Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Drugs are bad, m'kay.Follow

#27 Jul 21 2006 at 1:23 PM Rating: Decent
**
777 posts
Ryne, I'm not saying that it's the job of teachers to test for drugs.

I'm saying that it's the student's job to learn, and going to school stoned impairs that.

If you are only an "in my own free time" smoker, then you have time to clean the system and are in no danger of failing a drug test.
#28 Jul 21 2006 at 1:26 PM Rating: Good
So again, Moss, in order to join the activities that are supposed to keep kids off drugs, they should be required to first jump through the hoop of artificially detoxing themself or buying some other masking agent? Your logic and bitterness toward children who would use is a clear indication you were the child of a teenage mother who drank while you were in the womb.
#29 Jul 21 2006 at 1:27 PM Rating: Good
Well agreed, it's a students job to learn, that's why they're in school. But the fact remains, that it's not the schools job to police what the student does outside of school. The arguement is not whether or not the student is stoned at class and how that should affect his ability to learn. The arguement is whether or not schools should be drug testing students, and reprimanding them based on the results of such tests.

Edited, Jul 21st 2006 at 2:27pm EDT by Ryneguy
#30 Jul 21 2006 at 1:28 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
So you are all for the schools trying to catch people for doing illegal activities and yet you are for people trying to circumvent the detection methods.

#31 Jul 21 2006 at 1:28 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
You can't clean up for a urine test over the weekend. You can dilute it to a point but it won't help in that timeframe. Goldenseal is useless.

Saliva tests will be clean after as little as 24 hours and proper, thorough oral hygeine.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#32 Jul 21 2006 at 1:34 PM Rating: Good
Well technically you could, even as close as 8 hours to test time. At least you can for marijuana.
#33 Jul 21 2006 at 1:35 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
Ryneguy wrote:
Well technically you could, even as close as 8 hours to test time. At least you can for marijuana.


Yes, but that all depends on % body fat, amount comsumed, ect.



Ya know who is going to profit from this.. The kids that are smart enough to sell their ****.

Edited, Jul 21st 2006 at 2:35pm EDT by PsiChi
#34 Jul 21 2006 at 1:36 PM Rating: Good
There's also masking products that will just temporaril make your pee-pee clean. Those can work in as little as an hour, but it's all beside the point, because it's just silly to suggest a kid circumvent the rules if one is so adamant of their neccessity.
#35 Jul 21 2006 at 1:39 PM Rating: Good
Americans are so funny with their all pervasive big-brother policies. Smiley: lol

My highscool soccer team used to sit and smoke a big reefer before tournaments. We used to travel by our own means and would carpool our hot boxes. Those were the days.
#36 Jul 21 2006 at 1:47 PM Rating: Decent
**
777 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
So again, Moss, in order to join the activities that are supposed to keep kids off drugs, they should be required to first jump through the hoop of artificially detoxing themself or buying some other masking agent?


Why do you say that activities are supposed to be there to keep kids off drugs? Most people play sports/chess/sing because they enjoy it. Lock-ins at the rec center (Timmaaayyy!) are activities that are supposed to keep kids off drugs.

If you wish to do something illegal, I hope you are smart enough to cover your tracks and/or accept the consequences of getting caught.

I'm not bitter at all towards kids who smoke/snort/huff. What I am bitter towards are the students that I have seen wasting my tax money and making the American educational system even more of a joke. I've only met a couple of teachers that give a rat's *** about students that smoke on the weekends. But I haven't yet met one that isn't peeved at smelling students walk into class with a Pigpen like cloud following them.

There are students that smoke before, during, and while out on school related activities. That is what pisses off teachers, and that's the reason for the schools testing.

#37 Jul 21 2006 at 2:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Mossholder wrote:
Why do you say that activities are supposed to be there to keep kids off drugs? Most people play sports/chess/sing because they enjoy it. Lock-ins at the rec center (Timmaaayyy!) are activities that are supposed to keep kids off drugs.


It's a psychological benefit...doing something you're interested in helps better curb negative attitude. It's not just scholastic extra-curricular activities either. Any hobby...any interest, has a psychological benefit to keep kids and teens better focused. Why do you think those activities are there? No one is even making a comparison to environmental settings for the activity. It's not a matter of the activity keeping the kids off drugs, it's a matter of keeping the kid occupied in a positive way. Negative is drug testing Timmy before every Choir Concert or Chess Meet.

Mossholder wrote:
What I am bitter towards are the students that I have seen wasting my tax money and making the American educational system even more of a joke.


Heh, the American Educational System is not a joke because of kids doing drugs, I can assure you that much.
#38 Jul 21 2006 at 2:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Mossholder wrote:
Why do you say that activities are supposed to be there to keep kids off drugs? Most people play sports/chess/sing because they enjoy it. Lock-ins at the rec center (Timmaaayyy!) are activities that are supposed to keep kids off drugs.



