Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Brit Special Forces, Nobby, thwarts a terrorist attackFollow

#1 Aug 10 2006 at 6:39 AM Rating: Good
Link

A close one, nice work gents.

Quote:


By DANICA KIRKA, Associated Press Writer 1 minute ago

LONDON - British authorities said Thursday they had thwarted a terrorist plot to simultaneously blow up several aircraft heading to the U.S. using explosives smuggled in carry-on luggage, averting what police described as "mass murder on an unimaginable scale." Home Secretary John Reid said British police and government were confident the main suspects had been arrested.
ADVERTISEMENT

Huge crowds formed at security barriers at London's Heathrow airport as officials searching for explosives barred nearly every form of liquid outside of baby formula.

Officials raised security to its highest level in Britain — suggesting a terrorist attack might be imminent — and banned hand-carried luggage on all trans-Atlantic flights.

The extreme measures at one of the major international aviation hubs sent ripple effects throughout the world. Heathrow airport was closed to most flights from Europe.

The U.S. government responded by raising its threat alert to its highest level for commercial flights from Britain to the United States amid fears the plot had not been completely crushed. The alert for all flights coming or going from the United States was also raised slightly.

In Washington, two U.S. counterterrorism officials said the terrorists had targeted United, American and Continental airlines. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case.

Police arrested 21 people in London, its suburbs and in Birmingham as part of a major covert counterterrorism operation that had lasted several months, Deputy Commissioner Paul Stephenson said. Searches continued in a number of locations.

Police are confident they have disrupted a plot against aircraft which was "intended to be mass murder on an unimaginable scale," he said.

The suspects were "homegrown," though it was not immediately clear if they were all British citizens, said a police official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case. Police were working closely with the South Asian community, the official said.

The official said the plotters intended to simultaneously target multiple planes bound for the United States.

Prime Minister
Tony Blair, vacationing in the Caribbean, briefed
President Bush on the situation overnight, Blair's office said. There was no immediate public reaction from the White House. Bush is spending a few days at his ranch near Crawford, Texas.

It is the first time the red alert level in the
Homeland Security warning system has been invoked, although there have been brief periods in the past when the orange level was applied. Homeland Security defines the red alert as designating a "severe risk of terrorist attacks."

"We believe that these arrests (in London) have significantly disrupted the threat, but we cannot be sure that the threat has been entirely eliminated or the plot completely thwarted," said U.S. Homeland Security Secretary
Michael Chertoff.

Chertoff added, however, there was no indication of current plots within the U.S. Numerous flights from U.S. cities to Britain were canceled Thursday morning.

A senior U.S. counterterrorism official said authorities believe dozens of people — possibly as many as 50 — were involved in the plot, which "had a footprint to al-Qaida back to it." The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation.

The plan involved airline passengers hiding masked explosives in carry-on luggage, the official said. "They were not yet sitting on an airplane," but were very close to traveling, the official said, calling the plot "the real deal."

Passengers in Britain faced delays as tighter security was hastily enforced at the country's airports and additional measures were put in place for all flights. Laptop computers, mobile phones, iPods, and remote controls were among the items banned from being carried on board.

Liquids, such as hair care products, were also barred on flights in both Britain and the U.S., raising the possibility that authorities were searching for a liquid explosive.

Huge lines formed at ticket counters and behind security barriers at Heathrow and other airports in Britain. Ed Lappen, 55, a businessman from Boston, who was traveling with his wife and daughter to Russia, found himself unable to travel further.

"We're safe, we're OK," he said at Heathrow. "Now my daughter is going to get a shopping trip in London."

Hannah Pillinger, 24, seemed less concerned by the announcement. "Eight hours without an iPod, that's the most inconvenient thing," she said, waiting at the Manchester airport.

Most European carriers canceled flights to Heathrow because of the massive delays created after authorities enforced strict new regulations banning most carry-on baggage.

