Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Like I said.....Follow

#1 Jul 18 2006 at 4:50 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Straight from the horses mouth....Bolton Says Lebanese lives ain't worth worrying about!

Quote:
Asked to comment on the deaths in an Israeli air strike of eight Canadian citizens in southern Lebanon Sunday, he said: "it is a matter of great concern to us ...that these civilian deaths are occurring. It's a tragedy."

"I think it would be a mistake to ascribe moral equivalence to civilians who die as the direct result of malicious terrorist acts," he added, while defending as "self-defense" Israel's military action, which has had "the tragic and unfortunate consequence of civilian deaths".


So now that we know what the official stance is, anyone feel like defendind the idea that some (read Lebanese)peoples lives are somehow worth less than others (read Israeli)?
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#2 Jul 18 2006 at 4:56 PM Rating: Decent
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
paulsol wrote:
Straight from the horses mouth....Bolton Says Lebanese lives ain't worth worrying about!

Quote:
Asked to comment on the deaths in an Israeli air strike of eight Canadian citizens in southern Lebanon Sunday, he said: "it is a matter of great concern to us ...that these civilian deaths are occurring. It's a tragedy."

"I think it would be a mistake to ascribe moral equivalence to civilians who die as the direct result of malicious terrorist acts," he added, while defending as "self-defense" Israel's military action, which has had "the tragic and unfortunate consequence of civilian deaths".


So now that we know what the official stance is, anyone feel like defendind the idea that some (read Lebanese)peoples lives are somehow worth less than others (read Israeli)?


o.O looks to me like he's saying the Israeli civilian deaths should not be viewed the same as the Lebanese deaths.

Quote:
It's simply not the same thing to say that it's the same act to deliberately target innocent civilians, to desire their deaths, to fire rockets and use explosive devices or kidnapping versus the sad and highly unfortunate consequences of self-defense," Bolton noted.


He doesnt seem to say Lebanese lives are worth less than anyone's. He just says the deaths are different... if that makes any sense at all.
#3 Jul 18 2006 at 4:57 PM Rating: Excellent
How to make a Niobia
Ingredients:
1 part jealousy
3 parts courage
3 parts beauty
Method:
Stir together in a glass tumbler with a salted rim. Top it off with a sprinkle of curiosity and enjoy!
#4 Jul 18 2006 at 4:57 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Damn you Michael Bolton...you no-talent *** clown! Smiley: mad


#5 Jul 18 2006 at 4:57 PM Rating: Decent
that is not what he is stating. he is stating that those who support terrorist deserve their fate.

if you support terrorist you are not better then a terrorist your self and as a resuult you deserve the same fate as a terrorist.

now if the Lebanese would give up the hezbuhla(sp) espeicially those who kidnaped the soldiers then things would be differnt for them.

the biggest differance between Isreal's action vs. the terrorist is the intended target.

isreal targets military, terrorists, and the government.

the terrorists target the civilian population more then 90% of the time.

if isreal targeted the civilians 90% of the time the civ. death would be in the 10s of thousands if not 100s of thousands or more. it would be a complete massicar(sp?0 bloody and savage without a doubt.

so yes, i do feel sorry for the deaths of the leb. civs. but i do support isreals actions, but wish they would either declare war or use some restraint on their actions.
#6 Jul 18 2006 at 4:59 PM Rating: Decent
trickybeck wrote:
Damn you Michael Bolton...you no-talent *** clown! Smiley: mad
Have you ever thought about going by Mike?
#7 Jul 18 2006 at 5:10 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
now if the Lebanese would give up the hezbuhla(sp) espeicially those who kidnaped the soldiers then things would be differnt for them
.

You obviously know nothing of the situation in Southern lebanon.

Quote:
the biggest differance between Isreal's action vs. the terrorist is the intended target.


You think that Israel, with all its incrdibly sophisticated military equipment and intelligence is hitting anything that it doesnt intend to hit? Wise up.

Quote:
isreal targets military, terrorists, and the government.


Like I said....

Quote:
Hezbollah 'captured' active duty soldiers, on the disputed border between 2 countries still 'at war'. In the process a army vehicle was destroyed, and 8 uniformed soldiers where killed.

