Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Reply To Thread

Take away our right to vote next?Follow

#102 Jul 06 2006 at 5:14 PM Rating: Decent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Claimed
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#103 Jul 06 2006 at 5:41 PM Rating: Default
Banning abortion is not a lose of freedom anymore than banning murder is a lost of freedom. You cant live your life as you choose if you choose to murder, rape etc.

Even if you narrow your agrument down to the body. my next question is who's body, the mother or the baby's? Abortion is and has been a long standing issue in our society and I expect ( regardless of outcome) for it to continue to be a long standing issue. With that in mind, it becomes obvious that it is not as simple as a lose of freedom.

Did you know its against the law to kill yourself? How about other laws that effect just your body? seatbelt, helmet etc.? Are these loses of freedom as well?

You dont even have the RIGHT to drive in this country, its a privilege. This is true even after you spend 30k for a car, 3.00 plus gasoline, insurance, tags. license, registration, sales tax, tolls etc.

So, lets see now, when talking just about yourself. Its unlawful to kill yourself, harm yourself, possibly harm yourself (drugs), or even put yourself in a position where you MAY suffer damage (helmet). These are just laws about yourself, abortion would fall under another catagory, harm to others.

If you are a champion of freedom, your agrument is lost on me -(
#104 Jul 06 2006 at 5:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
So, for those of us who don't share your views - do we have a right to make our own decisions about a medical procedure?

Are you one of those cowards who piously intones "except in case of rape or incest, or to save the mother's life" when raging against abortion? Just curious; I always wonder how those fools can face themselves in the mirror.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#105 Jul 06 2006 at 8:07 PM Rating: Default
So when we kill a criminal via an IV, i guess you would call that a medical procedure, as well. Of course you are entitled to your own opinion, as am I and I believe I was just expressing mine.
#106 Jul 06 2006 at 8:29 PM Rating: Default
FYI: I dont believe in abortion for any reason, not rape, incest or to save the mothers life. Dont get me wrong, I think we should do anything and everything to save all life, but if it comes down to the mother or the child, I for one dont wanna play God. What mother would wanna live if it meant the death or her child, for that matter what parent. Abortion is a tough issue with people on both sides of the fence, both sides are equally passionate about their position. As I said earlier, the biggest controversy with abortion stems from KNOWING when life begins. IF it were to be proven (for example) that life begins at 3 months, than I believe a HUGH percentage of people would support abortion up till that time. However, it is pure speculation as to when life starts. Since only God knows when life begins and one of his commandments is: Thou shall not kill. I will side with life. I fully expect to be judged one day and I dont wanna have to try and explain, Oh I didnt think you meant that, or I didnt think that applied.

So, in closing samira if you really are curious what those fools look like in the mirror, go look in your mirror:P I think all those that are against abortion and who call an abortion murder, would call you FOOLISH by stating that murder is a medical procedure. Now, you have not heard me call the other side foolish because in issues where there is no definite answer(when life begins) I must allow for the possibility that I am wrong. If you do the same than your foolish goes away:P
#107 Jul 07 2006 at 1:51 AM Rating: Good
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
I dont believe in abortion for any reason, not rape, incest or to save the mothers life
So allowing the woman to die, for the sake of the maybe baby is okay.

Gotcha.

Glad to know you value life so highly.

F'ucking mysogonyst.
#108 Jul 07 2006 at 4:58 AM Rating: Decent
vanelr wrote:
As I said earlier, the biggest controversy with abortion stems from KNOWING when life begins. IF it were to be proven (for example) that life begins at 3 months, than I believe a HUGH percentage of people would support abortion up till that time.


Is a cluster of cells "life". Or do you mean a living organism? Life is an evolutionary process. An embryo will turn into an individual, but before it has a brain, a heart, a spine, is it an individual? Or is just a cluster of cells? In this case, having a **** kills potential babies, do I take it you don't ********** either? Think of all those little spermatozoids jumping into the air thinking "Oh noes!"

And then they die. Murderer!

Quote:
Since only God knows when life begins and one of his commandments is: Thou shall not kill. I will side with life.


Just out of curiosity, do you support the death penalty?
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#109 Jul 07 2006 at 6:57 AM Rating: Decent
No. I do not support the death penalty.

