Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Thermate in WTCFollow

#127 Jul 17 2006 at 11:45 AM Rating: Good
****
8,619 posts
One itsy bitsy tiny differerence between assasinating the president of the USA and setting thermite charges on a building that you plan to fly a fully loaded 737 into.

Well more than one, think about that for a nanosecond i'm sure it will come to you.

If my post does not elaborate on these reasons it's because you claims are so utterly bazaar that i can treat them seriously. You sir, are a crackpot and so is Messer Jones.
#128 Jul 17 2006 at 12:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
You know guys, if he keeps talking, we can keep pushing him down to the filter level, then below it.


Dronadork, stop wasting your time. Think about it like this:

If you do one day find relevant information, and uncover some goverment conspiracy, what will you have accomplished? Likely the people responsable will never see justice. The lives lost will never be recovered. People already can't even begin to trust the goverment anyway, so why the crusade? No one will feel that this work was good. People who have already let grief run it's course will hate and despise you. You, and those like you will be running for your lives. Is this what you want? Do you want the world to hate you for breaking the bubble, should it actually exist?

I suppose that you have no care for anyone elses feelings, thoughts, or facts, so let me ask you this: What's the point? It's over. Nothing can change that. Most of us know someone who died as a result of 9/11. I have friends that I served with that have died in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq. A friend of mine lost her older sister in the WTC attack, and another friend lost her father in the Pentagon attack. People like you are causing more pain, harm, and doing more to hurt these people than you are doing good. Just please stop your stupid crusade. Stop going out of your way to hurt these people.

I imagine that you still won't get it. So fire off your "witty comebacks", and keep playing loose with the facts.
#129 Jul 17 2006 at 1:09 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
I haven't posted on this page yet in case you're keeping track. I am.
#130 Jul 17 2006 at 1:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
I haven't posted on this page yet in case you're keeping track. I am.
If you loved America and freedom, you'd be defending your government.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#131 Jul 17 2006 at 1:25 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Jophiel wrote:
If you loved America and freedom, you'd be defending your government.


I love America, but can't really stand the goverment anymore. I've lost faith in them to get anything but their own pay raises right for years.

I will from here on out vote for the Constitution party, unless they show themselves to be no different from the Republicrats or Democans.
#132 Jul 17 2006 at 1:27 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Metastophicleas wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
If you loved America and freedom, you'd be defending your government.


I love America, but can't really stand the goverment anymore. I've lost faith in them to get anything but their own pay raises right for years.

I will from here on out vote for the Constitution party, unless they show themselves to be no different from the Republicrats or Democans.


Yeah. Huge pay raises. What do they get paid again? And how much has it increased over hte last couple of years?
#133 Jul 17 2006 at 1:42 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
2% yearly, and they have to vote NOT to get a raise. I bet you can count how many times that's happened...(three times since the enactment of the law/bill/******** of the American people).

It's up over 200k annually now. Why these people get paid, and have the goverment pay for everything is beyond me. Very bad form. (>")p
#134 Jul 17 2006 at 2:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Let's put this to a vote. Let it continue, or /iwin the thread and put it out of it's mysery. Democracy in action folks, sound off!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#135 Jul 17 2006 at 3:18 PM Rating: Good
One I used a thermate to keep my cocoa warm when I was at a hockey game. Mmm warm.
#136 Jul 17 2006 at 4:08 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
One I used a thermate to keep my cocoa warm when I was at a hockey game. Mmm warm.


Was the rink on an upper floor of the WTC, by chance? And did you happen to spill it when your team scored short-handed in OT?

#137 Jul 17 2006 at 4:08 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
I vote nuke, even though it's entertaining...well everyone besides Dronadork, and those people are at lest intelligent, and have their own thoughts.
#138 Jul 17 2006 at 4:44 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
You know if you replaced Dronedork's repetitive posts with 'Blah, blah, blah' this thread would lose about 75% of it's text. That should be some nice energy efficient savings on the already taxed servers. His posts are making the baby hamsters cry.
#139 Jul 17 2006 at 4:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Let's put this to a vote. Let it continue, or /iwin the thread and put it out of it's mysery. Democracy in action folks, sound off!


Why nuke it? It's not like it's pushing dozens of interesting, well-written discussions off the page.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#140 Jul 17 2006 at 4:50 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Samira wrote:
Why nuke it? It's not like it's pushing dozens of interesting, well-written discussions off the page.


This is true...that's sad.
#141 Jul 17 2006 at 4:51 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Eske wrote:
The kind of conspiracy theory that you're pushing is completely implausible. It's loaded with inconsistencies and potential error which undermine the kind of precision that someone would need to execute what would be the most horrific con in the history of mankind. There's massive potential for error with controlling witnesses, documents, and the media. Why would the government take such absurd risks? There's the inconsitency of citing Al'Qaeda as the culprit and attacking Afghanistan, if the motive was actually to seize Iraq for oil. Our government has already had to say "mea culpa" about the WMD fiasco. Why would these issues even arise if they were to orchestrate 9/11 with such intents?

