on the worst nausea and vomiting of your life, and if you vomit up the second dose of the pill, you have to take it all over again, and the effectiveness decreases the longer you wait. I knew a girl who waited a full day after sex, took Plan B, and got pregnant anyway.

I'm glad it's out there for girls who have protected themselves and had something unexpected come up, but it wouldn't be a 'go-to' option, trust me.


/nod I don't think people have the idea of what your body actually goes through and what you feel after taking Plan B. But after one time of taking it, people will probably not see this as their regular form of birth control. It should have the label "for when all else fails."
#23 Aug 25 2006 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
well Ill be honest and say Ive never used it before, so I will defer to the insight of those who have.
#24 Aug 25 2006 at 3:02 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
DSD wrote:
well Ill be honest and say Ive never used it before, so I will defer to the insight of those who have.


Me neither. Unfortunately, the "morning after" for me usually occurs 2 weeks later, when I'm staring at a positive pregnancy test. Smiley: laugh

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#25 Aug 25 2006 at 3:05 PM Rating: Decent
One question, one comment...

What are the actual side-effects of Plan B? I couldn't find anything.

MA has been selling Plan B for a little while now. Back in March, there was a lawsuit against Wal-Mart because they refused to sell it for "ethical" reasons. In the end, Wal-Mart did decide to stock Plan B. link

This open a whole new can of worms. Although not considered abortion by the government, what happens if a pharmacist refuses to fill a prescription for Plan B on their own personal ethical grounds?
#26 Aug 25 2006 at 3:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
In the Prairie State, the governor made an executive order stating that pharmacists must either dispense the medication or else assist the customer in locating and obtaining the medication if it is not in stock. Under penalty of law in some form or sense, I'd imagine.

The order has been the target of a couple lawsuits but I didn't see information on any resolution yet and, as far as I know, the order (which became permanent in August 2005) is still in effect.

Edited, Aug 25th 2006 at 4:26pm EDT by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 395 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (395)