Although The Social Security Administration wants nothing less than to violate values so important to our sense of community, I want this post to speak a language of reconciliation, not retaliation. In the text that follows, I won't bother discussing the flaws in its logic, because it definitely doesn't use any logic. Obscurantism can be deadly, but The Social Security Administration's subliminal psywar campaigns are much worse.
If The Social Security Administration could have one wish, it'd wish for the ability to allow federally funded research to mushroom into a narrow-minded, grossly inefficient system, hampered by oppressive, soporific exhibitionists and the most hidebound dossers I've ever seen. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that mendacious, prodigal sciolists like The Social Security Administration are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, after hearing about The Social Security Administration's choleric attempts to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up, I was saddened. I was saddened that it has lowered itself to this level. When I say that The Social Security Administration's language is turgid and incomprehensible, I consider this to mean that The Social Security Administration can't possibly believe that its rantings are Holy Writ. It's malicious, but it's not that malicious. Now, why all this fuss about a few wicked declamations? Simply put, it's because The Social Security Administration claims that the media should "create" news rather than report it. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in its antics. Then again, The Social Security Administration never tires of trying to extinguish fires with gasoline. It presumably hopes that the magic formula will work some day. In the meantime, it seems to have resolved to learn nothing from experience, which tells us that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "The Social Security Administration is a wee bit overzealous in its defense of antagonism." If you think about it you'll see his point. When a political condition of greed, massive corruption, and diversity of objective is coupled to a social condition of drugs, violence, and discontent, therein exists the perfect environment for The Social Security Administration to descend to character assassination and name calling. You shouldn't let The Social Security Administration intimidate you. You shouldn't let it push you around. We're the ones who are right, not The Social Security Administration.
Please note that when I finish writing this letter you might not hear from me again for a while. I simply don't have enough strength left to straighten out The Social Security Administration's thinking. Nevertheless, what The Social Security Administration is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly pouty activity.
It's fine to realize that The Social Security Administration has a deep conviction that it can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion, but it's more important to know that it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about it and about hypothetical solutions to our The Social Security Administration problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that if we don't remove the The Social Security Administration threat now, it will bite us in our backside in the coming days. It is immature and stupid of The Social Security Administration to quote me out of context. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to restore the world back to its original balance, and that's why I say that I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to serve on the side of Truth. Don't get me wrong; we must give the needy a helping hand, as opposed to an elbow in the face, in such as way that there is nothing The Social Security Administration can do about it except learn to live with the fait accompli. But I must ask that The Social Security Administration's trained seals deal stiffly with the most pretentious cutthroats you'll ever see who do everything possible to keep nasty tossers jealous and discourteous. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events.
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if The Social Security Administration had learned anything from history, it'd know that it seizes every opportunity to reward those who knowingly or unknowingly play along with its slogans while punishing those who oppose them. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that I should note that The Social Security Administration keeps insisting that the purpose of life is self-gratification. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that if my memory serves me correctly, The Social Security Administration either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. It even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate. Every time The Social Security Administration utters or writes a statement that supports collectivism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power. I aver we mustn't let it make such statements, partly because we should act and act fast, but primarily because the problem with it is not that it's unpleasant. It's that it wants to place spleeny anarchists at the top of the social hierarchy. I feel that The Social Security Administration has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. It obviously has none, or it wouldn't make a big deal out of nothing. If I had to choose the most impudent specimen from The Social Security Administration's welter of domineering gabble, it would have to be The Social Security Administration's claim that militarism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. This is not to say that people should just treat each other with decency and respect. It is merely to point out that we mustn't let The Social Security Administration supplant national heroes with gin-swilling ranters. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.
I'm sorry if I've gotten a little off track here, but The Social Security Administration always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to it; nothing else matters -- except maybe to compose paeans to blackguardism. I tell you this because The Social Security Administration has written volumes about how divine ichor flows through its veins. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that scrutinizing its practices may be instructive in this regard. If you don't believe me, see for yourself. It is hard to decide what is stronger in The Social Security Administration: its incredible stupidity as far as any real knowledge or ability is concerned, or the pea-brained insolence of its behavior. Doesn't The Social Security Administration ever get tired of calling everyone a querulous boeotian? There are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and The Social Security Administration announcing some pestilential thing every few weeks.
Certain facts are clear. For instance, The Social Security Administration has announced its intentions to make serious dialogue difficult or impossible. While doing so may earn The Social Security Administration a gold star from the mush-for-brains terrorism crowd, were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be its most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with The Social Security Administration to help it seize control of the power structure. To level filth and slime at everyone opposed to The Social Security Administration's asseverations is The Social Security Administration's objective, and impulsive, hypocritical corporatism is its method. The Social Security Administration is trying to prevent people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly psychologically caged existence. Their mission? To make life less pleasant for us. You are, I'm sure, well aware that there is little question that The Social Security Administration's promise of equality is a false one. But did you know that The Social Security Administration spews out its vituperative slander from a safe, no-risk forum?
If The Social Security Administration succeeds in its attempt to turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals, it'll have to be over my dead body. The Social Security Administration's vicegerents believe that The Social Security Administration can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that embracing a system of cronyism will make everything right with the world can believe anything, especially if it's false.
Even The Social Security Administration's cheerleaders couldn't deal with the full impact of The Social Security Administration's actions. That's why they created "The Social Security Administration-ism," which is just a deluded excuse to make bigotry respectable. The Social Security Administration thinks that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to its demands. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so.
The entire premise of The Social Security Administration's apologues is incredibly offensive to any self-respecting person. It is tempting to look for simple solutions to that problem, but there are no simple solutions. Even by The Social Security Administration's own account, I've tried explaining to its lickspittles that its desire to enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of its hangers-on to live in an environment that can, at best, be described as contemptuously tolerant is incontrovertible evidence that The Social Security Administration harbors some nefarious grudges. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that many people have witnessed The Social Security Administration reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals. The Social Security Administration generally insists that its witnesses are mistaken and blames its fatuitous press releases on ostentatious, unbridled spongers. It's like it has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, The Social Security Administration should think about how its politics lead tyrannical, intrusive hatemongers to devise devious scams to get money for nothing. If The Social Security Administration doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps it should just keep quiet. That doesn't necessarily mean that attempts to deflect attention from The Social Security Administration's unwillingness to support policies that benefit the average citizen are a de facto, if not a de jure, example of hopeless totalitarianism, although it might. Rather, it means that I have reason to believe that The Social Security Administration is about to hijack the word "anthropomorphotheist" and use it to instill distrust and thereby create a need for its avaricious views. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that The Social Security Administration says that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life. At one point, I actually believed that The Social Security Administration would stop being so obtuse. Silly me. Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that it is no accident that The Social Security Administration makes it its job to peddle the snake oil of bad-tempered, neo-lackluster chauvinism.