A conspiracy like the one you're implying reeks of heavy-handedness that counters the relative cunning that you'd like to believe the government had. There are methods to achieve a greater military presence which are hundreds of times more viable than what you suggest.


Totem wrote:
More importantly, just why, exactly, would the government actually destroy the World Trade Center? Yeah, yeah, I hear you freaks and weirdos who continue to believe any and all governments are inherently evil that the diabolical George W. Bush is Satan personified and thus would instinctively want to indiscriminately kill people. Ok, aside from that obviously stupid premise (and you know who you are who secretly believe that at the bottom of your goofy hearts), just why go through such machinations? There are any other number of equally (heheh) plausable (guffaw!) scenarios which would involve a whole lot more destruction and fewer people to employ.

Moreover, just how do you manage to keep all the people you have involved quiet? Lol, people being what they are, they can't keep any secret secret, period, much less one where literally thousands of people would have to be in on the hijinks.

Like every other wacky conspiracy theory (JFK's assasination, the space shuttle explosion, etc) the means by which to carry it off is simply impossible. This one is no different. And the fact that Dron believes that it has validity just goes to prove how gullible and childishly foolsih he is. Fortunately for scam artists everywhere, there are plenty of people like him who are perfectly willing to hand their life savings to these folks to purchase swamp land, bridges in Brooklyn, and other questionable investments.


Good job punching yourself in the balls, Dron!

Totem


Great minds think alike.
#142 Jul 17 2006 at 4:57 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Last
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#143 Jul 17 2006 at 5:10 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Metastophicleas wrote:
2% yearly, and they have to vote NOT to get a raise. I bet you can count how many times that's happened...(three times since the enactment of the law/bill/******** of the American people).

It's up over 200k annually now. Why these people get paid, and have the goverment pay for everything is beyond me. Very bad form. (>")p


Wow. My father makes 250+ just as a V.P. of a company most people have never even heard of.

You're right though. The men and women that run the most powerful NATION in the world are overpayed.

Take your liberal fruitcake poli-sci teacher's opinions and shove it up your ***.
#144 Jul 17 2006 at 5:25 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
I think that all of our politicians should have their pay reduced to poverty level. The power should be enough...why kill the tax monies too? Think about it, 435 in the House, 100 in the Senate, Pres + VP (Pres makes a cool 400k+ thanks to Slick Willy, and the VP makes between 250 and 300k supposedly) = 107.7 million wasted U.S. dollars. Really, what the fuck are these jack asses doing that makes them worth all that cash? Please don't tell me they're securing the country...
#145 Jul 17 2006 at 5:32 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Metastophicleas wrote:
Blah blah blah



And I repeat....
Take your liberal fruitcake poli-sci teacher's opinions and shove it up your ***.


#146 Jul 17 2006 at 5:36 PM Rating: Good
I agree with Matastifuckles, politicians should be payed next to nothing so that they'll be even easier to buy.
#147 Jul 17 2006 at 5:43 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
I agree with Matastifuckles, politicians should be payed next to nothing so that they'll be even easier to buy.
Excellent idea!

That way none of your country's successful entrepeneurs will be able to afford the drop in income and you'll have senate and congress full of assembly line workers that think digital watches are cool teknoloji

****
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#148 Jul 17 2006 at 5:49 PM Rating: Excellent
When did you start signing your posts, Nobby?
#149 Jul 17 2006 at 6:03 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
When did you start signing your posts, Nobby?


Yesterday


~Pottymouth~
#150 Jul 17 2006 at 7:17 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
I haven't taken any poly-psi clases. Not enough hawt women. Can't stand libs. I'd like to burn them all...using thermate.

Wanting my elected officials to actually give a shit about the country, rather than be greedy bastards, doing it for the money (yes, I know most of them are millionares, just supports my point that the job should be about the nation, not the money) and the power. It's bad enough they can fuck us in the *** by stipping our dollars with taxes, and spending them on $100 toliet seats and $8 ***** drivers, nevermind the multi-million dollar press junkets and Senators flying around the planet putting their noses into other countries affairs. No, I suppose that's all ok.

I suppose it's ok that 90% of the country is more concerned with aledged rape/murders in Iraq, rather than be worried about the increasing debt (I love how people stress that the deficit is lower than expected...I hope at least you guys realize that still means there's a deficit an the budget is still way out of control), or even the rape/murder rates in the largest cities, or securing our borders. I suppose that's all yesterdays news, old hat you might say. No, not a big deal at all.

Let's live the high life, and mortgage our childrens futures. Bringing the budget down, getting rid of wasteful spending, and moronic policies isn't important. Neither is voting for someone who may get the job done right, and turn this cesspool around. GO REPUBLICRATS IN '08!!! GO DEMOCANS IN '08!!! FUCK THE REST OF US IN '08!!!

/overdramatic hype off
#151 Jul 17 2006 at 11:19 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Did I just read the word last? Woot! I'm in! With whipping cream and thermite on top!

Totem
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 218 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (218)