Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I'd hit it.Follow

#1 Jul 27 2006 at 7:11 AM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
Quote:
HARRY POTTER is going to be waving his other wand.

Daniel Radcliffe, the 17-year-old star of the hugely popular "Harry Potter" movies, will play the role of an emotionally disturbed boy who takes off his clothes and blinds horses in a London revival of Peter Shaffer's drama "Equus," The Post has learned.

The production is scheduled to open in the West End in January.

Richard Griffiths, known to millions of Harry Potter fans as nasty Uncle Vernon, has been asked to co-star as the psychiatrist who tries to save the boy, a production source said.

Griffiths, who declined comment for this article, was with Radcliffe last week, shooting the fifth installment of the Harry Potter series, "Order of the Phoenix."

In an interview with The Post shortly before "The History Boys" opened, Griffiths wondered how Radcliffe and the other young "Harry Potter" stars would fare as the movies got darker and more complex.

"Massive acting demands are going to be made on them," he said. "And the question is: Will they have the emotional technique to do it?"

"Equus" - an intense and disturbing drama - will certainly make huge acting demands on Radcliffe, who has never acted on stage.

A modern classic, it deals with the complex question of how a conservative, well-ordered society deals with a brutal but passionate act.


Forget wondering how they will fare with the "darker films", how far are these kids going to have to go to shake being known as Harry, Ron, and Hermine?


Edited, Jul 27th 2006 at 8:11am EDT by PsiChi
#2 Jul 27 2006 at 7:26 AM Rating: Good
Psi wrote:
Forget wondering how they will fare with the "darker films", how far are these kids going to have to go to shake being known as Harry, Ron, and Hermine?


Probably forever (and a day), much like how Elijah Wood will always be Frodo, and those other two guys will always be Merry & Pippin. Even well known actors with established careers can fall into a category like this. Keanu Reeves and Neo from The Matrix. Toby McGuire and Spider-man. Hugh Jackman and Wolverine. It's the familiarity & popularity of the role that binds it to the actor.

Some get away with it, (or embrace it) like Gandolf vs. Magneto...established enough in both franchises that he ideally suits two roles (and when broken down to good and evil, can be portrayed as both antagonist and protagonist). The Harry Potter films are so popular (as were LotR films), that the characters become imbedded into that era's pop culture...so they'll always be identified that way. Much like a child sitcom star of the 80's will always be just that...the child star they once were.

Edited, Jul 27th 2006 at 10:33am EDT by Ryneguy
#3 Jul 27 2006 at 7:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Ryneguy wrote:
Some get away with it, (or embrace it) like Gandolf vs. Magneto...established enough in both franchises that he ideally suits two roles (and when broken down to good and evil, can be portrayed as both antagonist and protagonist). The Harry Potter films are so popular (as were LotR films), that the characters become imbedded into that era's pop culture...so they'll always be identified that way. Much like a child sitcom star of the 80's will always be just that...the child star they once were.


One reason that Ian McKellan refused to be Dumbledore
____________________________
Do what now?
#4 Jul 27 2006 at 7:32 AM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
Ryneguy wrote:
Psi wrote:
Forget wondering how they will fare with the "darker films", how far are these kids going to have to go to shake being known as Harry, Ron, and Hermine?


Probably forever (and a day), much like how Elijah Wood will always be Frodo, and those other two guys will always be Merry & Pippin. Even well known actors with established careers can fall into a category like this. Keanu Reeves and Neo from The Matrix. Toby McGuire and Spider-man. Jack Hughman and Wolverine. It's the familiarity & popularity of the role that binds it to the actor.


But Elijah was also that guy in Eternal Sunshine and he was... umm...
And Keanu was the surfer in Point Break and Bill.. or Ted.

I think there is a difference between the Harry Potter kids and people like Keanu or Toby, since the latter have not made their public debut with a cultural "icon".

Quote:
Some get away with it, (or embrace it) like Gandolf vs. Magneto...established enough in both franchises that he ideally suits two roles (and when broken down to good and evil, can be portrayed as both antagonist and protagonist).


F that. He will always be the grumpy **** from Apt Pupil to me.
#5 Jul 27 2006 at 8:30 AM Rating: Default
Forget wondering how they will fare with the "darker films", how far are these kids going to have to go to shake being known as Harry, Ron, and Hermine?
--------------------------------------------------------------------

bout as far as william shatner will have to go so people dont see captain kirk,
#6 Jul 27 2006 at 8:37 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
bout as far as william shatner will have to go so people dont see captain kirk,


So they should start singing?
#7 Jul 27 2006 at 8:56 AM Rating: Decent
Kronig wrote:
Quote:
bout as far as william shatner will have to go so people dont see captain kirk,


So they should start..... singing?



fixed.
#8 Jul 27 2006 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Ryneguy wrote:
Some get away with it, (or embrace it) like Gandolf vs. Magneto...established enough in both franchises that he ideally suits two roles (and when broken down to good and evil, can be portrayed as both antagonist and protagonist). The Harry Potter films are so popular (as were LotR films), that the characters become imbedded into that era's pop culture...so they'll always be identified that way. Much like a child sitcom star of the 80's will always be just that...the child star they once were.