How did Israel respond? They bombed civilian targets and civilian infrastructure and have killed many civilians.

Let's see if I have this right. The Arab 'terorists' attack militery units, destroy at least one tank, and are therefore terrorists. Israel retaliates by launching aerial, naval, and artillery bombardments of civilian areas and they are engaging in self-defense. If we ar'nt able to see the hypocrisy of this, then we are so twisted by propaganda and emotion that, like the Israelis, Hezbollah, and Hamas, we arn't thinking rationally.


Israel is not attacking the individuals who hit their soldiers. Israel is engaged in mass punishment against a people who are innocent bystanders. Supported and supplied by the USA. Again.

So.....who are the terrorists again????


Quote:
so yes, i do feel sorry for the deaths of the leb. civs. but i do support isreals actions, but wish they would either declare war or use some restraint on their actions.


No. you dont feel sorry for the lebanese civilian deaths. Otherwise you wouldnt be supporting Israels actions against them. Israel and Lebanon are still officially 'at war', and have been since 1982, when Israel invaded southern Lebanon.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#8 Jul 18 2006 at 5:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
The answer is a Terrorist is what your government says it is.
____________________________
Do what now?
#9 Jul 18 2006 at 6:08 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
paulsol wrote:
Quote:
now if the Lebanese would give up the hezbuhla(sp) espeicially those who kidnaped the soldiers then things would be differnt for them
.

You obviously know nothing of the situation in Southern lebanon.

Quote:
the biggest differance between Isreal's action vs. the terrorist is the intended target.


You think that Israel, with all its incrdibly sophisticated military equipment and intelligence is hitting anything that it doesnt intend to hit? Wise up.

Quote:
isreal targets military, terrorists, and the government.


Like I said....

Quote:
Hezbollah 'captured' active duty soldiers, on the disputed border between 2 countries still 'at war'. In the process a army vehicle was destroyed, and 8 uniformed soldiers where killed.

How did Israel respond? They bombed civilian targets and civilian infrastructure and have killed many civilians.

Let's see if I have this right. The Arab 'terorists' attack militery units, destroy at least one tank, and are therefore terrorists. Israel retaliates by launching aerial, naval, and artillery bombardments of civilian areas and they are engaging in self-defense. If we ar'nt able to see the hypocrisy of this, then we are so twisted by propaganda and emotion that, like the Israelis, Hezbollah, and Hamas, we arn't thinking rationally.


Israel is not attacking the individuals who hit their soldiers. Israel is engaged in mass punishment against a people who are innocent bystanders. Supported and supplied by the USA. Again.

So.....who are the terrorists again????


Quote:
so yes, i do feel sorry for the deaths of the leb. civs. but i do support isreals actions, but wish they would either declare war or use some restraint on their actions.


No. you dont feel sorry for the lebanese civilian deaths. Otherwise you wouldnt be supporting Israels actions against them. Israel and Lebanon are still officially 'at war', and have been since 1982, when Israel invaded southern Lebanon.


Why do you hate the Jews? Smiley: frown


#10 Jul 18 2006 at 8:17 PM Rating: Decent
Value of life is based on net worth,
#11 Jul 18 2006 at 9:21 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
paulsol wrote:
Quote:
now if the Lebanese would give up the hezbuhla(sp) espeicially those who kidnaped the soldiers then things would be differnt for them
.

You obviously know nothing of the situation in Southern lebanon.


You obviously know nothing of international law. Lebanon is the sovereign state that "owns" the territory from which Hezbollah is attacking. As such it is responsible for their actions. It is aboslutely proper to require that the government of Lebanon be required to take care of Hezbollah.

The reality is that the government of Lebanon *cannot* do anything about Hezbollah. It doesn't have the strength. That's part of why this is a critical process. First, you have to establish that. You have to give Lebanon the opportunity to fullfill it's international obligations. If/when it is unable to do so, *then* the international community must act to "help" it remove Hezbolla from its midst. We all know this, but have to go through the process.

