paulsol wrote:
Quote:
now if the Lebanese would give up the hezbuhla(sp) espeicially those who kidnaped the soldiers then things would be differnt for them
.
You obviously know nothing of the situation in Southern lebanon.
You obviously know nothing of international law. Lebanon is the sovereign state that "owns" the territory from which Hezbollah is attacking. As such it is responsible for their actions. It is aboslutely proper to require that the government of Lebanon be required to take care of Hezbollah.
The reality is that the government of Lebanon *cannot* do anything about Hezbollah. It doesn't have the strength. That's part of why this is a critical process. First, you have to establish that. You have to give Lebanon the opportunity to fullfill it's international obligations. If/when it is unable to do so, *then* the international community must act to "help" it remove Hezbolla from its midst. We all know this, but have to go through the process.
For the record, the absolute worst case result here is if the UN comes in and simply deploys peacekeepers in order to maintain some sort of cease fire. That will be a disaster. They need to disarm Hezbollah. With or without Lebanon's support (but preferrably "with", which I *hope* is why there's been delay on this).
The second worst result will occur of the UN does not act to disarm Hezbolla. Israel will be forced to do so themselves, and we'll have another round of occupation and fuel Arab hatred towards Isreal even more. On can argue that this is exactly what Hezbollah wants.
Quote:
You think that Israel, with all its incrdibly sophisticated military equipment and intelligence is hitting anything that it doesnt intend to hit? Wise up.
You're kidding right? All the sophisticated military equipment in the world does not prevent bombs from blowing up everything near them. It does not prevent an attack on a single window of a building to destroy a rocket launcher placed inside from blasting the rooms right next door. And if civilians happen to be there, there will be casualties.
What kind of dream world do you live in where militaries can magically push a "don't hurt any innocent people" button and have it work? These are not nerf weapons here. They are bombs. They explode. Anyone in the radius of explosion will be hurt and/or killed.
Quote:
Israel is not attacking the individuals who hit their soldiers. Israel is engaged in mass punishment against a people who are innocent bystanders. Supported and supplied by the USA. Again.
Isreal is specifically targetting three things:
1. Specific rocket installations. These tend to be hidden among populated areas, so it's hard to hit them without hitting people who might be nearby.
2. Specific Hezbolla command and control locations. These are offices, buildings, and homes of the leaders of the organization. See. Militaries like ours do things like build structures to do military planning in (like the Pentagon, and military bases and such). Militant groups like Hezbollah tend to run this stuff out of rented rooms and homes and office buildings, often shared with other people. Makes it hard to hit just them. Which is, of course, the whole reason they choose those locations to operate out of.
3. Supply routes. They know. We know. Everyone knows, that Hezbollah is supported by Iran via Syria. Thus, Isreal has targetted routes by which Hezbollah can be resupplied. Yeah. This sucks for the citizens of Lebanon because they can't get supplies either. But there's nothing militarily "wrong" with doing that. Hitting airports, bridges, and roads are a pretty standard part of miltary attacks. It's the first thing you do, in fact.
Meanwhile, Hezbolla is specifically avoiding targetting military targets, or command/control, and instead aiming their rockets at civilian centers.
Quote:
So.....who are the terrorists again????
Yeah. Who? I'd say it's Hezbollah. Any sane person would. Why don't you?
Quote:
No. you dont feel sorry for the lebanese civilian deaths. Otherwise you wouldnt be supporting Israels actions against them. Israel and Lebanon are still officially 'at war', and have been since 1982, when Israel invaded southern Lebanon.
Um. No. The only reason they're still officially "at war" is because Lebanon has not complied with the final terms in the agreement. That was to disarm Hezbollah. Isreal has officially met every term set by the UN sponsored peace agreement.
Way to totally twist things around though.