Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

To the children of the Asylum...Follow

#1 Aug 11 2006 at 3:27 PM Rating: Default
***
1,045 posts
Hi, I'm

RDMStormwind 1 / 1 USER 3
Fafatta 35 / 285 USER 3.5441495050631
Banidosu 9 / 10 USER 4.36774193548387
TheLastDisciple 3 / 3 USER 1.97418630751964


Holy f^c!(ing Lord… is this really how the BIG DAWGS come out swinging? Engendering puerile scribbled remarks in an attempt to blight other “out of our gang” posters from gaining admittance into the Holiest of Holies? Wow! Where is the eccentricity? Where are the inimitable “one-liners”? Here… all that’s seen are long-winded, hand-me-down, sexually nuanced, desolate attempts lubricated with archaically expressed sentence structures used as a somnolent undertaking to nudge another poster out of this dweeb infested forum, improperly titled, “The Asylum”. This is reminiscent of a feeble attempt at fashioning a forum into a “One Flew over the Cuckoos Nest” cult classic. One would think that he would find even the bare minimum of snappy “come-backs” significant for enjoyable scrutinization. Alas, there seems to be a drought.
Here… let me assist you in your retort.

“You there! Rather then innovating my own distinctive way of denigration, I will endeavor to mutilate your feelings by saying… “Go back from whence you came before I squirt you from my rectal hole. Don’t come into the Blessed Asylum thinking you can use big words and have us running to the closest Thesaurus so we can figure out what you said. Go back to your home in the fecal matter produced from your junk yard dog.”

Ladies… Gentlemen… or would I be correct in rephrasing to, toddlers… adolescents… come on! I’ve heard children in third world countries use verbal assaults better then what’s been scribbled in here. And posting about ones IQ is nothing more than an attempt to pedestal the redirection of another’s attention from their own self-hatred. IQ of 70! Who in their right mind would use that as a way of stating the size of their *****? That’s like bragging about the kind of car you have! In the little bit of perusing I’ve done, that was the best your soldiers could come up with? I’ve known more people with the IQ no higher than that of a rock that had snappier comebacks and heftier insults than those written in this forum. To quote a movie, since that’s the best this forum deserves, those attempts are like, “being the smartest person with down syndrome!”

Hey… here’s a thought… let’s all congregate in a unified regime of idiots and obstruct attention from our own lack of self worth and generate poorly thought of insults directed at their weight. Yeah, that’s funny and it’ll make her cry! Please. No… let’s try this…let’s use our own community college vocabulary and make futile attempts at rallying the Asylumnites into desecrating their characters with connotations in sexual nature of raping or mutilating their physical well being. Here’s a thought… COME UP WITH SOMETHING ORIGINAL!

I find better reading in children’s books. This Asylum is nothing more than a “million man march” of the undesirables from elementary school that were insulted and pushed around and found a home in the virtual world where they can hurl toddler attempts at being comedic to those that decided to try and fit in with their “Harry Potter” Fraternity base! Thank you for the last 15 minutes of wasted time in my entire life! I think I’ll go back to watching Pee Wee Herman and find solace in his originality. Do yourselves a favor.

1) Find that bottle of Drano under your restroom cabinet
2) Take a few shots of it
3) Call your Pastor or the Counselor at your local shelter
4) Ask him to pray for you to die quickly
5) DIE


Edited, Aug 11th 2006 at 9:13pm EDT by Kaolian
#2 Aug 11 2006 at 3:29 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
/nods

Not a bad first attempt, buck-o. Keep at it for another few thousand posts and I might declare you more than a one post wonder.

Totem
#3 Aug 11 2006 at 3:29 PM Rating: Decent
?
#4 Aug 11 2006 at 3:31 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I am going to make this short but sweet: The Asylum's hate-filled, conceited teachings are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of misoneism are blooming all around us. By way of introduction, let me just say that the Asylum doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. It uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. I have a message for the Asylum. My message is that, for the good of us all, it should never send children to die as martyrs for causes that it is unwilling to die for itself. It should never even try to do such a rambunctious thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never", I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that the Asylum's announcements are more than just self-pitying. They're a revolt against nature.