Why do I say that? Well it's not that I think these activities serve the sole purpose of keeping kids off drugs, but the idea is that kids who are actively involved in these things are less likely to self-destruct. I admire your compassion, though, when equating users with deficients.

Mossholde wrote:
There are students that smoke before, during, and while out on school related activities. That is what pisses off teachers, and that's the reason for the schools testing.



Ahh, I see, this is in your mind a solution to kisd who are intoxicated in class? Clearly because there are no ways to apprehend these offenders short of punishing those who would use in a more responsible manner. Going back to your DUI analogy this is like handing out tickets to folks in bars before they ever leave, kind of like the Texas stings we were discussing months ago. I s'pose if you don't mind trampling on privacy and being proactive in stopping the evil little buggers from progressing to your tax-leaching, in class stoners this is fine.

I still like to think that what I do behind closed doors is my business, otherwise Nadenu wouldn't be chained to my radiator and would be posting here more often.

Edited, Jul 21st 2006 at 3:10pm EDT by Barkingturtle
#39 Jul 21 2006 at 2:10 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Ryneguy wrote:
Well technically you could, even as close as 8 hours to test time. At least you can for marijuana.

Is that how long it takes to pump fake **** up through your urethra?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#40 Jul 21 2006 at 2:16 PM Rating: Good
I had a friend who once used her dog's urine to pass a pre-employment drug test. She followed the pup around with a plastic cup till he did his duty, then use an empty Visine bottle to extract the frothy goodness. The irony is that she got the job, and it was at the humane society.

This method works better for females, though, as they have a built-in compartment to hide the visine bottle in. Smiley: schooled
#41 Jul 21 2006 at 2:32 PM Rating: Good
Debalic wrote:
Is that how long it takes to pump fake **** up through your urethra?


No, but 8 hours is required for consumption & completion of a specific cleansing product that comes to mind. Anyone who goes to such extreme's as pumping fake or replacement **** into their bladder over smokin' a bone needs to re-evaluate their need to smoke that bone.
#42 Jul 21 2006 at 2:38 PM Rating: Decent
**
777 posts
From the OP's link.
Quote:
The Milford School Board on Thursday approved a policy that requires students participating in any co-curricular (band/chorus) or extracurricular (sports, groups) activities and students who apply for a parking permit to be subject to random drug testing.
...

Students eligible for testing will be assigned numbers. A computer will randomly select numbers, and those students will be required to provide a urine sample.

If students test positive, they will be removed from the activity they are currently participating in for the rest of the season, or their parking permit will be revoked for the remainder of the season. Permits are sold seasonally - fall, winter and spring.

Students would not be suspended or expelled, nor would they be turned over to the police.

Why do they feel the need for this? Because the herb isn't staying at home, its coming to school.
Quote:
Milford School District spent $60,000 in the 2004-05 school year for an undercover private investigator to pose as a student and make drug buys from high school students. Sixteen students were arrested at a drug bust in April 2005.

NARCs are a *****, but if the new guy can pick up herb from multiple places it doesn't say much about the intelligence of the sellers and I really don't feel sorry for them.
Quote:
Random drug testing for students who participate in extracurricular activities has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court and is legal, said Jeff Gamso, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio.


So instead of sending out another narc (talk about bad for student morale) they opt for a random wrist-slap solution. Oh noez! I missed the rest of the season because I did something illegal and got caught! No police, no suspension, nothing but losing parking or activity privelages for a couple of months.
#43 Jul 21 2006 at 2:57 PM Rating: Good
Personally, having played scholastic sports in my teenage years, I would've rathered a Narc bust me, than subject my entire team (nevermind the entire school) to a negative, demoralizing future indefinately. Sounds harsh, but my actions are my actions and only I should be held accountable for it, not an entire population.

And IMHO, it's one thing to get a Narc and address the issue through means such as parent/teach conferences, so on and so forth, recommending counseling, etc to the student. It's pretty freakin' harsh to just stick a Narc in the crowd and literally arrest 16 students. Kids experiment...it's part of growing up. The majority of people in the world have done something that can be classified as illegal. Kids act out more now (IMO) because everyone's putting such high expectations and hardcore restrictions on what they do (all the while setting a ridiculous "Do as I say, Not as I do" example).
#44 Jul 21 2006 at 3:01 PM Rating: Good
Mossholder wrote:
Why do they feel the need for this? Because the herb isn't staying at home, its coming to school.


I don't see that conclusion drawn from what you've quoted, I'm gong to assume it's your own.

Mossholder wrote:

So instead of sending out another narc (talk about bad for student morale) they opt for a random wrist-slap solution. Oh noez! I missed the rest of the season because I did something illegal and got caught! No police, no suspension, nothing but losing parking or activity privelages for a couple of months.


