Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

People Vs GubbermentsFollow

#27 Aug 18 2006 at 5:04 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Quote:
S. Africa & Mandela?
If Mandela is a nice guy then so is Gerry Adams, they both have an aweful lot of blood on thier hands.
Terrorist Vs Freedom Fighter argument. I agree though.

In a different context, you could add Arafat.

____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#28 Aug 18 2006 at 7:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Hellboy the Hand wrote:
After reading Vonneguts latest book and pushing myself through Walden I have to disagree. I think the people we do put into power are the type of people who can easily feed off a certain mind set or fear that we all share as the human collective. We really just need to stop voting on instinct and vote on ideals that actually suit us and not special interests.


Vonnegut's latest book? Copyright nineteen-seventy-what?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#29 Aug 18 2006 at 9:05 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
King Nobby wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Wasn't he the younger, goofier brother on Wings?
You're thinking of Paul McCartney, silly

The show, not the band!

____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#30 Aug 18 2006 at 9:07 PM Rating: Good
Apparently you're all wrong; he's this guy. Doesn't look like a Canuck, but who knows?
#31 Aug 19 2006 at 12:10 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Stephen Weber's profile wrote:
We are also developing novel and powerful separations based on molecular recognition, such as the interaction with lanthanides and oxygen-containing organic molecules. This has been used to separate neutral organic molecules in nonaqueous solvents by capillary electrophoresis.

Watch out for this guy. He sounds very dangerous.
#32 Aug 21 2006 at 7:27 AM Rating: Decent
Tarv wrote:
Aparteit aside he was still a terrorist.

We had a nice guy in charge not long back over here Nobby, W.Hauge and look what the press did to him..


Nazism aside, Roosevelt killed lots of people.

Sorry, but this is silly. You can't just "put apartheid aside". Sure Ghandi did some nice work, and it would be cool if more people made revolutions by gathering salt, but it doesnt always work like that.

Also Hague was a stupid prick that built his campaign on anti-immigration, anti-Europe, anti-Euro policies. Great.

He did crack good jokes though, I'll give him that. Much funnier that Michael "peeple" Howard, or David "Lets-hug-a-hoodie" Cameron.

I think the solution is to force every 18-year olds to go on gap-years abroad. Make them see the world a bit. Really, there's nothing like it. Understanding other cultures. Realising that Zone 2 is not the end of the civilised world. That barbarians are not gathering across the English French Channel.

Still if nobby's 2nd rule of Geopolitics is true, Iranians and North Koreans must be incredibly nice people.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#33 Aug 21 2006 at 8:31 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,128 posts
Quote:
Still if nobby's 2nd rule of Geopolitics is true, Iranians and North Koreans must be incredibly nice people.
Hitler liked puppies, plump blondes and beer, and not in that order. If it was not for that whole world domination and genocide thing, he probably would have been a good guy to go out drinking with.
Smiley: chug



Edited, Aug 21st 2006 at 12:11pm EDT by fhrugby
#34 Aug 21 2006 at 8:39 AM Rating: Good
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Sure Ghandi did some nice work, and it would be cool if more people made revolutions by gathering salt, but it doesnt always work like that.


What Gandhi taught, or tried to teach, is that there is a non-violent solution to everything... if people are willing to pay the price. The price may be extreme, as others do not necessarily refrain from violence. The point is that people have to be creative and actively involved to effect the changes they want; sitting around ******** doesn't count.

Then someone shot him, so lesson learned, I guess.

Gandhi wrote:
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#35 Aug 21 2006 at 12:40 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
Sorry, but this is silly. You can't just "put apartheid aside".
Ok, i won't.

Mandela was a cold blooded killer and terrorist glamorised by a sympathetic media who ignored the blood on his hands to make him a hero to people with no knowlage or interest if the suffering he cause to totally innocent people.

Happy?
#36 Aug 21 2006 at 1:02 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Quote:
Sorry, but this is silly. You can't just "put apartheid aside".
Ok, i won't.

Mandela was a cold blooded killer and terrorist glamorised by a sympathetic media who ignored the blood on his hands to make him a hero to people with no knowlage or interest if the suffering he cause to totally innocent people.

Happy?
We're back to the terrorist vs Freedom Fighter argument again.

Was the bombing of Dresden or Baghdad terrorism, or a blow for democracy?

I agree with your statement about Mandela (in the 1960s) and the same words can apply to Adams and McGiuinness in the 70s. However, once both parties finally realised that the spiral of tit-for-tat killings was achieving fUck-all, they had the courage to negotiate.

That meant the UK/S African Government risking the hatred of previous victims of violence (most of whom came round to supporting the negotiations) and Adams/Mandela risking assassination from the die-hards.

I get pissed off at the sanctification of Mandela too, but he (like so many great figures) moved from war-war to jaw-jaw.

A difference between that and Middle East is that the UK/SA Govts weren't blowing up entire Belfast/Soweto Suburbs because a loony provvie was spotted in a council flat or a tin shack.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#37 Aug 21 2006 at 2:13 PM Rating: Decent
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Quote:
Sorry, but this is silly. You can't just "put apartheid aside".
Ok, i won't.

Mandela was a cold blooded killer and terrorist glamorised by a sympathetic media who ignored the blood on his hands to make him a hero to people with no knowlage or interest if the suffering he cause to totally innocent people.

Happy?


Happier.

But you still got to put that in context. The people he was fighting against were not saints either.

I'm not saying the end always justifies the means. But at least he was fighting for a good cause.

Like Dresden.

I agree with Nobby about Adams, Mandela, and Arafat. Governments have to create a mechanism so that these people have more to gain through praticipating in the political process than in using guns and bombs.

It's not easy when some of these people's goal is to create a world-wide theocratic medieval state. But then, they are not all that crazy. Which is why blanket-labelling everyone as a "terrorist" is not the smarting thing to do, and doesn't really help anyone in the end.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#38 Aug 21 2006 at 2:32 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
Quote:


Was the bombing of Dresden or Baghdad terrorism, or a blow for democracy?



Please keep in mind, a "democracy" is not inherently good because it has that label on its hat.

A democracy is just another form of government. Ever hear of "the tyranny of the masses?" A democracy put one of our greatest thinkers to death - Athens - Socrates (I know, Soc chose to drink hemlock instead of taking the other choice of punishment, which I believe was exhile - but I also believe he'd said in the trial he'd never accept exhile - so they put him to death).

This is precisely why the USA is not a "true democracy." And I thank God for it!
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 281 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (281)