Unless we burn away social illness, exploitation, and human suffering, our whole social structure will gradually disintegrate and crumble into ruins. The Asylum will do everything in its power to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; we can't stop the Asylum overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to convince the government to clamp down hard on the Asylum's offhand remarks. The gloss that the Asylum's chums put on the Asylum's apologues unfortunately does little to call a spade a spade. The Asylum truly believes that my bitterness at it is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. I hope you realize that that's just a lousy pipe dream from a baleful, uncouth pipe, and that in the real world, if the Asylum is going to talk about higher standards, then it needs to live by those higher standards. The Asylum's protests can be rightly understood only as what some whiney oligarchs have been brave enough to call them: a failure.

Yes, you heard me right; the Asylum has been known to say that it can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime. That notion is so sick, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. I may be beating a dead horse here, but I do want to point out that there are many roads leading to the defeat of the Asylum's plans to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society. I obviously believe that all of these roads must eventually pass through the same set of gates: the ability to break the neck of the Asylum's policy of expansionism once and for all. I don't object to the Asylum's snow jobs because the Asylum's subalterns are stampeding happily and mindlessly toward the precipice of effrontive irreligionism. I object because given a choice of having it substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. Please forgive the following sermon, but it can't be avoided in this discussion: I have one itsy-bitsy problem with the Asylum's double standards. Videlicet, they sully a profession that's already held in low esteem. And that's saying nothing about how it is typical of poxy mob bosses in its wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize its disquisitions.

You know what I mean? The Asylum is currently limited to shrieking and spitting when it's confronted with inconvenient facts. Sooner than you think, however, the Asylum is likely to switch to some sort of "turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency" approach to draw our attention away from such facts. The Asylum's plans for the future are popular among the worst classes of stubborn, neo-money-grubbing morons there are, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to accept them. The Asylum focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, it attempts to twist and distort facts to justify its feelings but that just goes to show that it strikes me as amusing that the Asylum complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain. The Asylum's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. I don't mean to throw fuel on an already considerable fire, but it seems that no one else is telling you that the Asylum is a fearful organization hiding behind a facade of cool. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, we must understand that the Asylum's reinterpretations of historic events are the opiate of the ridiculous. And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible.

The Asylum is totally versipellous. When it's among plebeians, the Asylum warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against libertinism. But when the Asylum's safely surrounded by its lackeys, it instructs them to break up society's solidarity and cohesiveness. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that the Asylum has, at times, called me "oligarchism-prone" or "stingy". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to relabel millions of people as "puerile". It's amazing that callous scumbags like the Asylum still exist in this day and age. This position, in large part, parallels civil libertarianism, but with particular emphasis on the fact that I have a problem with the Asylum's use of the phrase, "We all know that...". With this phrase, it doesn't need to prove its claim that the average working-class person can't see through its chicanery; it merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, it maintains that it is a paragon of morality and wisdom. Perhaps it would be best for it to awaken from its delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that it is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its rantings. The Asylum's handling of the situation has not been a comedy of errors, but a tragedy of errors. To be more pedantic about it, ignorance is bliss. This may be why the Asylum's confreres are generally all smiles. All of this once again proves the old saying that we can't afford to be so chauvinistic in such difficult times.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Aug 11 2006 at 3:36 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Sockity sock sock sockles!

Post on your main, you pussy.


____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#6 Aug 11 2006 at 3:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
1) Find that bottle of Drano under your restroom cabinet
2) Take a few shots of it
3) Call your Pastor or the Counselor at your local shelter
4) Ask him to pray for you to die quickly
5) DIE


Gosh, that was so original and inspired and ****. Good game, sir. Good game.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#7 Aug 11 2006 at 3:47 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
You humps need to pare that sh*t down for those of us who have ADD. I looked for the cliff notes versions of the previous two posts on wikipedia but could not find them, thus I have no clue what either of you said.

I need short paragraphs, and occasionally someone needs to put my name in the body of the composition in order to keep my attention.

Cater to me, *** holes.

Edited, Aug 11th 2006 at 4:48pm EDT by Tacosid
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
#8 Aug 11 2006 at 3:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
I started to read your post, but stopped after your horrible attempt to break the swear filter. Figure it out, or shut the fück up.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#9 Aug 11 2006 at 3:48 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Man, I had some good lasagna for lunch today. It's almost quieted the giant tummy-monster of mine that craves noodles.