Read my post please, I never said let the mother die. I said, that I personally would not wanna play God. Meaning I for one would not be able to choose, or be able to make that decision. Thank God, I have never found myself in a situation where I would be forced to choose or to make a life or death call for someone other than myself. I pray I never will. Note: I do not stand in judgement of those that have to make those kinda calls.
#110 Jul 07 2006 at 7:15 AM Rating: Decent
There are some who claim life begins with conception. To be perfectly honest with you, I honestly dont know when life begins. Some say life begins when the heart and brain are formed, other claim its not life till the child draws breath. Yet kill a pregnant woman and you are charged with 2 counts of murder. Shrug, I just dont know. Since, I dont know, I era on the side of life. I will allow for the possibility that I am wrong, but without more difinitive information on when life begins, this has to be my position.

Rape, incest are horrible, horrible things, but so is being born with cancer or aids, retardation, downs etc. The difference being, there is nothing we can do about that. In the abortion issue, it is something we can do something about. Just because can doesnt mean we should. To me, that an example of playing God. For me, a christain, I believe God has a plan and things happen for a reason. Abeit, even if its something I dont understand.
#111 Jul 07 2006 at 8:08 AM Rating: Decent
vanelr wrote:
To me, that an example of playing God. For me, a christain, I believe God has a plan and things happen for a reason. Abeit, even if its something I dont understand.


And I have no problem with people holding this view. It is "logical" if you believe in God.

I just don't think it should be imposed upon people by law. I think having the choice is better than not. Those that are religious won't have an abortion, and thu fullfil God's plan, those who don't can choose to have an abortion. To me, this seems better for society than imposing religious values on non-believers.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#112REDACTED, Posted: Jul 07 2006 at 8:12 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Sami,
#113REDACTED, Posted: Jul 07 2006 at 8:26 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Redcommy,
#114 Jul 07 2006 at 8:27 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,735 posts
It's cute when Virus pretends he's religeous. Smiley: laugh


RedPheonix wrote:
And I have no problem with people holding this view. It is "logical" if you believe in God.

I just don't think it should be imposed upon people by law. I think having the choice is better than not. Those that are religious won't have an abortion, and thu fullfil God's plan, those who don't can choose to have an abortion. To me, this seems better for society than imposing religious values on non-believers.


Bite your tongue; not everyone who beleives in God is that absent minded. I fully agree that imposing religious 'values' on non-beleivers (or, people of other beleifs in general) is stupid.

The fact that abortion is -still- an issue is just sad.


Seriously now..."everything happens for a reason?" Well, of course. Everything in life is a cause and effect of something else. That's like trying to make me understand that "humans breathe oxygen." Plain as day. Playing the "I just don't understand" card with no interest in understanding just makes you ignorant; not Christian.
#115 Jul 07 2006 at 9:07 AM Rating: Decent
Sir Exodus, Eater of Cheese wrote:
The fact that abortion is -still- an issue is just sad.


I agree, it's kinda crazy. But in Ireland it's still illegal. Though they are catholics, and they tend to quite hardcore when it comes to those issues. Still, at least they allow it when it puts the woman's life in danger.

Edited, Jul 7th 2006 at 10:09am EDT by RedPhoenixxxxxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#116 Jul 07 2006 at 11:13 AM Rating: Decent
Sir exodus claims not all christains are narrow-minded:

Non-believers make up 3% of this country population. Like it or not this is a christain country. While we need to protect the rights of the minority, there is nothing wrong with making laws that are supported by the moral majority.

Sir edodus, have you read the bible? Did you find a different God than the rest of us? Or did you simply create a new one? Not looking for a religious debate here. Only commenting because it never ceases to amaze me that volume of people who can not post an INTELLIGENT REPLY, resort to name calling. Please post valid points without resorting to name calling.

I have found that the same people who resort to name calling behind the safety of their computer are the same one who would **** themselves in RL when someone shouts BOO.

At the very LEAST, if you are calling my point of view narrow-minded, than post the scriptures that validate your position, if you cant find any, I guess im in for another naming calling rant. -(
#117 Jul 07 2006 at 11:36 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
achileez wrote:
Quote:
Even youths grow tired and weary, and young men stumble and fall; but those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint.
Isaiah 40:28-31
Quote:
With their own hands compassionate women have cooked their own children, who became their food when my people were destroyed.
Lamentations 4:10

That's why God is against abortion. You might need to eat them someday.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#118 Jul 07 2006 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
That's why God is against abortion. You might need to eat them someday.
The Bible's a cookbook, too? Damn that book's all-encompassing!
What does it say about fiber, Joph?
#119 Jul 07 2006 at 12:57 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,735 posts
About the only thing you got right in my post is

Quote:
Sir exodus claims not all christains are narrow-minded


As to the rest of your post.