Heathrow's block on incoming traffic applied to flights of three hours or less, affecting most of the incoming traffic from Europe, an airport spokesman said on condition of anonymity in line with airport policy.

Officials at Frankfurt's airport, Europe's second-busiest, Schiphol in Amsterdam and Charles De Gaulle in Paris said Heathrow-bound planes could instead land at their airports if they needed to.

London's Heathrow airport was the departure point for a devastating terrorist attack on a Pan Am airplane on Dec. 21, 1988. The blast over Lockerbie, Scotland, killed all 259 people aboard Pan Am Flight 103 and 11 people on the ground.

The explosive was hidden in a portable radio which was hidden in checked baggage.


Scary Shit, hidden inside a radio. Must of been a clstr fUck at Heathrow. 21 suspects arrested thats a decent number if they are in fact terrorists.

Edited, Aug 10th 2006 at 10:11am EDT by Soracloud
#2 Aug 10 2006 at 6:51 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Yeah, glad I'm not at Heathrow today.

Darn terrorists!

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#3 Aug 10 2006 at 7:11 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Have to baffled at the state of the terrorist mind when they think that blowing up transatlantic flights will somehow further thier cause.

Didn't work for Gadaffi.
#4 Aug 10 2006 at 7:42 AM Rating: Decent
Vrooooom Vrooooom here comes the ******** mobile!
#5 Aug 10 2006 at 8:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
The explosive was hidden in a portable radio which was hidden in checked baggage.
The news was making it sound like the explosive was in the form of various gels or liquids that would be mixed in flight. Which goes against what they say here. Huh.

I was wondering how they'd get the liquid explosive to detonate.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 Aug 10 2006 at 8:11 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
The explosive was hidden in a portable radio which was hidden in checked baggage.
The news was making it sound like the explosive was in the form of various gels or liquids that would be mixed in flight. Which goes against what they say here. Huh.

I was wondering how they'd get the liquid explosive to detonate.


Didn't you ever see Die Hard with a vengence?
#7 Aug 10 2006 at 8:26 AM Rating: Decent
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:


Must of been a clstr fUck at Heathrow.


If I am correct, Heathrow is the busiest airport in all of Europe. After the Pan Am flight was blown up by Libyian terrorists in the 80's, Heathrow instituted all kinds of security measures, making it one of the safest airports in the world. I guess those security measures finally paid off.
#8 Aug 10 2006 at 8:29 AM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
The explosive was hidden in a portable radio which was hidden in checked baggage.
The news was making it sound like the explosive was in the form of various gels or liquids that would be mixed in flight. Which goes against what they say here. Huh.

I was wondering how they'd get the liquid explosive to detonate.

Didn't you ever see Die Hard with a vengence?

Gels on a muthafuckin' plane!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#9 Aug 10 2006 at 8:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:
Didn't you ever see Die Hard with a vengence?
As a matter of fact, no.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Aug 10 2006 at 8:43 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:
Didn't you ever see Die Hard with a vengence?
As a matter of fact, no.


Well I just planned a part of your weekend, your welcome.
#11 Aug 10 2006 at 8:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If the government cared, the Dept of Homeland Security would mail me a copy. And some popcorn. And a bag of Gummi worms.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Aug 10 2006 at 8:55 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:
Didn't you ever see Die Hard with a vengence?
As a matter of fact, no.

Well I just planned a part of your weekend, your welcome.

To be honest, this one is the least of the trilogy. Its plot is even more ridiculously convoluted than the others (which, in ergards to 2, is saying quite a bit) and suffers from SoaP syndrome: "Put Sammy Jackson in there, yeah, that'll make it a hit!"

But then again, it *is* a "part 3". The only redeeming feature is that it retains the central character and original actor.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#13 Aug 10 2006 at 8:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Is it better than Aliens^3?

'Cause that wouldn't take much.