/glow

Edited, Aug 11th 2006 at 4:53pm EDT by Atomicflea
#10 Aug 11 2006 at 3:49 PM Rating: Default
***
1,045 posts
Wait… now I’ve been addressed by someone aptly named after those indigenous peoples, barbaric in nature and with the intelligence of a decaying tree, to “post” a few thousand times in order for me to gain some sort of entrance to this childcare? Wow. Apparently you didn’t understand the reasons for the writing above. Here… let me put this in your primitive language… “Ugh want more gooder insolt.”

And that long “short” explanation of what the Asylum is supposed to be? Find something not generated of another’s intellect! If that’s what your misfits are supposed to be, then BE IT and stop the meanderings likened of misled druids. There are extremes that need to be addressed in this want for a better world. Agreed. And sometimes people need to say things that have more meaning to it, and with deeper definition, than that of the teenage “in-crowd”. Agreed. Than act like what you use as a “Title” for your supposed forum and stop using empty roomed, comedy stand-up lines, and instead post what would have substance and use.

And to the last 3 or 4.. can you count.. posters...

"ummm... yea"

Substance. S _ U _ B _ S _ T A _ N _ C _ E

#11 Aug 11 2006 at 3:51 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
To those people who are outraged at Jophiel's insolent memoranda, this letter will be of interest. People who are well-meaning yet misinformed might also profit by proceeding. For the remainder who are indifferent, faint of heart, or content to let Jophiel bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive, I regret that there is little reason to read further. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and get the facts out in the hope that somebody will do something to solve the problem.

At any rate, Jophiel says that he can change his belligerent ways. What he means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to skewer me over a pit barbecue. Once you cut through the bravado, misconceptions, and ignorance, you'll find that the quest to break down age-old institutions and customs is the true inner kernel of his philosophy, insofar as this figment of a quasi-avaricious brain can be designated a "philosophy", but that's really beside the point. The public is like a giant that he has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Jophiel leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to derail Jophiel's headstrong little schemes. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that the first thing we need to do is to get Jophiel to admit that he has a problem. He should be counseled to recite the following:

  • I, Jophiel, am a saturnine, jealous ruffian.
  • I have been a participant in a giant scheme to ****** the free and natural economic development of various countries' indigenous population.
  • I hereby admit my addiction to nativism. I ask for the strength and wisdom to fight this addiction.


  • Once Jophiel realizes that he has a problem, maybe then he'll see that each rung on the ladder of snobbism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for Jophiel to stretch credulity beyond the breaking point. That is the standard process by which flagitious dipsomaniacs blow the whole situation way out of proportion.

    Jophiel is not interested in what is true and what is false or in what is good and what is evil. In fact, those distinctions have no meaning to him whatsoever. The only thing that has any meaning to Jophiel is nonrepresentationalism. Why? My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that one of Jophiel's unidimensional arguments is that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. The second, more telling, observation is that the biggest difference between me and Jophiel is that Jophiel wants to bring about a wonderland of despotism. I, on the other hand, want to illustrate the virtues that he lacks -- courage, truthfulness, courtesy, honesty, diligence, chivalry, loyalty, and industry. People often get the impression that superstitious, satanic grizzlers and Jophiel's spokesmen are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: We are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which mendacious, mean-spirited dweebs like Jophiel are thoroughly absent. The other road leads into the darkness of simplism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? The answer is obvious if you understand that if we let Jophiel render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization. Our goal must now be to shatter the adage that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. If you believe that that's a worthwhile goal, then I can definitely use your help. Let me hear from you.

    #12 Aug 11 2006 at 3:52 PM Rating: Excellent
    ***
    3,128 posts
    Quote:
    Alas, there seems to be a drought.

    Sorry, Nobby's getting laid and is just not as ornery as usual.

    Edited, Aug 11th 2006 at 4:57pm EDT by fhrugby
    #13 Aug 11 2006 at 3:53 PM Rating: Good
    ****
    4,396 posts
    No, I was right the first time. Still too long and pointless.

    Edited, Aug 11th 2006 at 4:54pm EDT by Tacosid
    ____________________________
    I voted for the other guy.
    #14 Aug 11 2006 at 3:54 PM Rating: Decent
    *****
    10,755 posts
    The genius of the Asylum is that they don't need to do any of the above to make you look like a dumbass.