For the record, the absolute worst case result here is if the UN comes in and simply deploys peacekeepers in order to maintain some sort of cease fire. That will be a disaster. They need to disarm Hezbollah. With or without Lebanon's support (but preferrably "with", which I *hope* is why there's been delay on this).

The second worst result will occur of the UN does not act to disarm Hezbolla. Israel will be forced to do so themselves, and we'll have another round of occupation and fuel Arab hatred towards Isreal even more. On can argue that this is exactly what Hezbollah wants.

Quote:
You think that Israel, with all its incrdibly sophisticated military equipment and intelligence is hitting anything that it doesnt intend to hit? Wise up.


You're kidding right? All the sophisticated military equipment in the world does not prevent bombs from blowing up everything near them. It does not prevent an attack on a single window of a building to destroy a rocket launcher placed inside from blasting the rooms right next door. And if civilians happen to be there, there will be casualties.

What kind of dream world do you live in where militaries can magically push a "don't hurt any innocent people" button and have it work? These are not nerf weapons here. They are bombs. They explode. Anyone in the radius of explosion will be hurt and/or killed.

Quote:
Israel is not attacking the individuals who hit their soldiers. Israel is engaged in mass punishment against a people who are innocent bystanders. Supported and supplied by the USA. Again.


Isreal is specifically targetting three things:

1. Specific rocket installations. These tend to be hidden among populated areas, so it's hard to hit them without hitting people who might be nearby.

2. Specific Hezbolla command and control locations. These are offices, buildings, and homes of the leaders of the organization. See. Militaries like ours do things like build structures to do military planning in (like the Pentagon, and military bases and such). Militant groups like Hezbollah tend to run this stuff out of rented rooms and homes and office buildings, often shared with other people. Makes it hard to hit just them. Which is, of course, the whole reason they choose those locations to operate out of.

3. Supply routes. They know. We know. Everyone knows, that Hezbollah is supported by Iran via Syria. Thus, Isreal has targetted routes by which Hezbollah can be resupplied. Yeah. This sucks for the citizens of Lebanon because they can't get supplies either. But there's nothing militarily "wrong" with doing that. Hitting airports, bridges, and roads are a pretty standard part of miltary attacks. It's the first thing you do, in fact.


Meanwhile, Hezbolla is specifically avoiding targetting military targets, or command/control, and instead aiming their rockets at civilian centers.

Quote:
So.....who are the terrorists again????


Yeah. Who? I'd say it's Hezbollah. Any sane person would. Why don't you?

Quote:
No. you dont feel sorry for the lebanese civilian deaths. Otherwise you wouldnt be supporting Israels actions against them. Israel and Lebanon are still officially 'at war', and have been since 1982, when Israel invaded southern Lebanon.


Um. No. The only reason they're still officially "at war" is because Lebanon has not complied with the final terms in the agreement. That was to disarm Hezbollah. Isreal has officially met every term set by the UN sponsored peace agreement.

Way to totally twist things around though.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#12 Jul 19 2006 at 9:40 AM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
Jawbox wrote:

Why do you hate the Jews? Smiley: frown


Cause he can't pull off the ringlets?
#13 Jul 19 2006 at 11:25 AM Rating: Decent
gab, thank you. i tried to post just about exactly what you posted but the servers did not like me last night and by the time they did i was at work and did not have the time for a long reply to correct his mistakes.

one more thing i will add:

the military of isreal has about as much sophisitacted weapons, accuracy, as the US military had in the 50s and 60s. that is it. dumb bombs, semi guided missles, NOTHING to compair with any modern military even that of the GWI, let alone of todays GPS guided munitions.

so yes when you blow up a power plant, or a bridge, or a command structur of the hezbuhlla, some civilians will get hurt or worst killed. it is a shame, but at least they are not carpet bombing like WWI, or Vietnam error attacks. there have been NO HIGH level bombing raids. there have been selected target destructions with the best ability they have to minimize civlian deaths.

sad part is Leb. is 100% responsible and thus the people of Leb. are also 100% responsible for this action being taken against them. i do feel sorry for the average citizen, but i also have limited simpathy for a group who supports and sponcers terrorists and chooses them as leaders.