I'm starting to feel we're getting off track from the OP here
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 Aug 10 2006 at 9:01 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Quote:
Brits thwart a possible terrorist attack

I know what we were all thinking, and it was along the lines of, "Thank Bob Nobby was there to thwart this terrorist plot".

Thanks, Nobs.
#15 Aug 10 2006 at 9:01 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I haven't seen A3, so I can't really make that call. But based on my criteria they'd be about neck-and-neck.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#16 Aug 10 2006 at 9:07 AM Rating: Good
I think Aliens 3 is badass just because Charles Dutton is one bad muthafucker.

And back on track: Personally, seems kind odd that when the administration get's under the microscope, scrutinized, and approval ratings go down...something always pops up where everyone get's a big 'ol "Pat on the back" for thwarting some evil terrorist plot, and the country goes on Red Alert.

It's getting old...and fishy.
#17 Aug 10 2006 at 9:08 AM Rating: Good
Yeah the only difference is teaming a white lead with a passive black and an overly aggresive black.

Forrest Whitaker > Sammy J

so yeah back on topic, hair gel, what a *****.
#18 Aug 10 2006 at 9:09 AM Rating: Decent
Ryneguy wrote:
I think Aliens 3 is badass just because Charles Dutton is one bad muthafucker.

And back on track: Personally, seems kind odd that when the administration get's under the microscope, scrutinized, and approval ratings go down...something always pops up where everyone get's a big 'ol "Pat on the back" for thwarting some evil terrorist plot, and the country goes on Red Alert.

It's getting old...and fish and chipsy.


#19 Aug 10 2006 at 9:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Quote:
Brits thwart a possible terrorist attack

I know what we were all thinking, and it was along the lines of, "Thank Bob Nobby was there to thwart this terrorist plot".

Thanks, Nobs.


That was not what I have been thinking in the past 10 minutes since I have learned of this. Smiley: cry

BUT now that you mention it, Nobby is in London today... coincidence? Thanks for making me smile Flea, yoos da woman!
____________________________

#20 Aug 10 2006 at 9:09 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Oh and BTW, the US is talking about liquid explosives in separate containers that when mixed and ignited, would have caused an explosion.

Quote:
U.S.Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said the terrorists planned to use liquid explosives disguised as beverages and other common products and detonators disguised as electronic devices.
#21 Aug 10 2006 at 9:11 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Kween Darqflame wrote:
yoos da woman!
That's a good thing, too. Otherwise I would feel mighty silly in these nylons.
#22 Aug 10 2006 at 9:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Ryneguy wrote:
And back on track: Personally, seems kind odd that when the administration get's under the microscope, scrutinized, and approval ratings go down...something always pops up where everyone get's a big 'ol "Pat on the back" for thwarting some evil terrorist plot, and the country goes on Red Alert.
The last two major plots were thwarted by Canada and Britain. If anything, this shows that we need to boot Bush and get Elizabeth II in here as queen.

Edited, Aug 10th 2006 at 10:14am EDT by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#23 Aug 10 2006 at 9:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Debalic wrote:
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
The explosive was hidden in a portable radio which was hidden in checked baggage.
The news was making it sound like the explosive was in the form of various gels or liquids that would be mixed in flight. Which goes against what they say here. Huh.

I was wondering how they'd get the liquid explosive to detonate.

Didn't you ever see Die Hard with a vengence?

Gels on a muthafuckin' plane!


Mousse would have been funnier. Just sayin'.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#24 Aug 10 2006 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Sora, did you edit the title for me? I'm honored!
#25 Aug 10 2006 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Sora, did you edit the title for me? I'm honored!


well you made a good point, why not Smiley: grin
#26 Aug 10 2006 at 9:24 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
On a more serious note, it made me wonder (again) what the status is on the whole "We're gonna get Al-Queda" thing we had going there for a while. It sure would be nice if our resources weren't all stretched to hell and we were really focused on the one agency, fo' sho', that we know wants to, keeps trying to, and did boom us good.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 202 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (202)