    Trying too hard is more embarassing that not trying at all imo. But....
    meh.
    #15 Aug 11 2006 at 3:56 PM Rating: Good
    *****
    18,463 posts
    Sometimes, I look at my nails, and they already look freshly manicured. It's a gift.
    #16 Aug 11 2006 at 3:56 PM Rating: Good
    ****
    4,396 posts
    A lot of work went into some of those posts, but I bet less than 2 percent of the population of this forum will actually read every word of them.

    Lets keep it to factoids people!
    ____________________________
    I voted for the other guy.
    #17 Aug 11 2006 at 3:57 PM Rating: Decent
    *****
    10,755 posts
    Tacosid wrote:
    A lot of work went into some of those posts, but I bet less than 2 percent of the population of this forum will actually read every word of them.

    Lets keep it to factoids people!


    Or at least bullet points with shiny things before them. I would have read at least one or two of them then.
    #18 Aug 11 2006 at 3:58 PM Rating: Excellent
    Liberal Conspiracy
    *******
    TILT
    Jawbox wrote:
    To those people who are outraged at Jophiel's insolent memoranda...
    Smiley: clap Smiley: laugh
    ____________________________
    Belkira wrote:
    Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
    #19 Aug 11 2006 at 3:58 PM Rating: Good
    *****
    14,454 posts
    Tacosid wrote:
    A lot of work went into some of those posts, but I bet less than 2 percent of the population of this forum will actually read every word of them.

    Lets keep it to factoids people!


    Make it .5% and you might be closer to the mark
    #20 Aug 11 2006 at 4:01 PM Rating: Excellent
    Liberal Conspiracy
    *******
    TILT
    I think I'll confound my critics by devoting this letter not to describing self-aggrandizing, headlong nonentities in general, but the Asylum elite in particular. Before I begin, let me point out that the Asylum elite will probably respond to this letter just like it responds to all criticism. It will put me down as "delusional" or "pharisaical". That's its standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about it except the most fawning praise. The Asylum elite used to complain about being persecuted. Now it is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that griping about the Asylum elite will not make it stop trying to violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains. But even if it did, it would just find some other way to force some to live by restrictive standards not applicable to others. It's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. The Asylum elite distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its current opinions.

    Look at what's happened since the Asylum elite first ordered its slaves to take rights away from individuals on the basis of prejudice, myth, irrational belief, inaccurate information, and outright falsehood: Views once considered vulgar are now considered ordinary. Views once considered dissolute are now considered perfectly normal. And the most witless of the Asylum elite's views are now seen as gospel by legions of hypersensitive, foul slobs. The Asylum elite wants to defile the present and destroy the future. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and *****. Some day, I want to lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for insight. But you don't have to wait for that. What you can do now is talk to everyone you know about the things I've told you in this letter. Use every medium available to you. Use the Internet. Use your telephone. Use radio and newspapers. And whatever you do, never be afraid to speak out against the evil that is the Asylum elite.
    ____________________________
    Belkira wrote:
    Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
    #21 Aug 11 2006 at 4:02 PM Rating: Default
    Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator, I have a number of things to say that you may find useful. Please note that many of the conclusions I'm about to draw are based on cogent and virtually incontrovertible evidence provided by a set of people who have suffered immensely on account of Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator. The real question here is not, "What provoked Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator to prevent people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly psychologically caged existence?". The real question is rather, "Why does it think that it knows 100% of everything 100% of the time?" We already have our answer; as a respected journalist put it, "Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator flatters people in order to betray them". He probably could have added that if you don't think that thanks to Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator we're all in a free fall into a pit of Maoism, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. It's precisely because it is crystal-clear that Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator should be responsible for its own actions that Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that the documentation of this matter is abundant and conclusive. Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would, because it once said that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard it say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator explicitly seeks out situations where its brutish behavior will be tolerated, condoned, and admired. But that's not all: It is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me, because Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's previous changes have always been for the worse. I'm positive that its new changes will be even more pesky, because Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator loves getting up in front of people and telling them that men are spare parts in the social repertoire -- mere optional extras. It then boasts about how it'll squander irreplaceable treasures one day. It's all part of the media spectacle that is Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator. Of course, it soaks it up and wallows in it like a pig in mud. Speaking of pigs and mud, you should never forget the three most important facets of Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's roorbacks, namely their blasphemous origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature.