Well, since you mentioned it...this came out a few years ago.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#9 Jul 27 2006 at 9:25 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
poor Riker Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#10 Jul 27 2006 at 9:28 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Ryneguy wrote:
Jack Hughman and Wolverine.


::raises eyebrow::
#11 Jul 27 2006 at 9:30 AM Rating: Good
Psi wrote:
F that. He will always be the grumpy **** from Apt Pupil to me.


Smiley: lol

The problem with being "introduced" into film as an actor with a role like the kids in the Harry Potter films have taken is that they build off that role for their entire career. It "is" different for the other actors that I described...because of their previously established careers as actors with multiple roles.

Elijah is a tough one to compare. LotR has completely turned him into a hobbit. He had a career before LotR and even during, but even with that...every time I see him I think "Hobbit". Those 3 movies were just so f'in big that there was no way to escape the bond to that character. Same with Sean Astin...who was much older when they filmed LotR and had a career behind him. Movies like "Rudy" and "Goonies" are what he was previously known for. But now, he's Sam...bottom line. He's crazy busy, but he's doing more TV stuff now and less film. Anyone in those 3 movies is now linked to a character that will be extremely hard to escape.

It very much has to do with the debut of their acting career being revolved around a very long series of movies. They've pretty much grown up on film, and grown as actors/actresses on film. Basically, every interview for a movie role Radcliffe goes to, they're probably going to F up and say "Ok Harry...er, I mean Daniel"

Quote:
::raises eyebrow::


Fixed it (yeesh...dyslexia ftw!)

Edited, Jul 27th 2006 at 10:38am EDT by Ryneguy
#12 Jul 27 2006 at 9:35 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
I've been seeing Tom Everett Scott in commercials for his role for that TNT show "Saved" alot lately.

But to me, he'll always be "Cobra" from Dead Man on Campus

Greatest movie ever made by the way. I'm not joking.
#13 Jul 27 2006 at 11:03 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,369 posts
Dakota Fanning getting raped in a movie beats this.
#14 Jul 27 2006 at 12:18 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
Dakota Fanning getting raped in a movie beats this.


That would be the best movie ever.
#15 Jul 27 2006 at 12:21 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
PsiChi the Flatulent wrote:
MentalFrog wrote:
Dakota Fanning getting raped in a movie beats this.


That will be the best movie ever. I nominate it for an Oscar!


FTFY
#16 Jul 27 2006 at 12:31 PM Rating: Decent
**
416 posts
hmmmm. I`m gonna have to say that elijah woods will always be burned into my retina`s as Kevin. The freaky *** silent kid from Sin City.
#17 Jul 27 2006 at 3:08 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
PsiChi the Flatulent wrote:
MentalFrog wrote:
Dakota Fanning getting raped in a movie beats this.


That will be the best movie ever. I nominate it for an Oscar!


FTFY


Quote:
Simulated or not, the thought of putting your little girl in that situation is abhorrent. Is it even legal for a 12-year-old girl to be naked on screen? Shouldn't anyone who goes to see the movie be arrested on the grounds that they're watching child pornography?


Please god dont let it be simulated
Please god dont let it be simulated
Please god dont let it be simulated
Please god dont let it be simulated
Please god dont let it be simulated
Please god dont let it be simulated

#18 Jul 27 2006 at 3:14 PM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
Production is apparently back on now for the movie Hounddog(prior link says production suspended) from IMBD

According to the 20 July 06 issue of the "Daily Mail" (London), the film's (hounddog) production was shutdown temporarily due to a lack of funding. Investors were found and the movie is expected to wrap at the end of July

Quote:
Simulated or not, the thought of putting your little girl in that situation is abhorrent. Is it even legal for a 12-year-old girl to be naked on screen? Shouldn't anyone who goes to see the movie be arrested on the grounds that they're watching child pornography?


Brooke Sheilds was 12 when she was broken in raped in a scene in Pretty Baby, released in 1978. No nudity, that I recall in that scene; however, I believe she is shown topless in a bath in a different scene.

Edited, Jul 27th 2006 at 4:39pm EDT by fhrugby
#19 Jul 28 2006 at 1:56 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Forget wondering how they will fare with the "darker films", how far are these kids going to have to go to shake being known as Harry, Ron, and Hermine?

Being typecasted is the worst for an actor .. everytime I catch commercials of "Two and a half men," I see "Ducky" from '16 Candles' rather than the actor Jon Crier.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 368 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (368)