Quote:
Then you can leave out the qualifier that the foster kid even needs to be molested for having gay foster parents be detrimental. That's how I inferred it, because you're saying that gay gfoster parents are going to be detrimental to kids due to societal images. Well what does that have to do with molestation? Using your logic, we could make a case that all sorts of minority groups shouldn't be allowed to foster parent since some segment of our population is going to give them grief.
Good point. I'm trying to sort out an argument on the fly here (you guys really put me back on my heels; I was definitely not expecting to be on the defensive). Implying that molestation wasn't requisite for my point was a mistake.
In my head I was picturing that the connection for the child would be with the fact that both homosexuality and said molestation would involve sexuality. That's what society would work off of, and what might mess with the kid. I really can't pretend to know what goes on in the mind of someone who's been abused though, so it's tough for me to make a case for that. I think I've heard of feelings of guilt and shame though, and those are emotions that would stack with what society would impress upon the child.
It's a weak argument, I know, but I feel like child development is a sensitive thing, especially in cases of abuse, so I'm apprehensive about going all-in without knowing full well that it'll work out.
Edited, Jul 31st 2006 at 12:54pm EDT by Eske
Edited, Jul 31st 2006 at 1:10pm EDT by Eske