Thermate in WTCFollow

Yeah, but this guy personally talked to someone about stuff that was very mysterious. How do you explain that? Huh?

In a very moving, substantive way. Just like a Dan Brown novel. Oh wait, nevermemind.

If I only had a pair of golden spectacles...that'd solve everything.

/kneeslapper

Marilyn Monroe is Barbara Bush.

Let's just say that somebody's getting added to the no fly list....

Did someone personally tell you this?





Let me google my lawyer. He knows a guy, who knows a guy, who was involved.

make sure you do it from the gym

Oh ya, and there was molten metal found in the rubble of WTC7 which wasn't even hit by an airplane (which was the supposed source for the aluminum).




Perhaps you didn't notice, but nobody claimed that the molten material pouring out of the building was purely melted steel, the claim is that it was thermite.


Edited, Jul 11th 2006 at 12:43am EDT by Dronadesh

You must be new here.

I wasn't trying to defend his position but rather clarify it because I feel that he does a good job defending himself.



You're right, I did say that aluminum doesn't turn red/orange and I was mistaken. It does turn colors but it can't be seen in daylight conditions.

However you also made a mistaken claim that aluminum turns colors at lower temperatures than steel, which is inaccurate. It does melt faster, which is why NIST included that theory to explain the said footage.

As far as occums razor is concerned, I find it esier to believe that thermite was used because proffesor jones found thermite on a sample of the original steel. Thermite accounts for the molten pools of metal wtc 1 2 and 7, as steel fueled by thermite could retain heat for long periods of time as did these pools of molten material, and since thermite was probably present within the building then this material coming out of the side of the building was most likely thermite. The color also indicates thermite as previously explained, and there is a large volume of the material pouring from a single location which would be most simply explained as a thermite (thermate) charge planted in that location rather than having vast amounds of airplane debris gather at one corner of the building and pour profusely from a single hole in the wall. All of the evidence fits perfectly with the theory of thermite, and the theory of aluminum melting into a corner of the building from jet fuel fires seems pretty far fetched to me. (I'd like to see if in any other plane crash the metal from the plane formed pools of molten metal)

As far as the feasability of 9/11 being a false flag governmental operation compared to the feasability that a small group of low budget highjackers attacked the wtc and pentagon, that's a whole other conversation.



Edited, Jul 11th 2006 at 3:07am EDT by Dronadesh

I would also like to add that different jetfuels burn at different tempratures. Most jetfuels are basically high-octane diesel fuel. JP-4, JP-5, and JP-8 for just a few examples are all different fuels, as such have different flash points, and burning tempratures. Much like gasoline that you buy at the pump shares the similar characteristics, 85, 87, 89, 91, and 93(there may be more than that but that is all I have ever seen) would all have different flash points and max burning tempratures.