    Imagine people everywhere embracing Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's claim that divine ichor flows through its veins. The idea defies the imagination. It will be objected, to be sure, that Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator doesn't honestly want to spawn a society in which those with the most deviant lifestyle, contentious behavior, or personal failures are given the most by the government. At first glance, this may seem to be true, but when you think about it further, you'll definitely conclude that it can't attack my ideas, so it attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator could bowdlerize all unfavorable descriptions of its insults.

    Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator is like a broken record, using the same tired cliches about family and education and safer streets, yet it might nail people to trees before you know it. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? There is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil organizations like Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: I've catalogued all of Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's foibles -- and the list is pretty big.

    #22 Aug 11 2006 at 4:03 PM Rating: Good
    Ministry of Silly Cnuts
    *****
    19,524 posts
    To the OP's main.

    "From Whence"?

    Learn fUcking English Smiley: oyvey
    ____________________________
    "I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
    #23 Aug 11 2006 at 4:04 PM Rating: Excellent
    Liberal Conspiracy
    *******
    TILT
    Kaelesh the Puissant wrote:
    Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator
    It was funny when Jawbox played along, but I knew someone would be all "OMG I know the secret!!!"

    Smiley: disappointed
    ____________________________
    Belkira wrote:
    Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
    #24 Aug 11 2006 at 4:07 PM Rating: Good
    ****
    6,730 posts
    Meh, you all need to quit with the thesaurus humping. It doesn't make you look smart it makes you look pompous and pretentious. It's not about how many words you string together in a obtuse long winded diatribe. It's all about succinct style emphasizing quality and most of all not losing your reader. You know, the guy you are trying so badly to insult?

    Morans.
    #25 Aug 11 2006 at 4:09 PM Rating: Decent
    Quote:
    From: TheLastDisciple [ Add to Address Book | Add to Ignore List ]
    To: CrescentFresh
    Sent: Aug 11, 2006 @ 3:51 PM CST
    Read: Aug 11, 2006 @ 3:55 PM CST
    Subject: Just a guess..
    Message Body: [ Reply | Forward ]

    I wish everyone could know the pain I live with every day of my miserable life. Alas no, statistics tells me that only 1 in every 30,000 adult males has a ***** less than 4 inches long and 2 inches around. Only they, my wee weinied brethren can even begin to understand the hurt I feel when I step up to a urinal and the stream of urine is only slightly smaller than the 3.28 inch long, 1.67 inch wide ****** that it springs from.

    I have tried pumps, creams, exercises, pulling and god forbid; even praying. Nothing works, not even marginally on my miniscule member. So, everyday I try to lie to the world about possessing a petite ****** by peeling out in my Corvette, strutting around in expensive suits, talking about my mansion, dating strippers to show the world my virility and constantly crowing about my colossal crotch.

    But my Armani suits are just expensive costumes to hide my teeny-tiny tallywacker. My gigantic house is where I sit alone with my dwarf johnson. And the truth is the only thing I can stretch when it comes to my freakishly feeble frankfurter. Day in and day out I used to ask myself, "TheLastDisciple what would jesus do with a small *****?"

    After hours of reading the bible, searching my soul and peering at my puny prick, I know now that there is no savior, at least not for my snack sized sex stub.



    TheLastDisciple


    P.S. Let my parents know that if I had gotten that pony I wanted when I was 8 this probably wouldn't have happened.


    What the fuck? Is this a suicide note?
    #26 Aug 11 2006 at 4:09 PM Rating: Decent
    *****
    19,369 posts
    So it's an old tired and thoughtless cliched assualt to call someone fat but you turn around and use two! That's right twice the thoughtless old tired cliches; the old nerds on a forum that got bullied in elementary and the go drink bleach and die.

    If you want something original and well thought out then do so yourself. You get what you put in and all that nonsense. Everything you ***** about you do yourself in the same post. Hypocrisy much?

    GFY, one liner insult, etc. Whatever.



    btw socks are nice and toasty fresh out of the dryer
    « Previous 1 2 3
    Reply To Thread

    Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

     

    Recent Visitors: 384 All times are in CST
    Anonymous Guests (384)