The One and Only Katie wrote:
Just a question to the "pro-lifers". Are you also against DNR? How about the "right to die"?
another offshoot of this would be if those who want to ban abortion becuase "god has plan for everyone," support resuscitating someone whose heart has stopped. I mean, you could very well say they are dead, right? So obviously god's plan was for them to die at that moment. So the doctor is messing with god's plans just as much then, as when he preforms an abortion.
Now, someone could come back and say, that they don't consider a person dead until all their body cannot be resuscitated. Fine. There are some who believe that life doesn't begin until the baby draws breath, or until it's brain starts to function, or until it is recognizable as a baby, or as soon as it is concieved. A similar arguement could be made for death.
Personally, I believe that life begins when the brain starts to function. I
believe that that is around 10 weeks. I did a report on abortion last year, but can't remember with 100% certainty. MY stance is that before the brain begins functioning, there is no way the baby could be sentient, and thus, could not be considered human. Then again, I'm not religious. But I also believe that no matter what majority Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, whatever, make up in this country, religious beliefs should not come into play when making laws. Medical arguements for when life starts, fine. Religous arguements for when life starts, no.
My stance on abortion is, if it is before the baby's brain begins functioning, it's the mother's choice. After that mark, it comes down to if the pregnancy is endangering th mother. If the mother's life is threatened, then I also support abortion after the 10 week mark.