as for the "still at war" that is bunk, and you sir/ma am have no understanding of history. that "war" was ended according to international law years ago. Sadly Leb. has not upheld their end of the end of war agreement by disarming and removing from all power that terrorist organization called Hezbollah.

so please learn your history, learn some basic concept of civility and the understanding of governement in the world scheme of the world and the responsibilities of a government to its people and its world neighbors.
#14 Jul 19 2006 at 11:53 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Singdall wrote:
the military of isreal has about as much sophisitacted weapons, accuracy, as the US military had in the 50s and 60s. that is it. dumb bombs, semi guided missles, NOTHING to compair with any modern military even that of the GWI, let alone of todays GPS guided munitions.


Do you just make **** up and pass it off as fact?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#15 Jul 19 2006 at 12:18 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Funny, I always thought Israel had one of the more advanced weapons programs...Jews are smart little pricks, indeed.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#16 Jul 19 2006 at 12:45 PM Rating: Good
those F15 and F16s are reduced in both avionics and powerplant in their ability compaired to even the first run vs of those airframe.

also keep in mind the F15 went live what when you were born? Unless you were born in the 50s the F-15 went operational in the 60s. hmm lets see that would be almost 50 years ago.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-15-history.htm

Now the f-16 is a bit younger, but not by much:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-16-history.htm

hmm went live in 72, that would make it 34 year old airframe.

the Israle vs of ea does not have the upgraded radar, nor does it have the upgraded avionics, thus it does not have the capability to drop lazar guidaded mobs, let alone GPS guided bombs.

so yes, the ability to drop a bomb from even those 2 airframes are no better then the technology used in WWII or Vietnam for accuracy.

so no, not making **** up, just stating facts that the Israel airforce may have a modern airframe, but do not have the avionics or powerplant to keep it as modern as what the USAF have.

now i was supprised by that link to see cruise missles on the list, but i have yet to read any news report from any attack useing that weapon. just helicoptor gunships and air strikes (that would be the F-15 or F-16 attacking).
#17 Jul 19 2006 at 12:47 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Make **** up it is then!

If you wanted to make the argument that they weren't using computer guided missles for the attack thats fine. However to say that they are using archaic 60's stuff is imprecise. Especially when the f15 and f-16 are both in active service by the US Airforce, as well have seen a number of technological upgrades since their initial release.

If you end up making a faulty statement because your grasp of the language and rhetorics is far from perfect then perhaps you best swallow it and admit where you were wrong and re-clarify your position.





Edited, Jul 19th 2006 at 2:00pm EDT by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#18 Jul 19 2006 at 1:41 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Aircraft? Pfft. Considering their location in the Middle East, one might assume that a heavily-armored ground force should be a key part of Israel's miliatry.

"The IDF has begun to equip itself with the Merkava Mk-4 tank, which was completely developed in Israel and is considered one of the best tanks in the world. The new tank, a fourth generation of the Israeli tank, is currently in production, and is expected to enter operational status with a regular tank brigade, replacing older M-60 (Magach) tanks currently in service.* It represents a sensible improvement over its three predecessors of the Merkava series, being a more lethal weapon on the one hand, and a safer vehicle for its crew, on the other."

* The Merkava Mk4 has been in service since 2004


____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#19 Jul 19 2006 at 2:00 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
A Plague on bot their houses.

Constant & mindless provocation from both sides for 4,000 years means we'll need lots of popcorn for this one.

Just confident that the medium term outlook is more kamikazes in Europe and USA Smiley: mad

The lack of condemnation from Bush and Bliar for the targeting of civilians makes us ever likelier targets.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#20 Jul 19 2006 at 2:19 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Singdall wrote:
those F15 and F16s are reduced in both avionics and powerplant in their ability compaired to even the first run vs of those airframe.

also keep in mind the F15 went live what when you were born? Unless you were born in the 50s the F-15 went operational in the 60s. hmm lets see that would be almost 50 years ago.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-15-history.htm

Now the f-16 is a bit younger, but not by much:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-16-history.htm

hmm went live in 72, that would make it 34 year old airframe.



