Quote:
That's what I'm driving at-that your method would actually be LESS effective, both trapping people who are not even your target, and letting others slide base on the fact that their looks don't fit your profile
..... At the moment you are trapping everyone. 200,000 people out of 200,000
If you where to only stop those who are of Arabic/Indian/Pakistani decent. (lets say 1%)
all of a sudden you are now only trapping 2000 with 198,000 people of other nationalities go through without the same stringent checks (just the normal ones as before) that removes 99% of the extra workload and cost correct?
Now can we argee that if there is going to be a fundamentalist islamic bomber the chances are extremely high that it's going to be a male of Arabic/Indian/Pakistani decent?
If the police are monitoring people who are frequenting places that are the hotbeds of said Fundermentalist views the small number of non Arabic/Indian?pakistani background are going to be alot easier to monitor as they would stand out and thier change in behaviour far easier to spot.
These people could be added to the Interpol records and would be subjected to the same level of extra scruteny as the 1%.
How can that be less effective?