Oh, I feel better now because it's random. Myself, I'd be happier with the school turning kids they catch under the influence over to the police, rather than arbitrary testing and revocation of extra-curricular activities and priveledges. You seem to fail to recognize that this doesn't impact the kids who are stoned in class so long as they don't particpate in any of thes activities or request a parking pass. They're still leaching the hard earned tax money you claim to hate seeing go to waste, and aren't likely to join in any activities that might actually spur them in a different dierction. But hey, at least the admins can feel good that they're pushing their ethics on others.
#45 Jul 21 2006 at 3:50 PM Rating: Decent
**
777 posts
Barkingtutle wrote:
I don't see that conclusion drawn from what you've quoted, I'm gong to assume it's your own.

It's called a segue.
Ryneguy wrote:
Sounds harsh, but my actions are my actions and only I should be held accountable for it, not an entire population.

And that is exactly the proper attitude imo. Your teammates have no need to worry about anything at all, unless they themselves are engaging in something that currently is illegal to 99.9% of americans. If they are, I hope they feel the same way that you do and can accept the consequences of their actions with a decent amount of grace.

BT, The only reason this is news is because they have stretched to SC ruling to
include parking passes. Sure it would be more effective to just test those that they see being stoned on campus, but that's not an option.

Why parking passes? So far in OR, TN, FL and MT I've met kids that hot box their cars/trucks during lunch. Those w/out vehicles have to find a place on campus, and are much easier to catch. Again, those that don't have nothing to worry about.

Why are you bringing ethics into a discussion on illegal activities? It's a case of students doing something illegal both on an around a public place of learning. It's not your playground, it's a school.

If your ego is so fragile that losing some privelages for something that could get you arrested is more than you can handle, then don't do it.

#46 Jul 21 2006 at 4:07 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
Mossholder wrote:

Why are you bringing ethics into a discussion on illegal activities? It's a case of students doing something illegal both on an around a public place of learning. It's not your playground, it's a school.


You stupid cunt. I hope you get Down Syndrome from christmas. I hope your grandmother gets raped by a **** of t0+emic proportions. I hope your father molests your new puppy.

You still seem to be unable to realize that the issues we have is not with the kids that get in trouble for being stoned at school.
#47 Jul 21 2006 at 4:17 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Ryneguy wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Is that how long it takes to pump fake **** up through your urethra?

No, but 8 hours is required for consumption & completion of a specific cleansing product that comes to mind.

So we're traversing the land of fantasy now, or shall we stick to methods that actually work?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#48 Jul 21 2006 at 4:21 PM Rating: Good
Mossholder wrote:
[
Why are you bringing ethics into a discussion on illegal activities? It's a case of students doing something illegal both on an around a public place of learning. It's not your playground, it's a school.


Because, for the last fUcking time, it's not about students doing something illegal both on an around a public place of learning. It's about students doing something at home or at least away from the institution and being restricted in what they can do at school due to it. This is like the school implementing its dress-code when you're kickin' it at the casa.

And can you honestly say you believe the kids with cars aren't just going to find a nearby alley to park in instead of toking up in the parking lot?

#49 Jul 21 2006 at 4:33 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
And can you honestly say you believe the kids with cars aren't just going to find a nearby alley to park in instead of toking up in the parking lot?

I think the problem here is the kids themselves. Everyone knows that adolescents and teens are going to ignore and rebuke authority as a matter of course. The best solution is to lock up everyone from 10 to 19 to make sure they never do anything wrong. Middle and high schools should be secure, self-sufficient facilities where these juvenile miscreants are forced to sit soberly in classes and perform menial, life-sustaining labor.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#50 Jul 21 2006 at 5:00 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
Debalic wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
And can you honestly say you believe the kids with cars aren't just going to find a nearby alley to park in instead of toking up in the parking lot?

I think the problem here is the kids themselves. Everyone knows that adolescents and teens are going to ignore and rebuke authority as a matter of course. The best solution is to lock up everyone from 10 to 19 to make sure they never do anything wrong. Middle and high schools should be secure, self-sufficient facilities where these juvenile miscreants are forced to sit soberly in classes and perform menial, life-sustaining labor.


Dont forget to castrate the males as well, to help eliminate that pesky teen pegnancy thing.
#51 Jul 21 2006 at 5:04 PM Rating: Good
Debalic wrote:

I think the problem here is the kids themselves. Everyone knows that adolescents and teens are going to ignore and rebuke authority as a matter of course. The best solution is to lock up everyone from 10 to 19 to make sure they never do anything wrong. Middle and high schools should be secure, self-sufficient facilities where these juvenile miscreants are forced to sit soberly in classes and perform menial, life-sustaining labor.


I think this is a fine alternative, as it would lead to graduating females being as repressed and horny as Catholic school-girls are presently but without the whole religion thing.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 364 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (364)