Take away our right to vote next?Follow

All that bra burning down the drain!






I realize this will not take effect unless the supreme court over turns Roe vs. Wade. I still think this is Shit. Complete and fUcking bull Shit! Give up with the Abstinence Shit already and teach people how to protect themselves. Make birth control OTC already! Out law abortion and people will turn to back alley abortions that kill both mother and child. Imagine the increase in well fare!

PMS sex rocks, IMO.

I lol'd



That's the only part of the would-be law that is bothers me. As far as I'm concerned, abortion (and banning it) shouldn't be such a hot topic these days. With all of the many, many ways to prevent pregnancy, anyone who is actually responsible enough to be having sex should be taking care of the contraception issue as well. And of course I support the idea of making all methods of birth-control over the counter, as it makes being responsible even easier.

As far as I'm concerned, it isn't your body once your baby is living in there. If you don't want to have a baby, keep your legs closed until you're responsible enough to take care of birth control, or responsible enough to take care of a baby. Of course incest and rape cases are special because control is taken away from the woman in the first place and responsibility isn't an option.

I don't understand how killing babies is ok just because you're too lazy to take care of yourselves. Rate-ups to this female democratic governor for her surprising stance on the issue.

Sure thing with the maturity of being responsible enough to take precautions against pregnancy. The only problem with that is the lack of education (STARTING AT HOME) that children recieve on this topic. All they schools teach them is "DONT". Why school should be teaching this while parents dodge the bullet is beyond me. People are going to have sex. Teach them how to NOT get pregnant. Have the other options available (condoms, BC).

Thanks I'll have to remember to check it out.

Simply, it's re-election time, and people don't want to rock the boat. Like on a recent video game bill that is being contested: the majority spoken to knew it wouldn't pass a constitutional challege. But they voted yes anyways, so people can't say "He voted no to _____. He votes to not protect children" or somethign stupid like that. Same for this type of crap. "He voted no to banning abortion. He's a baby-killer!"


And so on.

As evidenced by the complete lack of children in both state and private foster custody awaiting permanent homes.

*sigh* Really, this is so stupid. Instead of shifting blame for things and taking away things, lets focus our attention where it MATTERS with these kind of issues... The HOME.

Seriously, they don't teach you **** any more in sex ed at schools. (Varies by state) They can't teach you pretty much anything any more other then "You have sex you get pregnant." I don't even think they can talk about ways to prevent it, and if they can they use misleading information on it. Like "Over half of all condoms fail and the woman still gets pregnant." When the reality is, if it is used properly, it has something like a 99% success chance or something like that. But, they can't say that... nor can they tell students how to use em period.

But, why should the schools have to teach our kids about sex? Parents should be a lot more involved in their kid's lives. So many things that parents could do to help their kids aren't being done. And if something happens to the kid (like say meeting someone online who raped them) there is ZERO blame put on the parents, even though they should have monitored their kids more. This falls back to the whole thing about the getting pregnant in the first place...

As for outlawing abortions... REALLY bad idea. Like someone else said, people (who are scared and freaked out by it due to lack of info on the subject...) are going to turn to back alleys/go out of state to get one or something. Unless it was a nation ban (which would resort to the "back alleys" for this) it aint going to do **** really.

I seem to recall saying something about how other states would start passing these laws unless we stopped it cold with S. Dakota, and Gbaji started screaming "slippery slope!" 'til he was blue in the face.

I'm not too big to say "I told you so."

Oh, you people make me laugh. No, really you do, with all your prophecies and certainties about the future of your country.

We call this kind of baseless rant "wishful thinking". These things (feminism, liberalism, etc..) are not "dying". Nothing dies, everything evolves. It's a pendulum, not an arrow.

From the other side of the pond, it seems strange that so much time is spent on those religious/individual issues, when there are so many other focked up things to sort out in the US.

Is it really the role of governement to impose their religious beliefs on all individuals? This smacks of a theocracy to me. Gay marriage and abortion are popular theme, and yet there is no social basis for banning either. It's just religion. And when you place religion above the rights of the individual to choose for himself, I find it dangerous. And no, a one week old foetus is not an "individual".

I find it even worse when its guys that want to ban abortion. It's not your body, it's so easy to say "well abstain." You don't give a ****, you go in, splash out, and forget about it. If there to be a referendum about abortion, only women (and foetuses) should be allowed to vote. But guys saying "it's not your body once a foetus is inside" is just hilarious. But only cos I live abroad.

Anyway, I know it's election time, so anything goes, apparently.

Of course incest and rape cases are special because control is taken away from the woman in the first place and responsibility isn't an option.

Right, plus the baby might be black. It's ok to ruthlessly murder it then.

Nothing brightens my monday so much as when you champion the *****. Thanks.

Red Phoenix writes:

These things (feminism, liberalism,etc.) are not dying. Nothing dies, everything evolves. It's a pendulum, not an arrow.


Is this a new religion? Let's clarify, if something EVOLVES to the point that it is not recognizable by its our definition, can we than call it death?
_________________________________________________________________________________
Is it really the role of government to impose their religious beliefs on all individuals?

When did this happen? I didnt even know that the gov. had a religious belief? It is the role of the government to uphold the will of the majority while protecting the rights of the minority. If the majority ( 85% christains) wants to say a prayer in school, than it should be allowed as long as we dont force the minority to HAVE to participate.
_________________________________________________________________________________

And when you place religion above the rights of the individual to chose for himself.

Again, I have not witnessed this but my point is: What about the individual, who btw is also the majority, CHOOSES religion as a priority?
________________________________________________________________________________

And no, a one week old fetus is not an individual.

And you can prove this how? Since the largest issue with abortion is determining when is life created,You could sway many many people (including me) to your side of the agrument IF you can but prove your above statement.
________________________________________________________________________________

I find it even worse when its guys that want to ban abortion.

Hmmm, just because I'm a guy means I have no opinion? BTW, if YOU decide to keep the child, the law will require me to pay support for 18 years, and yet I'm still not entitled to voice an opinion?
________________________________________________________________________________