Quote:
Sir edodus, have you read the bible? Did you find a different God than the rest of us? Or did you simply create a new one? Not looking for a religious debate here. Only commenting because it never ceases to amaze me that volume of people who can not post an INTELLIGENT REPLY, resort to name calling. Please post valid points without resorting to name calling.


Yes, I've read it. No, and no.

Though, cute how you seem to be more bent out of shape that I mentioned anyone who refuses to understand is ignorant as name-calling.


Quote:
At the very LEAST, if you are calling my point of view narrow-minded, than post the scriptures that validate your position, if you cant find any, I guess im in for another naming calling rant. -(


I'd post scriptures if I was attacking religeon at all. I'm not judging Christianity; I was judging narrow-minded christians. Two seperate ballgames.



On top of that, other than the "everything happens for a reason" bit at the end, I mostly spoke in general. You aren't the first bible-thumper that has used that tired remark. Hell, I've even heard "you won't understand till you have died."

As Christian as I may be (wether you choose to recognize it or not), I rather not go for the "ignorance is bliss" approach. I also don't beleive that anything I beleive should be forced upon someone else. Yes, abortion is baby-killing, when you break it down. Good. I'm not crazy about it. Great. Other person is ok with it. Cool.

Can we move on now? Whatever happened to live and let live?
#120 Jul 07 2006 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
When you were young and your heart was an open book,
You used to say live and let live.
You know you did, you know you did, you know you did
But if this ever changin world in which we live in
Make you give in and cry,
Say live and let DIE
Live and let die...
#121 Jul 07 2006 at 6:19 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
That's why God is against abortion. You might need to eat them someday.
The Bible's a cookbook, too? Damn that book's all-encompassing!
What does it say about fiber, Joph?


Dammit Flea! Now I need a new cup of coffee. And maybe a new keyboard...

Double funny since they had the "To serve Man" episode of the Twilight Zone on last night. :)
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#122 Jul 07 2006 at 6:26 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Exo wrote:
Whatever happened to live and let live?



When You Were Young And Your Heart Was An Open Book
You Used To Say "Live And Let Live"
(You Know You Did, You Know You Did, You Know You Did)
But If This Ever Changing World In Which We Live In
Makes You Give In And Cry
Say "Live And Let Die"
"Live And Let Die"
"Live And Let Die"
"Live And Let Die"

What Does It Matter To Ya
When You Got A Job To Do
You Gotta Do It Well
You Gotta Give The Other Fellow Hell


You Used To Say "Live And Let Live"
(You Know You Did, You Know You Did, You Know You Did)
But If This Ever Changing World In Which We Live In
Makes You Give In And Cry
Say "Live And Let Die"
"Live And Let Die"
...
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#123 Jul 07 2006 at 6:28 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,735 posts
Both Kelvy and Bloodwolf wrote:
Live and let die...


Emo kids. Smiley: oyvey
#124 Jul 07 2006 at 6:32 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
are you saying Paul McCartney was Emo?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#125 Jul 09 2006 at 1:04 PM Rating: Decent
Just a question to the "pro-lifers". Are you also against DNR? How about the "right to die"?
#126 Jul 09 2006 at 5:05 PM Rating: Decent
The One and Only Katie wrote:
Just a question to the "pro-lifers". Are you also against DNR? How about the "right to die"?


another offshoot of this would be if those who want to ban abortion becuase "god has plan for everyone," support resuscitating someone whose heart has stopped. I mean, you could very well say they are dead, right? So obviously god's plan was for them to die at that moment. So the doctor is messing with god's plans just as much then, as when he preforms an abortion.


Now, someone could come back and say, that they don't consider a person dead until all their body cannot be resuscitated. Fine. There are some who believe that life doesn't begin until the baby draws breath, or until it's brain starts to function, or until it is recognizable as a baby, or as soon as it is concieved. A similar arguement could be made for death.

Personally, I believe that life begins when the brain starts to function. I believe that that is around 10 weeks. I did a report on abortion last year, but can't remember with 100% certainty. MY stance is that before the brain begins functioning, there is no way the baby could be sentient, and thus, could not be considered human. Then again, I'm not religious. But I also believe that no matter what majority Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, whatever, make up in this country, religious beliefs should not come into play when making laws. Medical arguements for when life starts, fine. Religous arguements for when life starts, no.

My stance on abortion is, if it is before the baby's brain begins functioning, it's the mother's choice. After that mark, it comes down to if the pregnancy is endangering th mother. If the mother's life is threatened, then I also support abortion after the 10 week mark.

1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 395 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (395)