If only they could find a way to incorporate new technology into an existing metal shell....that would help.

Pshaw....look at me. Talkin all Star Trek and stuff. It'll never happen

#21 Jul 19 2006 at 2:22 PM Rating: Good
King Nobby wrote:
Just confident that the medium term outlook is more kamikazes in Europe and USA Smiley: mad

The lack of condemnation from Bush and Bliar for the targeting of civilians makes us ever likelier targets.


And just on time for the five year anniversary of 09/11!

If you get the popcorn I'll spring for the Raisinettes, but who's bringing the thermate?
#22 Jul 19 2006 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
yes both the F16 and F15 are currently in service and yes both have been through multiple upgrades to their powerplant, their avionics (this includes the FCC), and even to a smaller extent to the airframe it self.

the vs the Israely use are the older vs of the airframe, they are WITHOUT the upgraded avionics, they are still using the A/B modle of the F16 with the dumbed down avionics package they bought back in the 80s. FYI the avionics package was from the 70s, so they are NOT dropping lazar guided bombs, they are NOT dropping GPS guided bombs, they do not have the pavway package installed in them. the avionics of that airframe is NOT CAPABLE OF RUNNING THAT HARDWARE/SOFTWARE.

hello, this is not making **** up, this is coming from personal experiance. i worked on the F-16 as an avionics spec. i have worked with the Israely airforce both their pilots and their ground crews. they do NOT have the same avionics package the USAF F-16s have, same goes for the F-15.

can they be upgraded, yes, have the Israel's done so the answere to that question is NO THEY HAVE NOT.

their attack helicoptors are more up to date with guided missles then the F-16 and F-15. with the size limitation of their air space neither airframe has the upgraded radar as the Israel AF has a standing polocy to visually identify all targets BEFORE engaging them. this is why Israel NEVER BOUGHT THE UPGRADED AVIONICS OR RADAR for either airframe.

without those upgrades you will not be dropping guided munitions it is just not going to happen.

when you have worked on either the F-15 or F-16 in some form of avionics postion please come back and talk me with some education on how those systems work.
#23 Jul 19 2006 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
King Nobby wrote:
Just confident that the medium term outlook is more kamikazes in Europe and USA Smiley: mad

The lack of condemnation from Bush and Bliar for the targeting of civilians makes us ever likelier targets.


And just on time for the five year anniversary of 09/11!

If you get the popcorn I'll spring for the Raisinettes, but who's bringing the thermate?


In!

But the real question is....what kind of soup do you want in it? I'm a clam chowder with tabasco kind of guy.
#24 Jul 19 2006 at 2:52 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Quote:
hello, this is not making **** up, this is coming from personal experiance. i worked on the F-16 as an avionics spec. i have worked with the Israely


I worked on the Palestiny lazar jetplanes from '97 to '01. I premarilee speshulized in bombs and guns and missiles.

Hello.
#25 Jul 19 2006 at 2:53 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
In!

But the real question is....what kind of soup do you want in it? I'm a clam chowder with tabasco kind of guy.
Not Kosher or Halal. Baaad Anti-semite!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#26 Jul 19 2006 at 3:01 PM Rating: Decent
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
Quote:
hello, this is not making **** up, this is coming from personal experiance. i worked on the F-16 as an avionics spec. i have worked with the Israely


I worked on the Palestiny lazar jetplanes from '97 to '01. I premarilee speshulized in bombs and guns and missiles.

Hello.


dont know that airframe, but i do know the F-16 damn well. I also have family who works on the F-15 active at Eglin AFB. I have had enough conversations with him both before and after his deployments to the ME and he has confirmed that the avionics package on the F-15 used by the Israel AF is what the USAF was using almost 30 years ago.

so again, link up, or prove that the Israel AF is using an upgraded/updated avionics package on those 2 airframe and ill just go away. I am more then willing to admit i am wrong, but not when i have overwhelming first hand account, both from self and brother, that those 2 airframes are not using lazar or gps guided munitions today and do not have the avionics to do so.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 379 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (379)